RES 2022-0196 - CIP Saddle Creek - Preliminary PlatExhibit “B”
Conditions: 1. Provide for all improvements identified in the final approved traffic study. 2. Grant a public access easement through the site between the site’s Saddle Creek Road and 49th Avenue accesses. 3. Coordinate with Public Works for acceptable locations for the storm and sanitary sewer connections. 4. Submit the 30 percent design report for the sanitary sewer to the Public Works Design Division per Section 2.14 of the City’s Wastewater Collection Systems Design Manual. 5. Coordinate with OPPD for the removal, relocation, design, grading, construction, and/or vegetation management plan for the existing high-voltage transmission line and distribution equipment on or near the property. 6. Receive preliminary approval of the Post Construction Stormwater Management Plan (PCSMP) from Public Works prior to submittal of a Final Plat application. Upload the drainage study and preliminary plans to Permix. 7. The development must comply with all stormwater management ordinances and policies, including no net increase in stormwater runoff and treatment of the first half inch of stormwater for water quality. 8. Provide sidewalks along all street frontages, as well as from Lots 2 and 3 to the sidewalk along Saddle Creek Road. Pln0168lgb
RML
City of Omaha
Planning Department
1819 Farnam Street
Suite 1100
Omaha, NE 68183
402-444-5150
Planning.CityofOmaha.org
Date: December 29, 2021
Case Number(s): C10-22-008, C10-22-029, C12-22-010
Applicant: Randy Chevalier, Commercial Investment Properties
Request: Preliminary Plat approval of CIP SADDLE CREEK, a subdivision inside
city limits, with rezoning from R4 and GI to R7 and CC, along with
approval of the MCC-Major Commercial Corridor Overlay District for a
portion of the property
Location: Northwest of Saddle Creek Road and Pacific Street
I. GENERAL INFORMATION:
Purpose: To subdivide 4.54 acres into three lots, and to rezone to allow
redevelopment of the site with multifamily residential and commercial uses.
Existing Use(s): Commercial/Industrial Existing Zoning: R4, GI
Adjacent Land Use(s): Adjacent Zoning:
North: Residential, Commercial North: R4, R4(35), CC-MCC
South: Industrial South: GI
East: Residential, Commercial East: CC, R8-MCC-PUR, GI
West: Residential West: R4, R4(35), GI
Future Land Use Designation(s): Low Density Residential and Office Commercial (High
Density Residential and Office Commercial pending)
Associated Requests: • Case #C11-22-009, Approval of a PUR-Planned
Unit Redevelopment Overlay District. Scheduled for
Planning Board hearing 01/05/22.
• Case #C3-21-318, Approval of the CIP
SADDLECREEK TIF Redevelopment Project Plan.
Scheduled for Planning Board hearing 01/05/22.
• Case #C3-22-028, Approval of an Amendment to
the Future Land Use Element of the City's Master
Plan from Office/commercial and Low Density
Residential to High Density Residential. Scheduled
for Planning Board hearing 01/05/22.
Applicable Regulations: If approved, development of the site will be subject to
the requirements of the associated PUR-Planned Unit
Redevelopment Overlay District, the underlying R7 and
CC zoning districts, the MCC Overlay District, as well
as all other applicable regulations.
No building permits will be issued based on a site plan that does not comply with the
provisions of the Zoning Ordinance.
Case Number: C10-22-008, C10-22-029, C12-22-010
CIP SADDLE CREEK
Page 2
RML
II. SPECIAL INFORMATION:
Site
Characteristics:
The site is comprised of 4.54 acres of residential, commercial, and industrial
land located on Saddle Creek Road southwest of the UNMC campus.
Property to the north and west is part of an established residential
neighborhood, as well as an existing commercial use. Property to the east
is a mix of high density residential and commercial uses. Property to the
south is developed with a mix of commercial and industrial uses. The
Saddle Creek Road corridor has been redeveloping with a mix of residential
and commercial uses in recent years.
Development
Proposal:
The applicant has submitted this Preliminary Plat and rezoning to
consolidate a total of 11 parcels and adjacent rights-of-way into a total of
three lots. Lot 1 is located southeast of 49th Avenue and Mayberry Streets
and is proposed for rezoning to R7-Medium Density Multiple Family
Residential District in order to allow development of the site with multifamily
residential housing through an associated PUR-Planned Unit
Redevelopment Overlay District. Lots 2 and 3 are located along Saddle
Creek Road and proposed for rezoning to CC-MCC, Community
Commercial District within a Major Commercial Corridor Overlay District, in
order to allow redevelopment of the lots with commercial pad sites. There
are no subdivision waivers included as a part of this request.
Public
Improvements:
Traffic Study: Provide for all improvements identified in the final approved
traffic study.
Easements: Grant a public access easement through the site between the
site’s Saddle Creek Road and 49th Avenue accesses.
Sewers: Coordinate with Public Works for acceptable locations for the
storm and sanitary sewer connections.
Submit the 30 percent design report for the sanitary sewer to the Public
Works Design Division per Section 2.14 of the City’s Wastewater Collection
Systems Design Manual.
Utilities: OPPD has a high voltage transmission line that runs from the terminus of
Pacific Street, northeast through the site, paralleling Saddle Creek Road.
Plans show the transmission line conflicts with the apartment building.
While utility plans appear to show the overhead lines are being removed,
OPPD has indicated that necessary coordination on the potential
removal/relocation of this line has not occurred. Coordinate with OPPD for
the design, grading, construction, and/or vegetation management plan for
this line. Additionally, OPPD has distribution equipment on/near the
property that must be included in coordination for removal/relocation if
necessary.
Water, gas, and electricity will be provided as required by Chapter 53,
Subdivisions, of the Omaha Municipal Code.
Grading and
Drainage:
Receive preliminary approval of the Post Construction Stormwater
Management Plan (PCSMP) from Public Works prior to submittal of a Final
Case Number: C10-22-008, C10-22-029, C12-22-010
CIP SADDLE CREEK
Page 3
RML
Plat application. Upload the drainage study and preliminary plans to
Permix.
The development must comply with all stormwater management ordinances
and policies, including no net increase in stormwater runoff and treatment
of the first half inch of stormwater for water quality.
Land Use and
Planning:
Future Land Use: If approved in conjunction with the associated
Amendment to the Future Land Use Element of the City’s Master Plan
(Case #C3-22-028), this Preliminary Plat generally complies with the goals
and objectives of the Omaha Master Plan and the requirements of the
Omaha Zoning Ordinance.
Sidewalks: Revise plans to provide a sidewalk and pedestrian crossing
extending from the southeast corner of Lot 1 south to connect with internal
sidewalks provided on Lot 3. In addition, provide a sidewalk and pedestrian
crossing from the southeast corner of the multifamily residential building to
the east, to connect with the pedestrian area identified on Lot 2. Provide a
pedestrian connection between both Lots 2 and 3 and the sidewalk provided
along Saddle Creek Road.
Additional details regarding project compliance with the requirements of the
Omaha Zoning Ordinance and Urban Design criteria are provided as a part
of the associated PUR-Planned Unit Redevelopment Overlay District (C11-
22-009) submitted jointly with this request.
III. ANALYSIS:
Conditionally, the proposed subdivision generally complies with the requirements of Chapters
53, Subdivisions and Chapter 55, Zoning of the Omaha Municipal Code.
IV. RECOMMENDATIONS:
Approval of the MCC-Major Commercial Corridor Overlay District for Lots 2 and 3.
Approval of the rezoning from R4 and GI to R7 (Lot 1) and CC (Lots 2 and 3).
Approval of the Preliminary Plat, subject to the following conditions:
1. Provide for all improvements identified in the final approved traffic study.
2. Grant a public access easement through the site between the site’s Saddle Creek Road
and 49th Avenue accesses.
3. Coordinate with Public Works for acceptable locations for the storm and sanitary sewer
connections.
4. Submit the 30 percent design report for the sanitary sewer to the Public Works Design
Division per Section 2.14 of the City’s Wastewater Collection Systems Design Manual.
5. Coordinate with OPPD for the removal, relocation, design, grading, construction, and/or
vegetation management plan for the existing high-voltage transmission line and
distribution equipment on or near the property.
6. Receive preliminary approval of the Post Construction Stormwater Management Plan
(PCSMP) from Public Works prior to submittal of a Final Plat application. Upload the
drainage study and preliminary plans to Permix.
Case Number: C10-22-008, C10-22-029, C12-22-010
CIP SADDLE CREEK
Page 4
RML
7. The development must comply with all stormwater management ordinances and policies,
including no net increase in stormwater runoff and treatment of the first half inch of
stormwater for water quality.
8. Provide sidewalks along all street frontages, as well as from Lots 2 and 3 to the sidewalk
along Saddle Creek Road.
V. ATTACHMENTS:
Preliminary Plat
WES
T
S
I
D
E
A
D
D
I
T
I
O
N
REP
L
A
T
4
1BLO
C
K
0
SAD
D
L
E
C
R
E
E
K
I
N
D
U
S
T
R
I
A
L
P
A
R
K
BLO
C
K
0
5
WES
T
S
I
D
E
A
D
D
I
T
I
O
N
6BLO
C
K
3
WES
T
S
I
D
E
A
D
D
I
T
I
O
N
4BLO
C
K
3
WES
T
S
I
D
E
A
D
D
I
T
I
O
N
REP
L
A
T
7
1BLO
C
K
0
DILL
O
N
S
S
A
D
D
L
E
C
R
E
E
K
1BLO
C
K
0
WES
T
S
I
D
E
A
D
D
I
T
I
O
N
12BLO
C
K
5
WES
T
S
I
D
E
A
D
D
I
T
I
O
N
REP
L
A
T
I
I
1BLO
C
K
0
WES
T
S
I
D
E
A
D
D
I
T
I
O
N
8BLO
C
K
5
WES
T
S
I
D
E
A
D
D
I
T
I
O
N
7BLO
C
K
5
WES
T
S
I
D
E
A
D
D
I
T
I
O
N
6BLO
C
K
5
WES
T
S
I
D
E
A
D
D
I
T
I
O
N
5BLO
C
K
5
WES
T
S
I
D
E
A
D
D
I
T
I
O
N
4BLO
C
K
5
project no.:
approved by:
checked by:
drawn by:
drawing no.:
QA/QC by:
date:
NO
.
RE
V
.
DA
T
E
RE
V
I
S
I
O
N
S
D
E
S
C
R
I
P
T
I
O
N
RE
V
I
S
I
O
N
S
SHEET
ww
w
.
o
l
s
s
o
n
.
c
o
m
TE
L
4
0
2
.
3
4
1
.
1
1
1
6
21
1
1
S
o
u
t
h
6
7
t
h
S
t
r
e
e
t
,
S
u
i
t
e
2
0
0
Om
a
h
a
,
N
E
6
8
1
0
6
CI
P
S
A
D
D
L
E
C
R
E
E
K
SA
D
D
L
E
C
R
E
E
K
&
P
A
C
I
F
I
C
OM
A
H
A
,
N
E
20
2
1
RN
EW
LW
LW
020-3570
12/06/2021
PR
E
L
I
M
I
N
A
R
Y
P
L
A
T
C1.0
VICINITY MAP
S.
S
A
D
D
L
E
C
R
E
E
K
R
D
MAYBERRY ST
S
.
4
9
T
H
A
V
E
PACIFIC ST
NOTE:
DEVELOPER
SURVEYOR
ENGINEERLEGEND
LOTS 1 THRU 3
A REPLAT OF LOTS 2, 5, 6, BLOCK 4, WEST SIDE ADDITION, LOTS 6 AND 7, BLOCK 0 SADDLE CREEK
INDUSTRIAL PARK, AND A LANDS ADDITION, A PLATTED AND RECORDED PLAT LOCATED IN THE
NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 30, TOWNSHIP 15 NORTH,
RANGE 13 EAST OF THE 6TH P.M., DOUGLAS COUNTY, NEBRASKA.
CIP SADDLECREEK
PACIFIC ST
EXISTING ZONING MAP
S.
S
A
D
D
L
E
C
R
E
E
K
R
D
MAYBERRY ST
S
.
4
9
T
H
A
V
E
PACIFIC ST PACIFIC ST
GI
GI
GI
GI
GI
R4 R4
R4
R4
R4
R4
R4(35)
R4(35)
R4(35)
R4(35)
R4(35)
R4(35)
GI
GI
GI
GI
GIR4(35)
R4
R4(35)
R4(35)
R4(35)R4(35)
R4(35)R4(35)
R4(35)
R4(35)
R4(35)
CC-MCC
GI
R8-MCC-PUR
CC-MCC
GI GI
CC
R4(35)
R4(35)
LOT 1
LOT 2
LOT 3
dlh
*Agenda items #7 (C3-22-028), #8 (C3-21-318), #13 (C10-22-008, C10-22-029, C12-22-010) and #22 (C11-22-029)
were heard together* 7. C3-22-028 Planning Department on behalf of the City of Omaha
REQUEST: Approval of an Amendment to the Future Land Use Element of the City's Master Plan from Office/Commercial and Low Density Residential to High Density Residential LOCATION: Northwest of Saddle Creek Road and Pacific Street
8. C3-21-318 Planning Department on behalf of the City of Omaha
REQUEST: Approval of the CIP SADDLE CREEK TIF Redevelopment Project Plan LOCATION: Northwest of Saddle Creek Road and Pacific Street
13. C10-22-008 C10-22-029 C12-22-010 Randy Chevalier Commercial Investment Properties
REQUEST: Preliminary Plat approval of CIP SADDLE CREEK, a subdivision inside city limits, with rezoning from R4 and GI to R7 and CC, along with approval of the MCC-Major Commercial Corridor Overlay District for a portion of the property LOCATION: Northwest of Saddle Creek Road and Pacific Street 22. C11-22-009 Randy Chevalier Commercial Investment Properties
REQUEST: Approval of a PUR-Planned Unit Redevelopment Overlay District LOCATION: Northwest of Saddle Creek Road and Pacific Street
At the Planning Board meeting held January 5, 2022, Larry Jobeun, 11440 West Center Road, appeared before the board on behalf of the applicant. Mr. Jobeun submitted an overall site plan and explained that the proposed development will consist of approximately 4.5 acres and subdivided into three lots: Lot One, multi-family housing project, Lot Two and Lot Three, proposed commercial uses (Credit Union, coffee shop or fast food restaurant). The multi-family housing portion of the project will be located on the southeast corner of 49th Avenue and Mayberry. There will be a courtyard located in the middle of the complex with various amenities: swimming pool, clubhouse and grilling area. There will be 195 total units: 80 studio apartments, 67 one bedrooms and 48 two bedrooms. The monthly rents will be market rate rents: $1,064 for the studios, $1,320 for the one bedrooms and $1,700 for the two bedrooms. Mr. Jobeun discussed the height, elevations on all sides and peak of the roofs based on the sides of the development. The developer has been working with City staff regarding material choices for the Class A apartments within a major commercial corridor. There will be 293 parking spaces provided with 15 of those on the east side of 49th Avenue and 15 on the west side of 49th Avenue. There will be a number of public improvements that include extending 49th Avenue, new sidewalks, street lighting, storm sewer improvements, and a power line that runs through the development that needs to be relocated at a very significant cost. There are a lot of TIF eligible expenses needed because of all the improvements, the site work as well as the relocation of the power line. The TIF request is $5,165,000 and the total construction cost is about $44,000,000. The TIF eligible expenses exceed the TIF request at about $7,236,605 but does not include the power line relocation or the continuation or the extension of 49th Avenue or the continuation of Pacific Street from 49th Avenue to 50th Street. The existing valuation is about $2.1 million with a tax revenue of about $45,000 annually. The projected value is about $26,625,000 with a tax revenue of $574,802 annually. Mr. Jobeun submitted the Future Land Use map and stated that the area is underutilized and pointed out that the proposed development will allow for more consistent zoning in the area and vastly improve the streetscape along Saddle Creek. A market study showed that the occupancy rates in the area are between 94% and 98% primarily due to UNMC and the Innovative Campus. This Amendment to the Master Plan will
dlh
further the goals of the Master Plan by allowing this property to redevelop. Mr. Jobeun stated that there has been a number of conversations with the neighbors to the north and west and neighborhood meetings were held through a webinar with about 30 people in attendance along with representatives from the City. There was another public meeting called by the neighbors on December 28th.
Don Seten, Housing Development Planner, appeared before the Board on behalf of the Planning Department. Mr. Seten explained that the TIF project complies with the goals of the City’s Master Plan by adding density in an area that is underutilized and will approve the aesthetics along a major roadway corridor. The financial structure of the project has been reviewed by the City’s TIF Committee and found that the use of TIF is needed and justified for the project that will allow public improvements as well including the construction of a platted street that has not been constructed.
Jordan Scupien, 4699 Pacific Street, appeared before the Board in opposition. Mr. Scupien stated that he was concerned with the change in his neighborhood with regard to density. He suggested that the proposed plan have more thought and interaction with the residents and questioned why several of the proposed apartments could not be affordable units. Debbie Rushlau, 1010 South 49 Avenue, appeared before the Board in opposition. Ms. Rushlau stated that she was concerned with increased traffic and slower response time. The plan disregards Master Plan objectives and ignores the infill and redevelopment guidelines document. The building is massive and does not conform to the neighborhood. Redevelopment will burden the sewer infrastructure, already running at full capacity. Saddle Creek is known for drainage issues and is unable to absorb any runoff without flooding. She further stated that the developers were unfair when scheduling the virtual informational neighborhood meeting during the week of Christmas resulting in low attendance leaving little time to prepare or organize. The schools in the area are already reported over capacity and the Council should not approve multi-family dwellings that create or aggravate this. Multi-family dwellings are inconsistent with the immediate neighborhood. There are several multi-family properties in close proximity that currently have many vacancies. This development will demolish two good useful commercial buildings, five single family homes and one small eight unit apartment building and not to mention many trees. How are they going to replace trees? Conservation is another big concern. Scott Tanner, 846 South 49 Street, appeared before the Board in opposition. Mr. Tanner stated that he has lived in the area for 35 years and his home will be 60 feet from the proposed project and was concerned that the building will be a “monster” that will take away the sun. Colleen Tanner, 846 South 49 Street, appeared before the Board in opposition. Ms. Tanner asked the Board to slow the process down and move the buildings towards Saddle Creek and Pacific. She stated she was originally told the buildings were going to be three stories but now they are six stories. Michele Bowers, 6720 North 44 Street, appeared before the Board on behalf of property and business owners in the area. She stated that she owns property at 1100 South Saddle Creek Road (Saddle Creek and Pacific). The community has asked the Planning Board to deny these request or layover the request due to the fact that the PUR does not adhere to the Omaha Municipal Code or the City Council adoption as specific development standards regarding the infill and redevelopment guidelines and does not achieve compatibility with the surrounding neighborhood pursuant to standards for infill development as adopted or amended or to implement the Master Plan. The overwhelming size of the apartment building is unacceptable, the footprint is roughly the size of Baxter Arena. Can the sanitary and sewer infrastructure handle the additional population? Traffic and pedestrian safety are major areas of concern, specifically the ability for fire and rescue crews to gain access. There has been lack of transparency and community engagements. There is concern for wildlife habitat and greenspace disruption, as well as the elevation, grading and drainage issues. Ms. Bowers stated that she recently spoke to the property manager of “The Bos” and the occupancy rate was 89% and two other apartment complexes in a two mile radius reported occupancy rates at 75% and 89%.
dlh
Melina Peterson, 4953 Mayberry Street, appeared before the Board in opposition. She stated that she also owns property at 968 and 972 South 49 Avenue. Ms. Peterson requested that the proposed development be delayed for 60 days. The proposed development is massive in all dimensions and will not be safe due to the increase in car and people traffic. Should the proposed development be approved for recommendation, Ms. Peterson requested the following: 1) a written agreement that the developer/buyer maintains the upkeep of the new sidewalk on the west side of 49th Avenue (ice melt, snow removal and mowing), 2) pay and install a quality 6’ privacy fence along the sidewalk on the west side of 49th Avenue and 3) provide a landscape berm and trees on the west side of 49th Avenue. Connor Kelley, 3225 South 55 Street, appeared before the Board. Mr. Kelley stated that he is a Water Resources Engineer working in the community and recently gave a presentation to the Nebraska Association of Flood Plain Managers and Storm Water Management. He stated that, through his work, he is aware that new flood plain maps are coming out for Douglas County in the next month that include the addition of the Saddle Creek corridor into the special flood hazard area that includes adding the special flood hazard area to the subject property. Mr. Kelley stated that developers have to be very responsible when developing in the flood plain and requested that the Board layover until the draft FEMA maps are issued and issued for public comment period in February. Mark Lucht, 824 South 49 Street, appeared before the Board in opposition. Mr. Lucht stated that his biggest concern is the size of the “monster” building and the increased traffic on the small, narrow neighborhood streets. He also questioned where will the construction entrance be located and where do the developers plan to route the truck traffic, specifically dump trucks, concrete trucks and semi-tractor trailers. Paige Rushlau, 973 South 50 Avenue, appeared before the Board in opposition. Ms. Rushlau stated that she was concerned with the lack of neighborhood engagement. Morris Peterson, 971 South 50 Street, appeared before the Board in opposition. Mr. Peterson stated that the money could be better spent in another area of town. Eric Englund, Assistance Director, briefly explained the TIF program and the TIF eligible expenses. In response to Cyndey Franklin, Mr. Englund stated that housing affordability continues to be a challenge. The City of Omaha is developing a Housing Action Plan that is looking at housing affordability. Mr. Jobeun stated that the issue of a layover or a negative recommendation would be a problem because the closing date is January 31st for the sale of the properties. He added that there was extra effort put forth in the design and layout in the project to move it forward. He further added that the TIF is based upon the high cost associated with the project including the installation of a street that has not been paved for over 100 years, the relocation of a transmission line that is not even in the numbers, the site preparation and the grading. Again, the cost is $44,000,000 with the valuation of the full buildout at approximately $26,000,000 on the income approach. It will take a while to recoup the investment “but for TIF” the project would not be feasible. The project return is 7.66% with TIF and 4% without TIF. With respect to traffic, there is a traffic study being required but multi-family is not the same am and pm peaks. Habitat studies are required before removing trees. The height requirement is met on all four sides of the development. The post construction storm water management and storm sewers are required and will be dealt with on site. Mr. Jobeun confirmed that there is not a Phase II. He confirmed that a notice was sent out two weeks before the neighborhood meeting which was on December 20th and he was available to answer any questions. Construction vehicles clearly will be restricted to using Saddle Creek. In response to Mr. Pate, Eric Englund and Eric Williams, Olsson Companies, stated that they did not know the particulars of the flood plain maps and when they will be issued. Mr. Pate stated that he was concerned that the neighbors did not have a chance to meet with the developers on a face to face basis. Mr. Jobeun answered that he tried to schedule a meeting at a nearby location that had the accommodations for neighbors in December when they were ready with the development plan. He expressed that there is still time to communicate the project plan and answer further questions.
dlh
In response to Mr. Pate, Dave Johnson, Studio 951, 7305 Main Street, Ralston, Nebraska, architect for the project, appeared before the Board and explained that the north elevation of the project was turned into a three story rowhouse look that faces onto 49th Avenue with the larger structured building located behind. He added on the north, the grade falls down off of Mayberry and is a four story building. Architecturally, the density of the project could be reduced but it would need to be a consideration with the developer client. Mr. Sotolongo expressed concern with the fabric of the neighborhood on the west and north side. Mr. Rosacker pointed out that the Board members are not designers but sit on the board to assure that the development is done within the confines of the code and the Master Plan. Mr. Pate added that community feedback is also important and reminded the developer to meet with the neighbors. Mr. Englund stated that recommendation reports are submitted to school districts with regard to overcrowding of schools. There are no plans or any project identified to extend Pacific Street at this time. If approved, the Preliminary Plat would proceed to City Council ahead of other items. The PUR plan would not go until the Final Plat therefore there is still time for communication and time to meet with neighbors. Dave Fanslau, Planning Director, stated that he would look into any agreement with regard to a fence maintenance issue.
Specifically regarding #7 (C3-22-028): Eric Englund, Assistant Director, appeared before the Board on behalf of the Planning Department. Mr. Englund stated that staff recommends approval. Mr. Rosacker motioned for approval. Ms. Franklin seconded the motion which carried 7-0.
Specifically regarding #8 (C3-21-318): Eric Englund, Assistant Director, appeared before the Board on behalf of the Planning Department. Mr. Englund stated that staff recommends approval. Mr. Pate motioned for approval. Ms. Franklin seconded the motion which carried 7-0.
Specifically regarding #13 (C10-22-008, C10-22-029, C12-22-010): Eric Englund, Assistant Director, appeared before the Board on behalf of the Planning Department. Mr. Englund stated that staff recommends approval of the MCC-Major Commercial Corridor Overlay District for Lots 2 and 3, approval of the rezoning from R4 and GI to R7 (Lot 1) and CC (Lots 2 and 3) and approval of the Preliminary Plat, subject to the eight conditions in the recommendation report. Mr. Morris motioned for approval of the MCC-Major Commercial Corridor Overlay District for Lots 2 and 3, approval of the rezoning from R4 and GI to R7 (Lot 1) and CC (Lots 2 and 3) and approval of the Preliminary Plat, subject to the following conditions: 1. Provide for all improvements identified in the final approved traffic study. 2. Grant a public access easement through the site between the site’s Saddle Creek Road and 49th Avenue accesses. 3. Coordinate with Public Works for acceptable locations for the storm and sanitary sewer connections. 4. Submit the 30 percent design report for the sanitary sewer to the Public Works Design Division per Section 2.14 of the City’s Wastewater Collection Systems Design Manual. 5. Coordinate with OPPD for the removal, relocation, design, grading, construction, and/or vegetation management plan for the existing high-voltage transmission line and distribution equipment on or near the property. 6. Receive preliminary approval of the Post Construction Stormwater Management Plan (PCSMP) from Public Works prior to submittal of a Final Plat application. Upload the drainage study and
dlh
preliminary plans to Permix. 7. The development must comply with all stormwater management ordinances and policies, including no net increase in stormwater runoff and treatment of the first half inch of stormwater for water quality. 8. Provide sidewalks along all street frontages, as well as from Lots 2 and 3 to the sidewalk along Saddle Creek Road. Mr. Sotolongo seconded the motion which carried 7-0.
Specifically regarding #22 (C11-22-009): Eric Englund, Assistant Director, appeared before the Board on behalf of the Planning Department. Mr. Englund stated that staff recommends approval of the PUR-Planned Unit Redevelopment Overlay District, subject to providing final acceptable plans prior to forwarding the request to City Council Mr. Pate motioned for approval of the PUR-Planned Unit Redevelopment Overlay District, subject to providing final acceptable PUR plans prior to forwarding the request to City Council. Ms. Franklin seconded the motion which carried 7-0.
SUBJECT AREA IS SHADED - JANUARY 2022
R4(35)
CC
R4(35)
R4(35)
R4(35)
R4(35)
R4(35)
R4(35)
R4(35)
LC
GI
R7GC
GC
GIR4(35)
R4(35)
R4(35)R4(35)
R4(35)
CC
CC-MCC
R5(35)R4(35)
R4(35)
R4(35)
GC GC
R4(35)
R4-PK
R4
GC
R4(35)
R4(35)
R4
GC
R8-MCC-PUR
R4
R4(35)
R4(35)
GI
R4(35)
R4
R4(35)
CC
GI
GC-ACI-2(PL)
R4(35)
R4(35)
GC
R4(35)
R4(35)
R4(35)
S 50th St
M ay b er r y S t
Pierce St
Pacific St
Mason S t
Marcy St
SSaddleCreekRd
S 48th St
S
49t
h
Ave
S 49th St
CC
R7
±0 900
Feet
13CASE:10-22-008,C10-22-029,C12-22-010APPLICANT:Randy ChevalierCommercial Investment PropertiesREQUEST:Preliminary Plat approval of CIP SADDLE CREEK, a subdivision inside citylimits, with rezoning from R4 and GI to R7 and CC, along with approval of the MCC-Major Commercial Corridor Overlay District for a portion of the propertyLOCATION:Northwest of Saddle Creek Road and Pacific Street