Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
RES 2021-0395 - PSA with Carollo Engineers for OPW 53820 - Cole Creek CSO 204 Phase 4 North 57th Street and Pratt Street Project
2 actual characteristics may vary significantly between successive test points and sample intervals and at locations other than where observations, exploration, and investigations have been made. Because of the inherent uncertainties in subsurface evaluations, changed or unanticipated underground conditions may occur that could affect total PROJECT cost and/or execution. These conditions and cost/execution effects are not the responsibility of Provider. I. Provider's Personnel at Construction Site i.The presence or duties of Provider's personnel at a construction site, whether as onsite representatives or otherwise, do not make Provider or Provider's personnel in any way responsible for those duties that belong to City and/or the construction contractors or other entities, and do not relieve the construction contractors or any other entity of their obligations, duties, and responsibilities, including, but not limited to, all construction methods, means, techniques, sequences, and procedures necessary for coordinating and completing all portions of the construction work in accordance with the construction Contract Documents and any health or safety precautions required by such construction work. ii.Provider and Provider's personnel have no authority to exercise any control over any construction contractor or other entity or their employees in connection with their work or any health or safety precautions and have no duty for inspecting the health or safety deficiencies of the construction contractor(s) or other entity or any other persons at the site except Provider's own personnel. iii.The presence of Provider's personnel at a construction site is for the purpose of providing to City a greater degree of confidence that the completed construction work will conform generally to the construction documents and that the integrity of the design concept as reflected in the construction documents has been implemented and preserved by the construction contractor(s). Provider neither guarantees the performance of the construction contractor(s) nor assumes responsibility for construction contractor's failure to perform work in accordance with the construction documents. For this AGREEMENT only, construction sites include places of manufacture for materials incorporated into the construction work, and construction contractors include manufacturers of materials incorporated into the construction work. J. Construction Progress Payments. Recommendations by Provider to City for periodic construction progress payments to the construction contractor(s) will be based on Provider's knowledge, information, and belief from selective sampling that the work has progressed to the point indicated. Such recommendations do not represent that continuous or detailed examinations have been made by Provider to ascertain that the construction contractor(s) have completed the work in exact accordance with the construction documents; that the final work will be acceptable in all respects; that Provider has made an examination to ascertain how or for what purpose the construction contractor(s) have used the moneys paid; that title to any of the work, materials, or equipment has passed to City free and clear of liens, claims, security interests, or encumbrances; or that there are no other matters at issue between City and the construction contractors that affect the amount that should be paid. K. Record Drawings. Record drawings, if required, will be prepared, in part, on the basis of information compiled and furnished by others, and may not always represent the exact location, type of various components, or exact manner in which the PROJECT was finally constructed. Provider is not responsible for any errors or omissions in the information from others that is incorporated into the record drawings. 3 III.DUTIES OF CITY A. City designates City designates D Anselme Nassa, whose business address and phone number are 1819 Farnam Street, Suite 600, Omaha, Nebraska 68183, 402-444-3629 as its contact person for this project, who shall provide a notice to proceed and such other written authorizations as are necessary to commence or proceed with the project and various aspects of it. B. City Furnished Data. Upon request, City will provide to Provider all available/known data in City's possession relating to Provider's services on the PROJECT. Provider will reasonably rely upon the accuracy, timeliness, and completeness of the information provided by City. C. Access to Facilities and Property. City will make its facilities accessible to Provider as required for Provider's performance of its services. D. Advertisements, Permits, and Access. Unless otherwise agreed to in the Scope of Services, City will obtain, arrange, and pay for all advertisements for bids; permits and lice nses required by local, state, or federal authorities; and land, easements, rights-of-way, and access necessary for Provider's services or PROJECT construction. E. Prompt Notice. City will give prompt written notice to Provider whenever City observes or bec omes aware of any development that affects the scope or timing of Provider's Services, or of any defect in the work of Provider or construction contractors. F. Asbestos or Hazardous Substances. 1)If asbestos or hazardous substances in any form are encountered or suspected, Provider will stop its own work in the affected portions of the PROJECT to permit testing and evaluation. 2)If asbestos is suspected, Provider will, if requested and if Provider has the knowledge, skills and ability, manage the asbestos remediation activities using a qualified subcontractor at an additional fee and contract terms to be negotiated. 3)City recognizes that Provider assumes no risk and/or liability for a waste or hazardous waste site originated by other than Provider. G. Litigation Assistance. The Scope of Services does not include costs of Provider for required or requested assistance to support, prepare, document, bring, defend, or assist in litigation undertaken or defended by City. All such Services required or requested of Provider by City, except for suits or claims between the parties to this AGREEMENT, will be reimbursed as mutually agreed. <<Summary>> IV.COMPENSATION AND PAYMENT A. The cost of services as specified in the Scope of Service, shall be performed on an hourly basis, but in no event shall it exceed $1,972,810.00. Detailed breakdown of costs shall be shown in Exhibit “C”. B. Reimbursable expenses shall be billed to the City by the Provider. After review and approval, City shall provide payment for reimbursable expenses on a monthly basis unless the parties agree to some other schedule. Provider shall pay any suppliers or sub-contractors within 30 days of receipt of reimbursement from the City. C. Errors and Omissions. Additional work that is required to be performed by Provider that is a result of errors or omissions by Provider shall not be compensated by City. 4 D. INCREASE OF FEES. The parties hereto acknowledge that, as of the date of the execution of the Agreement, Section 10-142 of the Omaha Municipal Code provides as follows: Any amendment to contracts or purchases which taken alone increase the original fee as awarded (a) by ten percent, if the original fee is one hundred fifty thousand dollars ($150,000) or more, or (b) by seventy-five thousand dollars ($75,000) or more, shall be approved by the City Council in advance of the acceptance of any purchase in excess of such limits. However, neither contract nor purchase amendments will be split to avoid advance approval of the City Council. The originally approved scope and primary features of a contract or purchase will not be significantly revised as a result of amendments not approved in advance by the City Council. The provisions of this section will be quoted in all future City contracts. Nothing in this section is intended to alter the authority of the Mayor under section 5.16 of the Charter to approve immediate purchases. V. OWNERSHIP OF INSTRUMENTS OF SERVICE The City acknowledges the Provider’s documents, including electronic files, as instruments of professional service. Nevertheless, upon completion of the services and payment in full of all monies due to the Provider, the final documents prepared under this Agreement shall become the property of the City. The City shall not reuse on another Project or make any modifications to the documents without prior written authorization of the Provider. The City agrees, to the fullest extent permitted by law, to indemnify and hold harmless the Provider, its officers, directors, employees and subconsultants (collectively, Provider) against any damages, liabilities or costs, including reasonable attorneys’ fees and defense costs, arising from or in any way connected with the unauthorized reuse or modification of the documents by the City, regardless of whether such reuse or modification is for use on this Project or another Project VI.ADDITIONAL SERVICES In the event additional services for the aforementioned Project not covered under this Agreement are required, the Provider agrees to provide such services at a mutually agreed upon cost. VII.INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS The Provider shall carry professional liability insurance in the minimum amount of one half million dollars and shall carry workers’ compensation insurance in accordance with the statutory requirements of the State of Nebraska. VIII.INDEMNIFICATION The Provider agrees, to the fullest extent permitted by law, to indemnify, defend and hold harmless the City, its officers, directors and employees (collectively, City) against all damages, liabilities or costs, including reasonable attorney’s fees and defense costs, to the extent caused by the Provider’s negligent performance of professional services under this Agreement and that of its subconsultants or anyone for whom the Provider is legally liable provided, that with respect solely to the said duty to defend, such duty of the Provider to defend shall arise only if, and to the extent, such duty is covered by Provider’s liability insurance . The City agrees, to the fullest extent permitted by law, to indemnify and hold harmless the Provider, its officers, directors, employees and subconsultants (collectively, Provider) against all damages, liabilities or costs, including reasonable attorney’s fees and defense costs in connection with the Project, to the extent caused by the City’s negligent acts or the negligent acts of anyone for whom the City is legally liable. Neither the City nor the 5 Provider shall be obligated to indemnify the other party in any matter whatsoever for the other party’s own negligence. The Provider shall not be liable for any loss of profit, loss of business or any incidental, special, indirect or consequential losses. IX. TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT Either party may terminate this Agreement without cause upon fifteen (15) days’ notice in writing. If either party breaches this Agreement, the non-defaulting party may terminate this Agreement after giving seven (7) days’ notice to remedy the breach. On termination of this Agreement, the City shall forthwith pay Provider for the services performed to the date of termination and all finished or unfinished documents, data surveys, studies, drawings, maps, models, reports or photographs shall become, at the City’s option, its property. X. GENERAL CONDITIONS A. Non-discrimination. Provider shall not, in the performance of this Agreement, discriminate or permit discrimination in violation of federal or state laws or local ordinances because of race, color, creed, religion, sex, marital status, sexual orientation, gender identity, age, or disability as recognized under 42 USCS 12101 et seq. and Omaha Municipal Code section 13-89, race, color, creed, religion, sex, marital status, sexual orientation, gender identity, national origin, age, or disability. B. Captions. Captions used in this Agreement are for convenience and are not used i n the construction of this Agreement. C. Applicable Laws. Parties to this Agreement shall conform with all existing and applicable City ordinances, resolutions, state laws, federal laws, and existing and applicable rules and regulations. Nebraska law will govern the terms and the performance under this Agreement. D. Interest of the City. Pursuant to Section 8.05 of the Home Rule Charter, no elected official or any officer or employee of the City shall have a financial interest, direct or indirect, in any City Agreement. Any violation of this section with the knowledge of the person or corporation contracting with the City shall render the Agreement voidable by the Mayor or Council. E. Interest of the Provider. The Provider covenants that he presently has no interest and shall not acquire any interest, direct or indirect, which would conflict with the performance of services required to be performed under this Agreement; he further covenants that in the performance of this Agreement, no person having any such interest shall be employed. F. Authorization to Proceed. Execution of this AGREEMENT by City will be authorization for Provider to proceed with the work, unless otherwise provided for in this AGREEMENT. G. Force Majeure. Provider is not responsible for damages or delay in performance caused by acts of God, strikes, lockouts, accidents, or other events beyond the control of Provider. In any such event, Provider’s contract price and schedule shall be equitably adjusted. H. Intellectual Property. City acknowledges and agrees that in the performance of the development service, Provider may utilize its proprietary data, concepts, methods, techniques, processes, protocols, ideas, inventions, know-how, trade secrets, algorithm, software, works of authorship, software and hardware 6 architecture, databases, tools, other background technologies and standards of judgment that Provider developed or licensed from third parties prior to the Effective Date (the “Pre-Existing Technology”). Subject to the terms and conditions of this AGREEMENT, Provider hereby grants to City a non- exclusive, non-transferable, royalty-free license under Provider’s Intellectual Property Rights to utilize the Pre-Existing Technology for the purpose of the City Project. City shall not, and shall not allow any third party to: (i) modify or otherwise create derivative works of the Pre-Existing Technology; (ii) use the Pre-Existing Technology for any other purpose, other than the City Project; (iii) make, have made, use, reproduce, license, display, perfor m, distribute, sell, offer for sale, service, support, or import any product that incorporates, embodies and/or is based upon the Pre- Existing Technology; (iv) sublicense, distribute or otherwise transfer to a third party any of the Pre - Existing Technology by itself or as incorporated into software or hardware; or (v) reverse engineer, disassemble, decompile or attempt to derive the source code or underlying ideas or algorithms of the Pre- Existing Technology. Any additional use of the Pre-Existing Technology shall require a separate written license agreement. I. Suspension, Delay, or Interruption of Work. City may suspend, delay, or interrupt the Services of Provider for the convenience of City. In such event, Provider's contract price and schedule shall be equitably adjusted. J. No Third-Party Beneficiaries. This Agreement gives no rights or benefits to anyone other than City and Provider and has no third- party beneficiaries. K. Merger. This Agreement shall not be merged into any other oral or written agreement, lease, or deed of any type. This is the complete and full Agreement of the parties. L. Modification. This Agreement contains the entire Agreement of the parties. No representations were made or relied upon by either party other than those that are expr essly set forth herein. No agent, employee, or other representative of either party is empowered to alter any of the terms hereof unless done in writing and signed by an authorized officer of the respective parties. M. Assignment. The Provider may not assign its rights under this Agreement without the express prior written consent of the City. N. Strict Compliance. All provisions of this Agreement and each and every document that shall be attached shall be strictly complied with as written, and no substitution or change shall be made except upon written direction from authorized representative. O. LB 403 Contract Provisions. - NEW EMPLOYEE WORK ELIGIBILITY STATUS - The Contractor is required and hereby agrees to use a federal immigration verification system to de termine the work eligibility status of new employees physically performing service within the State of Nebraska. A federal immigration verification system means the electronic verification of the work authorization program authorized by the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996, 8 U.S.C. 1324a, known as the E-Verify Program, or an equivalent federal program designated by the United States Department of Homeland Security or other federal agency authorized to verify the work eligibility status of a newly hired employee. 7 If the Contractor is an individual or sole proprietorship, the following applies: 1. The Contractor must complete the United States Citizenship Attestation Form, available on the Department of Administrative Services website at www.das.state.ne.us 2. If the Contractor indicates on such attestation form that he or she is a qualified alien, the Contractor agrees to provide the US Citizenship and Immigration Services documentation required to verify the Contractor’s lawful presence in the United States using the Systematic Alien Verification for Entitlements (SAVE) Program. 3. The Contractor understands and agrees that lawful presence in the United States is required and the Contractor may be disqualified or the contract terminated if such lawful presence cannot be verified as required by Neb. Rev. Stat. §4-108. P. Certificate of Authorization. If this Agreement contemplates the performance of professional architecture or engineering work by the Provider, the Provider shall provide to the City, and maintain in good standing, a current Certificate of Authorization from the State of Nebraska as required by Neb. Rev. Stat. section 81-3436. Q. Debarment or suspension by any federal agency. (This section applies if any part of this Agreement is funded by a federal agency.) Office of Management and Budget (OMB) guidelines require that any individual or entity that has been placed on the Excluded Parties List System (“EPLS” - available for review through www.sam.gov) may not be a participant in a federal agency transaction that is a covered transaction or act as a principal of a person participating in one of those covered transactions. These guidelines apply to covered transactions under a grant from any federal agency for which a recipient expects to receive reimbursement for expenditures incurred or an advance on future expenditures. The Contractor providing goods and/or services to the City of Omaha certifies, by acceptance and execution of this Agreement, that neither it nor its principals are presently debarred, suspended, proposed for debarment, declared ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from participation in this transaction by any federal department or agency. The Contractor further agrees, by accepting and executing this Agreement, that it will include this clause without modification in all lower tier transactions, solicitations, proposals, contracts, and subcontracts. Where the Contractor or any lower tier participant is unable to certify this statement, it shall attach an explanation to this Agreement. R. Contract Compliance Ordinance No. 35344, Section 10-192 Equal Employment Opportunity Clause During the performance of this contract, the Contractor agrees as follows: 1)The Contractor shall not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of race, color, creed, religion, sex, marital status, sexual orientation, gender identity, national origin, age, or disability. The Contractor shall ensure that applicants are employed and that employees are treated during employment without regard to their race, color, creed, religion, sex, marital status, sexual orientation, gender identity, national origin, age, or disabilit y. As used herein, the word “treated” shall mean and include, without limitation, the following: recruited, whether by advertising or by other means; compensated; selected for training, including apprenticeship; promoted; upgraded; demoted; downgraded; transferred; laid off; and terminated. The Contractor agrees to and shall post in conspicuous places, available to employees and applicants for employment, notices to be provided by the contracting officers setting forth the provisions of this nondiscriminati on clause. 2)The Contractor shall, in all solicitations or advertisements for employees placed by or on behalf of the Contractor, state that all qualified applicants will receive consideration for employment without 8 regard to race, color, creed, religion, sex, marital status, sexual orientation, gender identity, national origin, age, or disability. 3)The Contractor shall send to each labor union or representative of workers with which he has a collective bargaining agreement or other contract or understanding a notice advising the labor union or worker’s representative of the Contractor’s commitments under the Equal Employment Opportunity Clause of the City and shall post copies of the notice in conspicuous places available to employees and applications for employment. 4)The Contractor shall furnish to the Human Rights and Relations Director all Federal forms containing the information and reports required by the Federal government for Federal contracts under Federal rules and regulations, and including the information required by Sections 10-192 to 10-194, inclusive, and shall permit reasonable access to his records. Records accessible to the Human Rights and Relations Director shall be those which are related to Paragraphs (1) through (7) of this subsection and only after reasonable notice is given the Contractor. The purpose for this provision is to provide for investigation to ascertain compliance with the program provided for herein. 5)The Contractor shall take such actions with respect to any subcontractor as the City may direct as a means of enforcing provisions of Paragraphs (1) through (7) herein, including penalties and sanctions for noncompliance; however, in the event the Contractor becomes involved in or is threatened with litigation as the result of such directions by the City, the City will enter into such litigation as necessary to protect the interests of the City and to effectuate the provisions of this division; and in the case of contracts receiving Federal assistance, the Contractor or the City may request the United States to enter into such litigation to protect the interests of the United States. 6)The Contractor shall file and shall cause his subcontractors, if any, to file compliance reports with the Contractor in the same form and to the same extent as required by the Federal government for Federal contracts under Federal rules and regulations. Such compliance reports shall be filed with the Human Rights and Relations Director. Compliance reports filed at such times as directed shall contain information as to the employment practices, policies, programs and statistics of the Contractor and his subcontractors. 7)The Contractor shall include the provisions of Paragraphs (1) through (7) of this Section, “Equal Employment Opportunity Clause”, and Section 10-193 in every subcontract or purchase order so that such provisions will be binding upon each subcontractor or vendor. S. Conflict. In the event of any conflict between this Agreement and any of the exhibits attached hereto, the terms of this Agreement shall take precedence. EXHIBIT “A” UTILIZATION OF SMALL AND EMERGING SMALL BUSINESSES It is the policy of the City of Omaha that Small and Emerging Small Businesses shall have the maximum practicable opportunity to participate in City of Omaha projects. With regard to this AGREEMENT, the following Certified Professional Service Provider(s) have been identified and contracted with to perform the identified project tasks: Name of small or emerging small business Address Scope of work or project tasks to be performed Projected commencement and completion date of work Agreed price with SB/ESB Percentage (%) R.W. Engineering & Surveying 6225 N. 89th Cir., Omaha, NE 68134 Survey, drafting May 2021 May 2023 $204,190 10.4% Big Muddy Workshop 4502 S. 42nd St., Omaha, NE 68107 Tree mitigation plan May 2022 May 2023 $6,090 0.3% Totals $210,280 10.7% CERTIFICATION The undersigned certifies that he/she is legally authorized by the Provider to make the statements and representations regarding small and/or emerging small business participation and that said statements and representations are true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge and belief. The undersigned will enter into formal agreement(s) with the identified small and/or emerging small business(es) (which are otherwise deemed by the City of Omaha to be technically responsible to perform the work) listed at the price(s) set forth in this Exhibit conditioned upon execution of a Agreement by the Provider with the City of Omaha. The undersigned/Provider agrees that if any of the representation made regarding utilization of small and/or emerging small business by the Provider knowing them to be false, or if there is a failure by the Provider to implement the stated agreements, intentions, objectives, goals, and comments set forth herein without prior approval of the Public Works Director, such action shall constitute a material breach of the Agreement, entitling the City of Omaha to terminate the Agreement for default. The right to so terminate shall be in addition to, and not in lieu of, any other rights or remedies the City of Omaha may have for other defaults under the Agreement, under City of Omaha’s Contract Compliance Ordinance or otherwise. Additionally, the undersigned/Provider will be subject to the terms of any future professional service awards. Signature _________________________________________________________________________________ Title_Associate Vice President__________________________________ Date of Signing __2/23/21________ Firm or Corporate Name __Carollo Engineers, Inc.________________________________________________ Address__11422 Miracle Hills Dr, Suite 105, Omaha, NE 68154__ Telephone Number _402-496-4088 11 EXHIBIT “B” SCOPE OF SERVICES OPW 53820 Cole Creek 204 Phase 4 Sewer Separation (CSO) The ENGINEER shall provide study phase (10%) and preliminary design (30%) documents to the CITY as outlined in the task descriptions described herein. study phase and preliminary design documents shall be based on all field investigations results and utility coordination information. An additional amendment may be prepared if Final Design Services and Services during Construction are needed, as determined by the CITY. The ENGINEER shall perform the study phase and preliminary engineering design services in accordance with CITY and Combined Sewer Overflow (CSO) Program Plans, Protocols, Procedures, Standards, and Guidance Documents. These documents can be found on the CSO Web Portal The following documents are hereby included in this Scope of Services by reference: Document Name Document Date PLANS Combined Sewer Overflow Control Program Quality Management Plan Updated 12/11/2014 Environmental Plan Updated June 2019 Construction Management Plan 06/25/2012 Omaha CSO Program Materials Management Plan for Soil and Groundwater August 2020 Document and Records Management Plan 7/31/2020 PROTOCOLS Construction Management Protocol Updated 02/21/2014 Sewer Separation Protocol Rev. 0.01 Updated 07/30/2010 PROCEDURES City of Omaha Manhole and Lamping Inspection Procedure Revision 5 Updated 05/09/2014 City of Omaha Pipeline Inspection Procedure Using Closed Circuit Television Revision 4 Updated 04/11/2014 Public Information Procedure for CSO and RNC Projects Updated 04/11/2014 ROW Management and Property Acquisition Procedure for (Non- Federal) Projects Updated 08/17/2018 City of Omaha Smoke and Dye Testing Procedure (Revision 3) Updated 03/12/2012 Community Enhancement Procedure 04/30/2013 12 Utility Coordination Procedure Updated 02/28/2013 Electronic Advertisement for Projects in the CSO/RNC Program Updated 11/01/2017 NDEE Submittals 03/16/2011 Soil Restoration Procedure 07/30/2014 Project Transition – Design to Construction 04/21/2014 Work Change Acknowledgement 05/10/2012 STANDARDS City of Omaha 2020 Standard Specifications for Construction Updated 04/20/2020 Omaha CSO Program CAD Standards with Update 04/26/2010 03/15/2010 With 04/26/2010 Update InfoWorks Modeling Standard Updated 06/24/2010 Interim Flow Monitoring Standard, Rev. 0 12/30/2011 Public Works Department Design Division Surveying Proposals Guidelines for Preparation and Presentation 03/04/2011 GUIDANCE DOCUMENTS Sewer Separation Deliverable Expectations Guidance Documents Updated 05/09/2012 Geotechnical Guidance Document Updated 04/10/2014 Sewer Separation Cost Estimate Template Guidance Updated 03/24/2018 Omaha Green Solutions Site Suitability Assessment and BMP Selection Process Guidance Document 12/21/2009 Private Property Investigation Guidance Updated 07/12/2010 Omaha Wastewater Collection Design Manual Updated 08/27/2019 Storm Sewer Design Basis and Methodology Guidance Updated 06/27/2010 Sustainability Guidance Updated 01/04/2011 Complete Streets Design Guide 08/2019 Liquidated Damages Guidance 02/04/2013 Small & Emerging Small Business (SEB) Program Guidance for Major Facility and Sewer Separation Project Teams During Design Memorandum Revised Updated 08/15/2016 CSO Project Communication: PMT and Project Teams Technical Memorandum Updated 01/04/2013 Omaha Park Department Policies 04/01/2014 Demolition and Asbestos Remediation Permitting Process 10/10/2011 13 USACE Omaha district Levee Channel Review Submittal 12/12/2006 Use of Transportation Funds For CSO 07/27/2018 Inlet Placement Design Revision 12/29/2017 Omaha Parks Tree Mitigation Policy 04/01/2014 Vac Truck Dimensions 04/06/2017 Risk Management Guidance for Utilizing and Maintaining the Project Level Risk Register 04/02/2020 Notes: 1. Any documents listed above may be updated during the duration of the project. In the event that a change is made to a document that affects the scope of work included herein, a contract change may be required. 2. City of Omaha Standard Specifications and Plates shall be used, where applicable, unless special conditions require modification. Modifications shall be approved by the CITY. 14 TASK 1 -- PROJECT MANAGEMENT Objective: Provide for the overall project management and administration, project coordination, public involvement and neighborhood coordination throughout the duration of the PROJECT. Deliverables: Certificate of Insurance, Quality Control Plan; Project Health and Safety Plan; Project Execution Plan; monthly invoices; monthly progress reports; monthly schedule updates; progress meeting and other meeting minutes. Scope: 1.1. Project Management and Administration. ENGINEER to provide project management and administrative activities including: 1.1.1. Project Management and Administration. The ENGINEER must monitor progress and schedule and facilitate coordination of the PROJECT design elements; Prepare monthly invoicing with estimated percentage of work complete by contract task; prepare monthly progress reports; scope, schedule, and budget tracking; provide staffing management and contract administration; maintain communication with the CITY and the PMT; maintain Quality Control; provide monthly PROJECT schedule updates; If not on schedule or budget, explain reasons for deviations and mitigation plan to the CITY as soon as possible once the deviation has been observed and must file a copy with the CITY on a weekly basis until the project is back within scheduled timeline and or budget provide a plan to rectify and must file a copy with the CITY on a weekly basis until the project is back within scheduled timeline and or budget . File project documents on the Project page of the Program Web Portal and provide a hard copy of all deliverables to the Program Management Office (PMO) Library. 1.1.2. Quality Control Plan (QCP). The ENGINEER must prepare and implement a QCP that is consistent with the CSO Program Quality Management Plan (QMP). QCP must address field data QC as required in Field Services Procedures. Maintain QCP throughout the duration of the project. 1.1.3. Project Health and Safety Plan (HSP). The ENGINEER must be responsible for the health and safety of its employees and confirming that the ENGINEER’s subcontractors have a good understanding of all PROJECT health and safety requirements. The ENGINEER’S HSP must include all of the ENGINEER’S employees and all of the ENGINEER’S subcontractors. The CITY and PMT put a high value on the safety of all personnel working on delivery of the CSO Program. The ENGINEER must develop a project specific HSP to apply to employees working on this PROJECT. The HSP must address safety in the office, site visits, and field investigations, must include OWNER and PMT requirements and must be consistent with the CSO Program Protocols. 1.1.4. Project Execution Plan (PEP). The ENGINEER must develop and maintain a PEP in accordance with the requirements set forth in the project delivery plan, protocols, plans, procedures, standards and guidance documents prepared by the PMT. The PEP must include project procedures, CAD drafting standards, GIS coordination and deliverable format requirements, filing standards, public involvement coordination, project team organization, and a detailed project schedule developed in Microsoft Project with associated deliverable dates. Maintain PEP throughout the duration of the project. No 15 Quality Review Form (QRF) will be created for this document. City/PMT review comments will be made directly in the document. 1.1.5. Initial Project Kickoff Meeting. The ENGINEER must conduct the initial project kickoff meeting with PMT as part of the regularly scheduled progress meetings. The purpose of the meeting will be to review the project approach, PEP, project goals/objectives and conceptual design; establish project communication procedures; and establish the project schedule. The ENGINEER must prepare minutes for the meeting and distribute electronically in Microsoft Word format for draft and PDFs for final. 1.1.6. Monthly Progress Meeting. The ENGINEER must conduct monthly progress meetings with the CITY and PMT for the duration of the PROJECT to provide updates on project progress, budget and schedule status, current project issues, public involvement activities, and risk register updates. Anticipated future activities and PMT needs will be discussed. The ENGINEER must be responsible for arranging the meeting, per an agenda, conducting the meeting, and taking and distributing meeting notes. All agendas must be placed in the CSO Portal at least seven (7) days prior to the meeting and meeting minutes/notes must be placed in the CSO Portal within seven (7) days after the meeting. twenty-two (22) progress meetings are assumed based on the preliminary schedule. 1.2. Agency and Project Coordination. The ENGINEER must provide agency and project coordination activities including: 1.2.1. Utility Coordination. The ENGINEER must provide for the communication with the utilities in the project area including notification of the project, requests for facility information, requests for clarifications, transmittal of drawings, and meetings to discuss the project per the Utility Coordination Procedure. The ENGINEER must send utility requests directly to the utility companies with copies of the requests to the CITY project manager and the PMT utility coordinator. The ENGINEER must be responsible for setting up and updating a utility tracking log throughout the PROJECT, maintaining it throughout the PROJECT, and taking and distributing meeting notes and incorporating utility information into the design of the PROJECT. The ENGINEER must be responsible for providing utilities with relevant project information to facilitate with any required design work for replacement or relocation of their existing infrastructure within the PROJECT area. The ENGINEER must identify one person from the Project Team who will act as the singular contact throughout the PROJECT to request information from the Utilities. 1.2.2. Agency Coordination and Permitting. Agency coordination will be conducted in conformance with the Environmental Plan and under the oversight of the PMT’s Compliance Coordinator and City Project Manager. Communication with the impacted agencies will be in conformance with the Environmental Plan. The impacted agencies may include, but are not limited to, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, the Nebraska Department of Transportation (NDOT), the Nebraska Game and Parks Commission (NGPC), United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), the Nebraska State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO), Nebraska Department of Natural Resources (NDNR), the Nebraska Department of Environment and Energy (NDEE) and the CITY’s Quality Control Division. The ENGINEER must be responsible for taking and distributing meeting notes and incorporating Agency information into the design of the PROJECT. Two (2) agency coordination meetings are budgeted. 16 1.2.3. CITY Agency Coordination. The ENGINEER must provide for meetings through the CITY Project Manager with CITY Agencies including other divisions within the Public Works Department, Planning Department, Sewer Maintenance and Parks, Recreation and Public Property Department. Meetings will be held as necessary to maintain open lines of communication, obtain feedback on design elements that may impact other departments and allow for design reviews/comments (two (2) meetings budgeted). Coordination with the City Planning Department regarding Complete Street Design Guide approvals must be in accordance with the Complete Street Design Guide Policy. 1.2.4. GIS Coordination. This task includes GIS coordination work for the ENGINEER as well as coordination with the CITY/PMT to manage and update CITY GIS information for the PROJECT. This includes providing necessary electronic files and information developed as part of the PROJECT to the CITY/PMT for updating the CITY’s GIS database. If any GIS deliverables are submitted as part of this project, all GIS deliverables (in any task) should be created in ESRI's ArcGIS ArcMap v10.7 software or latest version available to the CITY, be in a file geodatabase format (shapefiles or personal geodatabase formats are not acceptable), and the use of the City of Omaha's GIS metadata XML template to populate new data with required metadata. 1.2.5. Program Management and Technical Team Meetings. This task includes program management and technical team meetings anticipated during the course of the project. Meetings will be held between the ENGINEER, CITY, PMT, and SUBCONSULTANTS (four (4) meetings budgeted). 1.3. Public Involvement and Neighborhood Coordination. ENGINEER must communicate with the impacted property owners, businesses, schools, and neighborhood associations affected by the PROJECT; organize and conduct meetings to discuss the PROJECT scope and schedule; develop correspondence regarding PROJECT; and prepare exhibits. ENGINEER must be responsible for the following: 1.3.1. Public Outreach Plan. ENGINEER will develop a Public Outreach Plan, in accordance with the CSO Public Outreach Guidance, identifying the PROJECT stakeholders (impacted property owners, businesses, schools, neighborhood associations, elected officials, etc.), public outreach tactics, public meetings, stakeholder meetings, and implementation timeline. It is assumed that the project team will not be updating the CSO website content. 1.3.2. Project Kick-off Public Meeting. The ENGINEER must organize and conduct a public PROJECT kickoff meeting in coordination with the Neighborhood Association, City of Omaha Parks, Recreation and Public Property Department, and other stakeholders. Prepare and distribute a “Sewer Back-up & Drainage Questionnaire” in conjunction with the mailing for Public Kick-off meeting. The ENGINEER shall, upon concurrence from the CITY, determine the distribution list for the public meetings, prepare and distribute the public meeting notifications according to the Public Information Procedure, arrange for the meeting place, arrangements and logistics for the meetings and prepare the presentation, agenda, sign-in sheets, meeting notes and other items as necessary, and as reviewed by the PMT. The purpose of the meeting will be to review the overall Project, including proposed schedule and opportunities for public input. The ENGINEER must take minutes for the meeting and distribute electronically in Word format for draft and PDFs for final (in English and Spanish upon request). 17 1.3.3. Sewer Backup & Drainage Questionnaire. A questionnaire must be sent out to all properties (and owners if different than resident) within the project boundary, which for this project is estimated to be approximately 1300 pieces of mail (will generally be the same list of people generated for a public meeting notice; Questionnaire could be mailed out with that public meeting notice if the timing works out). Use City of Omaha standard questionnaire form available on the Program Web Portal. The ENGINEER must be responsible for developing the mailing list, printing, and mailing the questionnaire after approval by City/PMT (responses are to come back to CSO office). 1.3.3.1. The ENGINEER must create a database of responses (Excel table or other), evaluate, follow up with phone calls to public as necessary to clarify information, summarize, and plot on a GIS aerial map the results of the questionnaire responses. Deliverables: Electronic & hard copy files of the response sheets & follow-up calls, results database, and GIS map layer. This information shall also be included in the Basis of Design Report. 1.3.4. Conduct One (1) 30% Design Public Meeting. The ENGINEER must organize and conduct a public PROJECT 30% design level meeting in coordination with neighborhood associations and other stakeholders. The ENGINEER must determine the distribution list for the public meetings, prepare and distribute the public meeting notifications according to the Public Information Procedure, arrange for the meeting place, arrangements and logistics for the meetings and prepare the presentation, agenda, sign-in sheets, meeting notes and other items as necessary, and as reviewed by the PMT. The purpose of the meeting will be to review the overall PROJECT 30% design plans, including the proposed schedule, potential community enhancements identified by the Project Team, per the Community Enhancements Procedure, and invite discussions on other potential community enhancements, and opportunities for public input. The ENGINEER must prepare presentation materials including Power Point presentations, hardboards, maps, design drawings and handouts to present at the meeting, and take minutes for the meeting and distribute electronically in Microsoft Word format for draft and PDF format for final. 1.3.5. Conduct Stakeholder Communications. Plan and implement one-on-one and small group meetings with impacted stakeholders (such as neighborhood associations, businesses, schools, churches, organizations, elected officials, community leaders in PROJECT area), PMT, and CITY agencies to coordinate proposed improvements, green infrastructure, community enhancements (if applicable) and construction impacts (four (4) meetings budgeted). 18 TASK 2 -- CONCEPTUAL (10%) DESIGN Hydrologic and Hydraulic Modeling and Calculations Objective: This task consists of developing a new model or expanding upon previous models and developing a more detailed model for the Basin and performing hydrologic and hydraulic calculations for the project study area for the proposed sanitary and storm sewer system. Deliverables: The key deliverables will be hydrologic and hydraulic calculations and model files that support the proposed capacities for the project study area. Sanitary and Stormwater modeling will be performed for the area tributary to the project area using existing data where no topographic survey is included in the scope of services, however manholes and inlets will be surveyed for location and elevation information where included in the scope of services. Other deliverables include Hydrologic and Hydraulic Modeling Approach TM; Updated Digital Model Files and Outputs. Scope: 2.1. Previous Reports and Studies. Obtain and review previous models and reports developed by the PMT. Review pertinent existing information including drawings, flow data, and reports related to the project study area. 2.2. H&H Modeling Approach TM. Prepare a Hydrologic and Hydraulic Modeling Approach TM that summarizes the ENGINEER’s modeling approach to support the PROJECT’s sanitary and stormwater infrastructure design. Conduct a meeting with the PMT Hydraulics Lead at the beginning of the TM preparation to discuss proposed modeling approach. The TM shall briefly summarize the review conducted in Task 2.1. The TM shall include discussion of modeling assumptions, strategies, and software to be used. InfoWorks ICM has been used by the CITY to model the combined and sanitary sewer system, including hydrology in the area. XP-SWMM, HEC-HMS, HydroCAD, or other software, may be approved for design or comparison as indicated by the PROJECT data needs to model the H&H response of the existing and proposed sewer systems. The TM should make clear which software is to be used for the PROJECT. It is not intended for the TM to repeat detailed information found in other reports nor to provide a lengthy narrative, but rather to provide a clear direction for the modeling work and a concise description of pertinent details to promote understanding and provide documentation. The rationale for deviation from any previous modeling assumptions should be made clear in the TM. The TM must also address the issues listed below. A draft TM shall be submitted to the CITY and PMT for review. Comments will be addressed by the ENGINEER and a final version of the TM submitted. The model will be utilized to determine peak flow and volume from separated drainage areas and pipeline hydraulics. At a minimum, the 2- and 10-year design events will be simulated to determine the appropriate sizing for the conveyance sewers. Design event durations that approximate the study basin’s time of concentration should be selected. Design event depths and hyetograph distributions should be specified in the TM. Subcatchment boundaries will align with those in the most recent master InfoWorks model for the CSO Program, except in cases where the watershed and combined/sanitary sewershed do not convey flow in the same direction. It is expected that subdivision of the subcatchments from InfoWorks to inlet-level subcatchments will be necessary to attain the degree of accuracy in hydrologic calculations necessary to support design efforts. Deviations from this approach, if any, are to be clearly discussed in the TM and approved by the CITY and PMT. 19 Hydrologic modeling will need to be detailed enough to address the complexity of simulating a 10-year storm. Subcatchments that are small in area, modeling of inlets, and similar details will need to be added. The downstream facility sizes may be sensitive to peak flow rates, so the shapes of the hydrographs need to be accurate for all storms modeled. Existing pipe infrastructure should be modeled so that travel times and any existing constrictions will be accurately represented by the model. Model shall include any updates to the existing pipe infrastructure information found during the field investigations. Unless directed otherwise by the CITY, new stormwater pipe design will be based on the Omaha Regional Storm Water Design Manual criteria. New stormwater piping that is included in the model will reflect those criteria. New sanitary pipe design will be based on the CSO Program's Sanitary Sewer Design Basis and Methodology Guidance. 2.3. Hydrologic and Hydraulic Modeling and Calculations. Employ the approach outlined in the Hydrologic and Hydraulic Modeling Approach TM to conduct the hydrologic and hydraulic calculations. Prepare the hydraulic calculations for the proposed storm and/or sanitary sewer system based on the initial system layout, pipe sizes, and invert elevations. The calculations are to be developed in accordance with the Storm Sewer Design Basis and Methodology Guidance and/or Sanitary Sewer Design Basis and Methodology Guidance. Calculations will be included in the conceptual design report. 20 Green Infrastructure Evaluation Objective: This task will consist of developing and defining green infrastructure opportunities and identifying the need for Stormwater Best Management Practices (BMPs) by identifying potential locations throughout the basin that may reduce stormwater runoff volumes entering the sewer system, improve storm water quality, and are cost effective. Deliverables: Green Infrastructure Screening TM Scope: 2.4. Review Previous Materials. Review any previous green infrastructure concept plans developed for the Basin. Review available GIS layers and mapping depicting topography, aerial mapping, land use and zoning to determine potential green solution locations. Based on a review of the collected information, potential green solution areas will be listed and then visited. 2.5. Pre-screening Review. Conduct a pre-screening review of candidate green infrastructure and stormwater BMP’s with CITY and PMT staff. The pre-screening effort will identify potentially feasible green infrastructure to be further evaluated by the ENGINEER. 2.6. Review Potential Sites. Based on the number of green infrastructure possibilities, a review of each potential site will be made and evaluations performed by the ENGINEER. 21 Field Work and Data Acquisition Objective: Receive and review the available project background data including any information related to locations of existing septic tanks, identification of vacant / distressed / abandoned properties, topographic survey information, Geographic Information Systems (GIS) information, record drawings from previous projects, quarter section drawings, utility drawings, CCTV videos and data files, manhole condition assessment data, smoke and dye testing data, and technical memorandum review. Identify any field data gaps. Perform field investigations to acquire data sufficient to complete conceptual, preliminary, and final design of the project. Deliverables: The key deliverables for this task will be utility information, Manhole and Lamping inspection data (as described in the Manhole and Lamping Procedure), CCTV interim QC deliverables, and final CCTV database (as described in the Pipeline Inspection Using CCTV Procedure. Scope: 2.7. Previous Reports and Studies. Obtain and review available GIS information, Drawings and Maps of Area. Obtain and review copies of maps for the project area including quarter section maps, record drawings, and maps from previous studies. 2.8. CCTV Investigations. Review existing CCTV and other sewer investigation information as requested by the ENGINEER and provided by PMT, and perform additional CCTV as necessary. The CCTV allowance includes cleaning, televising and review of existing piping in the project area, as required, and is based on an estimated 33,560 feet of sewer (as denoted in Figure 1) performed in accordance with the Pipeline Inspection Using CCTV Procedure. The City of Omaha shall be notified of any proposed CCTV work. ALL CCTV work shall be completed according to the OSHA Confined Space Entry requirements, 29 CFR 1910.146. No exceptions to these requirements shall be allowed. The City of Omaha shall be notified upon any proposed entry into a sewer system. These restrictions shall be for either permit required or non-permit required spaces. In most cases, entrance into a sanitary sewer shall be considered as a permit required space. In addition to the 1910 requirements compliance to OSHA publication 3138-01R shall be followed unless other procedures are approved by the CITY. 2.9. Field Verify Unusual or Unclear Pipe Conditions. The ENGINEER shall verify piping arrangements at locations where unusual or unclear pipe conditions might exist, and meet with the City of Omaha Sewer Maintenance Department personnel, as necessary. Field investigation services will require coordination with the City’s GIS and Sewer Maintenance personnel. Approximately 4 sites will be verified in the field. 2.10. Sewer Backup and Street Flooding Backup Review. Obtain and review previous reports and studies, maintenance reports, rain related sewer back-up information, and Sewer Back-up and Street Flooding Recommended Approach TM for study area. 2.11. Topographic Survey. Perform topographic survey of the project area. It is anticipated that topographic survey will provide manhole rim elevation information for manhole condition/storm inlet assessments at a minimum, to support the conceptual design. Survey shall be performed in accordance with Survey Standards. 2.12. Geotechnical Desktop Survey. Perform geotechnical desktop survey of existing soils information available to help evaluate conceptual design of the project components. A geotechnical desktop survey report shall be prepared and will discuss the general soil conditions underlying the site; and present the relevant engineering properties of the existing soils. 22 2.13. Manhole Condition Assessment. Perform Level 4 – Complete Condition Assessment manhole inventories, condition assessments and connectivity determination within the project area, as required, per the Manhole and Lamping Inspection Procedure. 360-degree photos shall be included. Approximately 132 total structures will be investigated as shown in Figure 2. 2.14. Existing Infrastructure Condition. Obtain and review information on existing infrastructure condition in the project area that may influence placement of utilities. (Road condition assessment, surface structures, overhead utilities, etc.) 2.15. Storm Inlets. Locate, plot and categorize all inlets in the project area. This will support preliminary pipe routing, sizing and profiles for the project area and conceptual design of the storm sewer system. Storm inlet location and identification number information, at a minimum, must be included in the Manhole and Lamping Inspection Field Tool Access database, as described in the Manhole and Lamping Inspection Procedure. Approximately 157 storm sewer inlets will be inspected as shown in Figure 3. 2.16. Environmental Data Resources, Inc. Report. Review the Environmental Data Resources, Inc (EDR) report provided by the PMT and other available information. The review of the EDR report and other readily available information will consist of identifying sites of environmental concern noted in the EDR report which are located within and adjacent to the project area. This information will be used to identify potential future soil borings requiring environmental analysis. 2.17. GIS Base Map. Generate a GIS base map for the project area utilizing information from GIS survey information, utility information and field investigations. 2.18. Septic Tank Locations. Identify the locations of any existing septic tanks in the project area and evaluate alternatives to serve the properties and eliminate the need for the septic tanks. Provide a map showing the properties where septic tanks are located. 2.19. Vacant / Distressed / Abandoned Properties. Identify the location of any vacant, distressed, or abandoned properties in the project area. Provide a map identifying these properties. 23 Conceptual Design Objective: Prepare a conceptual design of the proposed sewer separation systems with GIS based concept drawings, including development of the pipe sizing necessary for the proposed storm and/or sanitary sewer system (new pipe or existing separated sewer pipe, or a combination of both). Deliverables: Alignment analysis and Conceptual Plan Drawings to clarify the proposed separation plan. The analysis shall include alternatives, new storm sewers, new sanitary sewers, minimum and maximum velocities in new and existing lines and similar data. Scope: 2.20. Conceptual Drawings. Prepare conceptual level drawings of the proposed sanitary and storm sewers at an appropriate scale to show the level of detail required to convey the proposed alignments and relationships to other facilities. The size of drawings should not exceed 22” x 34” without the concurrence of the PMT. These drawings should have enough detail to show the proposed separation plan. Drawings must include currently available utility information and conceptual manhole invert elevations and pipe slopes and green infrastructure layout drawings. Drawings must be developed for sewer separation including converted and new sanitary and storm sewer systems. Included in the drawings will be combined sewer converted to sanitary sewer, combined sewer converted to storm sewer, new sanitary sewer and new storm sewer. Storm sewer system pipe layout must be based on the Omaha Regional Stormwater Design Manual. 2.21. Assign Pipe Sizes and Inverts. Assign initial pipe sizes and inverts based on the results of the hydrologic and hydraulic calculations. 2.22. System Refinement. Review the proposed system for conflicts with existing utilities, routing limitations, and constructability issues. Adjust the proposed storm and sanitary sewer system as necessary to eliminate conflicts including selecting and evaluating alternate alignments; revising inlet locations; and adjusting pipe inverts. Estimate hydraulic performance of selected pipe sizing and pipe slopes. 2.23. Sanitary and Storm Sewer Rehabilitation Schedules. Sanitary and storm sewer rehabilitation schedules and associated location maps will be developed. The rehabilitation schedules will identify the location of repairs recommended in the manhole structure or sewer pipe conduit. 24 Conceptual Basis of Design Technical Memorandum Objective: This task consists of preparing a Conceptual Basis of Design Technical Memorandum for the project study area summarizing the findings, calculations and assumptions developed in these tasks. Prepare Conceptual level plan sheets. Deliverables: The key deliverables will be the Conceptual Basis of Design Technical Memorandum and the conceptual level plan sheets which shall include, at a minimum, the items identified in the 10 Percent Deliverables Guidance. Scope: 2.24. Conceptual Opinion of Probable Cost. Prepare a conceptual level Opinion of Probable Cost (OPCC) based on the conceptual layout and basis of design. The OPCC is to be developed in accordance with the Sewer Separation Cost Estimate Template Guidance. 2.25. Conceptual Basis of Design TM. Prepare a draft Conceptual Basis of Design Technical Memorandum, to summarize the results of the Sewer Back-up Questionnaire, the collection of the field data, the processing of the data, the QA/QC performed on the data, and is sues or problems observed, the validation of the existing system problems, causes of sewer back-ups, and proposed solutions, the development of the conceptual plans, recommendations for future use of the existing sewer system including hydrologic and hydraulic calculations, system sizing, trenchless construction opportunities, summary of green infrastructure evaluation and preliminary screening, utility coordination, neighborhood coordination, agency coordination, OPCC, and recommendations for preliminary design. Submit draft Conceptual Basis of Design Technical Memorandum to the PMT for distribution of review plans to the appropriate CITY departments, agencies, utilities and other parties. 2.26. Utility Coordination Meeting. ENGINEER must conduct a utility coordination meeting coordinated with the PMT and per the Utility Coordination Procedure to review the proposed separation plan and identify impacts to existing utilities. ENGINEER must prepare and distribute meeting minutes. 2.27. Final Conceptual Basis of Design TM. Finalize TM. Attend one review meeting with the City and PMT. ENGINEER must take and distribute meeting notes. Revise TM to incorporate review comments. Prepare memo to address review comments that were not incorporated and summarize how the issue was reconciled. Submit the final TM and drawings to the PMT. 25 TASK 3 -- PRELIMINARY (30%) DESIGN Field Work and Data Acquisition Objective: Perform field investigations to acquire data sufficient to complete 30% design of the Project. Collected data will supplement field investigation results obtained during the field investigation and conceptual design phases of the project. Deliverables: Survey Data (both field books and electronic) Geotechnical Report Smoke and dye testing Scope: 3.1. Topographic Survey. Perform a site survey in sufficient detail to prepare construction documents. The survey shall follow the proposed pipe routing defined in conceptual design. Survey for the sewers within the neighborhood shall extend from the street centerline to the house. The survey of the route through undeveloped areas shall extend 50 feet on each side of the proposed centerline. Survey shall be performed in accordance with the Public Works Department Design Division Survey Standards. Survey field book and survey digital data shall be given to the CITY upon completion of final design. Features including edge of pavement, edge of gravel, culverts, pipes, boxes, structures, drives, fences, and utilities, trees and landscaping will be located in the improved areas. See Figure 4 for limits of topographic survey area. Prepare informational door hanger letter to residents before starting any surveying work. A draft copy of the letter will be sent to the PMT for review. Door hangers will be hand delivered to all homes within the limits of the topographic survey area. Copies of the letter will be kept with the surveyors and handed out to residents that approach with questions. Existing pipe network in AutoCAD Civil 3D will be developed utilizing manhole and storm inlet condition assessments. 3.2. Utility Input into CADD. Based on information obtained from the utilities at the Utility Coordination Meeting, input utility locations into CADD not picked up by the topographic survey. 3.3. Geotechnical Investigations. A subsurface exploration shall be performed in accordance with the Geotechnical Investigation Procedure for Sewer Separation Projects. Geotechnical investigations will include thirty-three (33) test borings locations as shown on the attached map (Figure 5). The boring locations will be adjusted based on equipment access, site conflicts, utility clearance issues and sites of environmental concern noted in the EDR report and identified during the conceptual phase. Right of Entry will be obtained by the CITY and all boring locations must be readily accessible. Perform test borings to obtain geologic information and samples of the soils, and laboratory tests to determine the relevant engineering properties of the various soil strata. Boring depths are intended to extend 5 to 10-feet below excavation level to permit assessment of excavation stability and possible shoring. If trenchless installation techniques are anticipated, Engineer must evaluate and provide design criteria/parameters for the construction. Depths of the groundwater table must be noted. Up to three (3) geotechnical borings will be converted to piezometers to monitor ground water levels during design phase of the project. These piezometers will be monitored quarterly (assume 4 readings during preliminary design). A slug test will be performed in each piezometer in accordance with ASTM D4044. 26 Develop and submit Nebraska Department of Transportation (NDOT) Application to Occupy Right of Way for geotechnical investigation work within NDOT Right of Way. Submit draft for City/PMT review prior to submitting to NDOT. 3.4. Street Coring. Perform street coring to determine composition and thickness of existing street surfacing and street base materials. Coring of the street section will include thirty-three (33) proposed locations at the borings as shown in Figure 5. Perform analysis of existing materials to determine bearing capacities and suitability for long term reliability. Investigation must also address adjacent streets that may be used for access routes to the construction area. This information will provide the existing pavement properties for the ENGINEER to properly determine pavement removal/replacement areas in coordination with existing street and curb conditions and utility impacts. The CITY will provide final approval for all proposed street corings. Any work within CITY ROW shall receive approval from the CITY prior to the work being started. Subcontractor will be required to provide proper notification of any street closings and will be required to use CITY approved lane closures associated with street coring operations. Include results of investigations and evaluations in the geotechnical report. 3.5. Smoke and Dye Testing. Perform smoke and dye testing within the project area in accordance with the Smoke and Dye Testing Procedure. Utilize the smoke and dye testing results to confirm connection of suspected inflow sources. Task will include smoke testing of approximately 30,770 linear feet of pipe as shown in Figure 6. Dye testing must be completed as part of other tasks included in the scope. 3.6. Rehabilitation Recommendations. It is not the intent of this scope of services to provide comprehensive manhole or pipe rehabilitation recommendations. However, all deficiencies in the study area that are found which the ENGINEER feels are serious in nature must be communicated to CITY immediately upon discovery. Additionally, the ENGINEER must evaluate all sewer infrastructures in the areas within the proposed construction limits for rehabilitation or replacement. Outside the proposed construction area, ENGINEER shall provide recommendations for rehabilitation or reconstruction of sewers as required to make the sewer system function properly. Examples include: Cured-in-Place (CIPP) lining to provide structural integrity to an unstable sewer line that is to be converted to a storm or sanitary sewer, OR replacement of a highly unstable existing sewer or manhole that could not withstand construction of the proposed new facilities due to the close horizontal and vertical proximity. The ENGINEER must review risk scores provided by the CITY within the study area to help inform rehabilitation recommendations. The ENGINEER must discuss possible recommendations early on with PMT and CITY staff as part of a Program Management and Technical Team Meeting prior to the submittal of 30% deliverables to determine and prioritize the rehabilitations to be included into the PROJECT, if any. 3.7. Geotechnical Report. A geotechnical report must be prepared and will discuss the general soil and ground water conditions underlying the site; results of any groundwater testing, monitoring, and slug tests; provide an estimate of the dewatering flow rate anticipated at the boring locations for use in preparing the dewatering permit; present the relevant engineering properties of the existing soils, provide excavation and earthwork recommendations including minimum setbacks from adjacent structures; evaluate feasibility of pipe boring/tunneling, if required; and recommend design criteria and parameters for pipe bedding, pavements, and other earth supported improvements. ENGINEER must provide the CITY with electronic files of all geotechnical test boring locations (and identification numbers referenced in the geotechnical report) created while preparing the Geotechnical Report. ENGINEER must coordinate with the PMT to provide that minimum data attributes are provided with the electronic data. 27 Private Property Investigations Objective: This task will consist of performing initial investigations at private properties in the PROJECT area to identify additional inflow sources into the system not identified through smoke testing, to further investigate inflow sources identified through smoke testing, as well as to identify service lateral locations for key properties. The private property investigations will help identify critical elevations to be served, and will help determine routing and prioritize phasing for the project area. Deliverables: The key deliverables will be private property inspections, smoke and dye testing results (as required in Smoke and Dye Testing Procedure), and a map summarizing results. Site visit forms and sketches will be developed. Scope: 3.8. Property Owner Notification. Private property investigations must be in accordance with the Private Property Investigation Guidance and proper notification must be provided to the property owner prior to the start of the private property investigations. At a minimum, the property owner and/or resident shall be notified three (3) days prior to any field work involving intrusive explorations such as digging, access to the basement, or access to a septic system. Field verification requiring access to the property for non-invasive investigation shall be accomplished by knocking on the door and explaining the need for access. Twenty (20) notifications are budgeted for tasks 3.10 and 3.11. 3.9. Sewer Backup Investigation: Perform an investigation on as many as five (5) properties to resolve sewer backup discrepancies noted in the Study Phase of the project or as needed. Specifically, the investigation must focus on determining if a rain related backup will actually occur and must include a letter to the homeowner and/or renter, potential phone correspondence, and face-to-face meeting at the property in question if needed. Results must be summarized in the 30% BODR. 3.10. Inflow Source Investigations. Investigate properties in the project area for external inflow sources, including downspouts directed underground, driveway drains, or other area drains according to Smoke and Dye Testing Procedure. This allowance includes investigation of five (5) inflow sources. 3.11. Perform Sewer Connectivity and Service Lateral Investigations. Schedule and investigate key properties (corner lots, multi-family residential properties, commercial properties) for sewer connectivity, manhole invert verifications and service lateral location in areas where new sanitary sewers are proposed and multiple service lead discharge locations are possible. As the anticipated separation plan includes potential new sanitary sewers, it is important to identify the location of service laterals for these properties to effectively design the proposed sewers. Investigations generally will consist of dye testing or line locating. This allowance includes investigation of five (5) commercial properties, dye testing at ten (10) residential properties. Effort associated with this task work must be reviewed with the CITY and only performed upon authorization by the CITY. Sewer connectivity investigations may include CCTV and/or dye testing. Five (5) sewer connectivity investigations are budgeted. Manhole invert verifications include determining invert elevations of piping in the field due to discrepancies in the provided field data. Five (5) manhole invert verifications are budgeted. Field locate twelve (12) existing segments of sanitary/combined curvilinear sewer using CCTV camera/sonde. Provide surface markings denoting location of existing sewer. Collect adequate 28 number of points/depths so that location of sewer can be updated in the plans. Coordinate field locates/work with surveyor so that surface marks can be surveyed. 3.12. Investigation Results. Note inflow locations and service lateral locations on the base map to be incorporated into design. Provide City with smoke and dye testing results (as required in Smoke and Dye Testing Procedure). Per deliverables, a GIS file geodatabase id entifying work performed and findings at each location (include associated CITY required metadata) and a map summarizing results shall be provided. 29 Green Infrastructure Evaluations Objective: Perform continued evaluation and preliminary design of green infrastructure based on the results of the pre-screening review of candidate green infrastructure and BMP’s by the CITY and PMT staff during the 10% Conceptual Design phase. Deliverables: Green Infrastructure TM Scope: 3.13. Draft Green Infrastructure TM. Prepare a draft Green Infrastructure Technical Memorandum, per the Green Solutions in Sewer Separation Guidance. The draft Green Infrastructure Technical Memorandum shall include the proposed green infrastructure elements identified as feasible during pre-screening task for the project study area. Concept-level landscape renderings and an OPCC will be developed for the green infrastructure. The CSO benefit and/or potential savings to the storm sewer system associated with implementation of the green infrastructure will be presented. 3.14. Review Draft TM. Review the draft Green Infrastructure TM with the CITY and PMT and prepare meeting minutes. 3.15. Address Review Comments. The review comments from the PMT and City staff will be addressed and the final Green Infrastructure Technical Memorandum will be submitted for final review. 3.16. Preliminary Green Infrastructure and PCSMP BMP Design. Provide further evaluation, design and prepare layout or schematic drawings of proposed green infrastructure and/or PCSMP BMPs including layout of amenities, grading, potential landscaping, etc., based on the results of the pre-screening review of candidate green infrastructure and BMP’s by the CITY and PMT staff during the 10% Conceptual Design phase. This task includes preliminary calculations for estimating WQCV for soil conditioning within ROW. 3.17. Prepare Draft Maintenance Sheet. Identify operation and maintenance needs for all BMPs and proposed infrastructure. Develop a draft Operations & Maintenance Sheet for all maintenance needs. Determine if Operations & Maintenance Manual development is required for final design. 3.18. Conduct Preliminary (30%) Maintenance Sheet Meeting. Conduct maintenance meeting to discuss potential BMPs and proposed infrastructure, likely maintenance requirements, and other considerations. Obtain signatures of approval from all appropriate City departments to move forward with green infrastructure design. 30 30% Design Deliverable Objective: Develop 30% design deliverables for review and utility coordination. The 30% design deliverable is meant to provide a preliminary determination of alignment and depth of proposed storm and sanitary sewers and/or conversion of the existing combined sewer to either storm or sanitary, in relationship to existing utilities and street features base d on the level of information available. Deliverables: Preliminary drawings of the proposed sewer improvements including known utilities. Copies will be provided in printed and electronic format in accordance with the Sewer Separation Protocol. Deliverables shall be based on the 30% Deliverables Guidance document for the Basis of Design Report and 30% Design Drawings. Scope: 3.19. Hydrologic and Hydraulic Modeling and Calculations. Update the hydrologic and hydraulic calculations based on layout of the proposed system. The final storm and/or sanitary sewer layout will be set after completion of the topographic survey, field investigations, and review of potential conflicts. The proposed pipe system will be adjusted as necessary to maintain the sewer flow without surcharging the pipes or manholes beyond acceptable design limits. 3.20. Trenchless Feasibility TM. Prepare a Technical Memorandum describing the feasibility of using trenchless construction methods for up to three (3) new pipe alignments. Describe work area site constraints including underground and overhead utilities, easements, and strategies for mitigating disruption to traffic, residents, property owners, and the environment. Provide recommendations for trenchless construction method, shaft considerations, risk of settlement with different methods, interpretation of geologic report of trenchless construction, and opinion of probable cost. This TM will be included as an attachment to the BODR. One (1) site visit is budgeted for this task. 3.21. Preliminary Green Infrastructure Design. (If Applicable) Prepare layout drawings of proposed green infrastructure including layout of amenities, landscaping, etc., for up to two (2) small, neighborhood scale design concepts. 3.22. System Refinement. Review the proposed storm and sanitary systems for conflicts with existing utilities, routing limitations, and constructability issues. Adjust the proposed storm and sanitary sewer systems as necessary to eliminate conflicts wherever reasonably possible including selecting and evaluating alternate alignments; revising inlet locations; and adjusting pipe inverts. 3.23. Hydraulic Performance. Estimate the capacity and performance of the adjusted storm and sanitary sewer systems to determine if the proposed pipes and manholes are likely to surcharge beyond acceptable design limits. Adjust as needed to meet this criterion. Sanitary sewer system shall be designed in conformance with the Sanitary Sewer Design Basis and Methodology Guidance. Storm sewer design shall be in conformance with the Storm Sewer Design Basis and Methodology Guidance. 3.24. Finalize Routing and Sizes. Update the system layout based on the topographic survey. Evaluate for conflicts and adjust accordingly. Evaluate the hydraulic performance and adjust the pipe sizes and inverts accordingly. 3.25. Plan and Profile Sheets. Import the topographic survey and develop the plan/profile sheets. Some clean-up of survey data is generally necessary so that the plan sheets are not overly cluttered as per the CAD Standards. Import available utility drawings. Show proposed storm 31 and/or sanitary sewer improvements. Show proposed green infrastructure location and type (no detailed green infrastructure drawings on plan/profile sheets). 3.26. Utility Relocation Coordination. Coordinate utility relocation requirements with affected utilities. Minimize utility relocation and design utility crossings by field verifying critical elevations, including locations of existing manholes, utilities, and sewer infrastructure along preferred alignments. 3.27. Pavement Removal and Replacement. Identify and incorporate pavement removal and replacement limits along the proposed construction alignments. The replacement limits will include anticipated intersection radii modifications and sidewalk and handicap ramp construction (conservative estimates at this stage). Determine preliminary pavement removal and replacement areas while taking into consideration existing street and curb conditions, and potential utility impacts to the City right-of-way and pavement due to relocations and replacements. Intersection improvements will incorporate minimum 25-foot radii upgrades at arterial and collector street intersections along the proposed construction alignments, or as identified by the CITY. In addition, where possible instead of placing the inlet at the end of return, as is suggested in the Stormwater Design Manual, the inlet will be placed at a 10-foot setback from the end of return (EOR). It's understood that many other factors may not allow for this setback, such as driveway location, utility conflicts, or other site constraints. This is meant to be implemented where possible and will likely be a project-specific and even intersection-specific decision made by the ENGINEER and CITY. If determined feasible, pavement removal and construction limits will be identified incorporating this design. Curb ramps will generally be designed for all four corners at every intersection affected along the proposed construction alignments. Intersection and curb ramp improvements shall be designed in accordance with guidance in the City Standard Plates. ENGINEER must evaluate the streets within the project limit for compliance with the City Complete Street Design Guide checklist. ENGINEER will review the findings with the CITY to determine applicability of the Complete Streets Design. Estimated costs for the potential pavement removal and replacements for designs described above will be included in the 30% construction cost estimates. It is assumed that full width removal and replacement of streets will be required for up to 19,000 linear feet of roadway removal and replacement and that the following sheets will be developed under this task: Roadway Typical Section Sheets Roadway Horizontal Control Sheets Roadway Plan and Profile Sheets Roadway Intersection Geometry Sheets An additional 1,000 linear feet of partial width removal and replacement is expected along NW Radial Hwy. For this stretch of pavement, the following sheets will be developed under this task: Roadway Typical Section Sheets Roadway Plan Sheets Roadway Intersection Geometry Sheets 32 Plan and profile sheets will not be needed for partial width removal and replacement. 3.28. Inflow/Infiltration Reduction Requirements. All sewer separation projects will include a minimum amount of rehabilitation and new construction measures to minimize and eliminate some direct sources of storm and ground water inflow and infiltration in both sanitary and storm sewer manholes, whether in pavement or in non-paved areas. These measures include: (1) installing external frame seals and solid manhole covers on all new manholes; (2) installing external frame seals on all existing manholes exposed during construction, which may include rebuilding risers; (3) cut out, expose, rebuild risers if necessary, and install external frame seals on all existing manholes which are on sanitary sewers or on pipes that are being changed from combined to sanitary sewers; (4) replace existing perforated manhole covers with solid covers (and new frame if necessary) on all existing sewers which are changed from combined to sanitary sewers. This work will be included in the final design project plans and specifications for the direct project area at a minimum, and to the extent of the system outside of the project area as determined through discussions with the PMT. The ENGINEER must discuss possible recommendations early on with PMT and CITY staff as part of a Program Management and Technical Team Meeting prior to the submittal of 30% deliverables to get confirmation or obtain direction on what rehabilitation to proceed with and incorporate into the PROJECT. Estimated costs for the above I/I reduction requirements should be included in the 30% construction cost estimates. 3.29. Permits. In collaboration with the CITY and PMT Compliance Team in accordance with the Environmental Plan, develop a preliminary list of the potential permits and clearances needed for this PROJECT. Communications with permitting agencies need to be done in conformance with the Environmental Plan. ENGINEER must fill out all permit applications for any governing agency or other entity related to performance of field investigations and surveying for preliminary and final design services. ENGINEER must coordinate with the PMT and CITY to get required permit applications submitted and approved. Prior to completion of the 30% BODR, the ENGINEER must meet with the PMT Compliance Team to review the list of possible permits and agree on those permits that will be carried forward into the BODR report. 3.30. Identification of Potential Community Enhancements (If Applicable). Identify potential community enhancements that may be compatible with the proposed project. This effort will require input from the community, and will be done in conjunction with Public Outreach activities in Task 1.3 3.31. Project Phasing and Scheduling. Develop a project phasing and sequencing, if applicable, and discuss in the technical memorandum. 3.32. Right-of-Way Requirements. Prepare right-of-way requirements for the construction of the new sewer system per the ROW Management and Property Acquisition Procedure. The right-of-way requirements are to be shown on the plans and discussed in the technical memorandum. Summarize potential properties impacted by the project on the ROW Table with current property information and show locations on project area map. City ROW will obtain titles to properties based on the areas identified. 3.33. Opinion of Probable Construction Cost. Prepare an opinion of probable costs (OPCC) based on the (30%) preliminary drawings and level of design. The OPCC shall be escalated to the anticipated construction timeframe. It is the intent that the OPCC reflect actual bid prices at the time the project bids are opened and will require escalation to future dollars. 33 30% Basis of Design Report Objective: Prepare a 30% Basis of Design Report that summarizes the findings, calculations, assumptions, and phasing plan, based on the preliminary design. Deliverables: The key deliverables will be the Basis of Design Report and 30% design drawings per the Basis of Design Report Guidance and the 30% Design Drawings Guidance. The Complete Street Design Guide Checklist will also be included. Scope: 3.34. Preliminary Permit List. Include a preliminary list of the permits needed for this PROJECT. 3.35. Risk Mitigation Strategy. The ENGINEER must be provided a copy of the Risk Management Guidance for Utilizing and Maintaining the Project Level Risk Register dated 04/02/2020 and a Project Level Risk Register template (PLRR) prior to or at kickoff meeting. The ENGINEER must own the PLRR and be responsible for filling in and maintaining the project’s Risk Register throughout the design phase of the project. The ENGINEER must be responsible for implementing the risk mitigation strategies developed during the course of the project. The Risk Register shall be formally included in the BODR at each delivery milestone to be reviewed by a member of the PMT Risk Management Team but risk mitigation strategy development and implementation will be part of the ongoing design work and discussed at the Monthly Progress Meetings. The ENGINEER must be responsible to transition the PLRR to the construction phase of the project prior to bidding the project. 3.36. Basis of Design Report. The 30% Basis of Design Report must summarize the development of the preliminary plans including field data, GIS data, tree removal inventory/replacement calculations/mitigation approach, hydrologic and hydraulic calculations; system sizing; utility coordination; potential community enhancements, neighborhood coordination; sustainability, risk mitigation strategy, green infrastructure; agency coordination; environmental issues, permits; property acquisition; OPCC; and recommendations for final design including phasing and sequencing. 3.37. Plan Distribution. Coordinate with the CITY and the PMT for the distribution of the 30% deliverables to the review agencies, permitting agencies, utilities, and CITY departments for review and comment. It is assumed that three (3) sets of hard copy half size plans will be provided in hard copy format as well as the electronic version. 3.38. Utility Coordination Meeting. The ENGINEER must conduct a utility coordination meeting per the Utility Coordination Procedure. The ENGINEER must be responsible for taking meeting notes and distributing meeting notes. The meeting will be coordinated with the PMT. 3.39. Finalize Report. Address review comments. PMT will endeavor to complete reviews of all PROJECT deliverables within a three-week time period; however, this will be dependent on workload at the time of the submittal. Sufficient schedule float shall be included to allow a four- week review time when necessary. CITY and PMT review comments will be compiled in one Quality Review Form (QRF) document per deliverable and will be submitted to the ENGINEER. The ENGINEER must incorporate comments from the QRF into the design. Address/resolve QRF comments. Submit the final report and drawings to the PMT in accordance with the Sewer Separation Protocol. 3.40. 30% Walkthrough. Coordinate field review and walkthrough using 30% preliminary design plans. The focus of this walkthrough will be on planning, green infrastructure, tree removals and 34 replacements, traffic and street issues, and overall constructability. The CITY and PMT will identify staff to attend the field review. Document walkthrough comments and outcomes for incorporation into the 60% design. Sewer Type Combined (83) Sanitary Combined (42) Storm Combined (21) Abandoned (14) Omaha, NE - CSO 204 - CCTV ³ 0 400 800200 Feet 1 inch = 317 feet Manhole Type Combined (81) Sanitary Combined (35) Storm Combined (16) Abandoned (14) Omaha, NE - CSO 204 - Manhole Inspection ³ 0 400 800200 Feet 1 inch = 317 feet Inlet Type Combined (1) Storm Combined (156) Abandoned (14) Omaha, NE - CSO 204 - Inlet Inspection ³ 0 400 800200 Feet 1 inch = 317 feet 2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 2 !!22 !R !!2 !R !!2 !!2 !!2 2 2 !!2 2 !!2 !!2 !!2 2 2 !!2 2 2 2 !!2 2 !!2 2 !!2 !!2 2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !R !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2!!2 $1 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 2 2 !R 2 2 2 2 2 2 22 2 !R 2 !R2 !R DDD 2 2 22 2 222 2 2 2 !!2 2 2 22 2 2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 2 !!2 2!!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 2 !!2 !!2 2 !!2 !!2 !!2 g 2 !!2 2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 $1 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 D 2 2 !!2 2 !!2 2 2 !!2 2 !!2 !!2 2 !!2 2 !!2 !!2 2 2 !!2 2 !!2 22 2 2 !!2 2 2 !!2 !!2 2 !!2 !R 2 2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 2!!2 !!2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 !!2 2 !!2 2 2 2 2 !!2 2 2 2 2 2 2 !!2 2 2 !!2 2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 D !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !R !!2 !!2 !!2 2 !!2 2 !!2 2 2 2 !!2 !!2 2 2 2 2 2 !R 2 !R !R 2 !!2 22 !R 2 2 2 2 2 !!2 2 2 2 2 2 !R !!2 !!2 2 DD D !!2 !R!R D 22 2 2 2!R2 2 D 22 222 22 2 2 MÛ !R !!2 !R !@ !!2 !!2 !!2 2 2 2 2 !R 2 2!!2 2 2 222!!2 !!2 !!2 2 2 2 !!2 !!2 2 !!2 !!2 !!2 2 !!2 !!2 !!2 2 !!2 2 !!2 !!2 !!2!!2 !!2 2 2 !!2 !!2 22 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 D !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !R !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2!!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 2 222 !!2 !!2 !R !!2 2 !!2 !!2 2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 2 2 2 2 2 !!2 !!2 !!2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 !!2 2 !!2 2 2 !!2 !!2 !!2 2 2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 2 2 !!2 22 22 !!2 2 2 2 2 !!2 !!2 2 !!2 2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 2 !!2 2 2 !!2 !!2 2 2 2 !!2 !!2 !!2 2 !!2 !!2 2 2 !!2 !!2 2 2 $1 !!2 !!2 2 2 !!2!!2 2 2 2 !!2 !!2 !!2 2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 2 !!2 !!2 !!2!!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2!!2 !!2 !R !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 D !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 2 2 !R 2 !!2 !!2 !!2 2 !!22 2 2 !!2 !!2 2 22 2 2 !!2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 22 !!2 2 2 !!2 !!2 2 2 2 !R !R 2 2 2 2 !R 2 2 !R 2 2 !!22 !R 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 !!2 g D DDDD !!2 22 2 2 2 2 2 22 2 2 2 22 2 g g g 2 2!!22 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 2 !!2 !!2 !R !R 2 MÛ 2 !!2 2 2 !R !!2 2 2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 2 !!22 !!2 !!2 !!2 $1 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 $1 !!2 !!2 $1 !!2D !!2 2 !!2 !!2 2 2 !!2 !!2 2 2 !!2 !!2 !R !!2 2 2 2 2 2 !!2 !!2 !!2 2 !!2 !!2 2 !!2 2 2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 2 !!2 !!2 2 !!2 2 2 2 2 !!2 !!2 2 !!2 !!2 2 !!2 !!2 2 22 2 !!2 !!2 2 2 !!2 2 !!2 !!2 !!2 2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2!!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 2 2 22 !!22 2 !!2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 22 2 2 2 !!2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 !R 2 2 2 2 2 !!2 D !R!R ") 22 2 MÛ 22 22 2 22 2!!2 2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 2 2 2 22 22 2 !R 2 2 !!2 2 !!2 2 !!2 !!2 !!2 2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 $1 2 !!22 2 2 2 2 !!2 !!2 22 !!2 !!2 !R !!2 2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !@ !!2 !!2 !!2 $1 !!2 !!2!!2 2 2 !R !!2 2 !!2 !!2 !!2 2 !!2 !R 2 !!2 2 !!2 2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 2 2 !!2 !!2 !!2 2 2 !!2 2 2 2 !!2 !!2 2 !!2 !!2 !!2 2 2 !!22 !!2 2 !!2 !!2 !!2 2 !!2 "b© !!2 !!2 !!2 2 !!2 !!2 2 !!2 2 2 !!2 2 !!2 2 2 !!2 2 2 !!2 2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 D !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2!!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 2 !!2 2 2 !!2 2 !!2 !!2 2 2 2 2 !!2 !!2 2 !!2 2 2 2!!2 22 2 2 2 2 2 22 2 !!2 !R 2 2 2 !!2 !R 2 !!2 2 2 2 2 !R 2 !R 2 2 D !!2 MÛ 2 2 2 2 2 2 22 !R !!2 !!2 !R g !!2 !!2 !!2 $1 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 22 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 "b© !!2 !!2 !!2 2 D 2 &SC D !!2 !!2 D !!2!!2 2 !!2 !!22222!!2 !!22 2222 !!222 !!22222 !!222 222!!2 222!!2 22!!2 22!!2 22!!22 !!2 !!2 2 2 !!2 2 2 2 222 !!2 g g gggg g !R !R !!2 2 "5 "5DDDDD DDDD !R !@ !@ 2222!!2 !!2 !!2 g !!2!!2!!2 !!2 !!2!!22!!222 !!2!!2$1 $1$1 !!2 D2!!2 "b©!!2$1 22 22 !!2222!!22222 2222 !!2 !!2 2 !!2 2 2 2Maple S t A m e s A v e N 60th StS p r a g u e S t N 56th StN W RadialHwy Northwest Dr B e d f o r d A v e P r a t t S t W i r t S tN 52nd StM i a m i S t N 50th AveN 60th AveBoydSt Ta y l o r S t N 53rd StN 59th StP i n k n e y S t C o r b y S t N 51st StS p a u l d i n g S t Country Club AveN55thAveN 55th StN 57th StR u g g l e s S t N 51st AveSahlerSt B i r c h S t N 54th StE m m e t S t B i n n e y S t E v a n s S t N51 s t PlzO h i o S t N50thCtSprague P l zM a n d e r so n S t N 58th StSource: Esri, Maxar, GeoEye, Earthstar Geographics, CNES/Airbus DS, USDA, USGS, AeroGRID, IGN ,and the GIS User Community 0 400 800200Feet± 2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 2 !!22 !R !!2 !R !!2 !!2 !!2 2 2 !!2 2 !!2 !!2 !!2 2 2 !!2 2 2 2 !!2 2 !!2 2 !!2 !!2 2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !R !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2!!2 $1 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 2 2 !R 2 2 2 2 2 2 22 2 !R 2 !R2 !R DDD 2 2 22 2 222 2 2 2 !!2 2 2 22 2 2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 2 !!2 2!!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 2 !!2 !!2 2 !!2 !!2 !!2 g 2 !!2 2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 $1 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 D 2 2 !!2 2 !!2 2 2 !!2 2 !!2 !!2 2 !!2 2 !!2 !!2 2 2 !!2 2 !!2 22 2 2 !!2 2 2 !!2 !!2 2 !!2 !R 2 2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 2!!2 !!2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 !!2 2 !!2 2 2 2 2 !!2 2 2 2 2 2 2 !!2 2 2 !!2 2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 D !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !R !!2 !!2 !!2 2 !!2 2 !!2 2 2 2 !!2 !!2 2 2 2 2 2 !R 2 !R !R 2 !!2 22 !R 2 2 2 2 2 !!2 2 2 2 2 2 !R !!2 !!2 2 DD D !!2 !R!R D 22 2 2 2!R2 2 D 22 222 22 2 2 MÛ !R !!2 !R !@ !!2 !!2 !!2 2 2 2 2 !R 2 2!!2 2 2 222!!2 !!2 !!2 2 2 2 !!2 !!2 2 !!2 !!2 !!2 2 !!2 !!2 !!2 2 !!2 2 !!2 !!2 !!2!!2 !!2 2 2 !!2 !!2 22 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 D !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !R !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2!!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 2 222 !!2 !!2 !R !!2 2 !!2 !!2 2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 2 2 2 2 2 !!2 !!2 !!2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 !!2 2 !!2 2 2 !!2 !!2 !!2 2 2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 2 2 !!2 22 22 !!2 2 2 2 2 !!2 !!2 2 !!2 2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 2 !!2 2 2 !!2 !!2 2 2 2 !!2 !!2 !!2 2 !!2 !!2 2 2 !!2 !!2 2 2 $1 !!2 !!2 2 2 !!2!!2 2 2 2 !!2 !!2 !!2 2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 2 !!2 !!2 !!2!!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2!!2 !!2 !R !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 D !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 2 2 !R 2 !!2 !!2 !!2 2 !!22 2 2 !!2 !!2 2 22 2 2 !!2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 22 !!2 2 2 !!2 !!2 2 2 2 !R !R 2 2 2 2 !R 2 2 !R 2 2 !!22 !R 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 !!2 g D DDDD !!2 22 2 2 2 2 2 22 2 2 2 22 2 g g g 2 2!!22 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 2 !!2 !!2 !R !R 2 MÛ 2 !!2 2 2 !R !!2 2 2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 2 !!22 !!2 !!2 !!2 $1 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 $1 !!2 !!2 $1 !!2D !!2 2 !!2 !!2 2 2 !!2 !!2 2 2 !!2 !!2 !R !!2 2 2 2 2 2 !!2 !!2 !!2 2 !!2 !!2 2 !!2 2 2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 2 !!2 !!2 2 !!2 2 2 2 2 !!2 !!2 2 !!2 !!2 2 !!2 !!2 2 22 2 !!2 !!2 2 2 !!2 2 !!2 !!2 !!2 2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2!!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 2 2 22 !!22 2 !!2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 22 2 2 2 !!2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 !R 2 2 2 2 2 !!2 D !R!R ") 22 2 MÛ 22 22 2 22 2!!2 2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 2 2 2 22 22 2 !R 2 2 !!2 2 !!2 2 !!2 !!2 !!2 2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 $1 2 !!22 2 2 2 2 !!2 !!2 22 !!2 !!2 !R !!2 2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !@ !!2 !!2 !!2 $1 !!2 !!2!!2 2 2 !R !!2 2 !!2 !!2 !!2 2 !!2 !R 2 !!2 2 !!2 2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 2 2 !!2 !!2 !!2 2 2 !!2 2 2 2 !!2 !!2 2 !!2 !!2 !!2 2 2 !!22 !!2 2 !!2 !!2 !!2 2 !!2 "b© !!2 !!2 !!2 2 !!2 !!2 2 !!2 2 2 !!2 2 !!2 2 2 !!2 2 2 !!2 2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 D !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2!!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 2 !!2 2 2 !!2 2 !!2 !!2 2 2 2 2 !!2 !!2 2 !!2 2 2 2!!2 22 2 2 2 2 2 22 2 !!2 !R 2 2 2 !!2 !R 2 !!2 2 2 2 2 !R 2 !R 2 2 D !!2 MÛ 2 2 2 2 2 2 22 !R !!2 !!2 !R g !!2 !!2 !!2 $1 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 22 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 "b© !!2 !!2 !!2 2 D 2 &SC D !!2 !!2 D !!2!!2 2 !!2 !!22222!!2 !!22 2222 !!222 !!22222 !!222 222!!2 222!!2 22!!2 22!!2 22!!22 !!2 !!2 2 2 !!2 2 2 2 222 !!2 g g gggg g !R !R !!2 2 "5 "5DDDDD DDDD !R !@ !@ 2222!!2 !!2 !!2 g !!2!!2!!2 !!2 !!2!!22!!222 !!2!!2$1 $1$1 !!2 D2!!2 "b©!!2$1 22 22 !!2222!!22222 2222 !!2 !!2 2 !!2 2 2 2Maple S t A m e s A v e N 60th StS p r a g u e S t N 56th StN W RadialHwy Northwest Dr B e d f o r d A v e P r a t t S t W i r t S tN 52nd StM i a m i S t N 50th AveN 60th AveBoydSt Ta y l o r S t N 53rd StN 59th StP i n k n e y S t C o r b y S t N 51st StS p a u l d i n g S t Country Club AveN55thAveN 55th StN 57th StR u g g l e s S t N 51st AveSahlerSt B i r c h S t N 54th StE m m e t S t B i n n e y S t E v a n s S t N51 s t PlzO h i o S t N50thCtSprague P l zM a n d e r so n S t N 58th StSource: Esri, Maxar, GeoEye, Earthstar Geographics, CNES/Airbus DS, USDA, USGS, AeroGRID, IGN ,and the GIS User Community 0 400 800200Feet± Sewer Type Combined (83) Sanitary Combined (42) Abandoned (14) Omaha, NE - CSO 204 - Smoke Testing ³ 0 400 800200 Feet 1 inch = 317 feet 35 EXHIBIT “C” BREAKDOWN OF COSTS OMAHA CSO PROGRAMOPW - 53820 Cole Creek CSO 204 Phase 4 Sewer SeparationPRIME -Carollo EngineersCarollo EngineersFelsburg Holt and UllevigR. W. EngineeringSUB # 1 -Felsburg Holt and UllevigSUB # 2 -R. W. EngineeringTASKTASKPRIMEPRIMEProject ProjectAssist. Senior CAD PrincipalDirectSUB # 1SUB # 1Project Senior Engineer Engineer Enviro EnivroDirectSUB # 2SUB # 2Project Survey RLS CAD CAD Clerical DirectSUB # 3 -Thiele TOTALTOTALTASKTASKManager Engineer ProfProf Modeler Technician Eng/QC Clerical ExpensesTASKTASKManager Engineer IVII Scientist IV Scientist II Admin ExpensesTASKTASKManager CrewManager TechnicianExpensesSUB # 4 -Lithos EngineeringTOTALTOTAL$205 $175 $160 $130 $265 $150 $265 $110TOTALTOTAL$220 $190 $155 $115 $155 $115 $90TOTALTOTAL$215 $155 $155 $135 $65 $95SUB # 5 -Big Muddy WorkshopSUB # 6 - TREKK$HRS$HRS$HRS$HRSTASK 1 - Project Management1.1Project Management and Administration 1.1.1Project Management and Administration$110,860559 $68,460360 220888 441000$21,32096 96200$18,92088 881.1.2Quality Control Plan (QCP)$7353 $7353 12$0- $0- 1.1.3Project Health and Safety Plan (HSP)$2051 $2051 1$0- $0- 1.1.4Project Execution Plan (PEP)$3,51521 $3,51521 241212$0- $0- 1.1.5Initial Project Kickoff Meeting$2,73513 $2,73513 481250$0- $0- 1.1.6Monthly PMT Meetings $68,950352 $64,240328 881324848486000$4,71024 1266$0- $0- $0- $0- $0- 1.2Agency and Project Coordination1.2.1Utility Coordination$6,54048 $6,54048 444$0- $0- 1.2.2Agency Coordination and Permitting$8,38045 $5,58028 8164500$2,80017 1124100$0- 1.2.3CITY Agency Coordination$7,14037 $5,58028 8164500$1,5609 18100$0- 1.2.4GIS Coordination$3,84020 $3,84020 22161000$0- $0- 1.2.5Program Management and Technical Team Meetings$13,66076 $7,38032 168441000$0- $0- $0- $0- $0- $0- 1.3Public Involvement and Neighborhood Coordination1.3.1Public Outreach Plan$5,74534 $3,04517 8414$2,70017 116$0- 1.3.2Project Kick-off Public Meeting$16,13094 $5,67030 16842250$10,46064 628 2010 1600$0- 1.3.3Sewer Backup and Drainage Questionnaire$9,86069 $5,34036 4824$4,52033 18 1212 600$0- 1.3.4Conduct one 30% Design Public Meeting$16,13094 $5,67030 16842250$10,46064 628 2010 1600$0- 1.3.5Conduct Stakeholder Communications$10,87064 $4,69024 816250$6,18040 816 124 200$0- Task Hours1,530 1,019 4063187214040 25 54364 1326 122 6440 3688 8800000Task Fee$285,295$193,225$83,230$55,650$11,520$18,200$1,060$0$6,625$5,940$11,000$64,710$29,040$1,140$18,910$7,360$620$0$3,240$4,400$18,920$18,920$0$0$0$0$0$0TASK 2 - Conceptual (10%) DesignTASK 2 - Hydrologic and Hydraulic Modeling Calculations2.1Review Previous Modeling Data$7,12040 $7,12040 48244$0- $0- 2.2 H&H Modleing Approach TM$12,290 74 $12,29074 412241282 12$0 - $0 - 2.3Hydrologic and Hydraulic Modeling and Calculations$52,240304 $52,240304 84020024 248$0- $0- Task Hours418 418 166024836 360 10 12- 0000000- 000000Task Fee$71,650$71,650$3,280$10,500$39,680$4,680$9,540$0$2,650$1,320$0$0$0$0$0$0$0$0$0$0$0$0$0$0$0$0$0$0TASK 2 - Green Infrastructure Evaluation2.4Review Previous Materials$3,23519 $5553 12$2,68016 484100$0- 2.5Pre-screening Review$12,64084 $4,66028 12241$7,98056 428 24$0- 2.6Review Potential Sties$11,39078 $2,15012 128150$9,24066 236 28$0- Task Hours181 43 363200020138 100 72 56000- 000000Task Fee$27,265$7,365$615$1,050$5,120$0$0$0$530$0$50$19,900$2,200$0$11,160$6,440$0$0$0$100$0$0$0$0$0$0$0$0TASK 2 - Field Work and Data Acquisition2.7Review Previous Reports and Studies$16,420100 $16,420100 12402424$0- $0- 2.8CCTV Investigations$242,570732 $23,730136 16804050$0- $0- 2.9Field Verify Unusual or Unclear Pipe Conditions$3,28020 $3,28020 4412200$0- $0- 2.10Sewer Backup and Street Flooding Review$6,06036 $6,06036 4248$0- $0- 2.11Topographic Survey$13,41082 $8204 4$0- $12,59078 7265002.12Geotechnical Desktop Survey$12,56082 $8204 4$0- $0- 2.13Manhole Condition Assessment$65,850622 $23,730136 16804050$0- $0- 2.14Existing Infrastructure Condition$9,07058 $2,27012 4850$6,80046 2 1628100$0- 2.15Storm Inlets$40,980432 $6,06036 4248$0- $0- 2.16Environmental Data Resources, Inc. Report$3,16018 $1,1706 42$1,99012 210$0- 2.17GIS Base Map$3,73022 $3,73022 2812$0- $0- 2.18Septic Tank Locations$1,4259 $1,4259 144$0- $0- 2.19Vacant / Distressed / Abandoned Properties$1,99513 $1,99513 14850$0- $0- Task Hours2,226 534 7627811664000058 4 16 10 2800078 0 726000Task Fee$420,510$91,510$15,580$48,650$18,560$8,320$0$0$0$0$400$8,790$880$3,040$1,550$3,220$0$0$0$100$12,590$0$11,160$930$0$0$0$500TASK 2 - Conceptual Design2.20Conceptual Drawings$64,720392 $50,060292 241208040 12 124100$14,660100 8 16 28 48$0- 2.21Assign Pipe Sizes and Inverts$22,600136 $22,600136 122480164$0- $0- 2.22System Refinement$20,040120 $20,040120 124040244$0- $0- 2.23Sanitary and Storm Sewer Rehabilitation Schedules$15,56092 $15,56092 124012244$0- $0- $0- $0- $0- $0- Task Hours740 640 60224212104 16 12 120100 8 16 28 48000- 000000Task Fee$122,920$108,260$12,300$39,200$33,920$13,520$4,240$1,800$3,180$0$100$14,660$1,760$3,040$4,340$5,520$0$0$0$0$0$0$0$0$0$0$0$0TASK 2 - Conceptual Basis of Design Technical Memorandum2.24Conceptual Opinion of Probable Cost$21,680136 $14,57086 84024122$3,03022 11812$0- 2.25Conceptual Basis of Design TM$44,260258 $34,360192 24802424412241600$5,82038 281612$0- 2.26Utility Coordination Meeting$2,47012 $2,47012 48250$0- $0- 2.27Final Conceptual Basis of Design TM$14,73089 $11,97070 12241282 12500$2,76019 1288$0- $0- $0- $0- $0- Task Hours495 360 48152604440 16 3679 4 11 32 32000- 000000Task Fee$83,140$63,370$9,840$26,600$9,600$5,720$1,060$0$4,240$3,960$2,350$11,610$880$2,090$4,960$3,680$0$0$0$0$0$0$0$0$0$0$0$0Page 1 of 4 OMAHA CSO PROGRAMOPW - 53820 Cole Creek CSO 204 Phase 4 Sewer SeparationPRIME -Carollo EngineersCarollo EngineersFelsburg Holt and UllevigR. W. EngineeringTASK 3 - Preliminary (30%) DesignTASK 3 - Field Work and Data Acquisition3.1Topographic Survey$100,810846 $6,41038 12 224$0- $94,400808 336 76 40 356 20003.2Utility Input into CADD$5,75048 $3,32020 4 412$0- $2,43028 4 24 2503.3Geotechnical Investigations$90,76084 $2,86016 8 4 4$0- $3,30022 16 2 4 2503.4Street Corings$5,6213 $5853 2 1$0- $0- 3.5Smoke and Dye Testing$39,780404 $7,94044 12 24 8$0- $0- 3.6Rehabilitation Recommendations$24,260140 $24,260140 16 80 24 164$0- $0- 3.7Geotechnical Report$15,38991 $1,7859 4 41$0- $0- $0- $0- $0- $0- Task Hours1,616 270 58 119 32 20 0 36 5 0 - 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 858 0 352 82 40 384 0Task Fee$282,370$47,160$11,890$20,825$5,120$2,600$0$5,400$1,325$0$0$0$0$0$0$0$0$0$0$0$100,130$0$54,560$12,710$5,400$24,960$0$2,500TASK 3 - Private Property Investigations$0 - $0 - $0 - $0 - 3.8 Property Owner Notification$3,505 31 $585 3 2 1$0 - $0 - 3.9Sewer Backup Investigation$7,33042 $7,33042 4 30 4 4100$0- $0- 3.10Inflow Source Investigations$6,50046 $4,08024 4 12 4 4$0- $0- 3.11Perform Sewer Connectivity and Service Lateral Investigations$52,540242 $7,37046 2 24 12 8$0- $2,92020 16 2 23.12Investigations Results$15,18092 $15,18092 8 40 12 244 4$0- $0- Task Hours453 207 20 107 20 44 0 8 4 4 - 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 0 16 2 0 2 0Task Fee$85,055$34,545$4,100$18,725$3,200$5,720$0$1,200$1,060$440$100$0$0$0$0$0$0$0$0$0$2,920$0$2,480$310$0$130$0$0TASK 3 - Green Infrastructure Evaluations3.13Draft Green Infrastructure TM$6,23040 $2,39014 2 4 8$3,84026 2 16 8$0- 3.14Review Draft TM$1,82010 $7604 2 2$1,0606 2 4$0- 3.15Address Review Comments$2,51516 $9055 1 4$1,61011 1 6 4$0- 3.16Preliminary Green Infrastructure and PCSMP BMP Design$10,57577 $1,1957 1 2 4$9,38070 2 28 40$0- 3.17Prepare Draft Maintenance Sheet$2,63516 $5553 1 2$2,08013 1 12$0- 3.18Conduct Preliminary (30%) Maintenance Sheet Meeting$3,01016 $1,7708 4 4250$1,2408 8$0- $0- $0- $0- $0- Task Hours175 41 11 18 12 0 0 0 0 0 134 8 0 74 52 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 0 0 0Task Fee$26,785$7,575$2,255$3,150$1,920$0$0$0$0$0$250$19,210$1,760$0$11,470$5,980$0$0$0$0$0$0$0$0$0$0$0$0TASK 3 - 30% Design Deliverable3.19Hydrologic and Hydraulic Modeling and Calculations$15,18084 $15,18084 12 12 40 8 12$0- $0- 3.20Trenchless Feasibility TM$30,630154 $3,39018 2 8 44$0- $0- 3.21Preliminary Green Infrastructure Design$13,73094 $1,1106 2 4$12,62088 8 8 24 48100$0- 3.22System Refinement$16,900100 $16,900100 12 40 40 8$0- $0- 3.23Hydraulic Performance$15,42084 $15,42084 8 24 40 12$0- $0- 3.24Finalize Routing and Sizes$12,24072 $12,24072 8 24 40$0- $0- 3.25Plan and Profile Sheets$221,3801,750 $148,360884 80 400 140 140 100 24$0- $69,630844 211 6333.26Utility Relocation Coordination$5,36032 $5,36032 4 12 12 4$0- $0- 3.27Pavement Removal and Replacement$95,420716 $2,92016 4 12$92,500700 20 40 160 480500$0- 3.28Inflow/Infiltration Reduction Requirements$4,66028 $4,66028 4 16 8$0- $0- 3.29Permits$2,52017 $7604 2 2$1,76013 1 4 8$0- 3.30Identification of Potential Community Enhancements$3,60025 $7604 2 2$2,84021 1 8 12$0- 3.31Project Phaseing and Scheduling$9,28053 $6,14032 8 16 44$3,14021 1 4 8 8$0- 3.32Right-of-way Requirements$8,53055 $5,08028 8 16 4$3,45027 1 6 20$0- 3.33Opinion of Probable Construction Cost$16,370102 $12,93078 8 40 4 242$3,44024 2 2 8 12$0- Task Hours3,366 1,470 164 628 324 196 24 100 34 0 894 34 54 218 588 0 0 0 844 0 0 0 211 633 0Task Fee$471,220$251,210$33,620$109,900$51,840$25,480$6,360$15,000$9,010$0$0$119,750$7,480$10,260$33,790$67,620$0$0$0$600$69,630$0$0$0$28,485$41,145$0$0TASK 3 - 30% Basis of Design Report3.34Preliminary Permit List$1,98013 $7604 2 2$1,2209 1 2 6$0- 3.35Risk Mitigation Strategy$10,26062 $8,22048 12 24 12$0- $0- 3.36Basis of Design Report$50,470314 $39,780240 24 80 40 40 4 16 36$4,60030 2 4 16 8$0- 3.37Plan Distribution$4,55010 $4,55010 2 44 3000$0- $0- 3.38Utility Coordination Meeting$2,47012 $2,47012 4 8250$0- $0- 3.39Finalize TM$15,69097 $13,39082 12 24 24 82 12$2,30015 1 2 8 4$0- 3.4030% Walk Through$11,18056 $6,66032 8 12 121000$4,52024 8 8 8$0- $0- $0- $0- $0- $0- $0- $0- $0- - Task Hours564 428 64 154 76 60 4 0 18 52 78 12 14 34 18 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 0 0 0Task Fee$96,600$75,830$13,120$26,950$12,160$7,800$1,060$0$4,770$5,720$4,250$12,640$2,640$2,660$5,270$2,070$0$0$0$0$0$0$0$0$0$0$0$0TOTALHours11,764 5,430 926 2,064 1,204 708 88 156 126 158 1,845 212 117 590 886 4 - 36 1,888 88 440 90 251 1,019 - Fee1,972,810 $951,700$189,830$361,200$192,640$92,040$23,320$23,400$33,390$17,380$18,500$271,270$46,640$22,230$91,450$101,890$620$0$3,240$5,200$204,190$18,920$68,200$13,950$33,885$66,235$0$3,000Summary by FirmHRSCarollo Engineers$951,7005,430 48.2%Felsburg Holt and Ullevig$271,2701,845 13.8%R. W. Engineering$204,1901,888 10.4%Thiele $110,410178 5.6%Lithos Engineering$53,840315 2.7%Big Muddy Workshop$6,09044 0.3%TREKK$375,3102,064 19.0%Total Labor Hours11,764 Total Fee$1,972,810 Page 2 of 4 OMAHA CSO PROGRAMOPW - 53820 Cole Creek CSO 204 Phase 4 Sewer SeparationPRIME -Carollo EngineersSUB # 1 -Felsburg Holt and UllevigSUB # 2 -R. W. EngineeringTASKTASKSUB # 3 -Thiele TOTALTOTALSUB # 4 -Lithos EngineeringSUB # 5 -Big Muddy WorkshopSUB # 6 - TREKK$HRSTASK 1 - Project Management1.1Project Management and Administration 1.1.1Project Management and Administration$110,860559 1.1.2Quality Control Plan (QCP)$7353 1.1.3Project Health and Safety Plan (HSP)$2051 1.1.4Project Execution Plan (PEP)$3,51521 1.1.5Initial Project Kickoff Meeting$2,73513 1.1.6Monthly PMT Meetings $68,950352 $0- 1.2Agency and Project Coordination1.2.1Utility Coordination$6,54048 1.2.2Agency Coordination and Permitting$8,38045 1.2.3CITY Agency Coordination$7,14037 1.2.4GIS Coordination$3,84020 1.2.5Program Management and Technical Team Meetings$13,66076 $0- 1.3Public Involvement and Neighborhood Coordination1.3.1Public Outreach Plan$5,74534 1.3.2Project Kick-off Public Meeting$16,13094 1.3.3Sewer Backup and Drainage Questionnaire$9,86069 1.3.4Conduct one 30% Design Public Meeting$16,13094 1.3.5Conduct Stakeholder Communications$10,87064 Task Hours1,530 Task Fee$285,295TASK 2 - Conceptual (10%) DesignTASK 2 - Hydrologic and Hydraulic Modeling Calculations2.1Review Previous Modeling Data$7,12040 2.2 H&H Modleing Approach TM$12,290 74 2.3Hydrologic and Hydraulic Modeling and Calculations$52,240304 Task Hours418 Task Fee$71,650TASK 2 - Green Infrastructure Evaluation2.4Review Previous Materials$3,23519 2.5Pre-screening Review$12,64084 2.6Review Potential Sties$11,39078 Task Hours181 Task Fee$27,265TASK 2 - Field Work and Data Acquisition2.7Review Previous Reports and Studies$16,420100 2.8CCTV Investigations$242,570732 2.9Field Verify Unusual or Unclear Pipe Conditions$3,28020 2.10Sewer Backup and Street Flooding Review$6,06036 2.11Topographic Survey$13,41082 2.12Geotechnical Desktop Survey$12,56082 2.13Manhole Condition Assessment$65,850622 2.14Existing Infrastructure Condition$9,07058 2.15Storm Inlets$40,980432 2.16Environmental Data Resources, Inc. Report$3,16018 2.17GIS Base Map$3,73022 2.18Septic Tank Locations$1,4259 2.19Vacant / Distressed / Abandoned Properties$1,99513 Task Hours2,226 Task Fee$420,510TASK 2 - Conceptual Design2.20Conceptual Drawings$64,720392 2.21Assign Pipe Sizes and Inverts$22,600136 2.22System Refinement$20,040120 2.23Sanitary and Storm Sewer Rehabilitation Schedules$15,56092 $0- Task Hours740 Task Fee$122,920TASK 2 - Conceptual Basis of Design Technical Memorandum2.24Conceptual Opinion of Probable Cost$21,680136 2.25Conceptual Basis of Design TM$44,260258 2.26Utility Coordination Meeting$2,47012 2.27Final Conceptual Basis of Design TM$14,73089 $0- Task Hours495 Task Fee$83,140Thiele Lithos EngineeringBig Muddy WorkshopTREKKSUB # 3SUB # 3Senior Project Project Enviro DirectSUB # 4SUB # 4Principal Senior Staff Admin DirectSUB # 5SUB # 5Principal Project Principal Intern DirectSUB # 5SUB # 5Project Manager / Project Engineer / Office Tech II /JetVac & CCTV / DirectTASKTASKEngineer Engineer Geologist Tech ExpensesTASKTASKEngineerProfessional 2Engineer ExpensesTASKTASKLA LA Planner LA ExpensesTASKTASKAdministrator Field Manager GIS II / Field Tech II Heavy Clean ExpensesTOTALTOTAL$205 $135 $134 $98TOTALTOTAL$200 $190 $110 $70TOTALTOTAL$195 $165 $120 $95TOTALTOTAL$210 $120 $80 $550$HRS$HRS$HRS$HRS$0- $2,16015 3 6 6$0- $0- $0- $0- $0- $0- $0- $0- $0- $0- $0- $0- $0- $0- $0- $0- $0- $0- $0- $0- $0- $0- $0- $0- $0- $0- $0- $0- $0- $0- $0- $0- $0- $0- $0- $0- $0- $0- $0- $0- $0- $0- $0- $6,28044 8 18 18$0- $0- $0- $0- $0- $0- $0- $0- $0- $0- $0- $0- $0- $0- $0- $0- $0- $0- $0- $0- $0- $0- $0- $0- $0- $0- - 0 0 0 0 59 11 24 0 24 - 0 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 0$0$0$0$0$0$0$8,440$2,200$4,560$0$1,680$0$0$0$0$0$0$0$0$0$0$0$0$0$0- $0- $0- $0- $0 - $0 - $0 - $0 - $0- $0- $0- $0- - 0 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 0$0$0$0$0$0$0$0$0$0$0$0$0$0$0$0$0$0$0$0$0$0$0$0$0$0- $0- $0- $0- $0- $0- $0- $0- $0- $0- $0- $0- - 0 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 0$0$0$0$0$0$0$0$0$0$0$0$0$0$0$0$0$0$0$0$0$0$0$0$0$0- $0- $0- $0- $0- $0- $0- $218,840596 80 24 152 340$0- $0- $0- $0- $0- $0- $0- $0- $0- $0- $0- $0- $8,94060 12 48$2,80018 2 8 8$0- $0- $0- $0- $0- $42,120486 20 16 450$0- $0- $0- $0- $0- $0- $0- $34,920396 20 16 360$0- $0- $0- $0- $0- $0- $0- $0- $0- $0- $0- $0- $0- $0- $0- $0- 60 12 48 0 0 18 2 8 8 0 - 0 0 0 0 1,478 120 56 962 340$8,940$2,460$6,480$0$0$0$2,800$400$1,520$880$0$0$0$0$0$0$0$0$295,880$25,200$6,720$76,960$187,000$0$0- $0- $0- $0- $0- $0- $0- $0- $0- $0- $0- $0- $0- $0- $0- $0- $0- $0- $0- $0- - 0 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 0$0$0$0$0$0$0$0$0$0$0$0$0$0$0$0$0$0$0$0$0$0$0$0$0$0- $4,08028 4816$0- $0- $0- $4,08028 4816$0- $0- $0- $0- $0- $0- $0- $0- $0- $0- $0- $0- $0- $0- - 0 0 0 0 56 8 16 32 0 - 0 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 0$0$0$0$0$0$0$8,160$1,600$3,040$3,520$0$0$0$0$0$0$0$0$0$0$0$0$0$0Page 3 of 4 OMAHA CSO PROGRAMOPW - 53820 Cole Creek CSO 204 Phase 4 Sewer SeparationPRIME -Carollo EngineersTASK 3 - Preliminary (30%) DesignTASK 3 - Field Work and Data Acquisition3.1Topographic Survey$100,810846 3.2Utility Input into CADD$5,75048 3.3Geotechnical Investigations$90,76084 3.4Street Corings$5,6213 3.5Smoke and Dye Testing$39,780404 3.6Rehabilitation Recommendations$24,260140 3.7Geotechnical Report$15,38991 $0- Task Hours1,616 Task Fee$282,370TASK 3 - Private Property Investigations$0 - 3.8 Property Owner Notification$3,505 31 3.9Sewer Backup Investigation$7,33042 3.10Inflow Source Investigations$6,50046 3.11Perform Sewer Connectivity and Service Lateral Investigations$52,540242 3.12Investigations Results$15,18092 Task Hours453 Task Fee$85,055TASK 3 - Green Infrastructure Evaluations3.13Draft Green Infrastructure TM$6,23040 3.14Review Draft TM$1,82010 3.15Address Review Comments$2,51516 3.16Preliminary Green Infrastructure and PCSMP BMP Design$10,57577 3.17Prepare Draft Maintenance Sheet$2,63516 3.18Conduct Preliminary (30%) Maintenance Sheet Meeting$3,01016 $0- Task Hours175 Task Fee$26,785TASK 3 - 30% Design Deliverable3.19Hydrologic and Hydraulic Modeling and Calculations$15,18084 3.20Trenchless Feasibility TM$30,630154 3.21Preliminary Green Infrastructure Design$13,73094 3.22System Refinement$16,900100 3.23Hydraulic Performance$15,42084 3.24Finalize Routing and Sizes$12,24072 3.25Plan and Profile Sheets$221,3801,750 3.26Utility Relocation Coordination$5,36032 3.27Pavement Removal and Replacement$95,420716 3.28Inflow/Infiltration Reduction Requirements$4,66028 3.29Permits$2,52017 3.30Identification of Potential Community Enhancements$3,60025 3.31Project Phaseing and Scheduling$9,28053 3.32Right-of-way Requirements$8,53055 3.33Opinion of Probable Construction Cost$16,370102 Task Hours3,366 Task Fee$471,220TASK 3 - 30% Basis of Design Report3.34Preliminary Permit List$1,98013 3.35Risk Mitigation Strategy$10,26062 3.36Basis of Design Report$50,470314 3.37Plan Distribution$4,55010 3.38Utility Coordination Meeting$2,47012 3.39Finalize TM$15,69097 3.4030% Walk Through$11,18056 $0- $0- Task Hours564 Task Fee$96,600TOTALHours11,764 Fee1,972,810 Summary by FirmHRSCarollo Engineers$951,7005,430 Felsburg Holt and Ullevig$271,2701,845 R. W. Engineering$204,1901,888 Thiele $110,410178 Lithos Engineering$53,840315 Big Muddy Workshop$6,09044 TREKK$375,3102,064 Total Labor Hours11,764 Total Fee$1,972,810Thiele Lithos EngineeringBig Muddy WorkshopTREKK$0- $0- $0- $0- $0- $0- $0- $0- $82,68036 20 16 78412$1,92010 2 8$0- $0- $5,036- 5036$0- $0- $0- $0- $0- $0- $31,840360 16 24 320$0- $0- $0- $0- $10,36460 8 40 12 1716$3,24022 2 8 12$0- $0- $0- $0- $0- $0- 96 8 60 12 16 32 4 16 12 0 - 0 0 0 0 360 16 24 320 0$98,080$1,640$8,100$1,608$1,568$85,164$5,160$800$3,040$1,320$0$0$0$0$0$0$0$0$31,840$3,360$2,880$25,600$0$0$0 - $0 - $0 - $0 - $0 - $0 - $0 - $2,920 28 4 4 20$0- $0- $0- $0- $0- $0- $0- $2,42022 2 10 10$0- $0- $0- $42,250176 20 40 65 51$0- $0- $0- $0- - 0 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 0 226 26 54 95 51$0$0$0$0$0$0$0$0$0$0$0$0$0$0$0$0$0$0$47,590$5,460$6,480$7,600$28,050$0$0- $0- $0- $0- $0- $0- $0- $0- $0- $0- $0- $0- $0- $0- $0- $0- $0- $0- $0- $0- $0- $0- $0- $0- $0- $0- $0- $0- - 0 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 0$0$0$0$0$0$0$0$0$0$0$0$0$0$0$0$0$0$0$0$0$0$0$0$0$0- $0- $0- $0- $0- $27,240136 32 40 64 6200$0- $0- $0- $0- $0- $0- $0- $0- $0- $0- $0- $0- $0- $0- $0- $0- $0- $0- $3,39022 6 16$0- $0- $0- $0- $0- $0- $0- $0- $0- $0- $0- $0- $0- $0- $0- $0- $0- $0- $0- $0- $0- $0- $0- $0- $0- $0- $0- $0- $0- $0- $0- $0- $0- $0- $0- 22 6 16 0 0 136 32 40 64 0 - 0 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 0$3,390$1,230$2,160$0$0$0$27,240$6,400$7,600$7,040$0$6,200$0$0$0$0$0$0$0$0$0$0$0$0$0- $0- $0- $0- $0- $2,04014 2 4 8$0- $0- $0- $0- $6,09044 18 2 24 60$0- $0- $0- $0- $0- $0- $0- $0- $0- $0- $0- $0- $0- $0- $0- $0- $0- $0- $0- $0- $0- $0- $0- $0- $0- - 0 0 0 0 14 2 4 8 0 44 18 0 2 24 - 0 0 0 0$0$0$0$0$0$0$2,040$400$760$880$0$0$6,090$3,510$0$240$2,280$60$0$0$0$0$0$0178 26 124 12 16 315 59 108 124 24 44 18 - 2 24 2,064 162 134 1,377 391 $110,410$5,330$16,740$1,608$1,568$85,164$53,840$11,800$20,520$13,640$1,680$6,200$6,090$3,510$0$240$2,280$60$375,310$34,020$16,080$110,160$215,050$0Page 4 of 4