RES 2012-0023 - Guidelines and regulations for driveway location, design and construction �totAHA,Nz,B
4°' *i } Public Works Department
!% rC• Omaha/Douglas Civic Center
z Rf�rih i"i m January10 2012 I I DEC 30 AM 8: �9 1819 Farnam Street,Suite 601
o'�'- '1.-1. 't 4 , Omaha,Nebraska 68183-0601
o + .... ° - (402)444-5220
� FE94��4 ro ' ` m Fax(402)444-5248
City of Omaha • Robert G.Stubbe,P.E.
Jim Suttle,Mayor Public Works Director
Honorable President
and Members of the City Council,
The attached Resolution approves the City of Omaha Guidelines and Regulations for Driveway
Location, Design and Construction.
These regulations were previously approved by the City Council in1991. The regulations have been
updated to reflect current engineering standards and practices.
The Public Works Department requests your consideration and approval of the attached Resolution.
Respectfully submitted, Referred to City Council for Consideration:
Oole $11/4; 1,(11.-C_, /)./Z// /2 • 2(• Zol/
Robert Stubbe, P.E. Date Mayor's 0 fice Date
Public Works Director
P:\msp\1243msp.doc
8 Issue Transportation Bond
Organization 117113.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF OMAHA:
THAT, as recommended by the Mayor, the Task Order Agreement between the
City of Omaha and HDR Engineering, Inc. for construction engineering services on Project
MAPA-5103(14), State Control No. 22353, and OPW 50408, being the 10th Street Bridge
Widening, Douglas to Farnam Streets, with a cost to the City of$80,252.00, which will be paid
from the 2006 Transportation Bond Fund 13182, 2008 Issue Transportation Bond Organization
117113, is hereby approved.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT:.
THAT, the City Council hereby authorizes the Mayor and City Clerk to sign the
attached Agreement on behalf of the City of Omaha.
133 lhtp
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Zi.4:-- 4
// j � -CITY ATTORNEY DATE
By
I• I ilmember
Adopted 12d4411 0 2 k /�`�
v ity Clerk
Approved ...
Mayor
will be paid upon completion of the work required under this Task Order,
acceptance by the LPA and State, and a final audit of all invoiced amounts has
been completed by the State or its authorized representative. The Consultant
Project No. MAPA-5103(14) EXHIBIT "F"
Control No. 22353 Sheet 4 of 5
10th St Bridge Widening, Douglas - Farnam
Project No. MAPA-5103(14) EXHIBIT "F"
Control No. 22353 Sheet 2 of 5
10th St Bridge Widening, Douglas - Farnam
a.)(NDOR Concrete) 1 $585.00 $595.00
Sieve Analysis of Aggregate(ea.) E8 J$70.00 $560.00
Subtotal $25,995.00
Contingency @ 10%of Subtotal $2,600.00
Total $28,595.00
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Exhibit"E"
•
_ ' Nms
iim E1O0 _ III,I ,3,`^a nA^ m 45 o v'. .^,3:°a ? 3 m3.6 63 c8'�
m^ 'o^ - - ,,y N i o o '.m g m, 3'- ;3 S.0 -
x ' m m m m 3 v_'mS z.H n E R°o F m 3- - _
E m 3 m 'v a 5 i,A v
3a`
- °i t�_ x
_ �5,o
3 1p�n
m ,n x n m-6 m .P 3«d.3'e H o' _a S i ¢6¢ a_ n o x o g,
L
m o383 =v .i a val 00000000000 000000000000 n'a Om�m F a� �'� �3 lilt wr 0�a
''; m 5 0 E v S' F,
N N-N 9 H m T T;A n c c -m 9 T'S D n N N N 9 ran v - T A ry R o v m., n. 3,m .m-. o"' m
a s a ti 3 $ a N 3 3 3 3 ti A m v- = 3 a 1 A Z a a^ n s^i n a o
N O. 3 u m m m n n 0 n 3_3_E"m m m "n O O ti_ T,N a 3 q D 3 n 3 S 6 F o 4 3
£4 x 2 2 x N o o c o 4 4£ r" y F F F a u m '° u- `$° E n ^A a -
30 o N� ;;O m- 330�- 04 m m 3 F m °¢'a 0a a O
3m c ,��} 33 's.�'� 33�.'0 _n3 Em o - ER;' ,�a >
,° m- N'� 3 x n 3=.o 84 n N =g w o g
x^ 3_3� - - E 3 9 3 ^- s I^
m c m m m'^ = h ro ,s'Z'n 3 :1d
N E m m m 3 g m z Gs
3 v
m m a 6
u
3 N 3
• ?.3 m
Oa c`3 £ v m A
343z0:$� 33''5
,r 0,- -, m•5 61
_. Exhibit"E"
OHOHO C)FC W O W Z oHO HoOo CxOC7OZOaH •> H '> O0) OC40XxO0) x0. Co LO a
C.) 1-1 Z CC O 0 04 C0) C0OZocn0C4CHOHHOHOMUMUMUEMUEcEv' 0) N > CD
W 0 E HKGNKCMWvHLU F) NOCDOCoNO WHONOMOW ,PONLU g CDDrZ
r 0 Z W U C ) CD r) O E. O V) OG.104.IOEO ) O1' H04H U HUHUC] HU0H 0 HUH Ov'
H E .4.1 O O O O O O O C O O O O O ' O C. O O
•
.••
rl `a t C) C. Cl r? C) _. r) O CD O C C O O 0 O 0
,t.o N to E o E o E-t O E to R+'O Z 0 04 0 .
t-a E co O U O U O O C] O H O H O CD M H O W O '1 H (x1 N W C' W' C' W O H O H O 0
<• W O W . Z CDHOH0OD Ox0.C7 O Z O to H > H •J O C4 O r4 O 124x O 124 x 0• 01 • LU I)1
UF-1 .ZC] O OL14004004OZoCnOCJOHOHHOHO01UM0MUEM0Ed' E ,' Wt- >. CD
H 124 E C7 '4 r< 3 w X Z Z Z Z a, Z a co )x a
Q W E E ,r, ZN ,r, `
Z W U o01O Cqo EOmo G4o4, o Eo X CDr4 H (Y' H U H U H U C] H U CI H U H U H O d''
H E. W O C) O O O O O O O O O O O ' O O CD 0
1-1 hH CO O O 0 O O O 0 CD CD O O CD CD O O CD O
•
CITY OF OMAHA
TRAFFIC ENGINEERING DIVISION
-x IV- t b '. ` ,N• rani.�+. "• � . u M�klt ,� ar t
° s,r : '✓az.d` w. •. ? xis •,6,4 f '7 --^•.w'f -'^ :' �"' Kr l.t
�7F 9'• 6 ". I '..j
<'�" 3 ,t .A
'" ;Yf�?s�x�J�..t '� fi`t . 5 �' P�� "jL•/♦ � '.`` 7 4 r. i � "r:
hh ♦V '°-„. t - yL-- .
ill' 44 .0- 3 _ y�' 7 _ �t C•`r "zip '` .` ,.. ar. .'.
..�y..3 ---' . - -- ,o meµ-,• v, ..
fry L C3 . j _ ��Y
„,,, 1( ! . a ►�h fi" - - x, .t .. I w
J R� F.+- - •r e-. 6 Fe
1 . 'a r `' l.d:� • ,��,,��Fx ,�figg
"� ! rr� -.0. �'l. it'
t _ a•A� ;t i`v�_ ,,;. �Md'j ♦7 ,
E1 f` h . F tea: "
yy}If
N
` ". fir/ 7. .. !+� s .- t @ /' r. 5r 4 r
:? •,tom. ,.i. 47 '.1 yI. • I• i'rfir!'• , •` g -.
v�
',.-1:1;.,"- ,
�� 4 Y t T t fig' :�. �.,P.'". I.::
, ^
':::-.::::::::.
i t `, v F 4 `P _ 1r ;�.,N•. �+
axe+'":� • " 5 »� ,..
.. --fir ;-- .' r,Y- } r_+ P4 -7 • o �Od` . h'
•'fit" � rf ,4.A. i '3' 7 !a,. 4 :'.By It V`1' f J i ...'1
GUIDELINES and REGULATONS FOR DRIVEWAY
•
LOCATION, DESIGN and CONSTRUCTION
• December, 2011
is hereby approved.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT:.
THAT, the City Council hereby authorizes the Mayor and City Clerk to sign the
attached Agreement on behalf of the City of Omaha.
133 lhtp
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Zi.4:-- 4
// j � -CITY ATTORNEY DATE
By
I• I ilmember
Adopted 12d4411 0 2 k /�`�
v ity Clerk
Approved ...
Mayor
will be paid upon completion of the work required under this Task Order,
acceptance by the LPA and State, and a final audit of all invoiced amounts has
been completed by the State or its authorized representative. The Consultant
Project No. MAPA-5103(14) EXHIBIT "F"
Control No. 22353 Sheet 4 of 5
10th St Bridge Widening, Douglas - Farnam
Project No. MAPA-5103(14) EXHIBIT "F"
Control No. 22353 Sheet 2 of 5
10th St Bridge Widening, Douglas - Farnam
a.)(NDOR Concrete) 1 $585.00 $595.00
Sieve Analysis of Aggregate(ea.) E8 J$70.00 $560.00
Subtotal $25,995.00
Contingency @ 10%of Subtotal $2,600.00
Total $28,595.00
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Exhibit"E"
•
_ ' Nms
iim E1O0 _ III,I ,3,`^a nA^ m 45 o v'. .^,3:°a ? 3 m3.6 63 c8'�
m^ 'o^ - - ,,y N i o o '.m g m, 3'- ;3 S.0 -
x ' m m m m 3 v_'mS z.H n E R°o F m 3- - _
E m 3 m 'v a 5 i,A v
3a`
- °i t�_ x
_ �5,o
3 1p�n
m ,n x n m-6 m .P 3«d.3'e H o' _a S i ¢6¢ a_ n o x o g,
L
m o383 =v .i a val 00000000000 000000000000 n'a Om�m F a� �'� �3 lilt wr 0�a
''; m 5 0 E v S' F,
N N-N 9 H m T T;A n c c -m 9 T'S D n N N N 9 ran v - T A ry R o v m., n. 3,m .m-. o"' m
a s a ti 3 $ a N 3 3 3 3 ti A m v- = 3 a 1 A Z a a^ n s^i n a o
N O. 3 u m m m n n 0 n 3_3_E"m m m "n O O ti_ T,N a 3 q D 3 n 3 S 6 F o 4 3
£4 x 2 2 x N o o c o 4 4£ r" y F F F a u m '° u- `$° E n ^A a -
30 o N� ;;O m- 330�- 04 m m 3 F m °¢'a 0a a O
3m c ,��} 33 's.�'� 33�.'0 _n3 Em o - ER;' ,�a >
,° m- N'� 3 x n 3=.o 84 n N =g w o g
x^ 3_3� - - E 3 9 3 ^- s I^
m c m m m'^ = h ro ,s'Z'n 3 :1d
N E m m m 3 g m z Gs
3 v
m m a 6
u
3 N 3
• ?.3 m
Oa c`3 £ v m A
343z0:$� 33''5
,r 0,- -, m•5 61
_. Exhibit"E"
OHOHO C)FC W O W Z oHO HoOo CxOC7OZOaH •> H '> O0) OC40XxO0) x0. Co LO a
C.) 1-1 Z CC O 0 04 C0) C0OZocn0C4CHOHHOHOMUMUMUEMUEcEv' 0) N > CD
W 0 E HKGNKCMWvHLU F) NOCDOCoNO WHONOMOW ,PONLU g CDDrZ
r 0 Z W U C ) CD r) O E. O V) OG.104.IOEO ) O1' H04H U HUHUC] HU0H 0 HUH Ov'
H E .4.1 O O O O O O O C O O O O O ' O C. O O
•
.••
rl `a t C) C. Cl r? C) _. r) O CD O C C O O 0 O 0
,t.o N to E o E o E-t O E to R+'O Z 0 04 0 .
t-a E co O U O U O O C] O H O H O CD M H O W O '1 H (x1 N W C' W' C' W O H O H O 0
<• W O W . Z CDHOH0OD Ox0.C7 O Z O to H > H •J O C4 O r4 O 124x O 124 x 0• 01 • LU I)1
UF-1 .ZC] O OL14004004OZoCnOCJOHOHHOHO01UM0MUEM0Ed' E ,' Wt- >. CD
H 124 E C7 '4 r< 3 w X Z Z Z Z a, Z a co )x a
Q W E E ,r, ZN ,r, `
Z W U o01O Cqo EOmo G4o4, o Eo X CDr4 H (Y' H U H U H U C] H U CI H U H U H O d''
H E. W O C) O O O O O O O O O O O ' O O CD 0
1-1 hH CO O O 0 O O O 0 CD CD O O CD CD O O CD O
GUIDELINES and REGULATONS FOR DRIVEWAY LOCATION, DESIGN and
CONSTRUCTION
Adopted by City Council Resolution
, 2011
Approved this day of , 2011
Public Works Director
ed basis.
•
Exhibit "E"
Tabulation, Generated by:admin for project OPW 52190
lease Date:
Field Book Number: Test Core Lengths:
Council Resolution: Adoption Date:
Percent Reserve Due: 10.0%
Percent Complete: 0.0% Percent Time Used: 0.0%
Engineer's Total: $110,613.65
Contract Total $0.00
Total Penalties: $0.00
Total Payments: $0.00 •
•
Contractor:
Phone#:
Fax#: •
Email address:
•
•
Page 1 of 7, 12/7/2011 1:25:57 PM, Bid Tabulation, Generated by:admin for project OPW 52190
i
Approved
/ - Mayor
TABLE OF CONTENTS
I. Introduction. 1
II. Driveway Types. 1
A. Residential Driveway 1
B. Commercial Driveway— 1
C. Industrial Driveway— 1
III. Permit — Required. 1
IV. Traffic Impact Study 2
V. General Requirements. 2
VI. Residential Access Design Requirements. 3
A. Number of Driveways 3
B. Driveway Spacing. 4
C. Driveway Corner Clearance 4
D. Driveway and Approach Design Standards. 4
VII. Commercial/Industrial Access Design Requirements. 4
A. Number of Driveways 4
B. Driveway Spacing. 5
C. Driveway Corner Clearance 6
D. Driveway and Approach Design Standards 6
E. Right Turn Deceleration Lane. 7
F. Left Turn Deceleration Lane 7
G. Minimum Sight Distance. 8
H. Driveway profiles 8
I. Restricted Movement Driveway Designs. 8
J. Driveway Alignment 10
K. Vehicle Storage. 10
VIII.Drive-In Facilities Storage Requirements 13
IX. Residential on-street parking requirements 13
X. Deviation from Regulations 14
XI. Appeals. 14
A) APPENDIX A-1
A-1. Traffic Impact Study Requirements A-1
1. Introduction A-1
2. Proposed Development and Access Routes A-1
3. Existing Traffic Conditions A-1
4. Traffic Impact or Capacity Analysis A-2
5. Queue length analysis A-2
6. Conclusions and recommendations A-2
7. Appendix A-3
ii
attached Agreement on behalf of the City of Omaha.
133 lhtp
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Zi.4:-- 4
// j � -CITY ATTORNEY DATE
By
I• I ilmember
Adopted 12d4411 0 2 k /�`�
v ity Clerk
Approved ...
Mayor
will be paid upon completion of the work required under this Task Order,
acceptance by the LPA and State, and a final audit of all invoiced amounts has
been completed by the State or its authorized representative. The Consultant
Project No. MAPA-5103(14) EXHIBIT "F"
Control No. 22353 Sheet 4 of 5
10th St Bridge Widening, Douglas - Farnam
Project No. MAPA-5103(14) EXHIBIT "F"
Control No. 22353 Sheet 2 of 5
10th St Bridge Widening, Douglas - Farnam
a.)(NDOR Concrete) 1 $585.00 $595.00
Sieve Analysis of Aggregate(ea.) E8 J$70.00 $560.00
Subtotal $25,995.00
Contingency @ 10%of Subtotal $2,600.00
Total $28,595.00
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Exhibit"E"
•
_ ' Nms
iim E1O0 _ III,I ,3,`^a nA^ m 45 o v'. .^,3:°a ? 3 m3.6 63 c8'�
m^ 'o^ - - ,,y N i o o '.m g m, 3'- ;3 S.0 -
x ' m m m m 3 v_'mS z.H n E R°o F m 3- - _
E m 3 m 'v a 5 i,A v
3a`
- °i t�_ x
_ �5,o
3 1p�n
m ,n x n m-6 m .P 3«d.3'e H o' _a S i ¢6¢ a_ n o x o g,
L
m o383 =v .i a val 00000000000 000000000000 n'a Om�m F a� �'� �3 lilt wr 0�a
''; m 5 0 E v S' F,
N N-N 9 H m T T;A n c c -m 9 T'S D n N N N 9 ran v - T A ry R o v m., n. 3,m .m-. o"' m
a s a ti 3 $ a N 3 3 3 3 ti A m v- = 3 a 1 A Z a a^ n s^i n a o
N O. 3 u m m m n n 0 n 3_3_E"m m m "n O O ti_ T,N a 3 q D 3 n 3 S 6 F o 4 3
£4 x 2 2 x N o o c o 4 4£ r" y F F F a u m '° u- `$° E n ^A a -
30 o N� ;;O m- 330�- 04 m m 3 F m °¢'a 0a a O
3m c ,��} 33 's.�'� 33�.'0 _n3 Em o - ER;' ,�a >
,° m- N'� 3 x n 3=.o 84 n N =g w o g
x^ 3_3� - - E 3 9 3 ^- s I^
m c m m m'^ = h ro ,s'Z'n 3 :1d
N E m m m 3 g m z Gs
3 v
m m a 6
u
3 N 3
• ?.3 m
Oa c`3 £ v m A
343z0:$� 33''5
,r 0,- -, m•5 61
_. Exhibit"E"
OHOHO C)FC W O W Z oHO HoOo CxOC7OZOaH •> H '> O0) OC40XxO0) x0. Co LO a
C.) 1-1 Z CC O 0 04 C0) C0OZocn0C4CHOHHOHOMUMUMUEMUEcEv' 0) N > CD
W 0 E HKGNKCMWvHLU F) NOCDOCoNO WHONOMOW ,PONLU g CDDrZ
r 0 Z W U C ) CD r) O E. O V) OG.104.IOEO ) O1' H04H U HUHUC] HU0H 0 HUH Ov'
H E .4.1 O O O O O O O C O O O O O ' O C. O O
•
.••
rl `a t C) C. Cl r? C) _. r) O CD O C C O O 0 O 0
,t.o N to E o E o E-t O E to R+'O Z 0 04 0 .
t-a E co O U O U O O C] O H O H O CD M H O W O '1 H (x1 N W C' W' C' W O H O H O 0
<• W O W . Z CDHOH0OD Ox0.C7 O Z O to H > H •J O C4 O r4 O 124x O 124 x 0• 01 • LU I)1
UF-1 .ZC] O OL14004004OZoCnOCJOHOHHOHO01UM0MUEM0Ed' E ,' Wt- >. CD
H 124 E C7 '4 r< 3 w X Z Z Z Z a, Z a co )x a
Q W E E ,r, ZN ,r, `
Z W U o01O Cqo EOmo G4o4, o Eo X CDr4 H (Y' H U H U H U C] H U CI H U H U H O d''
H E. W O C) O O O O O O O O O O O ' O O CD 0
1-1 hH CO O O 0 O O O 0 CD CD O O CD CD O O CD O
A-2. Traffic Impact Study General Information A-3
1. Purposes of the Impact Report A-3
2. Need for Studies A-3
3. Data Provided by the City of Omaha A-4
4. Coordinated studies A-4
5. Consultant Qualifications A-5
B. Driveway Standards A-6
C. Glossary of Terms A-7
•
iii
nt Reserve Due: 10.0%
Percent Complete: 0.0% Percent Time Used: 0.0%
Engineer's Total: $110,613.65
Contract Total $0.00
Total Penalties: $0.00
Total Payments: $0.00 •
•
Contractor:
Phone#:
Fax#: •
Email address:
•
•
Page 1 of 7, 12/7/2011 1:25:57 PM, Bid Tabulation, Generated by:admin for project OPW 52190
i
Approved
/ - Mayor
GUIDELINES AND REGULATIONS FOR DRIVEWAY
LOCATION, DESIGN and CONSTRUCTION
I. Introduction.
The purpose of this manual is to establish guidelines and regulations for the location, number and
the design of driveway approaches that provide access from public streets and highways to
private property. These policies and procedures conform closely to the recommended guidelines
approved by the Institute of Transportation Engineers, and the American Association of Street
and Highway Transportation Officials (AASHTO).
•
II. Driveway Types.
A. Residential Driveway —An approach providing access to a single family residence, to
a duplex, or to an apartment building containing five or fewer dwelling units.
B. Commercial Driveway — An approach providing access to an office, retail or
institutional building or an apartment building containing more than five dwelling units.
C. Industrial Driveway — An approach providing access to an industrial facility,
warehouse or truck terminal. An industrial driveway must accommodate a substantial number of
truck units.
III. Permit- Required.
It is unlawful for any person to cut, break, remove, or alter any curbing, alley, driveway
approach, sidewalk, or any vehicular access on any public right-of-way in the City of Omaha and
surrounding 3 mile limit without a permit. Permits are issued by the Permits and Inspection
Division after receiving approval of the City Traffic Engineer and payment of fees as provided.
Applications for permits shall be on forms furnished by the Permits and Inspection Division, and
shall specify the name of the applicant, the location of the property of which the driveway
approach is to be repaired and/or constructed, and the number of lineal feet to be repaired and/or
constructed. A sketch or plot plan shall be submitted with each request. The plan shall indicate
the proposed driveway construction, together with all existing street light standards, poles, signs,
• sidewalk boxes, fire hydrants, property lines, adjacent driveways and any other obstructions.
Minimum sight distance must be provided at all access points as described in Section VJI-G.
1
Task Order,
acceptance by the LPA and State, and a final audit of all invoiced amounts has
been completed by the State or its authorized representative. The Consultant
Project No. MAPA-5103(14) EXHIBIT "F"
Control No. 22353 Sheet 4 of 5
10th St Bridge Widening, Douglas - Farnam
Project No. MAPA-5103(14) EXHIBIT "F"
Control No. 22353 Sheet 2 of 5
10th St Bridge Widening, Douglas - Farnam
a.)(NDOR Concrete) 1 $585.00 $595.00
Sieve Analysis of Aggregate(ea.) E8 J$70.00 $560.00
Subtotal $25,995.00
Contingency @ 10%of Subtotal $2,600.00
Total $28,595.00
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Exhibit"E"
•
_ ' Nms
iim E1O0 _ III,I ,3,`^a nA^ m 45 o v'. .^,3:°a ? 3 m3.6 63 c8'�
m^ 'o^ - - ,,y N i o o '.m g m, 3'- ;3 S.0 -
x ' m m m m 3 v_'mS z.H n E R°o F m 3- - _
E m 3 m 'v a 5 i,A v
3a`
- °i t�_ x
_ �5,o
3 1p�n
m ,n x n m-6 m .P 3«d.3'e H o' _a S i ¢6¢ a_ n o x o g,
L
m o383 =v .i a val 00000000000 000000000000 n'a Om�m F a� �'� �3 lilt wr 0�a
''; m 5 0 E v S' F,
N N-N 9 H m T T;A n c c -m 9 T'S D n N N N 9 ran v - T A ry R o v m., n. 3,m .m-. o"' m
a s a ti 3 $ a N 3 3 3 3 ti A m v- = 3 a 1 A Z a a^ n s^i n a o
N O. 3 u m m m n n 0 n 3_3_E"m m m "n O O ti_ T,N a 3 q D 3 n 3 S 6 F o 4 3
£4 x 2 2 x N o o c o 4 4£ r" y F F F a u m '° u- `$° E n ^A a -
30 o N� ;;O m- 330�- 04 m m 3 F m °¢'a 0a a O
3m c ,��} 33 's.�'� 33�.'0 _n3 Em o - ER;' ,�a >
,° m- N'� 3 x n 3=.o 84 n N =g w o g
x^ 3_3� - - E 3 9 3 ^- s I^
m c m m m'^ = h ro ,s'Z'n 3 :1d
N E m m m 3 g m z Gs
3 v
m m a 6
u
3 N 3
• ?.3 m
Oa c`3 £ v m A
343z0:$� 33''5
,r 0,- -, m•5 61
_. Exhibit"E"
OHOHO C)FC W O W Z oHO HoOo CxOC7OZOaH •> H '> O0) OC40XxO0) x0. Co LO a
C.) 1-1 Z CC O 0 04 C0) C0OZocn0C4CHOHHOHOMUMUMUEMUEcEv' 0) N > CD
W 0 E HKGNKCMWvHLU F) NOCDOCoNO WHONOMOW ,PONLU g CDDrZ
r 0 Z W U C ) CD r) O E. O V) OG.104.IOEO ) O1' H04H U HUHUC] HU0H 0 HUH Ov'
H E .4.1 O O O O O O O C O O O O O ' O C. O O
•
.••
rl `a t C) C. Cl r? C) _. r) O CD O C C O O 0 O 0
,t.o N to E o E o E-t O E to R+'O Z 0 04 0 .
t-a E co O U O U O O C] O H O H O CD M H O W O '1 H (x1 N W C' W' C' W O H O H O 0
<• W O W . Z CDHOH0OD Ox0.C7 O Z O to H > H •J O C4 O r4 O 124x O 124 x 0• 01 • LU I)1
UF-1 .ZC] O OL14004004OZoCnOCJOHOHHOHO01UM0MUEM0Ed' E ,' Wt- >. CD
H 124 E C7 '4 r< 3 w X Z Z Z Z a, Z a co )x a
Q W E E ,r, ZN ,r, `
Z W U o01O Cqo EOmo G4o4, o Eo X CDr4 H (Y' H U H U H U C] H U CI H U H U H O d''
H E. W O C) O O O O O O O O O O O ' O O CD 0
1-1 hH CO O O 0 O O O 0 CD CD O O CD CD O O CD O
IV. Traffic Impact Study
Any development which generates more than 100 trips (2-way) during the peak hour, may
require a traffic impact study identifying the impact of the development on the existing and/or
planned street system. Specific requirements of this section are shown in Appendix A.
V. General Requirements.
Every driveway approach constructed or altered in the street right-of-way shall conform to the
following regulations.
A. Any time that there is a land use change and/or 50% or more of the total surface area
of a parcel of land under one ownership is cleared of existing surface improvements, the
driveway approaches serving such a parcel must be closed or reconstructed to conform to
the conditions of this ordinance.
B. No driveway approach shall be constructed or reconstructed within five feet (5') of
any existing obstruction in the street right-of-way.
C. No driveway approach shall be constructed or reconstructed in such manner and in
such location as, in the opinion of the City Traffic Engineer, the use thereof would
constitute a hazardous condition.
D. Any adjustments to utility facilities, light standards, fire hydrants, catch basins, street
signs, signals, underground conduits for street lighting or fire alarm systems, or other
public improvements or installations which are necessary because of construction under a
permit issued under this Article shall be accomplished without cost to the City by the
permittee.
E. All driveway approaches are to be constructed in accordance with City specifications
and appropriate standard plates (see Appendix). The Public Works Department may
furnish an inspector to inspect driveway approaches to be constructed, whose duties shall
be to check the forms for alignment grade, and materials and to see that the work is done
in accordance with the specifications of the City at the time of the issuance of the permit.
All work for the construction of the driveway approach shall be fully completed with 72
hours after the start, weather permitting. In the event such work has not been completed,
the City will have the option of completing the work at the expense of the permittee.
F. The Public Works Department shall be notified at least twenty-four (24) hours in
advance of the time of the inspections.
G. The entrance angle for all driveway approaches shall be as near ninety (90) degrees to
the center line of the street as is possible. In no case shall the center line of the driveway
intersect the center line of the street at an angle of less than sixty (60)degrees.
2
Bridge Widening, Douglas - Farnam
Project No. MAPA-5103(14) EXHIBIT "F"
Control No. 22353 Sheet 2 of 5
10th St Bridge Widening, Douglas - Farnam
a.)(NDOR Concrete) 1 $585.00 $595.00
Sieve Analysis of Aggregate(ea.) E8 J$70.00 $560.00
Subtotal $25,995.00
Contingency @ 10%of Subtotal $2,600.00
Total $28,595.00
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Exhibit"E"
•
_ ' Nms
iim E1O0 _ III,I ,3,`^a nA^ m 45 o v'. .^,3:°a ? 3 m3.6 63 c8'�
m^ 'o^ - - ,,y N i o o '.m g m, 3'- ;3 S.0 -
x ' m m m m 3 v_'mS z.H n E R°o F m 3- - _
E m 3 m 'v a 5 i,A v
3a`
- °i t�_ x
_ �5,o
3 1p�n
m ,n x n m-6 m .P 3«d.3'e H o' _a S i ¢6¢ a_ n o x o g,
L
m o383 =v .i a val 00000000000 000000000000 n'a Om�m F a� �'� �3 lilt wr 0�a
''; m 5 0 E v S' F,
N N-N 9 H m T T;A n c c -m 9 T'S D n N N N 9 ran v - T A ry R o v m., n. 3,m .m-. o"' m
a s a ti 3 $ a N 3 3 3 3 ti A m v- = 3 a 1 A Z a a^ n s^i n a o
N O. 3 u m m m n n 0 n 3_3_E"m m m "n O O ti_ T,N a 3 q D 3 n 3 S 6 F o 4 3
£4 x 2 2 x N o o c o 4 4£ r" y F F F a u m '° u- `$° E n ^A a -
30 o N� ;;O m- 330�- 04 m m 3 F m °¢'a 0a a O
3m c ,��} 33 's.�'� 33�.'0 _n3 Em o - ER;' ,�a >
,° m- N'� 3 x n 3=.o 84 n N =g w o g
x^ 3_3� - - E 3 9 3 ^- s I^
m c m m m'^ = h ro ,s'Z'n 3 :1d
N E m m m 3 g m z Gs
3 v
m m a 6
u
3 N 3
• ?.3 m
Oa c`3 £ v m A
343z0:$� 33''5
,r 0,- -, m•5 61
_. Exhibit"E"
OHOHO C)FC W O W Z oHO HoOo CxOC7OZOaH •> H '> O0) OC40XxO0) x0. Co LO a
C.) 1-1 Z CC O 0 04 C0) C0OZocn0C4CHOHHOHOMUMUMUEMUEcEv' 0) N > CD
W 0 E HKGNKCMWvHLU F) NOCDOCoNO WHONOMOW ,PONLU g CDDrZ
r 0 Z W U C ) CD r) O E. O V) OG.104.IOEO ) O1' H04H U HUHUC] HU0H 0 HUH Ov'
H E .4.1 O O O O O O O C O O O O O ' O C. O O
•
.••
rl `a t C) C. Cl r? C) _. r) O CD O C C O O 0 O 0
,t.o N to E o E o E-t O E to R+'O Z 0 04 0 .
t-a E co O U O U O O C] O H O H O CD M H O W O '1 H (x1 N W C' W' C' W O H O H O 0
<• W O W . Z CDHOH0OD Ox0.C7 O Z O to H > H •J O C4 O r4 O 124x O 124 x 0• 01 • LU I)1
UF-1 .ZC] O OL14004004OZoCnOCJOHOHHOHO01UM0MUEM0Ed' E ,' Wt- >. CD
H 124 E C7 '4 r< 3 w X Z Z Z Z a, Z a co )x a
Q W E E ,r, ZN ,r, `
Z W U o01O Cqo EOmo G4o4, o Eo X CDr4 H (Y' H U H U H U C] H U CI H U H U H O d''
H E. W O C) O O O O O O O O O O O ' O O CD 0
1-1 hH CO O O 0 O O O 0 CD CD O O CD CD O O CD O
H. City street right-of-way shall not be used for private-commercial purposes. A permit
for the construction of a driveway approach shall not be issued unless vehicles which will
be using said driveway approach can be parked entirely on private property.
I. No permit shall be issued for access to parking or loading areas that require backing
maneuvers in a public street right-of-way except for residential uses on local and
collector streets.
J. A property that has frontage on more than one street will be permitted access only on
those street frontages where standards can be met. If a property cannot be served by an
access point meeting these standards, the City Traffic" Engineer shall designate access
point(s) based on traffic safety and operational needs.
K. At locations where a drainage culvert is needed under the driveway approach, the
person constructing the driveway approach shall install a drainage culvert of the proper
size and elevation so that the driveway and culvert are capable of handling a 50 year
storm without flooding the adjacent street.
L. All driveway approaches shall be constructed of concrete with the following minimum
thickness:
Residential—6 inches
Commercial—7 inches
Industrial—8 inches
See Standard Plate 1-70 for minimum requirements.
VI. Residential Access Design Requirements.
All residential driveway approaches hereafter constructed, relocated, or widened in the City or its
extraterritorial jurisdiction shall comply with the following conditions:
A. Number of Driveways.
In any allowable location, no driveway throat width shall be less than ten feet (10') wide or
greater than 30' wide. Frontages of sixty feet (60') or less shall be limited to one (1) driveway.
No more than two (2) driveways shall be provided to any single property tract except for corner
properties.
3
of the permit.
All work for the construction of the driveway approach shall be fully completed with 72
hours after the start, weather permitting. In the event such work has not been completed,
the City will have the option of completing the work at the expense of the permittee.
F. The Public Works Department shall be notified at least twenty-four (24) hours in
advance of the time of the inspections.
G. The entrance angle for all driveway approaches shall be as near ninety (90) degrees to
the center line of the street as is possible. In no case shall the center line of the driveway
intersect the center line of the street at an angle of less than sixty (60)degrees.
2
Bridge Widening, Douglas - Farnam
Project No. MAPA-5103(14) EXHIBIT "F"
Control No. 22353 Sheet 2 of 5
10th St Bridge Widening, Douglas - Farnam
a.)(NDOR Concrete) 1 $585.00 $595.00
Sieve Analysis of Aggregate(ea.) E8 J$70.00 $560.00
Subtotal $25,995.00
Contingency @ 10%of Subtotal $2,600.00
Total $28,595.00
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Exhibit"E"
•
_ ' Nms
iim E1O0 _ III,I ,3,`^a nA^ m 45 o v'. .^,3:°a ? 3 m3.6 63 c8'�
m^ 'o^ - - ,,y N i o o '.m g m, 3'- ;3 S.0 -
x ' m m m m 3 v_'mS z.H n E R°o F m 3- - _
E m 3 m 'v a 5 i,A v
3a`
- °i t�_ x
_ �5,o
3 1p�n
m ,n x n m-6 m .P 3«d.3'e H o' _a S i ¢6¢ a_ n o x o g,
L
m o383 =v .i a val 00000000000 000000000000 n'a Om�m F a� �'� �3 lilt wr 0�a
''; m 5 0 E v S' F,
N N-N 9 H m T T;A n c c -m 9 T'S D n N N N 9 ran v - T A ry R o v m., n. 3,m .m-. o"' m
a s a ti 3 $ a N 3 3 3 3 ti A m v- = 3 a 1 A Z a a^ n s^i n a o
N O. 3 u m m m n n 0 n 3_3_E"m m m "n O O ti_ T,N a 3 q D 3 n 3 S 6 F o 4 3
£4 x 2 2 x N o o c o 4 4£ r" y F F F a u m '° u- `$° E n ^A a -
30 o N� ;;O m- 330�- 04 m m 3 F m °¢'a 0a a O
3m c ,��} 33 's.�'� 33�.'0 _n3 Em o - ER;' ,�a >
,° m- N'� 3 x n 3=.o 84 n N =g w o g
x^ 3_3� - - E 3 9 3 ^- s I^
m c m m m'^ = h ro ,s'Z'n 3 :1d
N E m m m 3 g m z Gs
3 v
m m a 6
u
3 N 3
• ?.3 m
Oa c`3 £ v m A
343z0:$� 33''5
,r 0,- -, m•5 61
_. Exhibit"E"
OHOHO C)FC W O W Z oHO HoOo CxOC7OZOaH •> H '> O0) OC40XxO0) x0. Co LO a
C.) 1-1 Z CC O 0 04 C0) C0OZocn0C4CHOHHOHOMUMUMUEMUEcEv' 0) N > CD
W 0 E HKGNKCMWvHLU F) NOCDOCoNO WHONOMOW ,PONLU g CDDrZ
r 0 Z W U C ) CD r) O E. O V) OG.104.IOEO ) O1' H04H U HUHUC] HU0H 0 HUH Ov'
H E .4.1 O O O O O O O C O O O O O ' O C. O O
•
.••
rl `a t C) C. Cl r? C) _. r) O CD O C C O O 0 O 0
,t.o N to E o E o E-t O E to R+'O Z 0 04 0 .
t-a E co O U O U O O C] O H O H O CD M H O W O '1 H (x1 N W C' W' C' W O H O H O 0
<• W O W . Z CDHOH0OD Ox0.C7 O Z O to H > H •J O C4 O r4 O 124x O 124 x 0• 01 • LU I)1
UF-1 .ZC] O OL14004004OZoCnOCJOHOHHOHO01UM0MUEM0Ed' E ,' Wt- >. CD
H 124 E C7 '4 r< 3 w X Z Z Z Z a, Z a co )x a
Q W E E ,r, ZN ,r, `
Z W U o01O Cqo EOmo G4o4, o Eo X CDr4 H (Y' H U H U H U C] H U CI H U H U H O d''
H E. W O C) O O O O O O O O O O O ' O O CD 0
1-1 hH CO O O 0 O O O 0 CD CD O O CD CD O O CD O
B. Driveway Spacing.
Driveways serving a single parcel of property or serving any of several adjacent parcels under
single ownership shall be separated by at least forty feet (40') of full height curb. Townhouse-
condominium developments shall be excepted.
C. Driveway Corner Clearance.
The curb return for driveways serving corner lots shall not begin closer than two feet (2') from
the tangent point of the corner radii of the intersecting street.
D. Driveway and Approach Design Standards.
Table 1 lists the basic widths of residential driveways and radii/flares for the different types of
streets.
TABLE 1—RESIDENTIAL DRIVEWAY STANDARDS
STREET THROAT WIDTH RETURN
Local 10 ft. min. 5 ft. flare min.*
30 ft. max. 10 ft. radius max.
Collector 10 ft. min. 5 ft. flare min.
30 ft. max. 10 ft. radius max.
Major 10 ft. min. 10 ft. radius min.
30 ft. max. 20 ft.radius max.
*For driveway widths 20' or wider, flare may be reduced to 3 ft. minimum.
VII. Commercial/Industrial Access Design Requirements.
All commercial and industrial driveway approaches shall be constructed according to the
following regulations:
A. Number of Driveways.
The number of driveways shall be limited to one, two-way driveway or a pair of one-way
driveways for each parcel, except when the following conditions exist.
4
comply with the following conditions:
A. Number of Driveways.
In any allowable location, no driveway throat width shall be less than ten feet (10') wide or
greater than 30' wide. Frontages of sixty feet (60') or less shall be limited to one (1) driveway.
No more than two (2) driveways shall be provided to any single property tract except for corner
properties.
3
of the permit.
All work for the construction of the driveway approach shall be fully completed with 72
hours after the start, weather permitting. In the event such work has not been completed,
the City will have the option of completing the work at the expense of the permittee.
F. The Public Works Department shall be notified at least twenty-four (24) hours in
advance of the time of the inspections.
G. The entrance angle for all driveway approaches shall be as near ninety (90) degrees to
the center line of the street as is possible. In no case shall the center line of the driveway
intersect the center line of the street at an angle of less than sixty (60)degrees.
2
Bridge Widening, Douglas - Farnam
Project No. MAPA-5103(14) EXHIBIT "F"
Control No. 22353 Sheet 2 of 5
10th St Bridge Widening, Douglas - Farnam
a.)(NDOR Concrete) 1 $585.00 $595.00
Sieve Analysis of Aggregate(ea.) E8 J$70.00 $560.00
Subtotal $25,995.00
Contingency @ 10%of Subtotal $2,600.00
Total $28,595.00
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Exhibit"E"
•
_ ' Nms
iim E1O0 _ III,I ,3,`^a nA^ m 45 o v'. .^,3:°a ? 3 m3.6 63 c8'�
m^ 'o^ - - ,,y N i o o '.m g m, 3'- ;3 S.0 -
x ' m m m m 3 v_'mS z.H n E R°o F m 3- - _
E m 3 m 'v a 5 i,A v
3a`
- °i t�_ x
_ �5,o
3 1p�n
m ,n x n m-6 m .P 3«d.3'e H o' _a S i ¢6¢ a_ n o x o g,
L
m o383 =v .i a val 00000000000 000000000000 n'a Om�m F a� �'� �3 lilt wr 0�a
''; m 5 0 E v S' F,
N N-N 9 H m T T;A n c c -m 9 T'S D n N N N 9 ran v - T A ry R o v m., n. 3,m .m-. o"' m
a s a ti 3 $ a N 3 3 3 3 ti A m v- = 3 a 1 A Z a a^ n s^i n a o
N O. 3 u m m m n n 0 n 3_3_E"m m m "n O O ti_ T,N a 3 q D 3 n 3 S 6 F o 4 3
£4 x 2 2 x N o o c o 4 4£ r" y F F F a u m '° u- `$° E n ^A a -
30 o N� ;;O m- 330�- 04 m m 3 F m °¢'a 0a a O
3m c ,��} 33 's.�'� 33�.'0 _n3 Em o - ER;' ,�a >
,° m- N'� 3 x n 3=.o 84 n N =g w o g
x^ 3_3� - - E 3 9 3 ^- s I^
m c m m m'^ = h ro ,s'Z'n 3 :1d
N E m m m 3 g m z Gs
3 v
m m a 6
u
3 N 3
• ?.3 m
Oa c`3 £ v m A
343z0:$� 33''5
,r 0,- -, m•5 61
_. Exhibit"E"
OHOHO C)FC W O W Z oHO HoOo CxOC7OZOaH •> H '> O0) OC40XxO0) x0. Co LO a
C.) 1-1 Z CC O 0 04 C0) C0OZocn0C4CHOHHOHOMUMUMUEMUEcEv' 0) N > CD
W 0 E HKGNKCMWvHLU F) NOCDOCoNO WHONOMOW ,PONLU g CDDrZ
r 0 Z W U C ) CD r) O E. O V) OG.104.IOEO ) O1' H04H U HUHUC] HU0H 0 HUH Ov'
H E .4.1 O O O O O O O C O O O O O ' O C. O O
•
.••
rl `a t C) C. Cl r? C) _. r) O CD O C C O O 0 O 0
,t.o N to E o E o E-t O E to R+'O Z 0 04 0 .
t-a E co O U O U O O C] O H O H O CD M H O W O '1 H (x1 N W C' W' C' W O H O H O 0
<• W O W . Z CDHOH0OD Ox0.C7 O Z O to H > H •J O C4 O r4 O 124x O 124 x 0• 01 • LU I)1
UF-1 .ZC] O OL14004004OZoCnOCJOHOHHOHO01UM0MUEM0Ed' E ,' Wt- >. CD
H 124 E C7 '4 r< 3 w X Z Z Z Z a, Z a co )x a
Q W E E ,r, ZN ,r, `
Z W U o01O Cqo EOmo G4o4, o Eo X CDr4 H (Y' H U H U H U C] H U CI H U H U H O d''
H E. W O C) O O O O O O O O O O O ' O O CD 0
1-1 hH CO O O 0 O O O 0 CD CD O O CD CD O O CD O
1. Property frontages that are too narrow to satisfy the minimum driveway spacing
criteria set forth in the following sections will require joint access locations at property
lines: frontage roads, restricted movement driveway designs, or other modifications.
2. Joint driveways may be permitted. Reciprocal, ingress/egress easements will be
required for all joint driveways.
3. If an approved traffic study indicates the need for more than one driveway, the Traffic
Engineer may approve additional driveways.
B. Driveway Spacing.
The distance between adjacent driveways (on the same or adjoining properties) must be
sufficient to allow vehicles to safely queue, accelerate, decelerate, and cross conflicting traffic
streams without excessive interference with through traffic or traffic using adjacent driveways.
1. On major streets, a driveway spacing of 300 feet or more is desirable. Where this
spacing cannot be attained, acceptable minimum spacing is shown in Table 2.
TABLE 2—MINIMUM DRIVEWAY SPACING
ARTERIAL SPEED (mph) MINIMUM SEPARATION(feet)
25 105
30 125
35 150
40 185
45 230
50 275
2. Closer driveway spacing than those listed above may be granted if the developer
agrees to limit turning movements (i.e. right turns in and out) as required.
3. The minimum distance between two driveways on adjoining properties on collector
and local streets shall be forty (40) feet. This 40 feet shall be measured from the end of
each radii.
4. The radii of a commercial driveway shall not begin closer than the property line
extended except for joint driveways.
5. Driveways to arterial streets will not be permitted for new developments. An internal
street network serving properties shall be designed to accommodate access. Intersections
with arterial streets shall be located in accordance with the Land Use Element of the City
of Omaha Master Plan.
5
ted with 72
hours after the start, weather permitting. In the event such work has not been completed,
the City will have the option of completing the work at the expense of the permittee.
F. The Public Works Department shall be notified at least twenty-four (24) hours in
advance of the time of the inspections.
G. The entrance angle for all driveway approaches shall be as near ninety (90) degrees to
the center line of the street as is possible. In no case shall the center line of the driveway
intersect the center line of the street at an angle of less than sixty (60)degrees.
2
Bridge Widening, Douglas - Farnam
Project No. MAPA-5103(14) EXHIBIT "F"
Control No. 22353 Sheet 2 of 5
10th St Bridge Widening, Douglas - Farnam
a.)(NDOR Concrete) 1 $585.00 $595.00
Sieve Analysis of Aggregate(ea.) E8 J$70.00 $560.00
Subtotal $25,995.00
Contingency @ 10%of Subtotal $2,600.00
Total $28,595.00
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Exhibit"E"
•
_ ' Nms
iim E1O0 _ III,I ,3,`^a nA^ m 45 o v'. .^,3:°a ? 3 m3.6 63 c8'�
m^ 'o^ - - ,,y N i o o '.m g m, 3'- ;3 S.0 -
x ' m m m m 3 v_'mS z.H n E R°o F m 3- - _
E m 3 m 'v a 5 i,A v
3a`
- °i t�_ x
_ �5,o
3 1p�n
m ,n x n m-6 m .P 3«d.3'e H o' _a S i ¢6¢ a_ n o x o g,
L
m o383 =v .i a val 00000000000 000000000000 n'a Om�m F a� �'� �3 lilt wr 0�a
''; m 5 0 E v S' F,
N N-N 9 H m T T;A n c c -m 9 T'S D n N N N 9 ran v - T A ry R o v m., n. 3,m .m-. o"' m
a s a ti 3 $ a N 3 3 3 3 ti A m v- = 3 a 1 A Z a a^ n s^i n a o
N O. 3 u m m m n n 0 n 3_3_E"m m m "n O O ti_ T,N a 3 q D 3 n 3 S 6 F o 4 3
£4 x 2 2 x N o o c o 4 4£ r" y F F F a u m '° u- `$° E n ^A a -
30 o N� ;;O m- 330�- 04 m m 3 F m °¢'a 0a a O
3m c ,��} 33 's.�'� 33�.'0 _n3 Em o - ER;' ,�a >
,° m- N'� 3 x n 3=.o 84 n N =g w o g
x^ 3_3� - - E 3 9 3 ^- s I^
m c m m m'^ = h ro ,s'Z'n 3 :1d
N E m m m 3 g m z Gs
3 v
m m a 6
u
3 N 3
• ?.3 m
Oa c`3 £ v m A
343z0:$� 33''5
,r 0,- -, m•5 61
_. Exhibit"E"
OHOHO C)FC W O W Z oHO HoOo CxOC7OZOaH •> H '> O0) OC40XxO0) x0. Co LO a
C.) 1-1 Z CC O 0 04 C0) C0OZocn0C4CHOHHOHOMUMUMUEMUEcEv' 0) N > CD
W 0 E HKGNKCMWvHLU F) NOCDOCoNO WHONOMOW ,PONLU g CDDrZ
r 0 Z W U C ) CD r) O E. O V) OG.104.IOEO ) O1' H04H U HUHUC] HU0H 0 HUH Ov'
H E .4.1 O O O O O O O C O O O O O ' O C. O O
•
.••
rl `a t C) C. Cl r? C) _. r) O CD O C C O O 0 O 0
,t.o N to E o E o E-t O E to R+'O Z 0 04 0 .
t-a E co O U O U O O C] O H O H O CD M H O W O '1 H (x1 N W C' W' C' W O H O H O 0
<• W O W . Z CDHOH0OD Ox0.C7 O Z O to H > H •J O C4 O r4 O 124x O 124 x 0• 01 • LU I)1
UF-1 .ZC] O OL14004004OZoCnOCJOHOHHOHO01UM0MUEM0Ed' E ,' Wt- >. CD
H 124 E C7 '4 r< 3 w X Z Z Z Z a, Z a co )x a
Q W E E ,r, ZN ,r, `
Z W U o01O Cqo EOmo G4o4, o Eo X CDr4 H (Y' H U H U H U C] H U CI H U H U H O d''
H E. W O C) O O O O O O O O O O O ' O O CD 0
1-1 hH CO O O 0 O O O 0 CD CD O O CD CD O O CD O
C. Driveway Corner Clearance.
Minimum corner clearances are shown in Tables 3 and 4. These corner clearances are for a 30
MPH operating speed. Higher speed conditions will require greater clearance than that shown.
The minimum corner clearance on major and collector streets at signalized intersections shall be
one hundred (100) feet from the projection of the intersection street curb line extended to the
driveway radius point.
TABLE 3 — MINIMUM CORNER CLEARANCE — SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION
CONTROL
Functional Classification of Road
Item Major Collector ,
(L.F.) (L.F.) Local (L.F.) I I. A.- .. _ B
A 230 175 60 I __ i '
B 115 100 60 r --
C 230 175 60 _ o j [e�
D 230 175 60
E 75 0 0
TABLE 4—MINIMUM CORNER CLEARANCE—STOP SIGN INTERSECTION CONTROL
Functional Classification of Road
Item Major Collector
(L.F.) (L.F.) Local (L.F.)
I . _
I
F 115 75 60 1 [_ F_; ,�.G_) L__ ___.
G 85 85 60 -- ____ _
H 115 85 60 H i_—� _ Lis 115 75 60
K 75 0 0 1
D. Driveway and Approach Design Standards
Table 5 and.Table 6 list the basic widths of commercial and industrial driveways and radii/flares
for the different street classifications.
6
(40) feet. This 40 feet shall be measured from the end of
each radii.
4. The radii of a commercial driveway shall not begin closer than the property line
extended except for joint driveways.
5. Driveways to arterial streets will not be permitted for new developments. An internal
street network serving properties shall be designed to accommodate access. Intersections
with arterial streets shall be located in accordance with the Land Use Element of the City
of Omaha Master Plan.
5
ted with 72
hours after the start, weather permitting. In the event such work has not been completed,
the City will have the option of completing the work at the expense of the permittee.
F. The Public Works Department shall be notified at least twenty-four (24) hours in
advance of the time of the inspections.
G. The entrance angle for all driveway approaches shall be as near ninety (90) degrees to
the center line of the street as is possible. In no case shall the center line of the driveway
intersect the center line of the street at an angle of less than sixty (60)degrees.
2
Bridge Widening, Douglas - Farnam
Project No. MAPA-5103(14) EXHIBIT "F"
Control No. 22353 Sheet 2 of 5
10th St Bridge Widening, Douglas - Farnam
a.)(NDOR Concrete) 1 $585.00 $595.00
Sieve Analysis of Aggregate(ea.) E8 J$70.00 $560.00
Subtotal $25,995.00
Contingency @ 10%of Subtotal $2,600.00
Total $28,595.00
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Exhibit"E"
•
_ ' Nms
iim E1O0 _ III,I ,3,`^a nA^ m 45 o v'. .^,3:°a ? 3 m3.6 63 c8'�
m^ 'o^ - - ,,y N i o o '.m g m, 3'- ;3 S.0 -
x ' m m m m 3 v_'mS z.H n E R°o F m 3- - _
E m 3 m 'v a 5 i,A v
3a`
- °i t�_ x
_ �5,o
3 1p�n
m ,n x n m-6 m .P 3«d.3'e H o' _a S i ¢6¢ a_ n o x o g,
L
m o383 =v .i a val 00000000000 000000000000 n'a Om�m F a� �'� �3 lilt wr 0�a
''; m 5 0 E v S' F,
N N-N 9 H m T T;A n c c -m 9 T'S D n N N N 9 ran v - T A ry R o v m., n. 3,m .m-. o"' m
a s a ti 3 $ a N 3 3 3 3 ti A m v- = 3 a 1 A Z a a^ n s^i n a o
N O. 3 u m m m n n 0 n 3_3_E"m m m "n O O ti_ T,N a 3 q D 3 n 3 S 6 F o 4 3
£4 x 2 2 x N o o c o 4 4£ r" y F F F a u m '° u- `$° E n ^A a -
30 o N� ;;O m- 330�- 04 m m 3 F m °¢'a 0a a O
3m c ,��} 33 's.�'� 33�.'0 _n3 Em o - ER;' ,�a >
,° m- N'� 3 x n 3=.o 84 n N =g w o g
x^ 3_3� - - E 3 9 3 ^- s I^
m c m m m'^ = h ro ,s'Z'n 3 :1d
N E m m m 3 g m z Gs
3 v
m m a 6
u
3 N 3
• ?.3 m
Oa c`3 £ v m A
343z0:$� 33''5
,r 0,- -, m•5 61
_. Exhibit"E"
OHOHO C)FC W O W Z oHO HoOo CxOC7OZOaH •> H '> O0) OC40XxO0) x0. Co LO a
C.) 1-1 Z CC O 0 04 C0) C0OZocn0C4CHOHHOHOMUMUMUEMUEcEv' 0) N > CD
W 0 E HKGNKCMWvHLU F) NOCDOCoNO WHONOMOW ,PONLU g CDDrZ
r 0 Z W U C ) CD r) O E. O V) OG.104.IOEO ) O1' H04H U HUHUC] HU0H 0 HUH Ov'
H E .4.1 O O O O O O O C O O O O O ' O C. O O
•
.••
rl `a t C) C. Cl r? C) _. r) O CD O C C O O 0 O 0
,t.o N to E o E o E-t O E to R+'O Z 0 04 0 .
t-a E co O U O U O O C] O H O H O CD M H O W O '1 H (x1 N W C' W' C' W O H O H O 0
<• W O W . Z CDHOH0OD Ox0.C7 O Z O to H > H •J O C4 O r4 O 124x O 124 x 0• 01 • LU I)1
UF-1 .ZC] O OL14004004OZoCnOCJOHOHHOHO01UM0MUEM0Ed' E ,' Wt- >. CD
H 124 E C7 '4 r< 3 w X Z Z Z Z a, Z a co )x a
Q W E E ,r, ZN ,r, `
Z W U o01O Cqo EOmo G4o4, o Eo X CDr4 H (Y' H U H U H U C] H U CI H U H U H O d''
H E. W O C) O O O O O O O O O O O ' O O CD 0
1-1 hH CO O O 0 O O O 0 CD CD O O CD CD O O CD O
•
TABLE 5—COMMERCIAL DRIVEWAY
STREET THROAT WIDTH RETURN
Local 22 ft. min. (16 ft.)* 10 ft. radius min.
30 ft.max. (16 ft.)* 20 ft. radius max.
Collector 25 ft. min. (16 ft.)* 10 ft. radius min.
35 ft. max. (20.ft.)* 20 ft. radius max.
Major 25 ft. min. (16 ft.)* 15 ft. radius min.
35 ft. max. (20 ft.)* 30 ft. radius max.
* Throat widths for one-way driveways:
One-way driveways shall be signed in accordance with the Manual on Uniform
Traffic Control Devices for Streets and Highways. This signing shall be the
responsibility of the property owner.
TABLE 6—INDUSTRIAL DRIVEWAY**
STREET THROAT WIDTH RETURN
Any Street 30 ft. min. 25 ft. radius min.
40 ft. max. 40 ft. radius max.
** The industrial driveway requirements are for driveways used by trucks.
Industrial driveways for passenger vehicles only shall use the same requirements
as a commercial driveway on a major street.
E. Right Turn Deceleration Lane.
Right turn deceleration lanes shall be constructed with the drive approach on all
commercial/industrial driveways that either:
1.Accesses a major street with a posted speed of 40 mph or greater.
2. Any development that generates over 100 vehicles per hour(two-way).
Right turn deceleration lanes shall have a minimum length of 150 feet of full width paving, plus
a taper appropriate for the design speed of the street.
F. Left Turn Deceleration Lane.
Left turn deceleration lanes (left turn storage lanes) may be required with the drive approach on
all commercial/industrial driveways on all streets that do not have a designated left turn lane.
The need for a left turn deceleration lane will be analyzed based on the design hour volume of
left turning vehicles verses opposing through traffic. Left turn deceleration lanes shall have a
minimum length of 150 feet of full width paving, plus a taper appropriate for the design speed of
the street.
7
g the work at the expense of the permittee.
F. The Public Works Department shall be notified at least twenty-four (24) hours in
advance of the time of the inspections.
G. The entrance angle for all driveway approaches shall be as near ninety (90) degrees to
the center line of the street as is possible. In no case shall the center line of the driveway
intersect the center line of the street at an angle of less than sixty (60)degrees.
2
Bridge Widening, Douglas - Farnam
Project No. MAPA-5103(14) EXHIBIT "F"
Control No. 22353 Sheet 2 of 5
10th St Bridge Widening, Douglas - Farnam
a.)(NDOR Concrete) 1 $585.00 $595.00
Sieve Analysis of Aggregate(ea.) E8 J$70.00 $560.00
Subtotal $25,995.00
Contingency @ 10%of Subtotal $2,600.00
Total $28,595.00
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Exhibit"E"
•
_ ' Nms
iim E1O0 _ III,I ,3,`^a nA^ m 45 o v'. .^,3:°a ? 3 m3.6 63 c8'�
m^ 'o^ - - ,,y N i o o '.m g m, 3'- ;3 S.0 -
x ' m m m m 3 v_'mS z.H n E R°o F m 3- - _
E m 3 m 'v a 5 i,A v
3a`
- °i t�_ x
_ �5,o
3 1p�n
m ,n x n m-6 m .P 3«d.3'e H o' _a S i ¢6¢ a_ n o x o g,
L
m o383 =v .i a val 00000000000 000000000000 n'a Om�m F a� �'� �3 lilt wr 0�a
''; m 5 0 E v S' F,
N N-N 9 H m T T;A n c c -m 9 T'S D n N N N 9 ran v - T A ry R o v m., n. 3,m .m-. o"' m
a s a ti 3 $ a N 3 3 3 3 ti A m v- = 3 a 1 A Z a a^ n s^i n a o
N O. 3 u m m m n n 0 n 3_3_E"m m m "n O O ti_ T,N a 3 q D 3 n 3 S 6 F o 4 3
£4 x 2 2 x N o o c o 4 4£ r" y F F F a u m '° u- `$° E n ^A a -
30 o N� ;;O m- 330�- 04 m m 3 F m °¢'a 0a a O
3m c ,��} 33 's.�'� 33�.'0 _n3 Em o - ER;' ,�a >
,° m- N'� 3 x n 3=.o 84 n N =g w o g
x^ 3_3� - - E 3 9 3 ^- s I^
m c m m m'^ = h ro ,s'Z'n 3 :1d
N E m m m 3 g m z Gs
3 v
m m a 6
u
3 N 3
• ?.3 m
Oa c`3 £ v m A
343z0:$� 33''5
,r 0,- -, m•5 61
_. Exhibit"E"
OHOHO C)FC W O W Z oHO HoOo CxOC7OZOaH •> H '> O0) OC40XxO0) x0. Co LO a
C.) 1-1 Z CC O 0 04 C0) C0OZocn0C4CHOHHOHOMUMUMUEMUEcEv' 0) N > CD
W 0 E HKGNKCMWvHLU F) NOCDOCoNO WHONOMOW ,PONLU g CDDrZ
r 0 Z W U C ) CD r) O E. O V) OG.104.IOEO ) O1' H04H U HUHUC] HU0H 0 HUH Ov'
H E .4.1 O O O O O O O C O O O O O ' O C. O O
•
.••
rl `a t C) C. Cl r? C) _. r) O CD O C C O O 0 O 0
,t.o N to E o E o E-t O E to R+'O Z 0 04 0 .
t-a E co O U O U O O C] O H O H O CD M H O W O '1 H (x1 N W C' W' C' W O H O H O 0
<• W O W . Z CDHOH0OD Ox0.C7 O Z O to H > H •J O C4 O r4 O 124x O 124 x 0• 01 • LU I)1
UF-1 .ZC] O OL14004004OZoCnOCJOHOHHOHO01UM0MUEM0Ed' E ,' Wt- >. CD
H 124 E C7 '4 r< 3 w X Z Z Z Z a, Z a co )x a
Q W E E ,r, ZN ,r, `
Z W U o01O Cqo EOmo G4o4, o Eo X CDr4 H (Y' H U H U H U C] H U CI H U H U H O d''
H E. W O C) O O O O O O O O O O O ' O O CD 0
1-1 hH CO O O 0 O O O 0 CD CD O O CD CD O O CD O
G. Minimum Sight Distance.
Sight distance as shown in Table 7 is designed to enable vehicles to:
1. When turning left or right, accelerate to the operating speed of the street without
causing approaching vehicles to reduce speed by more than 10 miles per hour.
2. When turning left, clear the near half of the street without conflicting with vehicles
approaching from the left.
The distance requirements are based on a 3.5 ft. driver eye height and 4.25 ft. object height for
passenger cars. The sight distance requirements for trucks will be considerably longer than for
the passenger vehicle. These relationships for trucks (SU, WB-50) can be derived using
appropriate assumptions for vehicle acceleration rates and turning paths.
TABLE 7—Sight Distance for Passenger Vehicles Exiting from Private Accesses.
Minimum Sight Distance Minimum Sight Distance
Speed (mph) Both Directions (feet)* Right in-Right out driveway
25 280 240
30 335 290
35 390 335
40 445 385
45 500 430
50 555 480
55 610 530
* Measured from the driver's eye ten feet from the edge of traveled way or pavement
edge.
When the criteria for sight distances cannot be met, the safe sight distance can be reduced by
prohibiting left turns by all vehicles. This restricts the turning movements to right turns in and
out of a driveway.
H. Driveway profiles.
Profiles shall be designed to permit entrance and exit maneuvers at desirable speeds and provide
sufficient underbody clearance for typical passenger cars. Driveway profiles with the fewest and
least severe grade changes are preferred. See Appendix pg.A-6 for minimum requirements.
•
I. Restricted Movement Driveway Designs.
When necessary for the safe and efficient movement of traffic, the City Traffic Engineer may
require access points to provide for only limited (e.g. right turns only) turning movements. The
8
7
g the work at the expense of the permittee.
F. The Public Works Department shall be notified at least twenty-four (24) hours in
advance of the time of the inspections.
G. The entrance angle for all driveway approaches shall be as near ninety (90) degrees to
the center line of the street as is possible. In no case shall the center line of the driveway
intersect the center line of the street at an angle of less than sixty (60)degrees.
2
Bridge Widening, Douglas - Farnam
Project No. MAPA-5103(14) EXHIBIT "F"
Control No. 22353 Sheet 2 of 5
10th St Bridge Widening, Douglas - Farnam
a.)(NDOR Concrete) 1 $585.00 $595.00
Sieve Analysis of Aggregate(ea.) E8 J$70.00 $560.00
Subtotal $25,995.00
Contingency @ 10%of Subtotal $2,600.00
Total $28,595.00
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Exhibit"E"
•
_ ' Nms
iim E1O0 _ III,I ,3,`^a nA^ m 45 o v'. .^,3:°a ? 3 m3.6 63 c8'�
m^ 'o^ - - ,,y N i o o '.m g m, 3'- ;3 S.0 -
x ' m m m m 3 v_'mS z.H n E R°o F m 3- - _
E m 3 m 'v a 5 i,A v
3a`
- °i t�_ x
_ �5,o
3 1p�n
m ,n x n m-6 m .P 3«d.3'e H o' _a S i ¢6¢ a_ n o x o g,
L
m o383 =v .i a val 00000000000 000000000000 n'a Om�m F a� �'� �3 lilt wr 0�a
''; m 5 0 E v S' F,
N N-N 9 H m T T;A n c c -m 9 T'S D n N N N 9 ran v - T A ry R o v m., n. 3,m .m-. o"' m
a s a ti 3 $ a N 3 3 3 3 ti A m v- = 3 a 1 A Z a a^ n s^i n a o
N O. 3 u m m m n n 0 n 3_3_E"m m m "n O O ti_ T,N a 3 q D 3 n 3 S 6 F o 4 3
£4 x 2 2 x N o o c o 4 4£ r" y F F F a u m '° u- `$° E n ^A a -
30 o N� ;;O m- 330�- 04 m m 3 F m °¢'a 0a a O
3m c ,��} 33 's.�'� 33�.'0 _n3 Em o - ER;' ,�a >
,° m- N'� 3 x n 3=.o 84 n N =g w o g
x^ 3_3� - - E 3 9 3 ^- s I^
m c m m m'^ = h ro ,s'Z'n 3 :1d
N E m m m 3 g m z Gs
3 v
m m a 6
u
3 N 3
• ?.3 m
Oa c`3 £ v m A
343z0:$� 33''5
,r 0,- -, m•5 61
_. Exhibit"E"
OHOHO C)FC W O W Z oHO HoOo CxOC7OZOaH •> H '> O0) OC40XxO0) x0. Co LO a
C.) 1-1 Z CC O 0 04 C0) C0OZocn0C4CHOHHOHOMUMUMUEMUEcEv' 0) N > CD
W 0 E HKGNKCMWvHLU F) NOCDOCoNO WHONOMOW ,PONLU g CDDrZ
r 0 Z W U C ) CD r) O E. O V) OG.104.IOEO ) O1' H04H U HUHUC] HU0H 0 HUH Ov'
H E .4.1 O O O O O O O C O O O O O ' O C. O O
•
.••
rl `a t C) C. Cl r? C) _. r) O CD O C C O O 0 O 0
,t.o N to E o E o E-t O E to R+'O Z 0 04 0 .
t-a E co O U O U O O C] O H O H O CD M H O W O '1 H (x1 N W C' W' C' W O H O H O 0
<• W O W . Z CDHOH0OD Ox0.C7 O Z O to H > H •J O C4 O r4 O 124x O 124 x 0• 01 • LU I)1
UF-1 .ZC] O OL14004004OZoCnOCJOHOHHOHO01UM0MUEM0Ed' E ,' Wt- >. CD
H 124 E C7 '4 r< 3 w X Z Z Z Z a, Z a co )x a
Q W E E ,r, ZN ,r, `
Z W U o01O Cqo EOmo G4o4, o Eo X CDr4 H (Y' H U H U H U C] H U CI H U H U H O d''
H E. W O C) O O O O O O O O O O O ' O O CD 0
1-1 hH CO O O 0 O O O 0 CD CD O O CD CD O O CD O
restriction of turning movements shall not affect the number and location of access points as
specified elsewhere.
The following figures are the minimum design for limited movement driveways. Deceleration
lanes may be required to be incorporated in the design.
CL Access Point
27
1 105'R
14' min 7
FIGURE 1: RIGHT-IN RIGHT-OUT, LEFT-IN DRIVEWAY DESIGN
R=50'min R=50'min
40'min Solid White Line
FIGURE 2: RIGHT-IN RIGHT-OUT DRIVEWAY DESIGN
9
eer's Total: $110,613.65
Contract Total $0.00
Total Penalties: $0.00
Total Payments: $0.00 •
•
Contractor:
Phone#:
Fax#: •
Email address:
•
•
Page 1 of 7, 12/7/2011 1:25:57 PM, Bid Tabulation, Generated by:admin for project OPW 52190
i
Approved
/ - Mayor
R=50'min
•
Solid White Line
20'mi
FIGURE 3: RIGHT-IN RIGHT-OUT, LEFT-OUT DRIVEWAY DESIGN
J. Driveway Alignment.
The location of access to properties on opposite sides of major and collector roadways shall be
coordinated so that they do not interfere with each other. Driveways directly opposite of each
other are desirable. However, if this is not possible, the resulting "T" configurations must be
spaced a minimum of 100 feet apart on collectors, and 200 feet apart on major streets. This may
be modified based on streets existing through traffic and the trip generation of the site. In no
case will a spacing of less than 75 feet be acceptable on arterial streets.
K. Vehicle Storage.
When development is located adjacent to a public street, the parking facility must have full
internal vehicular circulation and storage. Vehicular circulation must be located completely
within the property and vehicle within one portion of the development must have access to all
other portions without using the adjacent street system.
Adequate storage capacity must be provided for both inbound and outbound vehicles to facilitate
the safe and efficient movement between the street and the development. Inbound vehicle
storage areas must be of sufficient size to ensure that vehicles will not obstruct the adjacent
street, sidewalk, or circulation within the facility. Outbound vehicle storage areas must be
provided to eliminate backup and delay of vehicles within the development.
Recommended distances from the street to the first aisle and/or parking stall that backs into said
aisle for a parking lot design are presented in Table 8. Vehicle storage equivalent to the
distances shown in Table 8 must be provided at accesses serving the site. The recommended
vehicle storage area needed for the entire site may be spread over several accesses if more than
one access serves the site. The recommended distance may be further adjusted by the City for
accesses with two approach lanes and will be subject to traffic impact study findings, roadway
geometry,traffic volumes and site layout.
10
ast twenty-four (24) hours in
advance of the time of the inspections.
G. The entrance angle for all driveway approaches shall be as near ninety (90) degrees to
the center line of the street as is possible. In no case shall the center line of the driveway
intersect the center line of the street at an angle of less than sixty (60)degrees.
2
Bridge Widening, Douglas - Farnam
Project No. MAPA-5103(14) EXHIBIT "F"
Control No. 22353 Sheet 2 of 5
10th St Bridge Widening, Douglas - Farnam
a.)(NDOR Concrete) 1 $585.00 $595.00
Sieve Analysis of Aggregate(ea.) E8 J$70.00 $560.00
Subtotal $25,995.00
Contingency @ 10%of Subtotal $2,600.00
Total $28,595.00
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Exhibit"E"
•
_ ' Nms
iim E1O0 _ III,I ,3,`^a nA^ m 45 o v'. .^,3:°a ? 3 m3.6 63 c8'�
m^ 'o^ - - ,,y N i o o '.m g m, 3'- ;3 S.0 -
x ' m m m m 3 v_'mS z.H n E R°o F m 3- - _
E m 3 m 'v a 5 i,A v
3a`
- °i t�_ x
_ �5,o
3 1p�n
m ,n x n m-6 m .P 3«d.3'e H o' _a S i ¢6¢ a_ n o x o g,
L
m o383 =v .i a val 00000000000 000000000000 n'a Om�m F a� �'� �3 lilt wr 0�a
''; m 5 0 E v S' F,
N N-N 9 H m T T;A n c c -m 9 T'S D n N N N 9 ran v - T A ry R o v m., n. 3,m .m-. o"' m
a s a ti 3 $ a N 3 3 3 3 ti A m v- = 3 a 1 A Z a a^ n s^i n a o
N O. 3 u m m m n n 0 n 3_3_E"m m m "n O O ti_ T,N a 3 q D 3 n 3 S 6 F o 4 3
£4 x 2 2 x N o o c o 4 4£ r" y F F F a u m '° u- `$° E n ^A a -
30 o N� ;;O m- 330�- 04 m m 3 F m °¢'a 0a a O
3m c ,��} 33 's.�'� 33�.'0 _n3 Em o - ER;' ,�a >
,° m- N'� 3 x n 3=.o 84 n N =g w o g
x^ 3_3� - - E 3 9 3 ^- s I^
m c m m m'^ = h ro ,s'Z'n 3 :1d
N E m m m 3 g m z Gs
3 v
m m a 6
u
3 N 3
• ?.3 m
Oa c`3 £ v m A
343z0:$� 33''5
,r 0,- -, m•5 61
_. Exhibit"E"
OHOHO C)FC W O W Z oHO HoOo CxOC7OZOaH •> H '> O0) OC40XxO0) x0. Co LO a
C.) 1-1 Z CC O 0 04 C0) C0OZocn0C4CHOHHOHOMUMUMUEMUEcEv' 0) N > CD
W 0 E HKGNKCMWvHLU F) NOCDOCoNO WHONOMOW ,PONLU g CDDrZ
r 0 Z W U C ) CD r) O E. O V) OG.104.IOEO ) O1' H04H U HUHUC] HU0H 0 HUH Ov'
H E .4.1 O O O O O O O C O O O O O ' O C. O O
•
.••
rl `a t C) C. Cl r? C) _. r) O CD O C C O O 0 O 0
,t.o N to E o E o E-t O E to R+'O Z 0 04 0 .
t-a E co O U O U O O C] O H O H O CD M H O W O '1 H (x1 N W C' W' C' W O H O H O 0
<• W O W . Z CDHOH0OD Ox0.C7 O Z O to H > H •J O C4 O r4 O 124x O 124 x 0• 01 • LU I)1
UF-1 .ZC] O OL14004004OZoCnOCJOHOHHOHO01UM0MUEM0Ed' E ,' Wt- >. CD
H 124 E C7 '4 r< 3 w X Z Z Z Z a, Z a co )x a
Q W E E ,r, ZN ,r, `
Z W U o01O Cqo EOmo G4o4, o Eo X CDr4 H (Y' H U H U H U C] H U CI H U H U H O d''
H E. W O C) O O O O O O O O O O O ' O O CD 0
1-1 hH CO O O 0 O O O 0 CD CD O O CD CD O O CD O
TABLE 8: ON SITE VEHICLE STORAGE FOR PARKING LOT ACCESS'
Land Use Peak Hour Size Local Collector Arterial
Exit Trips* (Feet) (Feet) (Feet)
Low Rise Apts. (per unit) 0.4 0-80 20 20 20
81-160 20 20 40
161-300 20 40 80
High Rise Apts. (per unit) 0.1 0-300 20 40 80
Condominiums Mobile Homes Planned 0.5 0-60 20 40 40
Unit Development (per unit) 61-120 20 40 .40
121-180 20 40 60
181-240 20 40 80
241-300 20 60 100
Quality Restaurant(per 1000 sq. ft.) 2.5 0-15 20 20 20
15-30 20 20 40
High Turnover Sit-Down Restaurant 4.0 0-8 20 20 20
(per 1000 sq. ft.) 8-16 20 20 40
16-20 20 20 60
Drive-In Restaurant(per 1000 sq. ft.) 40.0 0-2 20 20 20
2-3 20 40 80
3-5 40 60 120
5-7 60 80 180
Motel (per room) 0.4 0-150 20 20 40
151-400 20 60 100
401-700 20 100 140
Convention Hotel (per room) 1.11 0-150 40 40 80
151-400 40 120 200
401-700 40 200 280
Office Park(per 1000 sq. ft.) 2.0 0-20 20 20 20
20-50 20 40 60
50-100 20 60 140
100-150 60 100 200
150-300 100 200 400
300-500 160 320 660
General Office (per 1000 sq. ft.) 1.36 0-50 20 20 40
50-100 20 40 80
100-150 40 60 140
150-200 40 60 180
200-300 60 140 280
300-400 100 180 360
400-500 120 220 460
Light Industrial (per 1000 sq. ft.) 0.63 0-100 20 20 40
100-200 20 40 80
200-300 40 60 120
300-400 40 80 160
400-500 60 100 200
11
dy findings, roadway
geometry,traffic volumes and site layout.
10
ast twenty-four (24) hours in
advance of the time of the inspections.
G. The entrance angle for all driveway approaches shall be as near ninety (90) degrees to
the center line of the street as is possible. In no case shall the center line of the driveway
intersect the center line of the street at an angle of less than sixty (60)degrees.
2
Bridge Widening, Douglas - Farnam
Project No. MAPA-5103(14) EXHIBIT "F"
Control No. 22353 Sheet 2 of 5
10th St Bridge Widening, Douglas - Farnam
a.)(NDOR Concrete) 1 $585.00 $595.00
Sieve Analysis of Aggregate(ea.) E8 J$70.00 $560.00
Subtotal $25,995.00
Contingency @ 10%of Subtotal $2,600.00
Total $28,595.00
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Exhibit"E"
•
_ ' Nms
iim E1O0 _ III,I ,3,`^a nA^ m 45 o v'. .^,3:°a ? 3 m3.6 63 c8'�
m^ 'o^ - - ,,y N i o o '.m g m, 3'- ;3 S.0 -
x ' m m m m 3 v_'mS z.H n E R°o F m 3- - _
E m 3 m 'v a 5 i,A v
3a`
- °i t�_ x
_ �5,o
3 1p�n
m ,n x n m-6 m .P 3«d.3'e H o' _a S i ¢6¢ a_ n o x o g,
L
m o383 =v .i a val 00000000000 000000000000 n'a Om�m F a� �'� �3 lilt wr 0�a
''; m 5 0 E v S' F,
N N-N 9 H m T T;A n c c -m 9 T'S D n N N N 9 ran v - T A ry R o v m., n. 3,m .m-. o"' m
a s a ti 3 $ a N 3 3 3 3 ti A m v- = 3 a 1 A Z a a^ n s^i n a o
N O. 3 u m m m n n 0 n 3_3_E"m m m "n O O ti_ T,N a 3 q D 3 n 3 S 6 F o 4 3
£4 x 2 2 x N o o c o 4 4£ r" y F F F a u m '° u- `$° E n ^A a -
30 o N� ;;O m- 330�- 04 m m 3 F m °¢'a 0a a O
3m c ,��} 33 's.�'� 33�.'0 _n3 Em o - ER;' ,�a >
,° m- N'� 3 x n 3=.o 84 n N =g w o g
x^ 3_3� - - E 3 9 3 ^- s I^
m c m m m'^ = h ro ,s'Z'n 3 :1d
N E m m m 3 g m z Gs
3 v
m m a 6
u
3 N 3
• ?.3 m
Oa c`3 £ v m A
343z0:$� 33''5
,r 0,- -, m•5 61
_. Exhibit"E"
OHOHO C)FC W O W Z oHO HoOo CxOC7OZOaH •> H '> O0) OC40XxO0) x0. Co LO a
C.) 1-1 Z CC O 0 04 C0) C0OZocn0C4CHOHHOHOMUMUMUEMUEcEv' 0) N > CD
W 0 E HKGNKCMWvHLU F) NOCDOCoNO WHONOMOW ,PONLU g CDDrZ
r 0 Z W U C ) CD r) O E. O V) OG.104.IOEO ) O1' H04H U HUHUC] HU0H 0 HUH Ov'
H E .4.1 O O O O O O O C O O O O O ' O C. O O
•
.••
rl `a t C) C. Cl r? C) _. r) O CD O C C O O 0 O 0
,t.o N to E o E o E-t O E to R+'O Z 0 04 0 .
t-a E co O U O U O O C] O H O H O CD M H O W O '1 H (x1 N W C' W' C' W O H O H O 0
<• W O W . Z CDHOH0OD Ox0.C7 O Z O to H > H •J O C4 O r4 O 124x O 124 x 0• 01 • LU I)1
UF-1 .ZC] O OL14004004OZoCnOCJOHOHHOHO01UM0MUEM0Ed' E ,' Wt- >. CD
H 124 E C7 '4 r< 3 w X Z Z Z Z a, Z a co )x a
Q W E E ,r, ZN ,r, `
Z W U o01O Cqo EOmo G4o4, o Eo X CDr4 H (Y' H U H U H U C] H U CI H U H U H O d''
H E. W O C) O O O O O O O O O O O ' O O CD 0
1-1 hH CO O O 0 O O O 0 CD CD O O CD CD O O CD O
TABLE 8: ON SITE VEHICLE STORAGE FOR PARKING LOT ACCESS'
Land Use Peak Hour Size Local Collector Arterial
Exit Trips* (Feet) (Feet) (Feet)
Industrial Park(per 1000 sq. ft.) 0.15 0-500 20 20 40
Discount Store (per 1000 sq. ft.) 2.0 0-30 20 20 20
30-50 20 40 60
50-75 20 40 100
75-100 40 60 140
Shopping Center 0-49,999 gross sq. ft. 7.2 0-10 20 20 40
(per 1000 sq. ft.) 10-20 20 40 100
20-30 40 80 140
30-40 60 100 180
40-50 60 120 200
Shopping Center 50,000 to 299,999 3.0 50-100 60 120 200
gross sq. ft. (per 1000 sq. ft.) 100-150 80 140 300
150-200 100 200 400
200-250 120 240 500
250-299 140 300 600
Shopping Center over 300,000 gross sq. 1.3 300-400 140 300 600
ft. (per 1000 sq. ft.) 400-500 140 300 600
500-600 140 300 600
600-700 160 300 600
700-800 180 340 700
800-900 200 400 780
900-1000 220 440 860
1000-1500 340 660 1300
Drive-In Bank(per 1000 sq. ft.) 12.3 0-10 20 20 40
10-20 40 40 160
20-30 60 120 240
30-40 80 160 320
40-50 120 200 400
Supermarket(per 1000 sq. ft.) 3.3 0-20 20 20 20
20-30 20 40 60
30-40 20 40 80
40-50 20 60 120
Medical Clinic (per employee) 0.62 0-100 20 20 40
*Peak hour exit trips per 1000 sq. ft. are as determined by the Institute of Transportation
Engineers' publication "Trip Generation".
' Distance is measured from the flow line of the street to the first parking stall or aisle.
These vehicles are based on a vehicle length of 20 feet.
12
120
300-400 40 80 160
400-500 60 100 200
11
dy findings, roadway
geometry,traffic volumes and site layout.
10
ast twenty-four (24) hours in
advance of the time of the inspections.
G. The entrance angle for all driveway approaches shall be as near ninety (90) degrees to
the center line of the street as is possible. In no case shall the center line of the driveway
intersect the center line of the street at an angle of less than sixty (60)degrees.
2
Bridge Widening, Douglas - Farnam
Project No. MAPA-5103(14) EXHIBIT "F"
Control No. 22353 Sheet 2 of 5
10th St Bridge Widening, Douglas - Farnam
a.)(NDOR Concrete) 1 $585.00 $595.00
Sieve Analysis of Aggregate(ea.) E8 J$70.00 $560.00
Subtotal $25,995.00
Contingency @ 10%of Subtotal $2,600.00
Total $28,595.00
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Exhibit"E"
•
_ ' Nms
iim E1O0 _ III,I ,3,`^a nA^ m 45 o v'. .^,3:°a ? 3 m3.6 63 c8'�
m^ 'o^ - - ,,y N i o o '.m g m, 3'- ;3 S.0 -
x ' m m m m 3 v_'mS z.H n E R°o F m 3- - _
E m 3 m 'v a 5 i,A v
3a`
- °i t�_ x
_ �5,o
3 1p�n
m ,n x n m-6 m .P 3«d.3'e H o' _a S i ¢6¢ a_ n o x o g,
L
m o383 =v .i a val 00000000000 000000000000 n'a Om�m F a� �'� �3 lilt wr 0�a
''; m 5 0 E v S' F,
N N-N 9 H m T T;A n c c -m 9 T'S D n N N N 9 ran v - T A ry R o v m., n. 3,m .m-. o"' m
a s a ti 3 $ a N 3 3 3 3 ti A m v- = 3 a 1 A Z a a^ n s^i n a o
N O. 3 u m m m n n 0 n 3_3_E"m m m "n O O ti_ T,N a 3 q D 3 n 3 S 6 F o 4 3
£4 x 2 2 x N o o c o 4 4£ r" y F F F a u m '° u- `$° E n ^A a -
30 o N� ;;O m- 330�- 04 m m 3 F m °¢'a 0a a O
3m c ,��} 33 's.�'� 33�.'0 _n3 Em o - ER;' ,�a >
,° m- N'� 3 x n 3=.o 84 n N =g w o g
x^ 3_3� - - E 3 9 3 ^- s I^
m c m m m'^ = h ro ,s'Z'n 3 :1d
N E m m m 3 g m z Gs
3 v
m m a 6
u
3 N 3
• ?.3 m
Oa c`3 £ v m A
343z0:$� 33''5
,r 0,- -, m•5 61
_. Exhibit"E"
OHOHO C)FC W O W Z oHO HoOo CxOC7OZOaH •> H '> O0) OC40XxO0) x0. Co LO a
C.) 1-1 Z CC O 0 04 C0) C0OZocn0C4CHOHHOHOMUMUMUEMUEcEv' 0) N > CD
W 0 E HKGNKCMWvHLU F) NOCDOCoNO WHONOMOW ,PONLU g CDDrZ
r 0 Z W U C ) CD r) O E. O V) OG.104.IOEO ) O1' H04H U HUHUC] HU0H 0 HUH Ov'
H E .4.1 O O O O O O O C O O O O O ' O C. O O
•
.••
rl `a t C) C. Cl r? C) _. r) O CD O C C O O 0 O 0
,t.o N to E o E o E-t O E to R+'O Z 0 04 0 .
t-a E co O U O U O O C] O H O H O CD M H O W O '1 H (x1 N W C' W' C' W O H O H O 0
<• W O W . Z CDHOH0OD Ox0.C7 O Z O to H > H •J O C4 O r4 O 124x O 124 x 0• 01 • LU I)1
UF-1 .ZC] O OL14004004OZoCnOCJOHOHHOHO01UM0MUEM0Ed' E ,' Wt- >. CD
H 124 E C7 '4 r< 3 w X Z Z Z Z a, Z a co )x a
Q W E E ,r, ZN ,r, `
Z W U o01O Cqo EOmo G4o4, o Eo X CDr4 H (Y' H U H U H U C] H U CI H U H U H O d''
H E. W O C) O O O O O O O O O O O ' O O CD 0
1-1 hH CO O O 0 O O O 0 CD CD O O CD CD O O CD O
VIII. Drive-In Facilities Storage Requirements
Locations that provide drive-through or drive-in services are subject to minimum storage
requirements. The purpose of minimum storage requirements is to ensure that vehicles can
queue on site without blocking access to parking areas, public sidewalks or streets. Table 9
shows the minimum storage requirements for various land uses. Land uses not listed shall
provide on site storage for a minimum of two vehicles, or as determined by an engineering study.
TABLE 9: DRIVE THROUGH LANE STACKING REQUIREMENTS
Type of Operation Minimum stacking Requirement(vehicles)
Automatic Teller Machine 3 vehicles
Drive Through Bank 8 vehicles per lane
Self Service Car Wash 2 vehicles per bay
Car Wash — drive through or 12 vehicles per entrance, 2 vehicles per exit*
automatic conveyor
Fast Food Restaurant 12 vehicles**
Gas station 2 vehicle per pump
Drive Through Coffee Stand 11 vehicles per lane** •
Drive Through Pharmacy 2 vehicles
* Chapter 55-765 (b) of the Omaha Municipal Code requires 300 feet stacking for car
washes.
** May be reduced to 8 vehicles if subject property is located greater than 300 feet from any
street with an ADT of 20,000 or more.
Storage requirements include the vehicle being served. Vehicle storage should not be located in
setback areas where parking of vehicles is prohibited. Allow 25 feet per vehicle storage.
IX. Residential on-street parking EX 5c 9
requirements •
Sidewalk
Applicants wanting to construct on-street parking similar to what Curbs I Areae
is shown on Figure 4 to serve residential land uses need to follow 7'SidewalkN
these requirements.
1. Plans must be prepared by an Engineer registered in the
State of Nebraska, and submitted to the Public Works 11
Department as Public Improvement Plans with the proper
bonds and insurance requirements. The plans need to meet '
the following minimum requirements: Property
a. Slope the parking area to drain to the street. Lune\
b. Paving material must be minimum seven inch I
concrete with curb and gutter.
c. Minimum parking stall dimensions shall be -—— ———
9' x 20'.
FIGURE 4: On-Street parking
13
intersect the center line of the street at an angle of less than sixty (60)degrees.
2
Bridge Widening, Douglas - Farnam
Project No. MAPA-5103(14) EXHIBIT "F"
Control No. 22353 Sheet 2 of 5
10th St Bridge Widening, Douglas - Farnam
a.)(NDOR Concrete) 1 $585.00 $595.00
Sieve Analysis of Aggregate(ea.) E8 J$70.00 $560.00
Subtotal $25,995.00
Contingency @ 10%of Subtotal $2,600.00
Total $28,595.00
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Exhibit"E"
•
_ ' Nms
iim E1O0 _ III,I ,3,`^a nA^ m 45 o v'. .^,3:°a ? 3 m3.6 63 c8'�
m^ 'o^ - - ,,y N i o o '.m g m, 3'- ;3 S.0 -
x ' m m m m 3 v_'mS z.H n E R°o F m 3- - _
E m 3 m 'v a 5 i,A v
3a`
- °i t�_ x
_ �5,o
3 1p�n
m ,n x n m-6 m .P 3«d.3'e H o' _a S i ¢6¢ a_ n o x o g,
L
m o383 =v .i a val 00000000000 000000000000 n'a Om�m F a� �'� �3 lilt wr 0�a
''; m 5 0 E v S' F,
N N-N 9 H m T T;A n c c -m 9 T'S D n N N N 9 ran v - T A ry R o v m., n. 3,m .m-. o"' m
a s a ti 3 $ a N 3 3 3 3 ti A m v- = 3 a 1 A Z a a^ n s^i n a o
N O. 3 u m m m n n 0 n 3_3_E"m m m "n O O ti_ T,N a 3 q D 3 n 3 S 6 F o 4 3
£4 x 2 2 x N o o c o 4 4£ r" y F F F a u m '° u- `$° E n ^A a -
30 o N� ;;O m- 330�- 04 m m 3 F m °¢'a 0a a O
3m c ,��} 33 's.�'� 33�.'0 _n3 Em o - ER;' ,�a >
,° m- N'� 3 x n 3=.o 84 n N =g w o g
x^ 3_3� - - E 3 9 3 ^- s I^
m c m m m'^ = h ro ,s'Z'n 3 :1d
N E m m m 3 g m z Gs
3 v
m m a 6
u
3 N 3
• ?.3 m
Oa c`3 £ v m A
343z0:$� 33''5
,r 0,- -, m•5 61
_. Exhibit"E"
OHOHO C)FC W O W Z oHO HoOo CxOC7OZOaH •> H '> O0) OC40XxO0) x0. Co LO a
C.) 1-1 Z CC O 0 04 C0) C0OZocn0C4CHOHHOHOMUMUMUEMUEcEv' 0) N > CD
W 0 E HKGNKCMWvHLU F) NOCDOCoNO WHONOMOW ,PONLU g CDDrZ
r 0 Z W U C ) CD r) O E. O V) OG.104.IOEO ) O1' H04H U HUHUC] HU0H 0 HUH Ov'
H E .4.1 O O O O O O O C O O O O O ' O C. O O
•
.••
rl `a t C) C. Cl r? C) _. r) O CD O C C O O 0 O 0
,t.o N to E o E o E-t O E to R+'O Z 0 04 0 .
t-a E co O U O U O O C] O H O H O CD M H O W O '1 H (x1 N W C' W' C' W O H O H O 0
<• W O W . Z CDHOH0OD Ox0.C7 O Z O to H > H •J O C4 O r4 O 124x O 124 x 0• 01 • LU I)1
UF-1 .ZC] O OL14004004OZoCnOCJOHOHHOHO01UM0MUEM0Ed' E ,' Wt- >. CD
H 124 E C7 '4 r< 3 w X Z Z Z Z a, Z a co )x a
Q W E E ,r, ZN ,r, `
Z W U o01O Cqo EOmo G4o4, o Eo X CDr4 H (Y' H U H U H U C] H U CI H U H U H O d''
H E. W O C) O O O O O O O O O O O ' O O CD 0
1-1 hH CO O O 0 O O O 0 CD CD O O CD CD O O CD O
d. Refer to Standard Plate 1-70 for curb removal and expansion joint details.
2. A seven foot sidewalk needs to be installed in front of the parking stalls, and a public
access easement granted over the new sidewalk. Connect to the existing sidewalks.
3. No more than 80%of the lots front footage can be used for parking.
4. Plant one street tree for every 500 square feet of parking. Submit a landscape plan to the
Planning Department for approval.
5. Parking area will be open to the public unless the space is leased. The area of parking
within right of way is subject to lease from the City. Contact the Planning Department
for information regarding lease applications.
6. Private maintenance of the parking area is required. The City will not make repairs or
remove snow from on-street parking areas.
7. If required, the applicant must obtain a waiver from the Zoning Board of Appeals to
allow for reduction of setbacks or parking in required setbacks prior to approval of the
plans
X. Deviation from Regulations.
Permission to deviate from the requirements and regulations of this article may be granted only
where unusual conditions or strict adherence to this article would cause unusual and extreme
hardship.
• Access onto State Highways in the City Limits and within three (3) miles of the City Limits, and
on County roads with three (3) miles of the City Limits will be subject to the approval of the
City of Omaha and the respective jurisdictions.
Xl. Appeals.
Any person aggrieved by the issuance, denial or cancellation of any permit issued under the
provision of this section may appeal any issuance, denial or cancellation to the Administrative
Appeals Board by giving written notice of such appeal to the Omaha City Planning Director.
14
dewalkN
these requirements.
1. Plans must be prepared by an Engineer registered in the
State of Nebraska, and submitted to the Public Works 11
Department as Public Improvement Plans with the proper
bonds and insurance requirements. The plans need to meet '
the following minimum requirements: Property
a. Slope the parking area to drain to the street. Lune\
b. Paving material must be minimum seven inch I
concrete with curb and gutter.
c. Minimum parking stall dimensions shall be -—— ———
9' x 20'.
FIGURE 4: On-Street parking
13
intersect the center line of the street at an angle of less than sixty (60)degrees.
2
Bridge Widening, Douglas - Farnam
Project No. MAPA-5103(14) EXHIBIT "F"
Control No. 22353 Sheet 2 of 5
10th St Bridge Widening, Douglas - Farnam
a.)(NDOR Concrete) 1 $585.00 $595.00
Sieve Analysis of Aggregate(ea.) E8 J$70.00 $560.00
Subtotal $25,995.00
Contingency @ 10%of Subtotal $2,600.00
Total $28,595.00
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Exhibit"E"
•
_ ' Nms
iim E1O0 _ III,I ,3,`^a nA^ m 45 o v'. .^,3:°a ? 3 m3.6 63 c8'�
m^ 'o^ - - ,,y N i o o '.m g m, 3'- ;3 S.0 -
x ' m m m m 3 v_'mS z.H n E R°o F m 3- - _
E m 3 m 'v a 5 i,A v
3a`
- °i t�_ x
_ �5,o
3 1p�n
m ,n x n m-6 m .P 3«d.3'e H o' _a S i ¢6¢ a_ n o x o g,
L
m o383 =v .i a val 00000000000 000000000000 n'a Om�m F a� �'� �3 lilt wr 0�a
''; m 5 0 E v S' F,
N N-N 9 H m T T;A n c c -m 9 T'S D n N N N 9 ran v - T A ry R o v m., n. 3,m .m-. o"' m
a s a ti 3 $ a N 3 3 3 3 ti A m v- = 3 a 1 A Z a a^ n s^i n a o
N O. 3 u m m m n n 0 n 3_3_E"m m m "n O O ti_ T,N a 3 q D 3 n 3 S 6 F o 4 3
£4 x 2 2 x N o o c o 4 4£ r" y F F F a u m '° u- `$° E n ^A a -
30 o N� ;;O m- 330�- 04 m m 3 F m °¢'a 0a a O
3m c ,��} 33 's.�'� 33�.'0 _n3 Em o - ER;' ,�a >
,° m- N'� 3 x n 3=.o 84 n N =g w o g
x^ 3_3� - - E 3 9 3 ^- s I^
m c m m m'^ = h ro ,s'Z'n 3 :1d
N E m m m 3 g m z Gs
3 v
m m a 6
u
3 N 3
• ?.3 m
Oa c`3 £ v m A
343z0:$� 33''5
,r 0,- -, m•5 61
_. Exhibit"E"
OHOHO C)FC W O W Z oHO HoOo CxOC7OZOaH •> H '> O0) OC40XxO0) x0. Co LO a
C.) 1-1 Z CC O 0 04 C0) C0OZocn0C4CHOHHOHOMUMUMUEMUEcEv' 0) N > CD
W 0 E HKGNKCMWvHLU F) NOCDOCoNO WHONOMOW ,PONLU g CDDrZ
r 0 Z W U C ) CD r) O E. O V) OG.104.IOEO ) O1' H04H U HUHUC] HU0H 0 HUH Ov'
H E .4.1 O O O O O O O C O O O O O ' O C. O O
•
.••
rl `a t C) C. Cl r? C) _. r) O CD O C C O O 0 O 0
,t.o N to E o E o E-t O E to R+'O Z 0 04 0 .
t-a E co O U O U O O C] O H O H O CD M H O W O '1 H (x1 N W C' W' C' W O H O H O 0
<• W O W . Z CDHOH0OD Ox0.C7 O Z O to H > H •J O C4 O r4 O 124x O 124 x 0• 01 • LU I)1
UF-1 .ZC] O OL14004004OZoCnOCJOHOHHOHO01UM0MUEM0Ed' E ,' Wt- >. CD
H 124 E C7 '4 r< 3 w X Z Z Z Z a, Z a co )x a
Q W E E ,r, ZN ,r, `
Z W U o01O Cqo EOmo G4o4, o Eo X CDr4 H (Y' H U H U H U C] H U CI H U H U H O d''
H E. W O C) O O O O O O O O O O O ' O O CD 0
1-1 hH CO O O 0 O O O 0 CD CD O O CD CD O O CD O
APPENDIX
A-1. Traffic Impact Study Requirements
1. Introduction
For any new development to be successful, adequate traffic service to this development must be
provided. In many cases in the past,the problem of adequate traffic service was considered only
after traffic service had deteriorated to such a point that it was adversely affecting the success of
the development. Also, the traffic generated by any large development may affect the overall
traffic service of the street system in the vicinity of the development, thus impacting on other
business, industrial and residential areas.
Principal elements which should be indicated in most traffic impact studies include the
following:
• Data on existing peak hour traffic volumes and conditions.
• Directional distribution estimates of site generated traffic.
• Projections of added traffic volumes for the appropriate critical hours.
• Determination of needed improvements, controls, driveway locations and their design.
• Identification of any need for additional right of way.
2. Proposed Development and Access Routes
This section of the report contains information on the type, size, shape and area of the
development, as well as the location of proposed street access. A map should be included that
relates the site to the street network. Estimated daily and peak hour trips (AM and PM) for the
development should be calculated based on the publication "Trip Generation" by the Institute of
Transportation Engineers. When provided, the equation should be used in lieu of average rates.
If site-specific or local data is available that is believed to be a better predictor of generated trips,
that data should be used upon approval by the Traffic Engineer.
3. Existing Traffic Conditions
Existing traffic conditions should show the peak hour turning movement volumes and levels of
service at the locations anticipated to be affected by the development. At a minimum, all
adjacent streets and intersections should be analyzed. Intersections within one mile of the
development should be considered for analysis as well. In the case of very large developments,
or developments which generate very high numbers of new trips, the City may request additional
analysis beyond this area. Industrial developments which generate a high percentage of truck
traffic may require analysis of extended areas as well.
A-1
le of less than sixty (60)degrees.
2
Bridge Widening, Douglas - Farnam
Project No. MAPA-5103(14) EXHIBIT "F"
Control No. 22353 Sheet 2 of 5
10th St Bridge Widening, Douglas - Farnam
a.)(NDOR Concrete) 1 $585.00 $595.00
Sieve Analysis of Aggregate(ea.) E8 J$70.00 $560.00
Subtotal $25,995.00
Contingency @ 10%of Subtotal $2,600.00
Total $28,595.00
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Exhibit"E"
•
_ ' Nms
iim E1O0 _ III,I ,3,`^a nA^ m 45 o v'. .^,3:°a ? 3 m3.6 63 c8'�
m^ 'o^ - - ,,y N i o o '.m g m, 3'- ;3 S.0 -
x ' m m m m 3 v_'mS z.H n E R°o F m 3- - _
E m 3 m 'v a 5 i,A v
3a`
- °i t�_ x
_ �5,o
3 1p�n
m ,n x n m-6 m .P 3«d.3'e H o' _a S i ¢6¢ a_ n o x o g,
L
m o383 =v .i a val 00000000000 000000000000 n'a Om�m F a� �'� �3 lilt wr 0�a
''; m 5 0 E v S' F,
N N-N 9 H m T T;A n c c -m 9 T'S D n N N N 9 ran v - T A ry R o v m., n. 3,m .m-. o"' m
a s a ti 3 $ a N 3 3 3 3 ti A m v- = 3 a 1 A Z a a^ n s^i n a o
N O. 3 u m m m n n 0 n 3_3_E"m m m "n O O ti_ T,N a 3 q D 3 n 3 S 6 F o 4 3
£4 x 2 2 x N o o c o 4 4£ r" y F F F a u m '° u- `$° E n ^A a -
30 o N� ;;O m- 330�- 04 m m 3 F m °¢'a 0a a O
3m c ,��} 33 's.�'� 33�.'0 _n3 Em o - ER;' ,�a >
,° m- N'� 3 x n 3=.o 84 n N =g w o g
x^ 3_3� - - E 3 9 3 ^- s I^
m c m m m'^ = h ro ,s'Z'n 3 :1d
N E m m m 3 g m z Gs
3 v
m m a 6
u
3 N 3
• ?.3 m
Oa c`3 £ v m A
343z0:$� 33''5
,r 0,- -, m•5 61
_. Exhibit"E"
OHOHO C)FC W O W Z oHO HoOo CxOC7OZOaH •> H '> O0) OC40XxO0) x0. Co LO a
C.) 1-1 Z CC O 0 04 C0) C0OZocn0C4CHOHHOHOMUMUMUEMUEcEv' 0) N > CD
W 0 E HKGNKCMWvHLU F) NOCDOCoNO WHONOMOW ,PONLU g CDDrZ
r 0 Z W U C ) CD r) O E. O V) OG.104.IOEO ) O1' H04H U HUHUC] HU0H 0 HUH Ov'
H E .4.1 O O O O O O O C O O O O O ' O C. O O
•
.••
rl `a t C) C. Cl r? C) _. r) O CD O C C O O 0 O 0
,t.o N to E o E o E-t O E to R+'O Z 0 04 0 .
t-a E co O U O U O O C] O H O H O CD M H O W O '1 H (x1 N W C' W' C' W O H O H O 0
<• W O W . Z CDHOH0OD Ox0.C7 O Z O to H > H •J O C4 O r4 O 124x O 124 x 0• 01 • LU I)1
UF-1 .ZC] O OL14004004OZoCnOCJOHOHHOHO01UM0MUEM0Ed' E ,' Wt- >. CD
H 124 E C7 '4 r< 3 w X Z Z Z Z a, Z a co )x a
Q W E E ,r, ZN ,r, `
Z W U o01O Cqo EOmo G4o4, o Eo X CDr4 H (Y' H U H U H U C] H U CI H U H U H O d''
H E. W O C) O O O O O O O O O O O ' O O CD 0
1-1 hH CO O O 0 O O O 0 CD CD O O CD CD O O CD O
4. Traffic Impact or Capacity Analysis
This section should contain narrative and appropriate figures and tables to identify intersection
turning movement volumes and levels of service. Opening day is the expected opening of the
• development and horizon year is typically 25 years in the future. Capacity analyses should be
run for the AM and PM peak hours for the following scenarios:
• Existing geometry and control: opening day background volumes.
• Existing geometry and control: opening day base plus site volumes
• Recommended opening day improvements and controls: opening day base plus site
volumes.
• Existing geometry and control: horizon year background volumes
• Recommended opening day improvements and controls: horizon year base plus site
volumes.
• Recommended horizon year improvements and controls: horizon year base plus site
volumes.
The report should be of a technical nature and need not contain cost estimates or construction
schedules. The developer will be responsible for ensuring that adequate improvements and
controls are provided for to ensure the highest possible level of service and safety, as well as
promoting efficient access to the development.
5. Queue length analysis
Queue length analyses should be preformed at all intersections to ensure the recommendations
contain adequate storage for turning vehicles. Through movements should not experience
excessive queues or extend past intersections or driveways. 95th percentile queue lengths should
be used to determine required vehicle stacking. Values should be rounded up to the nearest 25
feet.
6. Conclusions and recommendations
The conclusions of the report should be summarized and recommendations for improvements
made. Recommendations should include all geometric and control improvements to maintain the
existing level of service, or provide a minimum level of service "C" as defined in the Highway
Capacity Manual.
All recommendations (including turn lane storage lengths) should be provided for the opening
day scenario, as well as the horizon year. Any right of way required from the development for
the horizon year improvements should be dedicated during the initial platting of the
development. When turn lane storage requirements are similar from the opening day scenario to
the horizon year, the recommendation should be to construct the lanes to the length required by
the horizon year traffic.
As a general rule, the developer will be responsible for the construction and payment of all
improvements identified in the study for the opening day scenario.
A-2
1 $585.00 $595.00
Sieve Analysis of Aggregate(ea.) E8 J$70.00 $560.00
Subtotal $25,995.00
Contingency @ 10%of Subtotal $2,600.00
Total $28,595.00
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Exhibit"E"
•
_ ' Nms
iim E1O0 _ III,I ,3,`^a nA^ m 45 o v'. .^,3:°a ? 3 m3.6 63 c8'�
m^ 'o^ - - ,,y N i o o '.m g m, 3'- ;3 S.0 -
x ' m m m m 3 v_'mS z.H n E R°o F m 3- - _
E m 3 m 'v a 5 i,A v
3a`
- °i t�_ x
_ �5,o
3 1p�n
m ,n x n m-6 m .P 3«d.3'e H o' _a S i ¢6¢ a_ n o x o g,
L
m o383 =v .i a val 00000000000 000000000000 n'a Om�m F a� �'� �3 lilt wr 0�a
''; m 5 0 E v S' F,
N N-N 9 H m T T;A n c c -m 9 T'S D n N N N 9 ran v - T A ry R o v m., n. 3,m .m-. o"' m
a s a ti 3 $ a N 3 3 3 3 ti A m v- = 3 a 1 A Z a a^ n s^i n a o
N O. 3 u m m m n n 0 n 3_3_E"m m m "n O O ti_ T,N a 3 q D 3 n 3 S 6 F o 4 3
£4 x 2 2 x N o o c o 4 4£ r" y F F F a u m '° u- `$° E n ^A a -
30 o N� ;;O m- 330�- 04 m m 3 F m °¢'a 0a a O
3m c ,��} 33 's.�'� 33�.'0 _n3 Em o - ER;' ,�a >
,° m- N'� 3 x n 3=.o 84 n N =g w o g
x^ 3_3� - - E 3 9 3 ^- s I^
m c m m m'^ = h ro ,s'Z'n 3 :1d
N E m m m 3 g m z Gs
3 v
m m a 6
u
3 N 3
• ?.3 m
Oa c`3 £ v m A
343z0:$� 33''5
,r 0,- -, m•5 61
_. Exhibit"E"
OHOHO C)FC W O W Z oHO HoOo CxOC7OZOaH •> H '> O0) OC40XxO0) x0. Co LO a
C.) 1-1 Z CC O 0 04 C0) C0OZocn0C4CHOHHOHOMUMUMUEMUEcEv' 0) N > CD
W 0 E HKGNKCMWvHLU F) NOCDOCoNO WHONOMOW ,PONLU g CDDrZ
r 0 Z W U C ) CD r) O E. O V) OG.104.IOEO ) O1' H04H U HUHUC] HU0H 0 HUH Ov'
H E .4.1 O O O O O O O C O O O O O ' O C. O O
•
.••
rl `a t C) C. Cl r? C) _. r) O CD O C C O O 0 O 0
,t.o N to E o E o E-t O E to R+'O Z 0 04 0 .
t-a E co O U O U O O C] O H O H O CD M H O W O '1 H (x1 N W C' W' C' W O H O H O 0
<• W O W . Z CDHOH0OD Ox0.C7 O Z O to H > H •J O C4 O r4 O 124x O 124 x 0• 01 • LU I)1
UF-1 .ZC] O OL14004004OZoCnOCJOHOHHOHO01UM0MUEM0Ed' E ,' Wt- >. CD
H 124 E C7 '4 r< 3 w X Z Z Z Z a, Z a co )x a
Q W E E ,r, ZN ,r, `
Z W U o01O Cqo EOmo G4o4, o Eo X CDr4 H (Y' H U H U H U C] H U CI H U H U H O d''
H E. W O C) O O O O O O O O O O O ' O O CD 0
1-1 hH CO O O 0 O O O 0 CD CD O O CD CD O O CD O
7. Appendix
The appendix of the report should contain copies of the capacity analyses performed, queue
length analyses, background data and any other relevant information, data and computer output
to support the recommendations of the report.
A-2. Traffic Impact Study General Information
1. Purposes of the Impact Report
There are three primary reasons the City requires traffic impact reports:
a. To enable the Public Works Department, Planning Department, Planning Board, City
Council and other jurisdictions to verify whether capacity improvements will be
needed on streets or at intersections.
b. To enable the Traffic Engineering Division to check the access design. This includes
location, width, radii, allowable movements, control and estimated turning movements
during one or more critical design hours.
c. To allow a fair and equitable determination of cost sharing between the developer(or
developers), the City of Omaha and other public agencies for any needed intersection
or access improvements, including geometric and control improvements.
2. Need for Studies
Any development that will generate over 100 vehicles (two way) has the potential to have
significant traffic impact and may be required to submit a traffic impact study to the City
Planning Department. The traffic impact significance of individual developments should be
discussed with the City Planning Department and the City Traffic Engineer. Table A-1 gives
examples of sizes of several common types of development which meet the above criteria.
Table A-1 Traffic Generators
Developments likely to generate peak
hour Volumes of 100 vehicles
Type of Development Size
Residential
Single Family 100 units
Apartment 150 units
Retail
Hardware/Paint store 15,000 square feet
General Shopping Center 10,000 square feet
Supermarket 7,000 square feet
Discount Store 15,000 square feet
Restaurants
A-3
Capacity Manual.
All recommendations (including turn lane storage lengths) should be provided for the opening
day scenario, as well as the horizon year. Any right of way required from the development for
the horizon year improvements should be dedicated during the initial platting of the
development. When turn lane storage requirements are similar from the opening day scenario to
the horizon year, the recommendation should be to construct the lanes to the length required by
the horizon year traffic.
As a general rule, the developer will be responsible for the construction and payment of all
improvements identified in the study for the opening day scenario.
A-2
1 $585.00 $595.00
Sieve Analysis of Aggregate(ea.) E8 J$70.00 $560.00
Subtotal $25,995.00
Contingency @ 10%of Subtotal $2,600.00
Total $28,595.00
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Exhibit"E"
•
_ ' Nms
iim E1O0 _ III,I ,3,`^a nA^ m 45 o v'. .^,3:°a ? 3 m3.6 63 c8'�
m^ 'o^ - - ,,y N i o o '.m g m, 3'- ;3 S.0 -
x ' m m m m 3 v_'mS z.H n E R°o F m 3- - _
E m 3 m 'v a 5 i,A v
3a`
- °i t�_ x
_ �5,o
3 1p�n
m ,n x n m-6 m .P 3«d.3'e H o' _a S i ¢6¢ a_ n o x o g,
L
m o383 =v .i a val 00000000000 000000000000 n'a Om�m F a� �'� �3 lilt wr 0�a
''; m 5 0 E v S' F,
N N-N 9 H m T T;A n c c -m 9 T'S D n N N N 9 ran v - T A ry R o v m., n. 3,m .m-. o"' m
a s a ti 3 $ a N 3 3 3 3 ti A m v- = 3 a 1 A Z a a^ n s^i n a o
N O. 3 u m m m n n 0 n 3_3_E"m m m "n O O ti_ T,N a 3 q D 3 n 3 S 6 F o 4 3
£4 x 2 2 x N o o c o 4 4£ r" y F F F a u m '° u- `$° E n ^A a -
30 o N� ;;O m- 330�- 04 m m 3 F m °¢'a 0a a O
3m c ,��} 33 's.�'� 33�.'0 _n3 Em o - ER;' ,�a >
,° m- N'� 3 x n 3=.o 84 n N =g w o g
x^ 3_3� - - E 3 9 3 ^- s I^
m c m m m'^ = h ro ,s'Z'n 3 :1d
N E m m m 3 g m z Gs
3 v
m m a 6
u
3 N 3
• ?.3 m
Oa c`3 £ v m A
343z0:$� 33''5
,r 0,- -, m•5 61
_. Exhibit"E"
OHOHO C)FC W O W Z oHO HoOo CxOC7OZOaH •> H '> O0) OC40XxO0) x0. Co LO a
C.) 1-1 Z CC O 0 04 C0) C0OZocn0C4CHOHHOHOMUMUMUEMUEcEv' 0) N > CD
W 0 E HKGNKCMWvHLU F) NOCDOCoNO WHONOMOW ,PONLU g CDDrZ
r 0 Z W U C ) CD r) O E. O V) OG.104.IOEO ) O1' H04H U HUHUC] HU0H 0 HUH Ov'
H E .4.1 O O O O O O O C O O O O O ' O C. O O
•
.••
rl `a t C) C. Cl r? C) _. r) O CD O C C O O 0 O 0
,t.o N to E o E o E-t O E to R+'O Z 0 04 0 .
t-a E co O U O U O O C] O H O H O CD M H O W O '1 H (x1 N W C' W' C' W O H O H O 0
<• W O W . Z CDHOH0OD Ox0.C7 O Z O to H > H •J O C4 O r4 O 124x O 124 x 0• 01 • LU I)1
UF-1 .ZC] O OL14004004OZoCnOCJOHOHHOHO01UM0MUEM0Ed' E ,' Wt- >. CD
H 124 E C7 '4 r< 3 w X Z Z Z Z a, Z a co )x a
Q W E E ,r, ZN ,r, `
Z W U o01O Cqo EOmo G4o4, o Eo X CDr4 H (Y' H U H U H U C] H U CI H U H U H O d''
H E. W O C) O O O O O O O O O O O ' O O CD 0
1-1 hH CO O O 0 O O O 0 CD CD O O CD CD O O CD O
Drive-in All
Quality Restaurant 15 000 square feet
Q Y q
High Turnover Sit-Down 5,00 square feet
Banks
Walk-in 3,000 square feet
Drive-up All
Car Washes All
Offices
General 50,000 square feet
Medical 20,000 square feet
Industrial 100,000 square feet
Hospitals All
Schools All
For a more complete guide to trip generation rates, refer to "Trip Generation" published by the
Institute of Transportation Engineers. Other trip generation reference documents may be used, if
approved in advance by the Traffic Engineer. Local data on trip generation may be used, if
available.
The Impact Study should be submitted with the preliminary plat or rezoning application. If the
land is properly zoned and subdivided, a traffic impact study will need to be submitted prior to
issuing a building permit.
3. Data Provided by the City of Omaha
Traffic consultants should discuss their traffic impact reports with the City Traffic Engineer prior
to starting. Doing so will provide the traffic consultant with a further understanding of what
should be provided in the traffic impact report. The City Traffic Engineer will also be able to
provide the consultant with his knowledge of the present traffic situation in the vicinity of the
proposed development.
The City of Omaha will provide the consultant with any traffic counts presently on file in the
Traffic Engineering Office for their use. Locations that the city does not have counts for will
need to be counted and documented in the report. Previous traffic impact studies in the vicinity
of the proposed development may also be available to the consultant to use as reference or
background information.
4. Coordinated studies
When there are multiple proposed developments at an intersection, or in close proximity to each
other, the city may request a single study be performed to address the impacts of all
developments. These studies should address any improvements that are for the benefit of a
single development and those that serve more then one development.
Coordinated traffic studies will be the basis for approval of and determining the required
improvements for the proposed developments. Developers and their engineers are encouraged to
A-4
cenario to
the horizon year, the recommendation should be to construct the lanes to the length required by
the horizon year traffic.
As a general rule, the developer will be responsible for the construction and payment of all
improvements identified in the study for the opening day scenario.
A-2
1 $585.00 $595.00
Sieve Analysis of Aggregate(ea.) E8 J$70.00 $560.00
Subtotal $25,995.00
Contingency @ 10%of Subtotal $2,600.00
Total $28,595.00
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Exhibit"E"
•
_ ' Nms
iim E1O0 _ III,I ,3,`^a nA^ m 45 o v'. .^,3:°a ? 3 m3.6 63 c8'�
m^ 'o^ - - ,,y N i o o '.m g m, 3'- ;3 S.0 -
x ' m m m m 3 v_'mS z.H n E R°o F m 3- - _
E m 3 m 'v a 5 i,A v
3a`
- °i t�_ x
_ �5,o
3 1p�n
m ,n x n m-6 m .P 3«d.3'e H o' _a S i ¢6¢ a_ n o x o g,
L
m o383 =v .i a val 00000000000 000000000000 n'a Om�m F a� �'� �3 lilt wr 0�a
''; m 5 0 E v S' F,
N N-N 9 H m T T;A n c c -m 9 T'S D n N N N 9 ran v - T A ry R o v m., n. 3,m .m-. o"' m
a s a ti 3 $ a N 3 3 3 3 ti A m v- = 3 a 1 A Z a a^ n s^i n a o
N O. 3 u m m m n n 0 n 3_3_E"m m m "n O O ti_ T,N a 3 q D 3 n 3 S 6 F o 4 3
£4 x 2 2 x N o o c o 4 4£ r" y F F F a u m '° u- `$° E n ^A a -
30 o N� ;;O m- 330�- 04 m m 3 F m °¢'a 0a a O
3m c ,��} 33 's.�'� 33�.'0 _n3 Em o - ER;' ,�a >
,° m- N'� 3 x n 3=.o 84 n N =g w o g
x^ 3_3� - - E 3 9 3 ^- s I^
m c m m m'^ = h ro ,s'Z'n 3 :1d
N E m m m 3 g m z Gs
3 v
m m a 6
u
3 N 3
• ?.3 m
Oa c`3 £ v m A
343z0:$� 33''5
,r 0,- -, m•5 61
_. Exhibit"E"
OHOHO C)FC W O W Z oHO HoOo CxOC7OZOaH •> H '> O0) OC40XxO0) x0. Co LO a
C.) 1-1 Z CC O 0 04 C0) C0OZocn0C4CHOHHOHOMUMUMUEMUEcEv' 0) N > CD
W 0 E HKGNKCMWvHLU F) NOCDOCoNO WHONOMOW ,PONLU g CDDrZ
r 0 Z W U C ) CD r) O E. O V) OG.104.IOEO ) O1' H04H U HUHUC] HU0H 0 HUH Ov'
H E .4.1 O O O O O O O C O O O O O ' O C. O O
•
.••
rl `a t C) C. Cl r? C) _. r) O CD O C C O O 0 O 0
,t.o N to E o E o E-t O E to R+'O Z 0 04 0 .
t-a E co O U O U O O C] O H O H O CD M H O W O '1 H (x1 N W C' W' C' W O H O H O 0
<• W O W . Z CDHOH0OD Ox0.C7 O Z O to H > H •J O C4 O r4 O 124x O 124 x 0• 01 • LU I)1
UF-1 .ZC] O OL14004004OZoCnOCJOHOHHOHO01UM0MUEM0Ed' E ,' Wt- >. CD
H 124 E C7 '4 r< 3 w X Z Z Z Z a, Z a co )x a
Q W E E ,r, ZN ,r, `
Z W U o01O Cqo EOmo G4o4, o Eo X CDr4 H (Y' H U H U H U C] H U CI H U H U H O d''
H E. W O C) O O O O O O O O O O O ' O O CD 0
1-1 hH CO O O 0 O O O 0 CD CD O O CD CD O O CD O
work together to prepare these studies and share the costs of preparation. The City will not
withhold approval of a development included in a coordinated traffic study if they have not
participated in the costs of the study, provided they agree to construct and fund the required
improvements.
5. Consultant Qualifications
Traffic Impact reports must be prepared by a Professional Engineer registered in the State of
Nebraska. The engineer should have knowledge of traffic engineering principles, and if
requested must show evidence of prior experience in traffic engineering studies. Engineers
registered in another state may prepare reports as allowed by Nebraska State Law.
A-5
•
Email address:
•
•
Page 1 of 7, 12/7/2011 1:25:57 PM, Bid Tabulation, Generated by:admin for project OPW 52190
i
Approved
/ - Mayor
B. Driveway Standards
z ` 3 gig„ X
KA8R8tl86gffi8o9� 4 i i �/` Sg n IA i IA i sgu 1 a
6 ? a
ara:�em ehegqe Ro , ' g C 3 e�==RdgnRHARB Ijo n.
c •
, p¢ g B �
; 1 11 . si ihi H 1;
ES me
v A
gg N A G>
a
3 ; f z ; 1 1
A. Fe r 0 g33 b:.' N \I x El 1 t
i§ O
i iC _j\ t L3 z
fib —4----1-',, I. :Q
P. i
a
il- '
' NG--- g- ig o8 11b • fig. as
I m f fn k cc Q FFF
IMMIX
ns as ppp Fa _ N y•
� I§ � F �q3 t. m
R # u 3 1 <3.-.,„„N pgr..,
/�
�(( m 7 .2 4.5 W
~Y a i 11 :,eye a 9t Tel-e
IS
ill
f y
a j 1 i l g I ! Q t i i gm3
! ! i 1 NI 1 t;.: i ! ,!, - 1
pA j b 48 mr.e 1..-
g 1 g-1- r; N a i , 6 0
_ _; e o < 3 0 ., to
• 11 H Ct
a a a i ma _ c pQW
J W d a W LL y ¢
! y co 3
§� - ,\ 1, 4 a co b b ,,
mh 4 F ; Q
a•s_ sa a 8 4-
1 L1
WIVIAMIS
ip_
P.
t'i
� Mgt ,g g 1 ig '4 I ga
A-6
pment may also be available to the consultant to use as reference or
background information.
4. Coordinated studies
When there are multiple proposed developments at an intersection, or in close proximity to each
other, the city may request a single study be performed to address the impacts of all
developments. These studies should address any improvements that are for the benefit of a
single development and those that serve more then one development.
Coordinated traffic studies will be the basis for approval of and determining the required
improvements for the proposed developments. Developers and their engineers are encouraged to
A-4
cenario to
the horizon year, the recommendation should be to construct the lanes to the length required by
the horizon year traffic.
As a general rule, the developer will be responsible for the construction and payment of all
improvements identified in the study for the opening day scenario.
A-2
1 $585.00 $595.00
Sieve Analysis of Aggregate(ea.) E8 J$70.00 $560.00
Subtotal $25,995.00
Contingency @ 10%of Subtotal $2,600.00
Total $28,595.00
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Exhibit"E"
•
_ ' Nms
iim E1O0 _ III,I ,3,`^a nA^ m 45 o v'. .^,3:°a ? 3 m3.6 63 c8'�
m^ 'o^ - - ,,y N i o o '.m g m, 3'- ;3 S.0 -
x ' m m m m 3 v_'mS z.H n E R°o F m 3- - _
E m 3 m 'v a 5 i,A v
3a`
- °i t�_ x
_ �5,o
3 1p�n
m ,n x n m-6 m .P 3«d.3'e H o' _a S i ¢6¢ a_ n o x o g,
L
m o383 =v .i a val 00000000000 000000000000 n'a Om�m F a� �'� �3 lilt wr 0�a
''; m 5 0 E v S' F,
N N-N 9 H m T T;A n c c -m 9 T'S D n N N N 9 ran v - T A ry R o v m., n. 3,m .m-. o"' m
a s a ti 3 $ a N 3 3 3 3 ti A m v- = 3 a 1 A Z a a^ n s^i n a o
N O. 3 u m m m n n 0 n 3_3_E"m m m "n O O ti_ T,N a 3 q D 3 n 3 S 6 F o 4 3
£4 x 2 2 x N o o c o 4 4£ r" y F F F a u m '° u- `$° E n ^A a -
30 o N� ;;O m- 330�- 04 m m 3 F m °¢'a 0a a O
3m c ,��} 33 's.�'� 33�.'0 _n3 Em o - ER;' ,�a >
,° m- N'� 3 x n 3=.o 84 n N =g w o g
x^ 3_3� - - E 3 9 3 ^- s I^
m c m m m'^ = h ro ,s'Z'n 3 :1d
N E m m m 3 g m z Gs
3 v
m m a 6
u
3 N 3
• ?.3 m
Oa c`3 £ v m A
343z0:$� 33''5
,r 0,- -, m•5 61
_. Exhibit"E"
OHOHO C)FC W O W Z oHO HoOo CxOC7OZOaH •> H '> O0) OC40XxO0) x0. Co LO a
C.) 1-1 Z CC O 0 04 C0) C0OZocn0C4CHOHHOHOMUMUMUEMUEcEv' 0) N > CD
W 0 E HKGNKCMWvHLU F) NOCDOCoNO WHONOMOW ,PONLU g CDDrZ
r 0 Z W U C ) CD r) O E. O V) OG.104.IOEO ) O1' H04H U HUHUC] HU0H 0 HUH Ov'
H E .4.1 O O O O O O O C O O O O O ' O C. O O
•
.••
rl `a t C) C. Cl r? C) _. r) O CD O C C O O 0 O 0
,t.o N to E o E o E-t O E to R+'O Z 0 04 0 .
t-a E co O U O U O O C] O H O H O CD M H O W O '1 H (x1 N W C' W' C' W O H O H O 0
<• W O W . Z CDHOH0OD Ox0.C7 O Z O to H > H •J O C4 O r4 O 124x O 124 x 0• 01 • LU I)1
UF-1 .ZC] O OL14004004OZoCnOCJOHOHHOHO01UM0MUEM0Ed' E ,' Wt- >. CD
H 124 E C7 '4 r< 3 w X Z Z Z Z a, Z a co )x a
Q W E E ,r, ZN ,r, `
Z W U o01O Cqo EOmo G4o4, o Eo X CDr4 H (Y' H U H U H U C] H U CI H U H U H O d''
H E. W O C) O O O O O O O O O O O ' O O CD 0
1-1 hH CO O O 0 O O O 0 CD CD O O CD CD O O CD O
C. Glossary of Terms
Alley — A street intended to provide access to the rear or side of lots or buildings in urban
districts and not intended for the purpose of through vehicle traffic.
Curbwalk—Sidewalk paved immediately behind the curb.
Deceleration Lane — A speed change lane including tapered areas for the deceleration of
vehicles leaving the through traffic lanes. These deceleration lanes shall also include a taper.
Driveway (Driveway Approach)—The area, construction, or improvement between the edge of
the street or proposed curb line and the property line, to provide ingress and egress for vehicles
from the alley, street, or roadway to a definite area of the private property. This is also called the
driveway approach.
Driveway Return — The flare or radius that connects the edge or throat of a driveway with the
edge of the nearest travel lane.
Driveway Width (Throat) — That portion of the street curbing that is removed, excluding
driveway returns or transitions, to provide ingress to the egress from abutting property. This is
also called the driveway throat.
Frontage — The distance along the street right-of-way line of a single property or development
within the property lines. Corner property at an intersection would have a separate frontage
along each street.
Intersection —The area embraced within the prolongation or connection of the lateral curb lines
or, if none, then the lateral boundary lines of the roadways of two (2) or more roadways which
join one another, or approximately at right angles, or the area within which vehicles traveling
upon different roadways joining at any other angle may come in conflict.
Sidewalk—That portion of a street between curb lines or the outer lateral lines of a roadway and
the adjacent property lines, intended for use by pedestrians.
Sight Distance — Drivers ability to see an object at a safe distance, which assumes the driver's
eye is 3.75 feet above the ground and the object is 2 feet above the ground for stopping sight
distance and 3.75 feet above the ground for passing and sight triangle distances.
Street—A public way for the purpose of vehicular and pedestrian travel which affords a primary
means of access to the abutting properties. All streets are functionally classified in the following
categories in the City of Omaha Comprehensive Plan.
Arterial Street — Any street classified higher than local or collector. A high capacity
roadway designed to provide continuity between neighborhoods and the
expressway/freeway systems. Direct access to property is a minor function.
A-7
payment of all
improvements identified in the study for the opening day scenario.
A-2
1 $585.00 $595.00
Sieve Analysis of Aggregate(ea.) E8 J$70.00 $560.00
Subtotal $25,995.00
Contingency @ 10%of Subtotal $2,600.00
Total $28,595.00
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Exhibit"E"
•
_ ' Nms
iim E1O0 _ III,I ,3,`^a nA^ m 45 o v'. .^,3:°a ? 3 m3.6 63 c8'�
m^ 'o^ - - ,,y N i o o '.m g m, 3'- ;3 S.0 -
x ' m m m m 3 v_'mS z.H n E R°o F m 3- - _
E m 3 m 'v a 5 i,A v
3a`
- °i t�_ x
_ �5,o
3 1p�n
m ,n x n m-6 m .P 3«d.3'e H o' _a S i ¢6¢ a_ n o x o g,
L
m o383 =v .i a val 00000000000 000000000000 n'a Om�m F a� �'� �3 lilt wr 0�a
''; m 5 0 E v S' F,
N N-N 9 H m T T;A n c c -m 9 T'S D n N N N 9 ran v - T A ry R o v m., n. 3,m .m-. o"' m
a s a ti 3 $ a N 3 3 3 3 ti A m v- = 3 a 1 A Z a a^ n s^i n a o
N O. 3 u m m m n n 0 n 3_3_E"m m m "n O O ti_ T,N a 3 q D 3 n 3 S 6 F o 4 3
£4 x 2 2 x N o o c o 4 4£ r" y F F F a u m '° u- `$° E n ^A a -
30 o N� ;;O m- 330�- 04 m m 3 F m °¢'a 0a a O
3m c ,��} 33 's.�'� 33�.'0 _n3 Em o - ER;' ,�a >
,° m- N'� 3 x n 3=.o 84 n N =g w o g
x^ 3_3� - - E 3 9 3 ^- s I^
m c m m m'^ = h ro ,s'Z'n 3 :1d
N E m m m 3 g m z Gs
3 v
m m a 6
u
3 N 3
• ?.3 m
Oa c`3 £ v m A
343z0:$� 33''5
,r 0,- -, m•5 61
_. Exhibit"E"
OHOHO C)FC W O W Z oHO HoOo CxOC7OZOaH •> H '> O0) OC40XxO0) x0. Co LO a
C.) 1-1 Z CC O 0 04 C0) C0OZocn0C4CHOHHOHOMUMUMUEMUEcEv' 0) N > CD
W 0 E HKGNKCMWvHLU F) NOCDOCoNO WHONOMOW ,PONLU g CDDrZ
r 0 Z W U C ) CD r) O E. O V) OG.104.IOEO ) O1' H04H U HUHUC] HU0H 0 HUH Ov'
H E .4.1 O O O O O O O C O O O O O ' O C. O O
•
.••
rl `a t C) C. Cl r? C) _. r) O CD O C C O O 0 O 0
,t.o N to E o E o E-t O E to R+'O Z 0 04 0 .
t-a E co O U O U O O C] O H O H O CD M H O W O '1 H (x1 N W C' W' C' W O H O H O 0
<• W O W . Z CDHOH0OD Ox0.C7 O Z O to H > H •J O C4 O r4 O 124x O 124 x 0• 01 • LU I)1
UF-1 .ZC] O OL14004004OZoCnOCJOHOHHOHO01UM0MUEM0Ed' E ,' Wt- >. CD
H 124 E C7 '4 r< 3 w X Z Z Z Z a, Z a co )x a
Q W E E ,r, ZN ,r, `
Z W U o01O Cqo EOmo G4o4, o Eo X CDr4 H (Y' H U H U H U C] H U CI H U H U H O d''
H E. W O C) O O O O O O O O O O O ' O O CD 0
1-1 hH CO O O 0 O O O 0 CD CD O O CD CD O O CD O
Collector Street — A moderate capacity roadway designed to penetrate neighborhoods
from which local traffic is collected and channeled to the arterial street system.
Local Street—A low speed, low volume street with no continuity which provides direct
access to abutting properties.
Right-of-Way — A strip of ground dedicated or set apart for public transportation use between
approximately parallel boundaries including the improved and unimproved portions thereof.
Traffic—Pedestrians, vehicles, and other conveyances, either singly or together, while using any
street, alley, or roadway for purposes of travel
A-8
s
registered in another state may prepare reports as allowed by Nebraska State Law.
A-5
•
Email address:
•
•
Page 1 of 7, 12/7/2011 1:25:57 PM, Bid Tabulation, Generated by:admin for project OPW 52190
i
Approved
/ - Mayor
C-25A
CITY OF OMAHA
LEGISLATIVE CHAMBER
Omaha,Nebraska • •
RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF OMAHA:
WHEREAS, The City of Omaha's current driveway regulations were compiled and
passed by the City Council in 1992; and,
WHEREAS, The Public Works Department has updated the regulations to reflect
current engineering standards and practices.
NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF OMAHA:
THAT,the Guidelines and Regulations for Driveway Location,Design and Construction previously
adopted by the Omaha City Council on November 26, 1991 via Resolution number 2635 be replaced
with the current version dated December, 2011.
P:\msp\1244msp.doc APPROVED AS TO FO •
ITY ATTORNEY DATE
By
Council r )er
Adopted JAN 1...0 2012
fa
City Clerk / /
Approved...
Mayor
CDw CD d c
cn
Nzt n 0 — co 4. .),) \
CD
194
t . \ 0 SID ,.-.., i••• re
a 0 pxaCD
c
P
° � °
• , i
.4 . •
te.
ulations to reflect
current engineering standards and practices.
NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF OMAHA:
THAT,the Guidelines and Regulations for Driveway Location,Design and Construction previously
adopted by the Omaha City Council on November 26, 1991 via Resolution number 2635 be replaced
with the current version dated December, 2011.
P:\msp\1244msp.doc APPROVED AS TO FO •
ITY ATTORNEY DATE
By
Council r )er
Adopted JAN 1...0 2012
fa
City Clerk / /
Approved...
Mayor