RES 2012-1433 - Agmt with Sprinkle Consluting Inc for design study services on Harney St corridor improvements �l.
6 •0.
.
•
i #I
OF AHA,lyEe�P RECEIVED� 4.� lam. 1 V � 4✓ �.
U OM
st4
" Public Works Department .
Q - r ,, �+ Omaha/Douglas Civic Center
F` i�t « 1819 Famam Street,Suite 601
26®. 42: �! October 23, 2012 12 OCT 12 .fl I,' 09
Omaha,Nebraska 68183-0601
(402)444-5220
04,
47'ED PEB4� CITY CLERK : Fax(402)444-5248
City of Omaha O M A H A, N E$€2 A S K A Robert G.Stubbe,P.E.
Jim Suttle,Mayor Public Works Director
Honorable President
and Members of the City Council,
Transmitted herewith is a Resolution approving a Design Study Services Agreement between the
City of Omaha and Sprinkle Consulting, Inc. for a design study to assess the feasibility of a
multi-modal corridor along Harney Street from 10th Street to 42"d Street. This is a part of the
2013-2018 Capital Improvement Program Transportation Project No. 112, and has a Federal
funding match which is stewarded by the Nebraska Department of Roads (NDOR).
The City Council approved a Program Agreement with NDOR for this study by Council
Resolution No. 637 on May 15, 2012 under the designation of Federal Aid Project MAPA-
28(110), State Control No. 22537. The study will consist of evaluation the City's current traffic
conditions within this corridor, evaluation of design alternatives, and the preparation studies and
documentation leading to the conceptual design for the project. This agreement furthermore
provides for coordination (in the later phase of this study) with required environmental study and
documentation on this project, which will be provided for through a separate consultant and
Agreement. Federal funding is pledged to cover 80% of the eligible project costs. The City is
then responsible for its 20% share plus any costs determined ineligible for Federal assistance,
currently estimated at $48,955.69. The City's share of the project cost will be paid from the
2010 Transportation Bond Fund 13183, 2012 Issue Transportation Bond Organization 117117.
Sprinkle Consulting, Inc. has filed the required Annual Contract.Compliance Report Form CC-1
in the Human Rights and Relations Department.
The Public Works Department requests your consideration and approval of the attached
Resolution and Program Agreement.
Respectfully submitted, Referred to City Council for Consideration:
16 /9. (L2 UOWn;c1-‘ LeAmitkr-di thz,// 2_
Fed Robert G. Stubb , Date Mayor's Office Date
Public Works Di ctor
Approved as to Funding: Approved:
6
.---- / '/d Lae
— /Q/2/ a
Pam Spaccarotella Date Human Rights and Relations Date
'n Finance Director Department
1586htp
cxFREM1"-----. - .- ..
Name o=ND0R.ov=urbanLPD, Signature• •
I-I e 1 to n emalkbarney helton@nebraska.
FHWA• -05 Notice to Proceed Date:
Date:3U,1.U7.;09:421)2-05 00 0 7/0 9/2 012
•
,_: _____.._.._.__�rank--------eigitaltysigtrcQby frankle17RKM.----.""- ---- .
Name DN:cn=Frank M.Rich,o=Federal Date B.C.H. _--_ _
Highway Administration,
ou=Nebraska Division.
•
Distribution: Consultant, LPA.-RC, State Rep., IFRU , Qi •h6'�' �s�e peer, Highway Funds Manager
'V' n Date:2012.07.0910:03:20-05'00'
DR Form 250,October 2010 Exhibit"B"
Page 1 of 5
•
,
• ` I
LPA - CONSULTANT
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING SERVICES
CITY OF OMAHA, NEBRASKA
SPRINKLE CONSULTING, INC.
PROJECT NO. MAPA-28(110)
CONTROL NO. 22537
HARNEY STREET CORRIDOR FEASIBILITY STUDY
THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into by and between the City of Omaha,
Nebraska, hereinafter referred to as the Local Public Agency or LPA, and Sprinkle Consulting,
Inc., hereinafter referred to as the Consultant.
WITNESSETH •
WHEREAS, the LPA used a qualification based selection process to select the Consultant
to render professional services for the above named project at the location shown on
EXHIBIT "A", which is attached and hereby made a part of this agreement, and
WHEREAS, the Consultant is qualified to do business in Nebraska and has met all
requirements of the Nebraska Board of Engineers and Architects to provide consultant
engineering services in the State of Nebraska, and
WHEREAS, Consultant is willing to perform the services in accordance with the terms
hereinafter provided agrees to comply with all federal, state, and local laws and ordinances
applicable to this agreement, and agrees to comply with all applicable federal-aid transportation
related program requirements, so that Consultant's costs under this agreement will be fully
eligible for federal reimbursement, and
WHEREAS, the LPA and Consultant intend that the services under this agreement be
completed in accordance with the terms and conditions of the Nebraska LPA Guidelines Manual
for Federal Aid Projects; hereinafter referred to as LPA Manual (See definition in Section 1),and
WHEREAS, the Consultants primary contact person for LPA will be the LPA's
representative, who has been designated as being in responsible charge of the project, and who
is referred to herein as RC or Responsible Charge.
WHEREAS, the parties understand that the State of Nebraska, Department of Roads is
involved in this federal-aid project on behalf of the FHWA only for issues related to the eligibility
of the project for reimbursement of project costs with federal-aid funds.
NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of these facts, the parties hereto agree as follows:
BU1233
blic Works Department requests your consideration and approval of the attached
Resolution and Program Agreement.
Respectfully submitted, Referred to City Council for Consideration:
16 /9. (L2 UOWn;c1-‘ LeAmitkr-di thz,// 2_
Fed Robert G. Stubb , Date Mayor's Office Date
Public Works Di ctor
Approved as to Funding: Approved:
6
.---- / '/d Lae
— /Q/2/ a
Pam Spaccarotella Date Human Rights and Relations Date
'n Finance Director Department
1586htp
cxFREM1"-----. - .- ..
Name o=ND0R.ov=urbanLPD, Signature• •
I-I e 1 to n emalkbarney helton@nebraska.
FHWA• -05 Notice to Proceed Date:
Date:3U,1.U7.;09:421)2-05 00 0 7/0 9/2 012
•
,_: _____.._.._.__�rank--------eigitaltysigtrcQby frankle17RKM.----.""- ---- .
Name DN:cn=Frank M.Rich,o=Federal Date B.C.H. _--_ _
Highway Administration,
ou=Nebraska Division.
•
Distribution: Consultant, LPA.-RC, State Rep., IFRU , Qi •h6'�' �s�e peer, Highway Funds Manager
'V' n Date:2012.07.0910:03:20-05'00'
DR Form 250,October 2010 Exhibit"B"
Page 1 of 5
� r
SECTION 1. DEFINITIONS
WHEREVER in this agreement the following terms are used, they will have the following
meaning:
"LPA" stands for Local Public Agency, and in this agreement means the City of Omaha,
Nebraska, unless the context otherwise requires. LPA may also be used to refer generally to
other Local Public Agencies. Local Public Agencies include, but are not necessarily limited to;
Nebraska Cities, Villages, Counties, Political Subdivisions, Native American Tribes, and other
entities or organizations found to be eligible sub recipients of federal funds for transportation
projects, and
"CONSULTANT" means the firm of Sprinkle Consulting, Inc. and any employees thereof,
whose business and mailing address is 18115 US Hwy 41 N, Suite 600, Lutz, FL 33549, and
"SUBCONSULTANT/SUBCONTRACTOR" means the firm of Rundell Ernstberger
Associates, LLC, and any employees thereof, whose business and mailing address is 618 E
Market Street, Indianapolis, IN 46202 and the firm of Vireo, and any employees thereof, whose
business and mailing address is 1111 N 13th Street, Suite 116, Omaha, NE 68102, and the firm
of Lamp, Rynearson &Associates, Inc., and any employees thereof, whose business and
mailing address is 14710 W Dodge Road, Suite 100, Omaha, NE 68154, and
"LPA MANUAL" shall mean the Nebraska Department of Roads' LPA Guidelines Manual
for Federal-Aid Projects. The LPA Manual is a document approved by the Federal Highway
Administration (FHWA) that sets out the requirements for local federal-aid projects to be eligible
for federal reimbursement; the LPA Manual can be found in its entirety at the following web
address: http://www.transportation.nebraska.gov/qov-aff/Ipa/Ipa-quidelines.pdf, and
"RESPONSIBLE CHARGE" or"RC" shall mean LPA's representative for the project
whose duties and responsibilities are identified in federal law and in the LPA Manual, and
"STATE" means the Nebraska Department of Roads in Lincoln, Nebraska, its Director, or
authorized representative. The State represents the interests of the United States Department
of Transportation on federally funded transportation projects sponsored by a sub recipient of
federal funds and any reference to the "State" in this agreement shall mean the State on behalf
of the United States Department of Transportation, and
"FHWA" means the Federal Highway Administration, United States Department of
Transportation, Washington, D.C. 20590, acting through its authorized representatives.
"DOT" means the United States Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C. 20590,
acting through its authorized representatives, and
Project No. MAPA-28(110) Agreement No. BO1233
Control No. 22537
Harney St Corridor Feasibility Study - 2 -
Template Revised 7-26-12
Department
1586htp
cxFREM1"-----. - .- ..
Name o=ND0R.ov=urbanLPD, Signature• •
I-I e 1 to n emalkbarney helton@nebraska.
FHWA• -05 Notice to Proceed Date:
Date:3U,1.U7.;09:421)2-05 00 0 7/0 9/2 012
•
,_: _____.._.._.__�rank--------eigitaltysigtrcQby frankle17RKM.----.""- ---- .
Name DN:cn=Frank M.Rich,o=Federal Date B.C.H. _--_ _
Highway Administration,
ou=Nebraska Division.
•
Distribution: Consultant, LPA.-RC, State Rep., IFRU , Qi •h6'�' �s�e peer, Highway Funds Manager
'V' n Date:2012.07.0910:03:20-05'00'
DR Form 250,October 2010 Exhibit"B"
Page 1 of 5
� t
t.
)
•
To "ABANDON" the services means that the LPA has determined that conditions or
intentions as originally existed have changed and that the services as contemplated herein is to
be renounced and deserted for as long in the future as can be foreseen, and
To "SUSPEND" the services means that the LPA has determined that progress is not
sufficient, or that the conditions or intentions as originally existed have changed, or the services
completed or submitted are unsatisfactory, and that the services as contemplated herein should
be stopped on a temporary basis. This cessation will prevail until the LPA determines to
abandon or terminate the services or to reinstate it under the conditions as defined in this
agreement, and
To "TERMINATE" or the "TERMINATION" of this agreement is the cessation or quitting of
this agreement based upon action or failure of action on the part of the Consultant as defined
herein and as determined by the LPA, and
SECTION 2. THIS SECTION HAS INTENTIONALLY BEEN LEFT BLANK
SECTION 3. THIS SECTION HAS INTENTIONALLY BEEN LEFT BLANK
SECTION 4. TERM OF THE AGREEMENT
This agreement becomes effective on the date it is signed bythe State and will end upon:n:
9 9 p
(1) the waiver of an audit review or (2) the final completion of an audit review by the State or its
authorized representative, and the resolution of all issues identified in the audit report. •
SECTION 5. SCOPE OF SERVICES
LPA and Consultant understand that the Services provided by Consultant must be
completed in accordance with all federal-aid reimbursement requirements and conditions. The
Consultant agrees to provide design study services for Project No. MAPA-28(110), Control No.
22537, in Douglas County as set out in Exhibit "B", entitled Scope of Services and Fee
Proposal, which are attached and hereby made a part of this agreement.
Exhibit "B" is the result of the following process:
(1) LPA provided Consultant with a document describing the detailed proposed
Scope of Services for this project
(2) Consultant made necessary and appropriate proposed additions, deletions, and
revisions to LPA's detailed Scope of Services document
(3) LPA and Consultant together reviewed the proposed Scope of Services, the
proposed revisions and negotiated the final detailed Scope of Services and Fee
Proposal document, which is attached as Exhibit "B".
Project No. MAPA-28(110) Agreement No. BO1233
Control No. 22537
Harney St Corridor Feasibility Study - 3 -
Template Revised 7-26-12
ect No. MAPA-28(110) Agreement No. BO1233
Control No. 22537
Harney St Corridor Feasibility Study - 2 -
Template Revised 7-26-12
Department
1586htp
cxFREM1"-----. - .- ..
Name o=ND0R.ov=urbanLPD, Signature• •
I-I e 1 to n emalkbarney helton@nebraska.
FHWA• -05 Notice to Proceed Date:
Date:3U,1.U7.;09:421)2-05 00 0 7/0 9/2 012
•
,_: _____.._.._.__�rank--------eigitaltysigtrcQby frankle17RKM.----.""- ---- .
Name DN:cn=Frank M.Rich,o=Federal Date B.C.H. _--_ _
Highway Administration,
ou=Nebraska Division.
•
Distribution: Consultant, LPA.-RC, State Rep., IFRU , Qi •h6'�' �s�e peer, Highway Funds Manager
'V' n Date:2012.07.0910:03:20-05'00'
DR Form 250,October 2010 Exhibit"B"
Page 1 of 5
The LPA has the absolute right to add or subtract from the scope of services at any time
and such action on its part will in no event be deemed a breach of this agreement. The addition
or subtraction will become effective seven days after mailing written notice of such addition or
subtraction.
SECTION 6. STAFFING PLAN (For PE Services)
The Consultant has provided LPA with a staffing plan that identifies the employees of the
Consultant who will be part of the primary team for this project. The primary team members will
be agreed upon and identified in this agreement. The primary team is expected to be directly
responsible for providing the services under this agreement. This document shall specify the
role that will be assigned to each member of the primary team. This document is attached
hereto as Exhibit "B" and is incorporated herein by this reference. During design, the Consultant
may make occasional temporary changes to the primary team. However, any permanent change
to the primary team will require prior written approval from the LPA.
Personnel who are added to the Staffing Plan as replacements must be persons of
comparable training and experience. Personnel added to the Staffing Plan as new personnel
and not replacements must be qualified to perform the intended services. Failure on the part of
the Consultant to provide acceptable replacement personnel or qualified new personnel to keep
the services on schedule will be cause for termination of this agreement, with settlement to be
made as provided in the SUSPENSION, ABANDONMENT, OR TERMINATION section of this
agreement.
SECTION 7. NEW EMPLOYEE WORK ELIGIBILITY STATUS
The Consultant agrees to use a federal immigration verification system to determine the
work eligibility status of new employees physically performing services within the State of
Nebraska. The Consultant hereby agrees to contractually require any Subconsultants to use a
federal immigration verification system to determine the work eligibility status of new employees
physically performing services within the State of Nebraska. A federal immigration verification
system means the electronic verification of the work authorization program authorized by the
Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996, 8 U.S.C. 1324a, known as
the E-Verify Program, or an equivalent federal program designated by the United States
Department of Homeland Security or other federal agency authorized to verify the work eligibility
status of a newly hired employee.
The undersigned duly authorized representative of the Consultant, by signing this
agreement, hereby attests to the truth of the following certifications, and agrees as follows:
Project No. MAPA-28(110) Agreement No. BO1233
Control No. 22537
Harney St Corridor Feasibility Study -4 -
Template Revised 7-26-12
Name o=ND0R.ov=urbanLPD, Signature• •
I-I e 1 to n emalkbarney helton@nebraska.
FHWA• -05 Notice to Proceed Date:
Date:3U,1.U7.;09:421)2-05 00 0 7/0 9/2 012
•
,_: _____.._.._.__�rank--------eigitaltysigtrcQby frankle17RKM.----.""- ---- .
Name DN:cn=Frank M.Rich,o=Federal Date B.C.H. _--_ _
Highway Administration,
ou=Nebraska Division.
•
Distribution: Consultant, LPA.-RC, State Rep., IFRU , Qi •h6'�' �s�e peer, Highway Funds Manager
'V' n Date:2012.07.0910:03:20-05'00'
DR Form 250,October 2010 Exhibit"B"
Page 1 of 5
Neb.Rev.Stat. § 4-114. I certify compliance with the provisions of Section 4-114 and,
hereby certify that this Consultant shall register with and use a federal immigration verification
system to determine the work eligibility status of new employees physically performing services
within the State of Nebraska. I agree to require all Subconsultants, by contractual agreement,
to require the same registration and verification process.
If the Consultant is an individual or sole proprietorship, the following applies:
1. The Consultant must complete the United States Citizenship Attestation form,
and attach it to this agreement. This form is available on the Department of
Roads website at www.transportation.nebraska.gov/proldev/#save.
2. If the Consultant indicates on such Attestation form that he or she is a
qualified alien, the Consultant agrees to provide the US Citizenship and
Immigration Services documentation required to verify the Consultant lawful
presence in the United States using the Systematic Alien Verification for
Entitlements (SAVE) Program.
3. The Consultant understands and agrees that lawful presence in the United
States is required and the Consultant may be disqualified or the contract
terminated if such lawful presence cannot be verified as required by
Neb. Rev. Stat. §4-108.
SECTION 8. NOTICE TO PROCEED AND COMPLETION DATE (PE)
The LPA will issue the Consultant a written Notice-to-Proceed when LPA determines
that federal funding approval has been obtained for the project, upon full execution of the
agreement and upon State concurrence that the form of this agreement is acceptable for federal
funding eligibility. Any services performed by Consultant on the project prior to the date
specified in the written Notice-to-Proceed will not be eligible for reimbursement.
The Consultant shall complete all the services according to the schedule in attached
Exhibit "B" and shall complete all services required under this agreement in a satisfactory
manner.
Any costs incurred by Consultant after the completion date are not eligible for
reimbursement unless the Consultant has received a written extension of time from LPA.
The completion date will not be extended because of any avoidable delay attributed to the
Consultant, but delays not attributable to the Consultant, such as delays attributable to the LPA
may constitute a basis for an extension of time.
Project No. MAPA-28(110) Agreement No. BO1233
Control No. 22537
Harney St Corridor Feasibility Study - 5 -
Template Revised 7-26-12
ve of the Consultant, by signing this
agreement, hereby attests to the truth of the following certifications, and agrees as follows:
Project No. MAPA-28(110) Agreement No. BO1233
Control No. 22537
Harney St Corridor Feasibility Study -4 -
Template Revised 7-26-12
Name o=ND0R.ov=urbanLPD, Signature• •
I-I e 1 to n emalkbarney helton@nebraska.
FHWA• -05 Notice to Proceed Date:
Date:3U,1.U7.;09:421)2-05 00 0 7/0 9/2 012
•
,_: _____.._.._.__�rank--------eigitaltysigtrcQby frankle17RKM.----.""- ---- .
Name DN:cn=Frank M.Rich,o=Federal Date B.C.H. _--_ _
Highway Administration,
ou=Nebraska Division.
•
Distribution: Consultant, LPA.-RC, State Rep., IFRU , Qi •h6'�' �s�e peer, Highway Funds Manager
'V' n Date:2012.07.0910:03:20-05'00'
DR Form 250,October 2010 Exhibit"B"
Page 1 of 5
SECTION 9. FEES AND PAYMENTS
The general provisions concerning payment under this agreement are set out on the
Exhibit "D", attached hereto and hereby made a part of this agreement.
For performance of the services as described in this agreement, the Consultant will be
paid a fixed-fee-for-profit of$13,253.66 and up to a maximum amount of$231,524.81 for actual
costs in accordance with Exhibit "D". The total agreement amount is $244,778.47.
SECTION 10. PROFESSIONAL PERFORMANCE (LPA PE)
The Consultant understands that the LPA will rely on the professional training,
experience, performance and ability of the Consultant. Examination by the LPA, State or
FHWA, or acceptance or use of, or acquiescence in the Consultant's work product, will not be
considered to be a full and comprehensive examination and will not be considered an approval
of the Consultant's work product which would relieve the Consultant from any liability or
expense that would be connected with the Consultant's sole responsibility for the propriety and
integrity of the professional services to be accomplished by the Consultant pursuant to this
agreement. The Consultant further understands that acceptance or approval of any of the work
of the Consultant by the LPA or concurrence by the State/FHWA or of payment, partial or final,
will not constitute a waiver of any rights of the LPA to recover from the Consultant, damages
that are caused by the Consultant due to error, omission, or negligence of the Consultant in its
work. That further, if due to error, omission, or negligence of the Consultant, the work project of
the Consultant is found to be in error or there are omissions therein revealed during or after the
construction of the project and revision, reconsideration, or reworking of the Consultant work
product is necessary, the Consultant shall make such revisions without expense to the LPA.
The Consultant shall respond to the LPA's or State's notice of any errors or omissions within
24 hours and give immediate attention to necessary corrections to minimize any delays to the
project. This may involve visits by the Consultant to the project site, if directed by the LPA. If
the Consultant discovers errors in its services, it shall notify the LPA and State of the errors
within seven days. Failure of the Consultant to notify the LPA will constitute a breach of this
agreement. The Consultant's legal liability for all damages incurred by the LPA caused by error,
omission, or negligent acts of the Consultant will be borne by the Consultant without liability or
expense to the LPA.
SECTION 11. SUSPENSION, ABANDONMENT OR TERMINATION (2/8/12)
The LPA has the absolute right to suspend or abandon the work, or terminate the
agreement at any time and such action on its part will in no event be deemed a breach of this
Project No. MAPA-28(110) Agreement No. B01233
Control No. 22537
Harney St Corridor Feasibility Study - 6 -
Template Revised 7-26-12
• -05 Notice to Proceed Date:
Date:3U,1.U7.;09:421)2-05 00 0 7/0 9/2 012
•
,_: _____.._.._.__�rank--------eigitaltysigtrcQby frankle17RKM.----.""- ---- .
Name DN:cn=Frank M.Rich,o=Federal Date B.C.H. _--_ _
Highway Administration,
ou=Nebraska Division.
•
Distribution: Consultant, LPA.-RC, State Rep., IFRU , Qi •h6'�' �s�e peer, Highway Funds Manager
'V' n Date:2012.07.0910:03:20-05'00'
DR Form 250,October 2010 Exhibit"B"
Page 1 of 5
agreement. The LPA.will give the Consultant seven days written notice of such suspension,
abandonment, or termination. Any necessary change in Scope of Services shall follow the
Consultant Work Order Process outlined in the FEES AND PAYMENTS section above.
If the LPA suspends or abandons the work or terminates the agreement as presently
outlined, the Consultant shall be compensated in accordance with the provisions of 48 CFR 31
provided however, that in the case of suspension, abandonment or termination for breach of this
agreement, the LPA will have the power to suspend payments, pending the Consultant's
compliance with the provisions of this agreement. For the abandonment or termination of this
agreement, payment to Consultant will be prorated based on the percentage of work completed
by the Consultant prior to abandonment or termination compared to the total amount of work
contemplated by this agreement.
SECTION 9. OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS (11/17/11)
All surveys, maps, reports, computations, charts, plans, specifications, electronic data,
shop drawings, diaries, field books, and other project documents prepared or obtained under
the terms of this agreement are the property of the LPA and the Consultant shall deliver them to
the LPA at the conclusion of the project without restriction or limitation as to further use.
LPA acknowledges that such data may not be appropriate for use on an extension of the
services covered by this agreement or on other projects. Any use of the data for any purpose
other than that for which it was intended without the opportunity for Consultant to review the
data and modify it if necessary for the intended purpose will be at the LPA's sole risk and
without legal exposure or liability to Consultant.
Further, Consultants' time sheets and payroll documents shall be kept in Consultants' files
for at least three years from the completion of final cost settlement by FHWA and project
closeout by the State. •
SECTION 10. CONFLICT OF INTEREST LAWS
The Consultant shall review the Conflict of Interest provisions of 23 CFR 1.33 and 49
CFR 18.36(b)(3) and agrees to comply with all the Conflict of Interest provisions in order for the
LPA's project to remain fully eligible for Federal funding. By signing this agreement, the
Consultant certifies that Consultant is not aware of any financial or other interest the Consultant
has that would violate the terms of these federal provisions.
SECTION 11. USE AND/OR RELEASE OF PRIVILEGED OR CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION
Certain information provided by the LPA or State to the Consultant is confidential
information contained within privileged documents protected by 23 U.S.C. §409. "Confidential
Project No. MAPA-28(110) Agreement No. B01233
Control No. 22537
Harney St Corridor Feasibility Study - 7 -
Template Revised 7-26-12
3
Control No. 22537
Harney St Corridor Feasibility Study - 6 -
Template Revised 7-26-12
• -05 Notice to Proceed Date:
Date:3U,1.U7.;09:421)2-05 00 0 7/0 9/2 012
•
,_: _____.._.._.__�rank--------eigitaltysigtrcQby frankle17RKM.----.""- ---- .
Name DN:cn=Frank M.Rich,o=Federal Date B.C.H. _--_ _
Highway Administration,
ou=Nebraska Division.
•
Distribution: Consultant, LPA.-RC, State Rep., IFRU , Qi •h6'�' �s�e peer, Highway Funds Manager
'V' n Date:2012.07.0910:03:20-05'00'
DR Form 250,October 2010 Exhibit"B"
Page 1 of 5
information" means any information that is protected from disclosure pursuant to state and
federal law and includes, but is not limited to, accident summary information, certain accident
reports, diagnostic evaluations, bridge inspection reports, and any other documentation or
information that corresponds with said evaluations or reports, and any other information
protected by 23 U.S.C. §409. "Privileged document" means any document pertaining to any file
or project maintained by the LPA or State that is privileged and protected from disclosure,
pursuant to appropriate state and federal law, including any document containing attorney-client
communications between an LPA or State employee and Legal Counsel. This confidential and
privileged information is vital and essential to the Consultant in order that the Consultant
adequately design the project at hand on behalf of the LPA or State.
The Consultant agrees it will only use any information or documentation that is considered to be
privileged or confidential for the purposes of executing the services by which it has agreed to
render for the LPA or State for the not to reveal
project
at hand only. The Consultant
Yagrees
disseminate, or provide copies of any document that is confidential and privileged to any
individual or entity. The LPA agrees that any information or documentation that is considered to
be privileged or confidential that is provided to Consultant will be marked with the following
information (Approved 3/16/11):
"CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION: Federal Law, 23 U.S.0 §409, prohibits the
production of this document or its contents in discovery or its use in evidence in a State
or Federal Court. The LPA has not waived any privilege it may assert as provided by
that law through the dissemination of this document and has not authorized further
distribution of this document or its contents to anyone other than the original recipient."
The Consultant agrees to obtain the written approval of the Consultant Coordinator prior
to the dissemination of any privileged or confidential information or documentation if it is unclear
to the Consultant whether such information or documentation is in fact privileged or confidential.
The Consultant and the LPA agree that any unauthorized dissemination of any privileged
or confidential information or documentation on the part of the Consultant will create liability on
the part of the Consultant to the LPA for any damages that may occur as a result of the
unauthorized dissemination. The Consultant agrees to hold harmless, indemnify, and release
the LPA for any liability that may ensue on the part of the LPA for any unauthorized
dissemination of any privileged or confidential information or documentation on the part of the
Consultant.
Project No. MAPA-28(110) Agreement No. BO1233
Control No. 22537
Harney St Corridor Feasibility Study - 8 -
Template Revised 7-26-12
Template Revised 7-26-12
• -05 Notice to Proceed Date:
Date:3U,1.U7.;09:421)2-05 00 0 7/0 9/2 012
•
,_: _____.._.._.__�rank--------eigitaltysigtrcQby frankle17RKM.----.""- ---- .
Name DN:cn=Frank M.Rich,o=Federal Date B.C.H. _--_ _
Highway Administration,
ou=Nebraska Division.
•
Distribution: Consultant, LPA.-RC, State Rep., IFRU , Qi •h6'�' �s�e peer, Highway Funds Manager
'V' n Date:2012.07.0910:03:20-05'00'
DR Form 250,October 2010 Exhibit"B"
Page 1 of 5
SECTION 12. FORBIDDING USE OF OUTSIDE AGENTS
The Consultant warrants that it has not employed or retained any company or person,
other than a bona fide employee working for the Consultant, to solicit or secure this agreement,
and that it has not paid or agreed to pay any company or person, other than a bona fide
employee, any fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gift, or any other consideration
contingent upon or resulting from the award or making of this agreement. For breach or
violation of this warranty, the LPA has the right to annul this agreement without liability or, in its
discretion, to deduct from the agreement price or consideration, or otherwise recover the full
amount of such fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gift, or contingent fee.
SECTION 13. NON-RAIDING CLAUSE
The Consultant shall not engage the services of any person or persons presently in the
employ of the State for services covered by this agreement without the prior written consent of
the employer of the persons.
SECTION 14. GENERAL COMPLIANCE WITH LAWS
The Consultant hereby agrees to comply with all federal, state, and local laws and
ordinances applicable to the work in effect at the time of the work.
SECTION 15. DISPUTES
Any dispute concerning a question of fact in connection with the work covered under this
agreement will be addressed in accordance with LPA Manual Section 4.4.3.5 DISPUTE
RESOLUTION.
SECTION 16. RESPONSIBILITY FOR CLAIMS AND LIABILITY (PE) (1-24-12)
The Consultant agrees to save harmless the LPA from all claims and liability due to the
error, omission, or negligence of the Consultant or those of the Consultant's agents or
employees in the performance of services under this agreement. Further, it is expected that in
carrying out the work under this agreement, Consultant will make various decisions and
judgments and Consultant will determine what actions are required by Consultant and by others
to properly complete the work. Nothing in this Agreement shall be interpreted to relieve
Consultant from any liability it would otherwise have to LPA in carrying out the work under this
agreement.
Finally, the Consultant shall for the life of this agreement, carry insurance as outlined in
Exhibit "C" and attached hereto, and hereby made a part of this agreement. In any contract
Consultant has with a subconsultant, Consultant shall require that the insurance requirements
outlined in Exhibit "C" must be met by the subconsultant.
Project No. MAPA-28(110) • Agreement No. BO1233
Control No. 22537
Harney St Corridor Feasibility Study - 9 -
Template Revised 7-26-12
ed
dissemination of any privileged or confidential information or documentation on the part of the
Consultant.
Project No. MAPA-28(110) Agreement No. BO1233
Control No. 22537
Harney St Corridor Feasibility Study - 8 -
Template Revised 7-26-12
Template Revised 7-26-12
• -05 Notice to Proceed Date:
Date:3U,1.U7.;09:421)2-05 00 0 7/0 9/2 012
•
,_: _____.._.._.__�rank--------eigitaltysigtrcQby frankle17RKM.----.""- ---- .
Name DN:cn=Frank M.Rich,o=Federal Date B.C.H. _--_ _
Highway Administration,
ou=Nebraska Division.
•
Distribution: Consultant, LPA.-RC, State Rep., IFRU , Qi •h6'�' �s�e peer, Highway Funds Manager
'V' n Date:2012.07.0910:03:20-05'00'
DR Form 250,October 2010 Exhibit"B"
Page 1 of 5
SECTION 17. PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION
The Consultant shall affix the seal of a registered professional engineer or architect
licensed to practice in the State of Nebraska, on all plans, documents, and specifications
prepared under this agreement as required by the Nebraska Engineers and Architects
Regulations Act, Neb.Rev.Stat §81-3401 et. seq.
SECTION 18. SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS
This agreement is binding on successors and assigns of either party.
SECTION 19. DRUG-FREE WORKPLACE POLICY
The Consultant shall have an acceptable and current drug-free workplace policy on file
with the State.
SECTION 20. FAIR EMPLOYMENT PRACTICES ACT
The Consultant agrees to abide by the Nebraska Fair Employment Practices Act, as
provided by Neb.Rev.Stat. 48-1101 through 48-1126, which is hereby made a part of and
included in this agreement by reference.
SECTION 21. DISABILITIES ACT
The Consultant agrees to comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (P.L.
101-366), as implemented by 28 CFR 35, which is hereby made a part of and included in this
agreement by reference.
SECTION 22. DISADVANTAGED BUSINESS ENTERPRISES
The Consultant shall ensure that disadvantaged business enterprises, as defined in
49 CFR 26, have the maximum opportunity to compete for and participate in the performance of
subagreements financed in whole or in part with federal funds under this agreement.
Consequently, the disadvantaged business requirements of 49 CFR 26 are hereby made a part
of and included in this agreement by reference.
The Consultant shall not discriminate on the basis of race, color, sex, or national origin in
the award and performance of FHWA-assisted contracts. Failure of the Consultant to carry out
the requirements set forth above will constitute a breach of this agreement and, after the
notification of the FHWA, may result in termination of this agreement by the LPA or such
remedy as the LPA deems appropriate.
Project No. MAPA-28(110) Agreement No. BO1233
Control No. 22537
Harney St Corridor Feasibility Study - 10 -
Template Revised 7-26-12 .
onsultant shall for the life of this agreement, carry insurance as outlined in
Exhibit "C" and attached hereto, and hereby made a part of this agreement. In any contract
Consultant has with a subconsultant, Consultant shall require that the insurance requirements
outlined in Exhibit "C" must be met by the subconsultant.
Project No. MAPA-28(110) • Agreement No. BO1233
Control No. 22537
Harney St Corridor Feasibility Study - 9 -
Template Revised 7-26-12
ed
dissemination of any privileged or confidential information or documentation on the part of the
Consultant.
Project No. MAPA-28(110) Agreement No. BO1233
Control No. 22537
Harney St Corridor Feasibility Study - 8 -
Template Revised 7-26-12
Template Revised 7-26-12
• -05 Notice to Proceed Date:
Date:3U,1.U7.;09:421)2-05 00 0 7/0 9/2 012
•
,_: _____.._.._.__�rank--------eigitaltysigtrcQby frankle17RKM.----.""- ---- .
Name DN:cn=Frank M.Rich,o=Federal Date B.C.H. _--_ _
Highway Administration,
ou=Nebraska Division.
•
Distribution: Consultant, LPA.-RC, State Rep., IFRU , Qi •h6'�' �s�e peer, Highway Funds Manager
'V' n Date:2012.07.0910:03:20-05'00'
DR Form 250,October 2010 Exhibit"B"
Page 1 of 5
a t
SECTION 23. NONDISCRIMINATION
A. Compliance with Regulations: During the performance of this agreement, the Consultant,
for itself and its assignees and successors in interest, agrees to comply with the regulations
of the DOT relative to nondiscrimination in federally-assisted programs of the DOT
(49 CFR 21 and 27, hereinafter referred to as the Regulations), which are hereby made a
part of and included in this agreement by reference.
B. Nondiscrimination: The Consultant, with regard to the work performed by it after award and
prior to completion of this agreement, shall not discriminate on the basis of race, color, sex,
or national origin in the selection and retention of Subconsultants, including procurements of
materials and leases of equipment. The Consultant shall not participate either directly or
indirectly in the discrimination prohibited by 49 CFR 21.5, including employment practices
when the agreement covers a program set forth in Appendixes A, B, and C of 49 CFR 21.
C. Solicitations for Subaqreements, Including Procurements of Materials and Equipment: In all
solicitations either by competitive bidding or negotiation made by the Consultant for work to
be performed under a subagreement, including procurements of materials or equipment,
each potential Subconsultant or supplier shall be notified by the Consultant of the
Consultant's obligations under this agreement and the Regulations relative to
nondiscrimination on the basis of race, color, sex, or national origin.
D. Information and Reports: The Consultant shall provide all information and reports required
by the Regulations, or orders and instructions issued pursuant thereto, and shall permit
access to its books, records, accounts, other sources of information, and its facilities as may
be determined by the LPA, State or FHWA to be pertinent to ascertain compliance with such
Regulations, orders, and instructions. Where any information required of a Consultant is in
the exclusive possession of another who fails or refuses to furnish this information, the
Consultant shall certify to the LPA, State or FHWA, as appropriate, and set forth what efforts
it has made to obtain the information.
E. Sanctions for Noncompliance: In the event of the Consultant's noncompliance with the
nondiscrimination provisions of this agreement, the LPA will impose such agreement
sanctions as it or the State and FHWA may determine to be appropriate, including but not
limited to withholding of payments to the Consultant under this agreement until the
Consultant complies, and/or cancellation, termination, or suspension of this agreement, in
whole or in part.
Project No. MAPA-28(110) Agreement No. BO1233
Control No. 22537
Harney St Corridor Feasibility Study - 11 -
Template Revised 7-26-12
MAPA-28(110) Agreement No. BO1233
Control No. 22537
Harney St Corridor Feasibility Study - 8 -
Template Revised 7-26-12
Template Revised 7-26-12
• -05 Notice to Proceed Date:
Date:3U,1.U7.;09:421)2-05 00 0 7/0 9/2 012
•
,_: _____.._.._.__�rank--------eigitaltysigtrcQby frankle17RKM.----.""- ---- .
Name DN:cn=Frank M.Rich,o=Federal Date B.C.H. _--_ _
Highway Administration,
ou=Nebraska Division.
•
Distribution: Consultant, LPA.-RC, State Rep., IFRU , Qi •h6'�' �s�e peer, Highway Funds Manager
'V' n Date:2012.07.0910:03:20-05'00'
DR Form 250,October 2010 Exhibit"B"
Page 1 of 5
r +
F. Incorporation of Provisions: The Consultant shall include the provisions of paragraphs A
through E of this section in every subagreement, including procurements of materials and
leases of equipment, unless exempt by the Regulations, orders, or instructions issued
pursuant thereto. The Consultant shall take such action with respect to any subagreement
or procurement as the LPA, State or FHWA may direct as a means of enforcing such
provisions including sanctions for noncompliance, provided however, that in the event a
Consultant becomes involved in or is threatened with litigation with a Subconsultant/
Subcontractor as a result of such direction, the Consultant may request that the LPA enter
into such litigation to protect the interests of the LPA and, in addition, the Consultant may
request that the State and United States enter into such litigation to protect the interests of
the State and United States.
SECTION 24. SUBLETTING, ASSIGNMENT, OR TRANSFER
The Subconsultant/Subcontractor will provide concepts and design themes and create
conceptual design documents.
Any other subletting, assignment, or transfer of any professional services to be performed
by the Consultant is hereby prohibited unless prior written consent of the LPA is obtained.
The Consultant shall enter into an agreement with its Subconsultants/Subcontractors for
work covered under this agreement. All Subconsultant/Subcontractor agreements for work
covered under this agreement, in excess of$10,000, must contain similar provisions to those in
this agreement. No right-of-action against the LPA will accrue to any
Subconsultant/Subcontractor by reason of this agreement.
As outlined in the DISADVANTAGED BUSINESS ENTERPRISES Section of this
agreement, the Consultant shall take all necessary and reasonable steps to ensure that
disadvantaged business enterprises have the maximum opportunity to compete for and perform
subagreements. Any written request to sublet any other work must include documentation of
efforts to employ a disadvantaged business enterprise.
SECTION 25. CONSULTANT CERTIFICATIONS
The undersigned duly authorized representatives of the Consultant, by signing this
agreement, hereby swears, under the penalty of law, the truth of the following certifications, and
agrees as follows:
A. Neb. Rev. Stat. § 81-1715(1). I certify compliance with the provisions of Section 81-1715
and, to the extent that this contract is a lump sum or actual cost-plus-a-fixed fee professional
service contract, I hereby certify that wage rates and other factual unit costs supporting the
fees in this agreement are accurate, complete, and current as of the date of this agreement.
Project No. MAPA-28(110) Agreement No. BO1233
Control No. 22537
Harney St Corridor Feasibility Study • - 12 -
Template Revised 7-26-12
trol No. 22537
Harney St Corridor Feasibility Study - 8 -
Template Revised 7-26-12
Template Revised 7-26-12
• -05 Notice to Proceed Date:
Date:3U,1.U7.;09:421)2-05 00 0 7/0 9/2 012
•
,_: _____.._.._.__�rank--------eigitaltysigtrcQby frankle17RKM.----.""- ---- .
Name DN:cn=Frank M.Rich,o=Federal Date B.C.H. _--_ _
Highway Administration,
ou=Nebraska Division.
•
Distribution: Consultant, LPA.-RC, State Rep., IFRU , Qi •h6'�' �s�e peer, Highway Funds Manager
'V' n Date:2012.07.0910:03:20-05'00'
DR Form 250,October 2010 Exhibit"B"
Page 1 of 5
I agree that the original contract price and any additions thereto shall be adjusted to exclude
any significant sums by which the LPA determines the contract price had been increased
due to inaccurate, incomplete, or noncurrent wage rates and other factual unit costs.
B. Neb. Rev. Stat. §§ 81-1717 and 1718. I hereby certify compliance with the provisions of
Sections 81-1717 and 1718 and, except as noted below neither I nor any person associated
with the firm in the capacity of owner, partner, director, officer, principal investor, project
director, manager, auditor, or any position involving the administration of federal funds:
1. Has employed or retained for a commission, percentage, brokerage, contingent fee, or
other consideration, any firm or person (other than a bona fide employee working solely
for me or the above Consultant) to solicit or secure this agreement, or
2. Has agreed, as an express or implied condition for obtaining this agreement, to employ
or retain the services of any firm or person in connection with carrying out this
agreement, or
3. Has paid, or agreed to pay, to any firm, organization or person (other than a bona fide
employee working solely for me or the above Consultant) any fee, contribution, donation,
or consideration of any kind for, or in connection with procuring or carrying out this
agreement, except as here expressly stated (if any).
C. Certification Regarding Debarment, Suspension, and Other Responsibility Matters-
Primary Covered Transactions. Section C1 below contains 10 instructions that consultant
agrees to follow in making the certifications contained in C2.
1. Instructions for Certification
a. By signing this agreement, the Consultant is providing the certification set out below.
b. The inability of a person to provide the certification required below will not
necessarily result in denial of participation in this project. The Consultant shall
submit an explanation of why it cannot provide the certification set out below. The
certification or explanation will be considered in connection with the State's
determination whether to enter into this agreement. However, failure of the
Consultant to furnish a certification or an explanation will disqualify the Consultant
from participation in this agreement.
c. The certification in this clause is a material representation of fact upon which reliance
was placed when the State determined to enter into this agreement. If it is later
determined that the Consultant knowingly rendered an erroneous certification, in
addition to other remedies available to the Federal government, the State may
terminate this agreement for cause or default.
d. The Consultant shall provide immediate written notice to the State if at any time the
Consultant learns that its certification was erroneous when submitted or has become
erroneous by reason of changed circumstances.
e. The terms "covered transaction," "debarred," "suspended," "ineligible," "lower tier
covered transaction," "participant," "person," "primary covered transaction,"
"principal," "proposal," and "voluntarily excluded," as used in this clause, have the
meanings set out in the Definitions and Coverage sections of the rules implementing
Executive Order 12549.
Project No. MAPA-28(110) Agreement No. BO1233
Control No. 22537
Harney St Corridor Feasibility Study - 13 -
Template Revised 7-26-12
6'�' �s�e peer, Highway Funds Manager
'V' n Date:2012.07.0910:03:20-05'00'
DR Form 250,October 2010 Exhibit"B"
Page 1 of 5
f. The Consultant agrees that should the proposed covered transaction be entered into,
it will not knowingly enter into any lower tier covered transaction with a person who is
debarred, suspended, declared ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from participation in
this covered transaction, unless authorized by the State before entering into this
agreement.
g. The Consultant further agrees to include the clause titled "Certification Regarding
Debarment, Suspension, Ineligibility and Voluntary Exclusion - Lower Tier Covered
Transaction," provided by the State without modification, in all lower tier covered
transactions and in all solicitations for lower tier covered transactions.
h. The Consultant in a covered transaction may rely upon a certification of a
prospective Subconsultant in a lower tier covered transaction that it is not debarred,
suspended, ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from the covered transaction, unless it
knows that the certification is erroneous. A Consultant may decide the method and
frequency by which it determines the eligibility of its principals.
i. Nothing contained in the foregoing will be construed to require establishment of a
system of records in order to render in good faith the certification required by this
clause. The knowledge and information of the Consultant is not required to exceed
that which is normally possessed by a prudent person in the ordinary course of
business dealings.
j. Except for transactions authorized under paragraph f of these instructions, if the
Consultant in a covered transaction knowingly enters into a lower tier covered
transaction with a person who is suspended, debarred, ineligible, or voluntarily
excluded from participation in this transaction, in addition to other remedies available
to the federal government, the State may terminate this agreement for cause or
default.
2. Certification Regarding Debarment, Suspension, and Other Responsibility Matters -
Primary Covered Transactions
a. By signing this agreement, the Consultant certifies to the best of its knowledge and
belief, that it and its principals:
i. Are not presently debarred, suspended, proposed for debarment, declared
ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from covered transactions by any federal
department or agency;
ii. Have not within a three-year period preceding this agreement been convicted
of or had a civil judgment rendered against them for commission of fraud or a
criminal offense in connection with obtaining, attempting to obtain, or
performing a public (federal, state, or local) transaction or contract under a
public transaction; violation of federal or state antitrust statutes or commission
of embezzlement, theft, forgery, bribery, falsification or destruction of records,
making false statements, or receiving stolen property;
iii. Are not presently indicted for or otherwise criminally or civilly charged by a
governmental entity (federal, state, or local) with commission of any of the
offenses enumerated in paragraph a.ii above; and
iv. Have not within a three-year period preceding this agreement had one or more
public transactions (federal, state, or local) terminated for cause or default.
Project No. MAPA-28(110) Agreement No. B01233
Control No. 22537
Harney St Corridor Feasibility Study - 14 -
Template Revised 7-26-12
'V' n Date:2012.07.0910:03:20-05'00'
DR Form 250,October 2010 Exhibit"B"
Page 1 of 5
b. Where the Consultant is unable to certify to any of the statements in this certification,
such Consultant shall attach an explanation to this agreement. I acknowledge that
this certification is to be furnished to the State and the FHWA in connection with this
agreement involving participation of federal-aid highway funds and is subject to
applicable, state and federal laws, both criminal and civil.
SECTION 27. (LPA) CERTIFICATION
By signing this agreement, I do hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge, the
Consultant or its representative has not been required, directly or indirectly as an express or
implied condition in connection with obtaining or carrying out this agreement to:
(a) employ or retain, or agree to employ or retain, any firm or person, or
(b) pay or agree to pay to any firm, person, or organization, any fee, contribution,
donation, or consideration of any kind.
I acknowledge that this certification is to be furnished to the FHWA, upon their request, in
connection with this agreement involving participation of Federal-Aid highway funds and is
subject to applicable state and federal laws, both criminal and civil.
SECTION 28. ALL ENCOMPASSED
This instrument embodies the whole agreement of the parties. There are no promises,
terms, conditions, or obligations other than contained herein, and this agreement supersedes all
previous communications, representations, or other agreements or contracts, either oral or
written hereto.
Agreement No. B01233
Project No. MAPA-28(110) A g
Control No. 22537
Harney St Corridor Feasibility Study - 15 -
Template Revised 7-26-12
ed, ineligible, or voluntarily
excluded from participation in this transaction, in addition to other remedies available
to the federal government, the State may terminate this agreement for cause or
default.
2. Certification Regarding Debarment, Suspension, and Other Responsibility Matters -
Primary Covered Transactions
a. By signing this agreement, the Consultant certifies to the best of its knowledge and
belief, that it and its principals:
i. Are not presently debarred, suspended, proposed for debarment, declared
ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from covered transactions by any federal
department or agency;
ii. Have not within a three-year period preceding this agreement been convicted
of or had a civil judgment rendered against them for commission of fraud or a
criminal offense in connection with obtaining, attempting to obtain, or
performing a public (federal, state, or local) transaction or contract under a
public transaction; violation of federal or state antitrust statutes or commission
of embezzlement, theft, forgery, bribery, falsification or destruction of records,
making false statements, or receiving stolen property;
iii. Are not presently indicted for or otherwise criminally or civilly charged by a
governmental entity (federal, state, or local) with commission of any of the
offenses enumerated in paragraph a.ii above; and
iv. Have not within a three-year period preceding this agreement had one or more
public transactions (federal, state, or local) terminated for cause or default.
Project No. MAPA-28(110) Agreement No. B01233
Control No. 22537
Harney St Corridor Feasibility Study - 14 -
Template Revised 7-26-12
'V' n Date:2012.07.0910:03:20-05'00'
DR Form 250,October 2010 Exhibit"B"
Page 1 of 5
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused these presents to be executed
by their proper officials thereunto duly authorized as of the dates below indicated.
After being duly sworn on oath, I do hereby acknowledge the foregoing certification and
state that I am authorized to sign this agreement.
EXECUTED by the Consultant this 16tlay of 0C5FIA9Pr— , 2012.
SPRINKLE CONSULTING, INC.
Bruce W. Lan ' P.E.
ecutive Vice Pr i nt
STATE OF FLORIDA )
)ss.
HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY )
Subscribed and sworn to before me this I day of ,'`b , 2012.
IfLutitoW ‘ a , 1 ir)
N to ublic 44.. otary Pub c StateofFo ICHELLE A. O
i
'� Commission#DD820
My comm.expires Nov,IL
EXECUTED bythe LPA this a of // �� 2012.
cV5'1 y 4r C�7JD` _
CITY OF OMAHA
Jim Suttle
s
ioodre ___
or
Subscribed and sworn to before me this .217dieay of . ?LQ / , 2012.
_joe<II--
Clerk
STATE OF NEBRASKA
DEPARTMENT OF ROADS
Form of Agreement Approved for
Federal Funding Eligibility:
iiiii k
///4/z 72
Date
A3N80ll, A110 Al .31
Project No. MAPA-28(110) p'• t , 0. B01233
Control No. 22537 /
Harney St Corridor Feasibility Study - 16 - /o7�7'>
Template Revised 7-26-12 'NM 01 SV 03r10 y
- 15 -
Template Revised 7-26-12
ed, ineligible, or voluntarily
excluded from participation in this transaction, in addition to other remedies available
to the federal government, the State may terminate this agreement for cause or
default.
2. Certification Regarding Debarment, Suspension, and Other Responsibility Matters -
Primary Covered Transactions
a. By signing this agreement, the Consultant certifies to the best of its knowledge and
belief, that it and its principals:
i. Are not presently debarred, suspended, proposed for debarment, declared
ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from covered transactions by any federal
department or agency;
ii. Have not within a three-year period preceding this agreement been convicted
of or had a civil judgment rendered against them for commission of fraud or a
criminal offense in connection with obtaining, attempting to obtain, or
performing a public (federal, state, or local) transaction or contract under a
public transaction; violation of federal or state antitrust statutes or commission
of embezzlement, theft, forgery, bribery, falsification or destruction of records,
making false statements, or receiving stolen property;
iii. Are not presently indicted for or otherwise criminally or civilly charged by a
governmental entity (federal, state, or local) with commission of any of the
offenses enumerated in paragraph a.ii above; and
iv. Have not within a three-year period preceding this agreement had one or more
public transactions (federal, state, or local) terminated for cause or default.
Project No. MAPA-28(110) Agreement No. B01233
Control No. 22537
Harney St Corridor Feasibility Study - 14 -
Template Revised 7-26-12
'V' n Date:2012.07.0910:03:20-05'00'
DR Form 250,October 2010 Exhibit"B"
Page 1 of 5
,t f , ,
•
, 1 •
°�,?. ` ` ;t .y''k - _,;,�I=e i,i TF_ ' p .J. r 11 ftt 1 �:+itt .s, iY,a f3. ,^r.�'� y�r'! ':{.•
1,. •'.x ul: I T.�P i.,r , ' .•r dl ;,t• t. 't •.+ l 1`
•rjyy f F 9 l� . I It, _a
� ii'J 7 �1; 4 {y,4 F.}'�•� . Ej � r I� 1•1 ' t i'' t ,tr {., y� .: ,, �I,, r j Q 1 .�V
4...,.•A• I4r—•1.I A•J•t- ' Ct►` {I Via. N ...91 '--t ,4i• :!. t 1:'•1.'1• .�.01i.iL� .t.'S' w-,i. 1 '' if s' t:-.40 ,LY•, ..' t,,a ',
�-�- `_._ _ ,1,+ S 42nd St• ,r- ••- } rt ,' - ; f•- .ws,..! .:Y'4 • f.
p7 ";1.,} ,{��atv tti /_�7 0 -� w (x,,'�t��y� y 45,t j!: •;��' �� F,,,i1..{I ✓'�s .
`.L. ,..lt' , `T"?( » .nt' 1s ,f} ,I.! o::fro oti r -tVtiD'_.a •t' • t4t.014 ,- .lir.i `,,c.;s �•q.1;,;i t'. t<,
?, tie i1 ):.�r t? 0 t -�^ �--4-s c fA'}aF�..r_k. �j t !rt w �� 2.1E 4„c►1.•, , t ,11:t i't .„ r t�,.: rt.
.f} it rt• ",, if1! t `•,•f ..• ;4 I,3 _1'] r"_'"1 `" tt,`r46 ! •f ► } ,. �� 4)
V 1 Sri �iA I Yi 'w t. 8 " tNA���.7�' 1\ s' �t t� ':.r. c•y
•r :l 46- ,. s1M I •.•e r•• I 2p '1# .y isl•;•:,, 1j'.- • ;-11.... . i=.,l .- ,ii
w $ ) i Ili}
/[� <Oa. I.:'t t�l�r t r1 I~,t (�ti`�IF .i. *f• —- ,i4 .' L ��.,=+° ,k, sra+nt 4' ,S`` Itt�Lt ds.. r
/ • �{•r �: k�'41.. •i' mil "Y s _, .� � -Tl� ,. ,. '•I2 „�,�' •t, i�� �_t fSt. } .U^i f .N�t�" 1• ''i•:i�{'.�t . 1.,i� ; �•t i.
iY r !,1; ,. r v .: i•. �to •i •:qn ::z.,:,,i� s F; I ti a tjilt
5
l`!I./°=s. {-,:*.t i. ,34 `t'J1' t.t11 , „it t .}ay t ', } • `j.I_► •tx V '. �1e•• tP* Z•• il.i ' .f,.4 1. 'yi,!;S1 ;
3" .- r 1i1tts.'a ;Y;_�S+',i,,r %ii: f-Li:., ,'.,:t P 1. t 1 , , A`/ �v4 .`",1/3 1{,-4' "" it4'. r�FF�•s';'.411 t1 :tx, 44,41.j'0 i..•R ,- 'i.;1
' s .1 H`lYXvti+ t► z. , t ,` _ , - • :Z }�yt'•• Ii c 1 • ,, rw R' f, L ':1', :S t't{,. r.At�tV :1.1..
a ' F..... 1 �I r 't`t `37'` kt , l t.•t...U.. ,tS'4 1 . .' .l t`;r.- ,e� •�'t i 1' rS, , �iI`.t'i lr i� ttt rI r
r"4,,1 jtTi •t;_fr•�„i ".� f 5t • !�; r''.' >n•�•-' .�J f �, ti l: S' V.- .� ( �r
y S .., ►9, t Ili }F # ,t.'t t.. x,,S {
1��`h�t:�i.!�ia�� �C\y.,tiii.}•��7itit'�, l.A( ,� ,' ry Y J ;a , �� Jr •s`c• 1;�C1ltll t kY •if:� ��rRik� tC,ii ��t, r^•�.�!'�LL•�`.
r ,f ••r rt, 'tt, 1t{t f1 1. � 1./. .ttjt r- r avPJ•. i',.Yi " '. ,i,,....4.01,kl•:. ; < S :�i1 f� l-• x
�h � Lc , ."1 +,..:, s 4....' rt i,n lv•", 'tr A%- �fi
i M S� � -�•�s} r F -tl .1
ti j_, J1.t" •1 74 is IX1f` r:.y° O.> 'tij1'%1' t' i':A4 .'k.,; ' t'! •'�� 1 't l t •=-1►rift:l ri yGtit r�:t j'n•-'}t }� t% :1 t noi�' ��';'l y.
i. : '�h t 3�.UY.: t ,t- - ' ,- 1.,,i 3.. . .4-- `l0.- ' i ',•t d� i �► � tb.i `'t..,J' '�'s `, !•rPLll
h �1
t'i;i� c�p",r r, t. a !f•. c 3rrys •'t'.Si It; ai •E; , t' $ C,E`d 4;y F <bJ..s
A 4. etw ,,. i �ti.i.. i O ;t.,,'+1 I Y , C r iYt , r 1 t.
o 1 •1 i £ �,, ; f .� t -i •tali, t;•. ' .t' ,�It!,! r,.eG` s S,., ;,f:•c�'•`"�4-. x i'1 -C'Tts! _;
} + ,}Iw y� r�i,1i,a4 ' 'r
t'1,.��} }j �"N1, l• -s � :.it' it � ,�r ► pz � tttN''. t.i° - } 1 ' .: �y 1 1_ .,, tI 4. It 1• '1 (;t�Vitt.'
�7,).'t.' .- t. 4 `'' k 1
a f`r a+i4 a ! /,'irq :' ; .•a . kZ• } �, +�'IM'�` ,, , 't J
i ,y,"•,�� �,Fl�i,6. '�.. .F t r'IL t '' --1 (4 v^"r'� t•1'{`{i j , ,f i h ; Ai.:.
't . ;'r att� .{i R 111fL:>•r14r; t.t,.7'4M,, r I� t ,. , ,I_� tti 111:; f, l.1,4 a;" 1 �' �
+n.ei) A' 1��d `li :4.4 1� aii t.1su ss,jj 1,iuj }' ' N n 1 * 6. •1 ` rr,,'f tir- ••H'. • Z'! t: 1, t %: i?/ .'i }.(I p ,i.,.frtJ{•} , '\' r.ts'' t '• .i r• 4` f)_ 'Al1:
f .xr- L, , i ; >;'' ,+tt, _i- �r s.;•t; l .it' !+.
.Ly f, �-i 1 .14.- • ..l 1 "'•')tftt [ti-k1,0,.... 4iti ,y.�1`ltil` - r '{t t'U. •, ' . �/I.K'•••.£' �,• m.
J..it4, j:'i���`ak�' r . m•r,.w: .•- , x� ,g.E t ii SS�- "I.� . t+ 'y 'F��iqt \ skjc.i .!EI.... u ::4 u . .;. .r'. u,M ,�, j
.If�ic` `V..'1�\a J�1t,F;FtSt 1••�>f 1.•, t L(.i�� . tir,p "`.. f31 t,a;�.r> - 1+;. r:�•,, .. �,•t •^ �YJ1, 'R
!t;` F 4 �' < 7 ..y t�1e;.' "'t.r [.,"e.�lfF,,,r 1:, 1 r +.... F!, .». O. > 0
a� �; j+f 'tl t 1, ii ;'s:: ' 'F'F. ,i.,aa..t+ �i a 's� •.. s I Fi i-L 5. P� . .11t, •�
t'r�r •5' ,i.1,r.t' ,hj ,.I i r 0k;;611i) .p,iy�!+���7�' ',4; .Iii :.,` •,',i,;,_'1..,'t`i1#J' •�_WW�� N 3Oth Sty.. i-+' r. ." '1'
t.r'LI;s•• ,yty*�Fy� •
.',l •t,i !ix'. ▪ f(( r qtf 1 va I ; { 1 - •
i. t . ?t, �. .,lr ►•"-• 1,1 •I. �, �_;t
ivmt
•
a w,t:ill rlf .ttlL+�;iil ia• , _ 1 1480 r:i CN t ^�� °S.r4 ,� I k5 �e i
�LR1Ft' 1 i I lk„+' y ' 4-•� "'•'1 sa` ;!��}t ��gq]'E a , ; J iic. `ftR1• - '`' � =w
. . �� ,•:!_? tu•. • i t 1.i.♦ `',,ii•�t6Y,» 1Intik t 1-• \North FreeWB�N Q••Z W t
''f C k 9 •-OF r. r t �t"1 t �.�. ti.,.�: ir:' if, R1.Vat ,� ,l '�,,�t�1! ')li am � O1 t s
' IL +i.+4 {�' t:Y' £'•�'• t`i� t 1f t '• •,ya'.� ..� �i3, t ' ':*,w, '^.\' '•!/' '�: �iY • �• ^' N
..yid•,_ , ,- ,yti try►, 4. 5••. ,A.. El, r .f , 1 a. :.5; j.I� g l.r ',IW t+
'� . r �i w-4 '. i !'F. )+mot'. 97•F ,••`T f , '7.�'.> x�.a •i F"i 4 ,:• A"i it :CU
. +fi44t.• . 11 '�j 7711,, } tI • rf� .�" ,,,• ,if ' ;, ,a• 1 •1� :N-i t ';,gti.TA"}'•-t1r'1$- •• .- •+:-t•`,,,. •, .4 �1Y -14 !i1, ., ' ti VI �j111�'_. )'a.'fec„�l�i? '�• t t '� ,` .�"S 2l�tti SL��' i. . , i-' i[ I.:JF?, t !r'`€ Y.I I _ _•
.
•
xi—lti-ia;i i O'1,lN4ST.R.f t�leit;"`4� 'iiii..ZU7;1Ir; '-'i4 1•i1 . ,1 .1`►It �p•II � r, '4. , o i
, '�"4 '<a3i' li. • !` ',f�l ,t�'1 wL'it -{i.i'!r`+.L�lJ.•:F` %® ,I . t iIt:n F°+,:[....,�. �` ', �' `',
4 \, fY , t 13iJi i } {�+{i{ t .� Oa (..ev,
ra \�Z..� .�� �.�•�_ n<!. t.`!r. 4}�0� ��}sjjt• .y J 1„� !l• :�` ,�' ;�' 4:�N.ZO O, 'ii,
-,• f�'/F�'N`�' Fl F' j. • „ HE. V=mil ,f ,7��}�T�.t�y�1. �cae,� •5_ jg j
'11.s l -Iy!,'r y•i SC21Otivh`St "','.I t7!ti �j rl CU� I ..•.i�r' i�'_`'17)' t u�} y� 7��jj��CC I—_ -t :T
-' '71.'c IP . . 4. `i7-Ip.f:. r t I''I,'r t��• -'1'•'r ` Y .' .--' Lif- .-7 " •�E..117
I +.+ 7 t+_ i tom., -^r ;' t,��';- [ 'd[ f7'1.1i1::r”
� n 1 t IA t 't+�
`•1`,11'' �_.+'�{,�?15Y I:j i1` '•�▪ �. ''\` f I p, Et-11•'ri~f. f•.• �I ,S,' rfyyn�L •'7Nt.rYJ, ;� 1t�, r i1, ,a „� .� i Xi 1t' S '�r~Yj,ti; l�.w 1,�.�" I.� „ �:� ,;V.1rlr,i a mr `•4 `� "e,27F.t wj 1 .,rr, d i1. �I.'i ,i R S�i,r1, 1� 1PI tojc,,r �
•.S F 1'4•3., '� NvE t ia'I. i V . r „�'-.' — .•
,, 1 .�•_i.. th-17'.
�+ 4 r.r• a S
tl. r•t`t•t;`i 1,(1,` ' t.it „, ! , WIDb _:.,a �, � i ••• 1/_�~ri, �- I�, 'I.SI -'t.i) �� ,i'a s 1
ti�'•y,IiITV ' '''i'..-1 k�„ 'iF'F fT^ �i r �}, r. r'!1f �' �:,J` i�! �. .' .V` ,1 4- i' G
+ SS1i It• •_it3A L ,::1ii t,i� 'S1 .. "_o%7i lyklC ut l,.t.` ,L' '•y ��hJ, '`;,' . , ,_• r f.1,
A„...„,:giitiliti
s� if ar _ ,S 1S-,13th St' - j ,�N;13th St ,
'.;) .r.14^ 'Cif 1 a"y q F,, ,i 3 *r , ti 1I4 „. ,I., � }..14I ._
.- ,,,} A...,,,,_l 12 )lli't. F ,,
vii YI1 Y l4. 1. 47.C.
f1 R 1 c-� 44ki • , ' • 1. i . . ,i � � 'r7litir=?q•
'L��'- � t i�;l';tlt} ',,,•ttf,', ,t' li y �� fl, i �;,L�'i' ' i1,It• Iiii�'"• r EA1 ff•R ' �t-TAN 4 .irr 1 I n sd 't 1..1 '�f •;"i'�+�
S 1Oth St +~ 1 +' ry.�
f t,►� r.7Ya �f -' . t-"i ct i, `1 ii i'• y;.
�) 1 l b..
I in
t��1,il 'Z 1' 'l: !..•1 k.lci''t,] ) 4t i* ( _. miac F. . ,0_ , i , /� i! i ii 'y,, a:s: , 46'''!.i1
(�II),tC► �. a l ! • $i W 1G'� : I7 t •r�; / i �� ,., i•• `'';�` ` ,'„'0,.J
r rAI: 1+•� 1. 1 1 �,, � • •d ,,.,`''1�' a- •--- nI.Project •i-. i
No. MAPA-28(110) Fr 1 [� t► ,l!` j
ti L 4 tv4n.E+ll:.., ; }' 'L. �R.rr1 :A! ... ram l i]l•. :t-:1...� r. i
Control No.22537 • Exhibit"A"
Harney St Corridor Feasibility Study
,� 4
Page 1 of 15
Scope of Services:
Harney Street Transformation - Market to Midtown
1 Conceptual Design Study
Harney Street in downtown Omaha is a four-lane one-way street typically carrying fewer than 8,000
vehicles per day. During the City of Omaha's Transportation Master Plan update,this street corridor
was identified as an opportunity for the City to better expand transportation mode options within the
larger east-west Dodge-Douglas-Farnam-Harney travel corridor. Potentially surplus cross-sectional space
within the street's right-of-way can be used to create a premium bicycle and pedestrian transportation
way(via a "buffered" multi-or shared use pathway,or"cycle track")that would allow two-way
bicycle/pedestrian travel within the larger east-west corridor. As the concept evolved during the city's
Transportation Master Plan, it has been envisioned that such a transformation of Harney Street would
form the spine of other short branches of similar"active transportation facilities,connecting major
downtown destinations, reaching westward to the University of Nebraska Medical Center campus and
connecting this with downtown Omaha and the Old Market. (This study will only evaluate the Harney
Street portion from 10th to 42nd Street.)
This transformation concept is fundamentally transportation-based and will increase the visibility and
viability of the bicycle mode in downtown,attracting and expanding the spectrum of cycling commuters.
In addition,this investment offers great potential as an economic catalyst. It can generate visitor
exposure along a greater extent of Midtown and Downtown Omaha, promoting tourism and enabling
business growth and redevelopment of vacant or underperforming properties. It can also serve as a
display of Omaha's rich history and culture, providing a setting for both Omaha residents and visitors
alike to celebrate or discover the accomplishments and continuing innovation of the city. Furthermore,
this new transformation of Harney Street can accommodate recreational travel and leisure activities,
thus creating greater demand for downtown businesses and boosting the appeal of urban living.
o.- .14.4'/ •- 1 n.
.. Iii -1, , I li 111---'-... . is i i
.n t r
✓w _rAT =�r mo
;', ,. e,', c V im' , .-1 - �.. . 'f� w ��'"_ 0
.1. -,A
�y�, lidhi
JT
r, ..cam" ,i
'''.1'1111111111101H
+n i7Ca ;1W1- _ e Proposed eiq:4'\
Project No. MAPA-28(110)
Control No. 22537 Exhibit"B"
Harney St Corridor Feasibility Study Page 1 of 15
) transaction or contract under a
public transaction; violation of federal or state antitrust statutes or commission
of embezzlement, theft, forgery, bribery, falsification or destruction of records,
making false statements, or receiving stolen property;
iii. Are not presently indicted for or otherwise criminally or civilly charged by a
governmental entity (federal, state, or local) with commission of any of the
offenses enumerated in paragraph a.ii above; and
iv. Have not within a three-year period preceding this agreement had one or more
public transactions (federal, state, or local) terminated for cause or default.
Project No. MAPA-28(110) Agreement No. B01233
Control No. 22537
Harney St Corridor Feasibility Study - 14 -
Template Revised 7-26-12
'V' n Date:2012.07.0910:03:20-05'00'
DR Form 250,October 2010 Exhibit"B"
Page 1 of 5
•
Page 2 of 15
The western portion of the Harney Street bicycle and pedestrian transportation way was first identified
as such during the development of the Destination Midtown Plan,adopted in 2005. Following in 2010
the eastern portion was identified with the Downtown Master Plan in 2010. Both plans, now a part of
the master plan, included considerable public engagement.This included a SWOT(strengths,
weaknesses,opportunities,and threats)analysis by the public during early stages of plan development
and later was refined through design workshops which included citizens from the area and the greater
community.
The transportation master plan update refined previously identified transportation concepts from all
recent plans, including the destination midtown plan and the downtown plan and built new ideas and
concepts through extensive public engagement.This was done through a multi-step public participation
and engagement process. Specifically,the Harney street bicycle and pedestrian way was advanced
during two week long design workshops and was confirmed at a public priorities meeting held in the fall
of 2011 with over 350 people in attendance and through online tools assisting the plan development
process.This added layer for public engagement was conducted throughout the development of the
transportation master plan via a project website,www.citvofomaha.org/tmplan and an active public
engage portal of www.engageomaha.org.These tools allowed for continuous public feedback and
confirmation on the plan and identified projects.
The policies and measurements of the environmental element of the master plan provide the underlying
basis of this project,specifically within the urban form and transportation section of the document.The
document states that"Omaha will substantially reduce its impact on the environment and the per capita
cost of critical infrastructure and municipal services and substantially increase its level of urban quality
and community health by supporting an efficient city form with a balanced transportation network that
increases the role of low-impact and active transportation modes in providing access to all parts of the
city."The plan measures success by"achieving a ten percent mode shift;whereas ten per cent of all
trips in Omaha will be made by active transportation modes—pedestrian, bicycle,and public
transportation within the next 20 years.Today about 2%of all trips and 4.4%of commuting trips are
made by these modes."
More specifically,the plan supports the Harney Street Bicycle and Pedestrian way through the following
policy; "Provide a high level of citywide access and continuity to pedestrians and bicyclists, making
active transportation a realistic and integral part of the city's transportation network." This will be
achieved through the following objective; "identify, conceptualize,and in the long-term develop a major
east-west bicycle/pedestrian corridor. The facility may share a corridor with motor vehicles, but be
separated or insulated from conflicts with automobile traffic. This will be facilitated through the
following actions; (1) Identify and evaluate possible east-west corridors,
(2) Develop a conceptual long-term design for the east-west corridor,for future implementation."
The Harney Street Bicycle and Pedestrian Transportation way is just one of many projects meeting the
environment element's policy for transportation.
Project No. MAPA-28(110)
Control No. 22537 Exhibit"B"
Harney St Corridor Feasibility Study Page 2 of 15
- 14 -
Template Revised 7-26-12
'V' n Date:2012.07.0910:03:20-05'00'
DR Form 250,October 2010 Exhibit"B"
Page 1 of 5
I
Page 3 of 15
Introduction
Overall downtown Omaha has seen an extensive addition of bicycle lanes on its streets in recent years.
However,these bicycle lanes are mostly on one-way streets and do not always feature a reciprocal route
system where one direction of travel is mirrored on an adjacent one-way street. This is complicated by
changes from one-way to two-way travel on some streets.
The spine of the proposed system is Market to Midtown itself, principally the extent between 10th
Street and 42nd Street,the logical east termini is 10th Street(Harney Street ends here)and the logical
west termini is 42nd Street (Harney Street transitions north to Farnam Street on the University of
Nebraska Medical Center Campus). This is where Harney Street is currently at its widest and has
generally the least traffic. However, branches, not a part of this project,of the same type of cycle track
design are proposed to be applied to other downtown streets in the future, creating a small network
connecting the Omaha Convention Center,Century Link Arena,the Old Market,the Omaha Central
Business District,the Joslyn Art Museum, Midtown Crossing and ultimately the UNMC campus.
In the following detailed scope, outlined is a two phased work plan to accomplish the above.The two
phases are:
Phase I—Assess Conditions, Identify and Evaluate Cross-section Alternatives within Harney Street
ROW, Prepare Traffic Study and Preliminary Purpose and Need Statement.
Phase II—Develop Implementing Concepts, Design Themes, Create Conceptual Design
Documents and NEPA. (NEPA will be completed by a separate but coordinated contract
• by another contractor.)
The consultant shall closely collaborate with Public Works Traffic Division, Planning Department
and key stakeholders (see details in both work phases).The consultant team and City staff will establish
a framework and a schedule for the Market to Midtown Streetscape and follow a detailed work plan
that shall include the following:
1. Citizen participation
2. Data needs
3. Project Schedule (9 active months, per proposal)
4. Quality Assurance and Quality Control Plan (per proposal)
5. Presenting the plan at required meetings and assisting City staff with presentations
6. Will coordinate all work tasks with the NEPA study
There is a need to implement a citizen-based planning process for this project;following the MPO
process. Furthermore, it is expected that this project will have a significant public/private partnership
aspect, as have other nationally prominent cycle track/pedestrian multi-modal pathways in resurgent
urban areas. In light of this, a public participation plan will be developed,as per MAPA's process,and
followed to aid all stakeholders throughout the process.
SCOPE:
Project No. MAPA-28(110)
Control No. 22537 Exhibit"B"
Harney St Corridor Feasibility Study Page 3 of 15
ity may share a corridor with motor vehicles, but be
separated or insulated from conflicts with automobile traffic. This will be facilitated through the
following actions; (1) Identify and evaluate possible east-west corridors,
(2) Develop a conceptual long-term design for the east-west corridor,for future implementation."
The Harney Street Bicycle and Pedestrian Transportation way is just one of many projects meeting the
environment element's policy for transportation.
Project No. MAPA-28(110)
Control No. 22537 Exhibit"B"
Harney St Corridor Feasibility Study Page 2 of 15
- 14 -
Template Revised 7-26-12
'V' n Date:2012.07.0910:03:20-05'00'
DR Form 250,October 2010 Exhibit"B"
Page 1 of 5
,t r
•
Page 4 of 15
PHASE I—ASSESS CONDITIONS, IDENTIFY AND EVALUATE CROSS-SECTIONAL ALTERNATIVES,
and PREPARE TRAFFIC STUDY AND STATEMENT OF NEED
Task 0- PROJECT MANAGEMENT, PROCESS COORDINATION,AND QA/QC
Task 1—Assess Accommodation Needs, Evaluate Harney Street Traffic Operational
Conditions, Multi-modal Conditions
Subtask 1.1. Operations Precedents Study
1.1.1 Conduct research and prepare a short summary presentation on
operational/design issues of urban pathways
1.1.2 Prepare short presentation of precedent(U.S. cities) examples of operationally
successful urban-setting multi-use paths/cycle track initiatives/projects
1.1.3 Prepare and conduct kick-off meeting with City staff: presentations on operational
challenges and recent success examples. Included is a conference call with the City
(Traffic) Engineer or Public Works Director of either Indianapolis or St. Petersburg to
discuss their operational safety experience with their city's cycle track. (Project Team
Meeting#1).
1.1.4 Finalize"Recent Successes Examples/Design Precedents Study"following review
at Project Team Meeting. Prepare abbreviated version of PowerPoint for use at public
open house session(s).
Subtask 1.2. Establish Design Parameters for Operations within Harney Street Corridor
1.2.1 Prepare design parameters, pathway/cycle track design options and
recommendation;submit for City review
1.2.2 Hold meeting with City and (optionally)agency partners,to affirm design
parameters for Harney Street setting and project(budget)scenarios(Project Team
Meeting#2)
1.2.3 Prepare the project's Preliminary Purpose and Need Statement,final purpose and
need statement will be developed by a separate contractor under a separate contract.
Subtask 1.3. Traffic and Multi-modal Conditions Study
The Consultant shall prepare a traffic study for the Market to Midtown corridor to
determine existing conditions and best alternatives for existing and future
transportation flows;this analysis shall include level of service for vehicles, pedestrians,
bicycles and transit using the planning level application of the 2010 Highway Capacity
Manual's Chapter 17-Urban Streets,specifically the link-based analyses. The
Consultant will have access to the Regional model for any needed data to perform the
Project No. MAPA-28(110)
Control No. 22537 Exhibit"B"
Harney St Corridor Feasibility Study Page 4 of 15
resurgent
urban areas. In light of this, a public participation plan will be developed,as per MAPA's process,and
followed to aid all stakeholders throughout the process.
SCOPE:
Project No. MAPA-28(110)
Control No. 22537 Exhibit"B"
Harney St Corridor Feasibility Study Page 3 of 15
ity may share a corridor with motor vehicles, but be
separated or insulated from conflicts with automobile traffic. This will be facilitated through the
following actions; (1) Identify and evaluate possible east-west corridors,
(2) Develop a conceptual long-term design for the east-west corridor,for future implementation."
The Harney Street Bicycle and Pedestrian Transportation way is just one of many projects meeting the
environment element's policy for transportation.
Project No. MAPA-28(110)
Control No. 22537 Exhibit"B"
Harney St Corridor Feasibility Study Page 2 of 15
- 14 -
Template Revised 7-26-12
'V' n Date:2012.07.0910:03:20-05'00'
DR Form 250,October 2010 Exhibit"B"
Page 1 of 5
•
•
Page 5 of 15
analyses. The expected deliverable shall be a brief memorandum (electronic)
documenting the initial traffic study findings and recommendations for Harney Street
being evaluated,the need justified and documented as the preferred alternative
corridor(compared to others such as Farnam, Leavenworth or Dodge).The Omaha
Transportation Master Plan will be used as a reference.Traffic counts and other traffic
information will be made available through Omaha Public Works Department; 2035
motor vehicle and transit forecast will be provided from MAPA.
For Harney Street,the Traffic Study will provide analysis related to the following, if
affected by the multi-use pathway/cycle track concept considered:
1. Vehicular, bicycle and pedestrian safety;
2. Current and projected future quality of service for all modes of travel in the
corridor, and how these operations will be affected by proposed changes in the
reconfiguration of features within the Harney Street right-of-way;
3. Review existing traffic signals and provide recommendations for intersection
alterations to accommodate the multi-use path/cycle track;
4. Pedestrian intersection markers, pedestrian "countdown" lights and enhanced
street crossings, bicycle only signals for consideration of two way bicycle traffic.
5. Mass transit opportunities and constraints.
1.3.1 Establish existing and projected baseline multi-modal conditions for Harney Street
1.3.2 Forecast/predict,for the cycle track/multi-use pathway scenario,the present and
future multi-modal conditions
1.3.3 Summarize via Comparative Matrix
1.3.4 Present Task 1.3 deliverables to City Staff and relevant agency stakeholders (at
Project Team Meeting#2)
1.3.5 Refine preliminary traffic study and prepare presentation materials for kick-off
public information open house.
Task 2 Initial Citizen-based Planning with Stakeholders and"Stockholders"
Subtask 2.1. Prepare Public and Stakeholder Involvement Plan
2.1.1 Outline Citizen Involvement Plan (i.e., per RFP; "public participation plan")
following MAPA PPP guidance
2.1.2 Identify groups for the Public Information Open House portion of citizen-based
planning; identify(with City staff)strategic stakeholder groups
2.1.3 Perform community and stakeholders outreach
Project No. MAPA-28(110)
Control No. 22537 Exhibit"B"
Harney St Corridor Feasibility Study Page 5 of 15
urban areas. In light of this, a public participation plan will be developed,as per MAPA's process,and
followed to aid all stakeholders throughout the process.
SCOPE:
Project No. MAPA-28(110)
Control No. 22537 Exhibit"B"
Harney St Corridor Feasibility Study Page 3 of 15
ity may share a corridor with motor vehicles, but be
separated or insulated from conflicts with automobile traffic. This will be facilitated through the
following actions; (1) Identify and evaluate possible east-west corridors,
(2) Develop a conceptual long-term design for the east-west corridor,for future implementation."
The Harney Street Bicycle and Pedestrian Transportation way is just one of many projects meeting the
environment element's policy for transportation.
Project No. MAPA-28(110)
Control No. 22537 Exhibit"B"
Harney St Corridor Feasibility Study Page 2 of 15
- 14 -
Template Revised 7-26-12
'V' n Date:2012.07.0910:03:20-05'00'
DR Form 250,October 2010 Exhibit"B"
Page 1 of 5
.
Page 6 of 15
2.1.4 Prepare and Conduct"kick-off" public information open house with displays of
project scope,timeline, preliminary results of Task 1(Design Parameters,
Representative Projects).
2.1.5 Based on feedback from initial open house, identify potential stakeholder
representatives of merchants, property owners,funding partners,etc. and for
ultimately,the Phase II Design Themes Workshop and Community Open House;Assist
the City with up to 12 follow-up information/meetings with stakeholders or groups
Subtask 2.2 Based in part from initial feedback at open house, research and propose baseline
measures and/or trends of current economic activity, property values, and other quality
of life aspects to develop and affirm those most important to the corridor's
stakeholders.
Subtask 2.3 Prepare summary assessment of corridor property{based on real estate market
data and trends [e.g., commercial and multi-family lease rates per(building)square
foot,cost per(property)square foot]}
Subtask 2.4 Present deliverables to City staff(at Project Team Meeting#2)
ICI
Task 3 Vision and Concepts' Development Design
Subtask 3.1 Establish Alignment with City's adopted Vision,Goals and Objectives
3.1.1 Review Adopted Plans; Prepare one-page summary that demonstrates Harney
Street project's potential to fulfill Goals/Objectives/Policies of adopted plan(s)
Subtask 3.2 Develop Performance Measures Matrix
3.2.1 Develop performance measures "shortlisted" in above Task into a citizen-response
format matrix to help(initially in Task 5 and) in Phase II to quantify/qualify internal
Harney Street conversion elements for their project impacts/benefits to stakeholders
(e.g. corridor parking changes, increased building occupancy,customers,travel options
for employees, etc.)
Subtask 3.3 Harney Street Conversion's role as a showcase of history,culture,a work of
art,etc.
3.3.1 Explore with City staff, and other stakeholders or agencies the range of needed,
and viable role(s)that the Harney streetscape transformation can fulfill.These may
include: Narration of Omaha history and/or culture(or elements or geographic
•
Project No. MAPA-28(110)
Control No. 22537 Exhibit"B"
Harney St Corridor Feasibility Study Page 6 of 15
each
Project No. MAPA-28(110)
Control No. 22537 Exhibit"B"
Harney St Corridor Feasibility Study Page 5 of 15
urban areas. In light of this, a public participation plan will be developed,as per MAPA's process,and
followed to aid all stakeholders throughout the process.
SCOPE:
Project No. MAPA-28(110)
Control No. 22537 Exhibit"B"
Harney St Corridor Feasibility Study Page 3 of 15
ity may share a corridor with motor vehicles, but be
separated or insulated from conflicts with automobile traffic. This will be facilitated through the
following actions; (1) Identify and evaluate possible east-west corridors,
(2) Develop a conceptual long-term design for the east-west corridor,for future implementation."
The Harney Street Bicycle and Pedestrian Transportation way is just one of many projects meeting the
environment element's policy for transportation.
Project No. MAPA-28(110)
Control No. 22537 Exhibit"B"
Harney St Corridor Feasibility Study Page 2 of 15
- 14 -
Template Revised 7-26-12
'V' n Date:2012.07.0910:03:20-05'00'
DR Form 250,October 2010 Exhibit"B"
Page 1 of 5
.1
•
•
Page 7 of 15
segments thereof);a linear Work of Art; an Art Exhibition Venue;an Ambassador of New
Urban Living; etc.
3.3.2 Develop format for Citizen Planning input and perspectives on above options for
Harney Street's near-future"civic" role.
3.3.3 Present deliverables to City staff(Project Team Meeting#3-a)
Task 4. Infrastructure Constraints Assessment and Community Fabric
A central aspect of this project is to identify relevant infrastructure within Harney Street which
may affect the cross-section alternatives,and ultimately,the design concept and cost.The
consultant will compile a project base map utilizing existing City-provided GIS data, aerial
photography, and CAD data, including any GIS-based infrastructure data (including current
planned roadway improvements) provided by the City. This base map will be the palette from
which all cross-section design alternatives are presented and then the (Phase II)final concept
plans are portrayed.
4.1. Base Map Data Palette
4.1.1 Compile City-provided GIS data (City to provide most,some supplement with other
available existing public GIS files)
Key data "layers"to this base map will include: R/W Information,Water
Utilities,Sanitary Sewer Utilities,Storm-Water Facilities,Overhead Power Lines
and Power Pole locations (from visual survey only), Street tree locations and
species, Electrical transformers and street tree power outlets, Land Use,
Telecommunications lines (if obtainable from local utility provider), Gas utility
maps (if obtainable from local utility provider), Pedestrian crossing signal pole
locations,signal types and crossing widths, Private property access points,and
driveway accesses.
4.1.2 Geo-rectify City-provided aerial imagery to GIS base
4.1.3 Field visual survey to clarify relevant overhead power poles and lines
4.2. Existing Street and Intersections'Geometry
Using the above base-map inventory,the consultant will begin to investigate concept
design alternatives and any constraints thereto with regard to horizontal location of
curbs,travel lane widths,sidewalk and tree lawn widths,street trees,site furnishings,
building setbacks,on-street parking, etc. The inventory will include a general sampling
of corner radii conditions.
4.2.1 Layout base map of corridor and intersections, (GIS data over rectified aerial)
4.2.2 Field verify rectified aerials and completeness of basic intersections'geometry
Project No. MAPA-28(110)
Control No. 22537 Exhibit"B"
Harney St Corridor Feasibility Study Page 7 of 15
SCOPE:
Project No. MAPA-28(110)
Control No. 22537 Exhibit"B"
Harney St Corridor Feasibility Study Page 3 of 15
ity may share a corridor with motor vehicles, but be
separated or insulated from conflicts with automobile traffic. This will be facilitated through the
following actions; (1) Identify and evaluate possible east-west corridors,
(2) Develop a conceptual long-term design for the east-west corridor,for future implementation."
The Harney Street Bicycle and Pedestrian Transportation way is just one of many projects meeting the
environment element's policy for transportation.
Project No. MAPA-28(110)
Control No. 22537 Exhibit"B"
Harney St Corridor Feasibility Study Page 2 of 15
- 14 -
Template Revised 7-26-12
'V' n Date:2012.07.0910:03:20-05'00'
DR Form 250,October 2010 Exhibit"B"
Page 1 of 5
•
Page 8 of 15
4.2.3 The consultant will first review available utility system maps. This subtask effort
includes a coordination meeting with utility providers to verify the provided GIS layer
data and discuss and ascertain the age and dispositions of their respective systems
relative to any upgrade initiatives. Impacts, if any,from the CSO Program will be
considered.
4.2.4 If needed,the consultant will prepare up to 6 cross sections of Harney Street to
illustrate existing street configurations to supplement the photographic inventory.
4.2.5 Immediately following Meeting#3-a, conduct a half-day project walk through with
City staff to generate potential facility type and Harney Street cross-section alternatives
based upon all above work activities and input.
Task 5. Formulate Viable Harney Street Cross-section Alternatives for Phase II Consideration
Subtask 5.1 Develop up to three general cross-section alternatives for Harney Street
two-way bike and pedestrian way(e.g., on-street cycle track at-grade with raised traffic
separator; expanded sidewalk/pedestrian promenade with integrated multi-use
pathway;etc.)and up to three transportation or community corridor quality investment
levels. For each alternative, illustrate using sketch plan view of a typical (mid-block)
section and with cross-section.
Subtask 5.2 Develop general high level (cost per mile)construction cost estimates
for the above. Identify components or proportions for public/private partnership
funding levels. Estimate general economic benefits for the above alternatives and
investment levels. Provide basis for any elimination of alternatives to ensure that those
offered in the beginning of(next) Phase II are feasible, particularly in the context of
public-private funding scenarios.
Subtask 5.3 Prepare a brief Potential Feasible Cross-section Design Alternatives and
Public-Partnership Funding Matrix report for submittal to City; Key staff to attend
Meeting#3-b to discuss and refine elements of the report.
Subtask 5.4 The City, in consultation with agency stakeholders will select from the
alternatives presented in the report to be brought forward into Phase II.
PHASE II - DEVELOP IMPLEMENTING CONCEPTS & DESIGN THEMES, CREATE
CONCEPTUAL DESIGN DOCUMENTS, AND NEPA COORDINATION.
Project No. MAPA-28(110)
Control No. 22537 Exhibit"B"
Harney St Corridor Feasibility Study Page 8 of 15
ls and completeness of basic intersections'geometry
Project No. MAPA-28(110)
Control No. 22537 Exhibit"B"
Harney St Corridor Feasibility Study Page 7 of 15
SCOPE:
Project No. MAPA-28(110)
Control No. 22537 Exhibit"B"
Harney St Corridor Feasibility Study Page 3 of 15
ity may share a corridor with motor vehicles, but be
separated or insulated from conflicts with automobile traffic. This will be facilitated through the
following actions; (1) Identify and evaluate possible east-west corridors,
(2) Develop a conceptual long-term design for the east-west corridor,for future implementation."
The Harney Street Bicycle and Pedestrian Transportation way is just one of many projects meeting the
environment element's policy for transportation.
Project No. MAPA-28(110)
Control No. 22537 Exhibit"B"
Harney St Corridor Feasibility Study Page 2 of 15
- 14 -
Template Revised 7-26-12
'V' n Date:2012.07.0910:03:20-05'00'
DR Form 250,October 2010 Exhibit"B"
Page 1 of 5
Page 9 of 15
The City of Omaha shall issue a Notice To Proceed with Phase II to the consultant,which will be
coordinated with the start of the separate NEPA contract. There shall be on-going coordination of Tasks
6 to 9 of Phase II between the consultant and the NEPA contract.
Task 6. Parking Inventory and Turnover Study
Subtask 6.1 Research and documentation of upcoming redevelopment, including
confirmation with City staff and business stakeholders;estimation of resulting changes
in blocks' parking demand.
Subtask 6.2 Space inventory/occupied parking inventory(Observation period- 16
hour timeframe,single day)and turnover and associated analysis.Assume 30 minute
observation vehicle"pass"frequency. Inventory and tabulate (and report) by public
street to public street"blockface"for both northside and southside,separately
tabulated.
Subtask 6.3 Summarize other measures of property and business owners' "topics of
interest" in the right-of-way as identified in Phase I. Potential measures may include
parking garage turn lane and/or truck loading and delivery operations
Subtask 6.4 Forecast future results of existing trends
Subtask 6.5 Summarize results
TASK 7 Combined Citizen-based Planning(i.e.Vision and Concepts Development)with
Stakeholders and"Stockholders"
Subtask 7.1. Design Theme Workshop and Community Open House
7.1.1 Create Agenda,Specifications and Schedule for the invitational Design Theme
Workshop charrette and summary Community Open House. Submit to City staff and
review and refine. (review and refine at phase 2 kick-off)
7.1.2 Develop invitation and outreach for the invitational Design Theme Workshop
charrette (and the Community Open House attendees: property/business owners,
general stakeholders and the public)
7.1.3 Arrange location/venue and prepare/coordinate Design Theme Materials Gallery
exhibits (vendors to be invited to furnish (loaned) materials)
Note:The Materials Gallery,staged at a suitable location within, or near the
mes
Harney Street corridor will be the venue for both the Design Themes Workshop
(invitational Charrette)as well as the summary Community Open House event.
This will be at City-provided venue accessible for at least one week.
Project No. MAPA-28(110)
Control No. 22537 Exhibit"B"
Harney St Corridor Feasibility Study Page 9 of 15
Feasibility Study Page 8 of 15
ls and completeness of basic intersections'geometry
Project No. MAPA-28(110)
Control No. 22537 Exhibit"B"
Harney St Corridor Feasibility Study Page 7 of 15
SCOPE:
Project No. MAPA-28(110)
Control No. 22537 Exhibit"B"
Harney St Corridor Feasibility Study Page 3 of 15
ity may share a corridor with motor vehicles, but be
separated or insulated from conflicts with automobile traffic. This will be facilitated through the
following actions; (1) Identify and evaluate possible east-west corridors,
(2) Develop a conceptual long-term design for the east-west corridor,for future implementation."
The Harney Street Bicycle and Pedestrian Transportation way is just one of many projects meeting the
environment element's policy for transportation.
Project No. MAPA-28(110)
Control No. 22537 Exhibit"B"
Harney St Corridor Feasibility Study Page 2 of 15
- 14 -
Template Revised 7-26-12
'V' n Date:2012.07.0910:03:20-05'00'
DR Form 250,October 2010 Exhibit"B"
Page 1 of 5
!
•
•
Page 10 of 15
7.1.4 Gallery assembly and setup (end of week preceding the Design Theme Workshop)
7.1.5 Design Theme Workshop(Charrette) run-through with City Staff(Project Team
Meeting#4-a)
7.1.6 Preview Reception for community foundation contacts to enhance participation at
Design Theme Workshop(or at Community Open House)
7.1.7 Design Theme Workshop Charrette (Day 1, afternoon)with invited stakeholder
representatives(e.g.,foundations, patrons, business organizational representatives,
etc.)to give input on:
o Operational Character Alternatives (shortlist pre-screened by City Staff
in prior Phase)
o Corridor's Thematic,or Civic Role(s) (see Subtask 3.3)
o Streetscape Design Palette(i.e., level of investment options)
o Capital and Operating Options (e.g.,TIF, BID and other methods)
7.1.8 Post-Design Themes Workshop(Charrette)debrief with City staff(Day 1, late
afternoon, or early morning Day 2) (Project Team Meeting#4-b).
7.1.9 Based on charrette outcome(s)and City staff input, more fully develop and refine
the stakeholders' preferred design and theme(s) (Day 2 and 14 of Day 3)
7.1.10 Update/Preview with City Staff(Day 3, late morning or early afternoon) (Project
Team Meeting#4-c)
7.1.11 Stage Community Open House with Design Themes Workshop(Charrette)
participants, public, and property/business owners(Day 3, evening)
TASK 8 Effects and Benefits to Infrastructure and Community Fabric
Subtask 8.1 Either coincident with,or subsequent to 7.1.9, evaluate and estimate Concept
&Theme Alternatives effects on key infrastructure, properties and community(using
prior Harney Street Corridor Performance Measures of Subtask 3.2).This will be
performed for up to three facility type (or level of investment options)scenarios for the
Harney Street(cycle track development)transformation (for example,a utilitarian cycle
track and sidewalks,a linear pathway with park like amenities,or a cultural-or art-rich
corridor way with an intense exhibit/program elements)
8.1.1 Evaluate potential property benefits and impacts
8.1.2 Evaluate operational performance/safety
8.1.3 Evaluate community/qualitative impacts
Project No. MAPA-28(110)
Control No. 22537 Exhibit"B"
Harney St Corridor Feasibility Study Page 10 of 15
idor Feasibility Study Page 9 of 15
Feasibility Study Page 8 of 15
ls and completeness of basic intersections'geometry
Project No. MAPA-28(110)
Control No. 22537 Exhibit"B"
Harney St Corridor Feasibility Study Page 7 of 15
SCOPE:
Project No. MAPA-28(110)
Control No. 22537 Exhibit"B"
Harney St Corridor Feasibility Study Page 3 of 15
ity may share a corridor with motor vehicles, but be
separated or insulated from conflicts with automobile traffic. This will be facilitated through the
following actions; (1) Identify and evaluate possible east-west corridors,
(2) Develop a conceptual long-term design for the east-west corridor,for future implementation."
The Harney Street Bicycle and Pedestrian Transportation way is just one of many projects meeting the
environment element's policy for transportation.
Project No. MAPA-28(110)
Control No. 22537 Exhibit"B"
Harney St Corridor Feasibility Study Page 2 of 15
- 14 -
Template Revised 7-26-12
'V' n Date:2012.07.0910:03:20-05'00'
DR Form 250,October 2010 Exhibit"B"
Page 1 of 5
Page 11 of 15
Subtask 8.2 Estimate Benefits and Economics
8.2.1 Evaluate Economic impacts
8.2.2 Present scenario comparisons and recommendations to City Staff(at Project Team
Meeting#4-c)
Subtask 8.3 Prepare and Present Recommended Concept and Design Themes
8.3.1 Compile Citizen Planning Input from Design Themes Workshop, City Staff Review,
and Community Open House; Conference Call
8.3.2 Prepare and submit final Concept and Design Themes Report based on the citizen-
based planning.
CONCEPTUAL DESIGN DOCUMENTS
TASK 9 Operational Safety,Traffic and Multi-Modal Quality
9.1 Guide Intersections'Approach Geometry
9.1.1 Coordinate Concept Design with Central Omaha AA Transit Study Team
9.1.2 Finalize design parameters for recommended Concept and Design Themes for City
staff for review and approval
o Intersection strategies
o Driveway strategies
o Transit interface Strategies
o Adjoining Properties and Business"Storefront"Strategies-including
maintaining business visibility(e.g., commercial signs),front door access and
ability to meet ADA requirements during future alterations.
o Other controlling issues or design features
9.2 Refine Traffic Study •
9.2.1 Conduct analysis of predicted activity level for preliminary design concept—
predict mode shift and non-motorized induced recreational travel activity based on
corridor and design characteristics. Submit preliminary design concept report.
9.2.2 Revise and submit final documents based on citizen input and comments and City
staff's review and direction on Concept and Design Themes report
9.2.3 Review deliverables with City staff(Project Team Meeting#5)
Project No. MAPA-28(110)
Control No. 22537 Exhibit"B"
Page 11 of 15
Harney St Corridor Feasibility Study
ransformation (for example,a utilitarian cycle
track and sidewalks,a linear pathway with park like amenities,or a cultural-or art-rich
corridor way with an intense exhibit/program elements)
8.1.1 Evaluate potential property benefits and impacts
8.1.2 Evaluate operational performance/safety
8.1.3 Evaluate community/qualitative impacts
Project No. MAPA-28(110)
Control No. 22537 Exhibit"B"
Harney St Corridor Feasibility Study Page 10 of 15
idor Feasibility Study Page 9 of 15
Feasibility Study Page 8 of 15
ls and completeness of basic intersections'geometry
Project No. MAPA-28(110)
Control No. 22537 Exhibit"B"
Harney St Corridor Feasibility Study Page 7 of 15
SCOPE:
Project No. MAPA-28(110)
Control No. 22537 Exhibit"B"
Harney St Corridor Feasibility Study Page 3 of 15
ity may share a corridor with motor vehicles, but be
separated or insulated from conflicts with automobile traffic. This will be facilitated through the
following actions; (1) Identify and evaluate possible east-west corridors,
(2) Develop a conceptual long-term design for the east-west corridor,for future implementation."
The Harney Street Bicycle and Pedestrian Transportation way is just one of many projects meeting the
environment element's policy for transportation.
Project No. MAPA-28(110)
Control No. 22537 Exhibit"B"
Harney St Corridor Feasibility Study Page 2 of 15
- 14 -
Template Revised 7-26-12
'V' n Date:2012.07.0910:03:20-05'00'
DR Form 250,October 2010 Exhibit"B"
Page 1 of 5
•
•
Page 12 of 15
TASK 10 Final Documents—After NEPA document is approved
The NEPA document must be approved before beginning this task. This task will establish the
overall layout and geometry and define the project aesthetic;the form,function and material
types. The Conceptual Design documents will include:
• Preliminary design plans identifying proposed typical landscape and hardscape
layout
• Graphic typical sections for typical roadway segments that convey the landscape
and hardscape image and illustrate relevant design elements of the project
• Imagery to illustrate project aesthetic quality including typical site furnishing,site
lighting and the overall hardscape/landscape materials palette. This will be one
photo/sketch visualization enhanced from any created during the Design Themes
charrette.
• Statement of probable cost
The package will be suitable for conducting a preliminary field review and confirming budget
and design prior to beginning any Preliminary Concept Design Plan production. The conceptual
design package may also be utilized in submission to the appropriate local utility companies for
review in order to obtain markups of existing facilities, identify potential utility conflicts and
delineate proposed relocations.The process is as follows:
10.1 Field Design Charrette
10.1.1 Utility walkthrough (with select City staff and utility company reps)to identify
"immovable objects" (morning session)
10.1.2 Field Design Charrette with City Staff—sketch implementation of preliminary •
design concept(afternoon session)
10.2 Preliminary Conceptual Design Plans
10.2.1 Prepare preliminary plans of pathway's typical horizontal geometry
10.2.2 Prepare preliminary"Artscape"overlay/matrix
10.2.3 Prepare preliminary Hardscape and Landscape Concept plans
10.2.4 Prepare up to 6 Typical Sections (For each defined street section)
10.2.5 Prepare one perspective view(refined from Task 2.B1.9)
10.2.6 Prepare snow removal plan
10.2.7 Prepare trail use counter protocol
Project No. MAPA-28(110)
Control No. 22537 Exhibit"B"
Harney St Corridor Feasibility Study Page 12 of 15
•
ts
Project No. MAPA-28(110)
Control No. 22537 Exhibit"B"
Harney St Corridor Feasibility Study Page 10 of 15
idor Feasibility Study Page 9 of 15
Feasibility Study Page 8 of 15
ls and completeness of basic intersections'geometry
Project No. MAPA-28(110)
Control No. 22537 Exhibit"B"
Harney St Corridor Feasibility Study Page 7 of 15
SCOPE:
Project No. MAPA-28(110)
Control No. 22537 Exhibit"B"
Harney St Corridor Feasibility Study Page 3 of 15
ity may share a corridor with motor vehicles, but be
separated or insulated from conflicts with automobile traffic. This will be facilitated through the
following actions; (1) Identify and evaluate possible east-west corridors,
(2) Develop a conceptual long-term design for the east-west corridor,for future implementation."
The Harney Street Bicycle and Pedestrian Transportation way is just one of many projects meeting the
environment element's policy for transportation.
Project No. MAPA-28(110)
Control No. 22537 Exhibit"B"
Harney St Corridor Feasibility Study Page 2 of 15
- 14 -
Template Revised 7-26-12
'V' n Date:2012.07.0910:03:20-05'00'
DR Form 250,October 2010 Exhibit"B"
Page 1 of 5
Page 13 of 15
10.2.8 Prepare Probable Cost opinion
10.2.9 Compile and submit all into single Preliminary Conceptual Plan
10.2.10 City Project Team Meeting#6 for review
10.2.11 Revise Plans according to City comments and direction
10.3. Affirmation meeting(s)Stakeholders,General Public and Property and Business
Owners, potential funding partners
10.3.1 Prepare exhibits/Presentation for final review meeting
10.3.2 Conduct design review meeting preview with City Staff(1-3 PM) (City Project
Team Meeting#7-a)
10.3.3 Conduct design review meeting with original participants of Design Themes
Workshop(Charrette) participants (4-6 PM)
10.3.4 Conduct design review open house with general public and business and property
owners(6-8 PM)
10.3.5 Conduct debrief(City Project Team Meeting#7-b) next morning
10.4 Final Conceptual Design Package
The consultant will finalize the prior conceptual design elements, consolidating them
into a design package taking into account the comments generated by the stakeholders
and Client's prior review(s). Plans shall be for representative sections (up to six
anticipated) illustrated on the Phase I generated aerial-GIS base maps.
• Overall landscape and hardscape plans identifying typical proposed planting design
and hardscape materials and layout for typical elements within the right-of-way.
• Proposed representative roadway cross-sections of elements within the right-of-
way.
• Refine Statement of probable cost(both capital costs and (present cost of)
operation and maintenance(above and beyond existing)).
Final elements are anticipated to include the following typicals:
• Conceptual curb location layout and proposed roadway lane striping
• Conceptual hardscape/landscape layout
• Paving materials palette and conceptual layout
• Site furnishings palette and typical layout locations
• Typical locations for public art(or alternative elements')opportunities
• Driveway tie-in methods (to be consistent with ACI district requirements)
• Typical on-street parking locations and dimensions
Project No. MAPA-28(110) Exhibit"B"
Control No. 22537 Page 13 of 15
Harney St Corridor Feasibility Study
Exhibit"B"
Harney St Corridor Feasibility Study Page 10 of 15
idor Feasibility Study Page 9 of 15
Feasibility Study Page 8 of 15
ls and completeness of basic intersections'geometry
Project No. MAPA-28(110)
Control No. 22537 Exhibit"B"
Harney St Corridor Feasibility Study Page 7 of 15
SCOPE:
Project No. MAPA-28(110)
Control No. 22537 Exhibit"B"
Harney St Corridor Feasibility Study Page 3 of 15
ity may share a corridor with motor vehicles, but be
separated or insulated from conflicts with automobile traffic. This will be facilitated through the
following actions; (1) Identify and evaluate possible east-west corridors,
(2) Develop a conceptual long-term design for the east-west corridor,for future implementation."
The Harney Street Bicycle and Pedestrian Transportation way is just one of many projects meeting the
environment element's policy for transportation.
Project No. MAPA-28(110)
Control No. 22537 Exhibit"B"
Harney St Corridor Feasibility Study Page 2 of 15
- 14 -
Template Revised 7-26-12
'V' n Date:2012.07.0910:03:20-05'00'
DR Form 250,October 2010 Exhibit"B"
Page 1 of 5
Page 14 of 15
• Conceptual lighting palette and typical layout(final conceptual specifications and
locations,wiring, circuitry, photometrics and lighting required for emergency egress,
if desired by City,will be by a separate lighting consultant not within this scope)
• Typical preliminary aesthetic grading/surface level stormwater/inlet retrofits
• Typical conceptual ADA ramp improvements at intersections
• Pedestrian scale improvements, crosswalks, pedestrian refuge areas,streetscape
including water retention/runoff treatment methods, integrated benches, bike
• parking, and snow removal plan,electronic counters along the facility to assess the
future usage.
10.4.1 Revise and submit Final Conceptual Plans based on City and stakeholder input
and on City comments and direction.
• Federal funding will be used for this study and on subsequent implementations. As a result, the project
will follow applicable portions of the"LPA Guidelines Manual for Federal-Aid Projects" and all applicable
Federal,State and Local requirements and procedures for a conceptual phase study of this nature.
SUMMARY OF ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES:
City staff — In addition to the roles and responsibilities implicit in the above scope (e.g., review
submitted draft and final work products, provide comments and coordinate reviews and comments
from appropriate other agencies, and provide approvals and perform other typical project duties of a
client) the City staff shall perform the following: arrange all meeting locations and logistics and
distribute meeting invitations; field all initial inquiries from general public and stakeholders; provide all
official communications to stakeholders and the public; assist consultant, when needed, in requesting
and obtaining information from utilities and other City departments and/or public agencies; and provide
all information and perform activities as identified in above scope. Major activity is listed below for
convenience.
Consultant—all above services not specifically or implicitly delegated to City staff
1.2.2 City to review deliverables and comment. City to schedule meeting(date, location and
time)with consultant and (optionally) agency partners.
1.3.4 City to review deliverables. City to schedule meeting(date, location and time). City to
extend invitation to agency stakeholders.
2.1.6 City to assist and participate in meeting(s)with stakeholders.
2.4 City to schedule meeting(date, location and time). City to review deliverables and
comment.
3.3.3 City to schedule and staff meeting(date, location and time). City to review deliverables
and comment.
7.1.2 City to review and comment.
Project No. MAPA-28(110)
Control No. 22537 Exhibit"B"
Harney St Corridor Feasibility Study Page 14 of 15
y Page 3 of 15
ity may share a corridor with motor vehicles, but be
separated or insulated from conflicts with automobile traffic. This will be facilitated through the
following actions; (1) Identify and evaluate possible east-west corridors,
(2) Develop a conceptual long-term design for the east-west corridor,for future implementation."
The Harney Street Bicycle and Pedestrian Transportation way is just one of many projects meeting the
environment element's policy for transportation.
Project No. MAPA-28(110)
Control No. 22537 Exhibit"B"
Harney St Corridor Feasibility Study Page 2 of 15
- 14 -
Template Revised 7-26-12
'V' n Date:2012.07.0910:03:20-05'00'
DR Form 250,October 2010 Exhibit"B"
Page 1 of 5
•
Page 15 of 15
7.1.5 City to schedule and staff meeting(date,location and time). City to review deliverables
and comment.
7.1.6 City staff may provide representation.
7.1.7 City to arrange venue.
7.1.8 City to schedule and staff meeting(date, location and time). City to review deliverables
and comment.
7.1.10 City to schedule and staff meeting(date, location and time). City to review deliverables
and comment.
8.2.2 City to schedule and staff meeting(date, location and time). City to review deliverables
and comment.
8.3.1 City to schedule and staff meeting(date, location and time). City to review deliverables
and comment.
9.2.3 City to schedule and staff meeting(date, location and time). City to review deliverables
and comment.
10.2.10 City to schedule and staff meeting(date, location and time)with utility company reps.
and attend.
10.3.3 City to schedule and staff meeting(date, location and time)and attend.City to review
deliverables and comment.
10.3.4 City to schedule and meeting(date, location and time).
10.3.5 City to send representatives to open house.
10.3.6 City to schedule and staff meeting(date, location and time). City to review deliverables
and comment.
SUMMARY OF FORMAL MEETINGS:
See Attachment A (OmahaMeetingsSummary4.pdf
QA/QC PROCESS: Per the proposal
SCHEDULE: See OmahaMarketToMidtownSchedule v15:pdf
Project No. MAPA-28(110)
Control No. 22537 Exhibit"B"
Harney St Corridor Feasibility Study Page 15 of 15
d all initial inquiries from general public and stakeholders; provide all
official communications to stakeholders and the public; assist consultant, when needed, in requesting
and obtaining information from utilities and other City departments and/or public agencies; and provide
all information and perform activities as identified in above scope. Major activity is listed below for
convenience.
Consultant—all above services not specifically or implicitly delegated to City staff
1.2.2 City to review deliverables and comment. City to schedule meeting(date, location and
time)with consultant and (optionally) agency partners.
1.3.4 City to review deliverables. City to schedule meeting(date, location and time). City to
extend invitation to agency stakeholders.
2.1.6 City to assist and participate in meeting(s)with stakeholders.
2.4 City to schedule meeting(date, location and time). City to review deliverables and
comment.
3.3.3 City to schedule and staff meeting(date, location and time). City to review deliverables
and comment.
7.1.2 City to review and comment.
Project No. MAPA-28(110)
Control No. 22537 Exhibit"B"
Harney St Corridor Feasibility Study Page 14 of 15
y Page 3 of 15
ity may share a corridor with motor vehicles, but be
separated or insulated from conflicts with automobile traffic. This will be facilitated through the
following actions; (1) Identify and evaluate possible east-west corridors,
(2) Develop a conceptual long-term design for the east-west corridor,for future implementation."
The Harney Street Bicycle and Pedestrian Transportation way is just one of many projects meeting the
environment element's policy for transportation.
Project No. MAPA-28(110)
Control No. 22537 Exhibit"B"
Harney St Corridor Feasibility Study Page 2 of 15
- 14 -
Template Revised 7-26-12
'V' n Date:2012.07.0910:03:20-05'00'
DR Form 250,October 2010 Exhibit"B"
Page 1 of 5
_ v 0 g'2V'
• m w �.q d >wF., ma�g�� 'm`�j' - d ++ + + + ''' + + + (h' � - '' H ? OH ? 0 p3 3. Z F 4' it j F.
H m A-, F -.3? -4, ' ° S x, F N 4, Y fA 41 !J Is is M + + + y A- OI • x Ol 7C O 3 3
W Is 3 < S' w N ,, ° 4'V L(:o O Nn+ N + A N + . " + 5 P 4' " + A N V 0 76 N N O+ry m
F. I
m0 2 4 90 p P < c m 2 a•g m a ;O m m O a 5 c m P T ;' ^ N 0 9 0 a F I v 0 ± �.17 m - T 0 9 5. ; . v m e m v m n s l c o g g y ,. o m'm 3 R g n m m v = n m °' g m Aa v ° n v a `� P ' o _3 m �? n a a z'm c ei c v g P,R = . 3 R m a a a m .@ 1, 3 m o_ c n m o e d - ' m 1 N n m d i m m 3 u ^ - V'n m _ n s m a ii II m ,- a n .O to 2; ~ A `a*?'m 0
o Z 3 0 0 c Z `° g N > > 3 o 7 y �+ O o N
v 3 m 0 3 n C - 0 6 Q 5 0 O_ n A S a c n m_ n N m m
a = v `1 n =�" m .mi t'SR a 'b o o N 7 m 1 1 1'a m' g v m 3 m O a i/1 L m m 1,..,.„...,N rf
• (2 2 E , 3 a c a O.'. m`m m i v m ' F) v a 8 - r i p o a m n v 3 -I 3 g.3.
gO
I. ^' , m F, " n K 'o N j w m 2.b i O v a, o m g m C a i n = g m. S a m n _ O D 0 3 ='. q o r"f
3 9 .7 o m N N g S' 0 3-1 a g d Ill ..'
N 3. `m - 3 1, 3: 3 N _ Z g- n = \V
N N 3 3 9 m a c g?o k' `�i "' ° - m 3 0 q ' 01 O 6 £ 3 9 D N a,
,o = 3 % dam' oo umR 3�3 o" ' g ? 2-4s' 3mv ,03R30m2 5 0 .'m,D O " m
d N N I m 1 ;,,,-1
N O m IN Y O ro ' 9 3 w g n 'a I m E N a m 7 Z ? O r' " o c
x d 2 m e m s H o o e P. 5.. -g c o 2 f O N = - 3• n 'p a m g n.n `
o m E ^ 2'' « O m 3 - ? 7 a:,.-1 2 ri n 8' g' = m = - E Z F.7m., 1 t a' G
.. 2 . 2 . n $ O �. N '2 • g m m n v ., ° F. O N
m - m L - N 1' 5 p •Fa' a m n '� fJ 0 13
n O, F . a m. - N o '�s £ a A .n n m O 0
k ° g ro • x B s n• mg. rn 'e a a a m m n " /A
N a E 0 -13 - n >m FS e 0 0 m• ? m Z 3 n 3. V^�
`x n 3 n o 0 - m 1 m o m 3 " e c y O C O H Y
p �' c s m a 3 , z 19 r—
_; 3 = q -9 3 -g 1. d 30. , N g m O O 0 /r-�i-
c Nv v n N Ort. y v -o �. x. c SU
4 n v
m n m` 89 a i m a A �c.
33 o Fi
C Z 3 r+
m a Z
2 4. e m m a 2 71
"= a m m o CD
1 a a N CD
m a '
•
. a" 0
✓ co N N N co N N coA G N N N 8 N N + A OS + W CO N N L Q 13
Cl) •
SD
a
N
O i CO w 8 N A .... + N CO N CO Co N N -1
li T
V N N N OD COO m OD N N N N N T
O A ODco A A A 130O3fdCN N 13 rr
A)
IY .
cn
O °' N A O DO .1
•
O
6 O O '°
3
m
p
NO
0 0 5Z
r m
O
, N
, , -:..A
O 0 • 0 5n
0
z
°'
0 0 0 5 .
, i N
0 • 0 0 0
, 0 0 0 • M
0 O O L
m
0
0 o o v •
•
H
A O A A O °' d+ m°' N N Na A m .+O W N L N + a• p co 0 A V
•
Project No.MAPA-28(110) Exhibit"B"
Control No.22537 Page 1 of 13
Harney St Corridor Feasibility Study
•
w iJ f. y N 2. w _ 0.0 - m_ -1 , A m a
co O Co co co • N - V V V V V V V V V V p 0 - m A m O m N Z Z. 0 Vt 0 0 (� A A A ,. A A A A • OI o O
a iv IJ iA m 17r ; • • • • • • • • • V h 7r F N > 41 N 7C m CO fC A .g.41 N + w lr IJ N !J I. IV al , r. m 7C c, N
f� IV. •. W Iv p. co V i + 0p 0 V 0 N 'a W iv + M V O N o (n a 0 0/ D y o. z a o O N A Ir A W no — o,• co N — N A N
m a m 3 m m m c c o c h N O a V G" a o ci a n c 3 a 3 28 a -I -. c N. '2 agg << << c v , g 3 O c o
m HUHU
v0m UIHII1U
UUH
- m_ n g, O m - o ='F.-5 c - m g, .) .2 F E c a Z ep m <
n °i o N 3 m m .. 3 A n s m 9 m 3 d d o C f° m e < n hl ol- -, N = m c m 3 N '� °a' F
'o 0 8 2 3 . m e i f o c g !, m » u, A a m h1 r• <a g n . < . , -' 9 n m a. m
m o f n a g co ° * 2 3 `2 ; •n m m N = m _�; a 0 o s o n il C mt. 3 y 'z '2° 61
3 3 c `� an d o A 41 m O n 3, a ti .n w 3 1a C : -,a G a P r 2 „ mD 5 2 o D 7 •a
3 am m o .° -'^-+ n n •<' o o' n o' m w' o °' ? g m D } 8 o « m N m 2 < m
� a A m 3 P. n4. do n
n g« 3 3• g g ,, 3 o ° ,2 o m � m c s gl c a N N v c p'„ Cry- g &m n 2 3 3 c g n v a e„ f z •3 —
- w m g - n m in 3 = a 3 4' o m e M M g m m 3 0 2 O n 8 3
n 0 3 g. o o c 3 _ Q m a `i o �30 o c e� m_;3 f� �S `�'- .m f/1 a y o C .2 3 7 2
77 2.m m n y m ? 3 o `�°. E 3 Dz N a . a , O 6 ht $ 3 a - .. `D 3 m a co
9 3.. w V „ P # '<` m o 'm m n 0 2 $ a 3 - » m �. m .ec T 7
m m T. S Y k.n eZ '" H y '? m W N o y 'c1 N � ,, n 'c ...<<
n m I. m m o •
N LP; o n _ = ,-, x �^ 3 a C) a m it o m 3. m e
em s ` E a z a I p o c.' a _ � g c
n 3 H o3 - a m2 � m a g 3 0 8 (7 m .O N m c 3.
0.
z y m0- 3 m .n Sr 3 m -' o r_1, N
va 3 o m o 3 • O t m C 3 m Q
g Z. 2 a c .O a c
rn m mg.
a
3 = '°
r arn '' c
o
I:. r ,_
2 0
O a •
a
c
N A N itOI a co La a - O. a N -. W • m - - N - 8 m W A a A a0
N 0 0 00 alI a a • -NI
I I '
•
a a a N N O. A Co W a T W - co A N N N - N N N• a a a 9
N + CO N 0 N a O' 0 0 a
O
0 • 0 V -' 1 o p
•
o C o 0 3
a
m
p
Ol
y 0
O o 0 r Z
PI
r
a
T
O • O o 0 5;
O
z
a
O 0 5
•
••
o 0 0 0 m
0 • 0 0 0 M
II
a
0 • ' o 0 0 m
• O
0 0 0 o m
a
m N m A m • C N O 8 o m - N A O. N O o L4, V - N O a � O 4 O N o o o a o o A O
Project No.MAPA-28(110)
Exhibit"B" •
Control No.22537
Page 2 of 13
Harney St Corridor Feasibility Study
• M
0 O O L
m
0
0 o o v •
•
H
A O A A O °' d+ m°' N N Na A m .+O W N L N + a• p co 0 A V
•
Project No.MAPA-28(110) Exhibit"B"
Control No.22537 Page 1 of 13
Harney St Corridor Feasibility Study
•
Y ? r
• a J°ac + P + + + O W ++ 8 + + N O.N F b b b „ m F. + N O E.m =O N 0
S A 71 O W 0002 IJ is, N IJ fJ N 1J IJ IJ ts,O is,O 'a O O a 7� b W IJ F.i C t0 m}J It N at
N 0, P W I. -3 + 0 CO V CI co A W N + _ N - + !?+
-eir
W XI - 0 0 n O V + o n V V '0 '0 V -0 -0V T C • C m R o ' 3.o '° c
,� 9�' A v o e3 m a 3 m E O o s. s.'n m o 0 c v o cD
`v o2n 2 ' a m .* my m ' m mwm m m ' ' _ m '' -' = m m3 m -1 23 mm fa
2 e d g 2 n a A �'n '. . g f m m m m m m m m m .2 rg 3 m c O D� F 0 a m _ C o m o
- c m c m 5. 5 '� 3 0. oQ c m m m u a < =c) 0 - m N m F' x
T. a m. o > 3 c m D On m m v 3 > 5' 5' o y °c m e c n , 4 F.g `De m 0 n 2 .9
w f0 .1. m m m a _G f g t }. G 0 3 N h, 3 3 .3 ? •�,' a P. 3 41
O 9 61 y T m .
q = m z i g ' W � 2 .g <m l m cT g -R g n ▪ m a =� 8 � 'n 3
[i. ut 0 a N a ,n N _' ° = B m a d n 3 • o Q "a 2 A - m
° m .mx. < 3 • o. o a o v �8, o Z. N 3 g O C
3 'g 2 ' S' 6 3 o Q a 3' c o 8 2 m v 3 3 m+c1 $ O g ` x
io = m E o .E 0. N w' o - m 0 3 c '
y c ! r 5' a n m o . . e3 3 N N m g ' m n at C m 3 2
m. v 3 * O d o a 3 k 3 a ' H s P 3 au,
a o •Z n 'ay 'n m00.1
m a +a O " m < m c 3 E E. 3 2 Egg 0 m a m 0 m 3 2 m 0
HUHfl ', HII
o a o 3 ? A
a °' a? H = ° v n • 5 m a m D m 0 p
is V c 3 .o ? 3 a g 0 3 oci a v m
V n gi a Of<' � •� A fD
y u O a m • Q N
m m o
n o A g s. cn
p g a 3 2 C
S 3 O
0 am a 8 g'
3 ;° a . O 3
2 3° g 0 3
1-
-3 otO O
0°' m (0 m 3 '
m 2 3 `? o .
w m
cn 0,- •
Ol O N g a a a a m a O m + + P a Al N A N 0) N N , A a + C
co 3 aE 0
..
TT,- gu
0
z
m
moo? , W a Na 22 m�}iA O to COd + + a NA a N co(O to a N to
Jt j,'N b
a N
Z 0 N
6,
' 3 N .
5 ,
N
O 0 a v W N a O, O) N + N Al N 0, N N O O O N a a �j °, CO 9
2 W
JC �m
V. N P P P O N + a
° i
m W '
^'co ,, o o °o a a, c • a w IV A g
88
0
0 0 0 0 0
S m
m
ro
O O O O r 2
. o m
8
r
. °
O : :'
o
an m
o CD
�2 C N
. v?3' o o 0 0 m
w 0 O W
N o o O O m
CO CO
(0 N o
e e O
0 0 0 a 0 m
8 .
O
O O O O W
9
C
w •
-Iy
- . o CO A AAOom8 ; c °, N m 2 A 0 m OO °io V m O W O ° a
N N b lo a
p
8 W CO'
8 E81 it 5 •
•
•
Project No.MAPA-28(110) •
Control No.22537 Exhibit"B"
Harney St Corridor Feasibility Study Page 3 of 13
N Na A m .+O W N L N + a• p co 0 A V
•
Project No.MAPA-28(110) Exhibit"B"
Control No.22537 Page 1 of 13
Harney St Corridor Feasibility Study
T
•
IJ + W m >fJ IV m 0 g N y 1 _ W _ N _ _ _ + 61 G1 . D
W m ry, 6 N N N F j j 2. C + + + y O N N N Q
G y� )C F V 9 52 O-j' ++ 9F 41 Hl 41 i.W 4f IJ N IJ N -• -• + yO Cl • JC OI JC 7�
+ ci W N a P W _N ,-0
ro + 4,> W IJ + a W N + g A W IJ + N N 'O O N N N O
A A ? N v$ f.o m 2 L n 0 N ,2,L N �t m R1 9 ,7 '9 ? 1i L L a m
a.-o m m
. 5. g. e.• c n y 0 m g a Z -^c '� .3-. v - 3 o , n v a d fi s a 2 "o -• a s O Fri
n $ p 0 ,3 n g o N a 3$ o a.Z 'm c of o `_°m 2 H H a m 2 n . m k A 3 x m N o.0
A n m -3 g o'.= p n 1 g m m - c v 9 . D. co . .1 xi <
m m A 6 0, m N^n e 3 m .v m 3 n m. c T. _ a 3 (y I E t ,N^ m ^ .g rn if O O
o n 3 a g g ,^ - a A . S� . 3 m c d n m � m m 3 e, t x
m 2 fl
s llhII1HuIittII !
H � a'" 41 !IU
V!n ;3N 2 D^ n K
3 DU
m .. ..o a 5.°i .z o r g Q 3 g C g f V m 4 y d T.' -.
G m a g a s m m'2 a o� < n y n 3 m .1D'^.. m PO v '^ ?' d D 47 .
A• O -'o _ate a, g - ol+ y O o c m I
, 9 R v 3 n 'm m P r, = ,‘ 2 ,3 a o 6^ N g = H ' 0 3 co
m• E 3 ga aa� ax 3 f, ay m E o a ; a 0.a.: m 3
g dE d �. 3 2CD
to g o O 3 g5 = N T O ? N R V yy p^ N
3 .N .N !g.: i a '- t"o n m '� m .S 0 -D n
a ? ? 'n H11
I
. 0n oQ a H LI
m 3 c ,o, m e p T
,^ m S m 'a� C, a IO m p, n •� V Z a H 0 9 0 0. _
g § n y • O. a ° T - n =
H a« 8 0 c ' d .ZO) -1 ,
0 0 I n y Z N
3 3 ' o g C 3
3m a c a n a 2 • n a
m o =moo
moo'^ y - a N O Oo0 OpNiii
rotm m A In s v
T N N X
. . • 0 0• 0 0
• ' r c 0 w o 8 v
c o o cns inm ui cn aa o
m
(n `J222'`' .
is
n _ .
o o r7r 7 +$oga'o' Fri
a
O 0 -a �T • A in 0 op'Opog00 9
N G
o
O.
to
. 0 0 V = L
m
N .
.►
2.0 Cr N 0
o o fa o
, . fD
. -I —
o y o
N +O N N N N + G A 3 0 3
0
-13
.. .... m mo. —m
in w m
5o (n O
O • O Z
m Sm
r r
o ' o
2 Er c
r � O T
• O 0 O^ g5
c 0
N
M m
cn(7) 3
O 0 -o a 5 a
0 O (Eno. m W Cr D
0N O in
o 0 m o _1 o.<y m
0
r _N P. N co
, O O ~ M
•
•
O o m m
G
O o m m
N
i O A W T W + O
O p O O O N W O N O 0 0 0 0 0 ONN + Q O O A g m Y N g
N
,O N G O
O W
V N W .8 (n
Project No.MAPA-28(110) Exhibit"B"
Control No.22537 Page 4 of 13
Harney St Corridor Feasibility Study
) f
N q V V V V V V J O• p m QI Ot O1 OI O. y ZI .� a' . m N N N p a A A A A A A A A J y a W W W = W V.
O
m •m- V V V V m F x N A W N + 9C m A .W - JC F IJ N t...1 N j.N i mm x• x W W W N y m
F.' J G 4' b' V GI to A 4f N i N V P C G (A V Q d' n A W N V R % N A -0 L IJ W o o A p W viii
11 co
_ u i m O E. ?x W - D a Q m 0 13
m.3 R a � o , 9 ,m ' am '� o• ° 0 " I'1' �'S N ,� r R ! o N ,a mgao2
O. o 0 0 5' o a y .o O ? + w �' 5'm n 3 0 s o A S.
•- m 3. Cyyf < 'D0 F - m u 1 M
0 2 V' 'r v 3 v o of a Q• ! '< m r'� 2 A. N d m Rik O o 3 = m O T e a a)
o,:3 °c i v' ii m ` ) 9 -1 _ ' s, m•
? '^ a E.
CIF;
=T�^ n 3 m 32 v_ D a d 3 a ' ° X.
s > o '$ N
2 3 m N 3 p g '2 d a a s n 3 C y v Z < c H rn 3 g g m a N �.` o (^n 3 3 o G7 ''o° v c . ,n m E
n . T 0 c m 3 m Q m 'CA H - V' o Z - '3 '" % m
.O 3 ' m f o m m D y O o. s $) G m R. n- m m -. a m v N %, N
? '°m _ _ a IK oo O
.1 F ma A x a, a �i' '.e g v, Ei m : 2 '4 ab n``.. N 'm — w - z .ir ', 0 7
m 0.6-' ? -1 2 m $ = l m a m o m .Ul O Z Qa s c) N c o c = 2 E. � m
q ,� N g. n 2. 8 m m = m ` n a n 0 o w m a A m m 2 m ': f o m 2 F U)
CP
ro r V1 o w £ o m I * ? ' y m 2 R. o v m P 9 3 ti ,��- n m v G
3 - 0. N. m o n > m. m c s =.
2o
• m.m R. 0 a
2 m g » N m)• y 'g. A t0 p m n �' fll
a' a o • ea .. 2u m 3 £ x _J N
o i V 3 O ::' i' m F a
qf a To G a y • n m 6
.. ('`+ • Z v o v 2
� iv v s a c
I
m
g m
tarna 0
T
m
O J 0
• m
O
•
0 - O 0 0 13
O
m
0 - O 0 tl M
O - O O O 9
!
O O O O V
• n
tl O o 0 g
a
it m A m A m + co A O. GI - 8 -. co co co A A 8 CO N m 3
•
-- V
m
z
m 2
O _ tl tl tl sZ
I
3
m
m
A O O O O O N N - N N • O O 5 D
0
2
2
- CO
A'
•
0 0 0 o m
m
•
O _ o ,aa V
m
•
i V
E`, O A W A m + W A m Co O - O O O O o N W W ut A A 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 ca ro m O E0
•
Project No.MAPA-28(110) Exhibit"B"
Control No.22537 Page 5 of 13
Harney St Corridor Feasibility Study
O^ g5
c 0
N
M m
cn(7) 3
O 0 -o a 5 a
0 O (Eno. m W Cr D
0N O in
o 0 m o _1 o.<y m
0
r _N P. N co
, O O ~ M
•
•
O o m m
G
O o m m
N
i O A W T W + O
O p O O O N W O N O 0 0 0 0 0 ONN + Q O O A g m Y N g
N
,O N G O
O W
V N W .8 (n
Project No.MAPA-28(110) Exhibit"B"
Control No.22537 Page 4 of 13
Harney St Corridor Feasibility Study
r r
•
m m = w ` _ 'mcc,c. N + m n - N N D
. . o P n • ° m o o d°° a ro ro ' o o �' s u io io z m m •O x O gt i x ko c. •v co 11 m m m x O
Q F .P T L, ° D o N N N N N ...I.> IJ Iu j T b N+ 2 io+ ° Z m N 5 w a -. .. N N + N N_
.. O - = N P W N O _ = r j° CO �I im <J N a fJ r O N m me 5 ?C'1 . 0 C ,,r y m m m m cu.
c A n o 0 o m Na. d N p, o -2 . -a v v v 3 ?! _C g,,4, c @@. k ° -, / c o 3 a m g. m m m Q
_ ~ IA C a a ? N N O 5, O ro N N O N W 9m d p O N 7 - % m n g a , •W y ° m l•m m, m N N N
c ° c = 2 2 p a o m f m a a a m"m a a a •2 ?� _ p ''� n p m �: F. m m `" n i.� 1l4bb m m m
a �-' 9 0 0 p (mn 3 v 3 m V N r v III
m a 2 m m 0: = n N 2 p D _a 'A n 3 N m ; n O 3 p
N 2 '2 2 5. 3' ~ a• : m n a' 2 m o~ . m ' ? F,3 1° m n a O m a r- , 3 a§ N 3 m x
_ > m 0 is a .e 01 O 3 = .ems
,o w O n 3 ^. .Z .Z S r T a m N p1 ° N m
'-I a K 5.. m• 2 a n - a } o c° 2 m S v g m o ' f m a mo v m '-� ?.o m 3 o IT, 3 0.7
c = m q % v m o SI �'n - 4) e. v <- a m c 1 2 pa 10'n d t Z = ' 3 m.A ° 01. a w N
a o O 3 a In m o 0 c Si K ° } a R a a ' = -1 0 9 a '0 3 m'_ g m co
d m.. 3 5.. 2. 3 3 = ' g ? 2 v g 2. m 5 E @ O % m a
o ' o ° g m 8 m ? G 3 �n O O 2 5 3" m` � x
m S m' F o E n N = .. m ° 3
a a tt g E f T S g g .T _ e a ° f x 3 N g m a ' .3e ^ O m 3 g m? 3 g' 'm 2
A .o c m p ?Lam' 3 3 m d m o z m? , a .2 7 R n p o g m m m w N
m 3 . -• to m y Q. 3 e 3 a 3 0 o m m E.m '" 3 3 2 m y m'. m w /D
g ., 5 k' r f 5' 3 a -2 m -o - . O m f g Co i m' m m �^
la x v m I. m a o R ° o = - 2 3 y 2 0 n
Vj F =' " gym , - S„ � A A' a 24 p
o m
m y v 3 v •
? 3 H '� n 3 m
m Li T7
" a , o< s to
vq o. $ o
a
0 3 •
$
mm n 3 E. h
H a
o m - ~ p
N a 7
O O O y'li„ O 90
O o 'a o m CA
o I 1,
c
•
ii.i.
,:i
0
i± .� �'1
0 0 ;.f 0 r;;c:. o v
w i Fc..
o •'
o �"
0 0 - 0 • o D
p
0
3 L
•
r a N a a a N N N N m N a N N m N A N 3
mM N• W
W P
V .°
, A
m
r0rO
O O O O 2
•
m
o r
m
m
41 m N N o 0 0
m m • O
Z
'a m m
rL
O O O i:.!'. 0
ili
• O m
m
c
. 8
O o T.11, m n:,,
S r�i
P'
0
:if
i:J JK'! S
o O O O m
11,
4; o Er,.
0 0 T.
O 9
.Sty 'l,�i,
g
c
EA En, a N L sail) N O O r O O O N N m rp a o 0 N 0 0 O N O m N a O N O O O E.
G
a
Project No.MAPA-28(110)
Control No.22537 Exhibit"B"
Page 6 of 13
Harney St Corridor Feasibility Study
0 ONN + Q O O A g m Y N g
N
,O N G O
O W
V N W .8 (n
Project No.MAPA-28(110) Exhibit"B"
Control No.22537 Page 4 of 13
Harney St Corridor Feasibility Study
,..1 G N g N N F N N N b w m ! H S O N S N N
•
a -•I R 9 F 41 W 41 fJ W . N N yl + w r CO X T. O
A w o is-• a N N a is i., 3 is k., ; E. 0 'w H A N T o N m y N
a. a Z O c D F. N G m V O ? T 7( L P. a -a• �.
m B B G1 � v." 'm II 2 i g m ' = m u m . ff aII
n 0
5.^o s _o > n,2 S r m .2 3 2 e N a a zi _.ar X
m'Yoe a `.' a _ 3 m v 3 A 3 y c', D
-T e A - m S. co a '- T o 0 m =
3 a^ . — ,; a s 0 ti d .. 2 0 3 m
E.
m° 0 a 8 v_ v n . a _2 ?. 2 n _m E 2 p a �i `�
�� S O} d 8 n a m .3 3 z 3 O o r
m J8 Y- ? S m N a 4 0. tt G In d n O
o A a o o a- d ` D m E. 2 C C) 3
c •m o m 3 . fe , v A —I OO o
a o 5, �', x 3 3 p1 < z -n
2N'3 d F 0 O p c m
6co
y o n in v 'V n o'
$ vO
on« a o c u -I 0
33 C
t oa ' m n ? n n
d3 a o m cr I 2p vv�
==os a m
V a 8 O re 0 0
2 2 N O o
5 g a c T m'm'x „m m
i". (1 N Q I'G o i o d N-0 i
' 'rm°.�°.`"3m23 z
NEnw v+ m0)0 m
(•O�• • code Ne0 N
f'Q A O 02000,cn 0 '0 m
0 a WO (/7 V)N nan. 2 0
d d d d . 0
m
G i
C
0 yyy A000 O
m R
0
O 1
m
—
z
ta O N
Vn - Nw(,� N a. w
N •A J• CO
p• O N o
e I/S� N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 L
\/ O ch
0 —
rn
o - E v
7
.r —
a m a
0
NN o 0
N N a N N N N N m 3
Cl —m
0 yo
N 0 5m 5m
• P r
n O
N —5
C N
N N
T 0 T
5p s S>
m z J o
—N
(T 2.
N
m
A n. 5 5 .
0
m o
N r 9 C N
N
0 m d w '- Q 3 m o,a.6
•
c m w w ..
W A
(T O)
c m m
c� . o
O 0 N
-u V
N ,a) o N Ol N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N 0 0 N ~ j A W m N O .T g
O N 51 N A
• dO� rpo
S O O O+'
Project No.MAPA-28(110)
Control No.22537 Exhibit"B"
Harney St Corridor Feasibility Study Page 7 of 13
11,
4; o Er,.
0 0 T.
O 9
.Sty 'l,�i,
g
c
EA En, a N L sail) N O O r O O O N N m rp a o 0 N 0 0 O N O m N a O N O O O E.
G
a
Project No.MAPA-28(110)
Control No.22537 Exhibit"B"
Page 6 of 13
Harney St Corridor Feasibility Study
0 ONN + Q O O A g m Y N g
N
,O N G O
O W
V N W .8 (n
Project No.MAPA-28(110) Exhibit"B"
Control No.22537 Page 4 of 13
Harney St Corridor Feasibility Study
1 !
•
•
J V J V J V �I N•. m N N N O. N N A ? N m N N A W N N N J ,N., N m N I 0 A, , N 0
F fP N A N N + F m 61 is P ii.l..N - x F N N N IJ IJ K + + 4F it N N N b = V a 'O a,
CI N A Gl N V P N •*1 N 9 0 a' n y N A 7 0 a. a
" a " "
S A W N — y W N — q P 4 41 N — 3 — = + N N
O V O O o C) « f V c R l� A N 5 I )1 V V ,ZI T F C fat c <Im o SU
N N N m () 3 5 a fY y y A fp T i O N R A fa.,: Imp 0 3 3 C mO m `� m0 9 A « CoI a N •rp
•- - d m a g o a 3 s 3 2 3 nl 7 1', m 9 m o 0 0 0 . v 5. 'n u 4 v3 v N . m -,n n +3 v 3 UU
f^ N A . v •e o LIU1IIt
O u _.. o p m 0 a � '° 0 � � 3mm ,0 O m = 8 A . - E - g r. g. Z a 2 - ro - rmconm m e m o a A-
« o •c iu 3 H n 0I « m 3 13 c j m r o$ O m l< a m 2 v N -. m A a{ a o v n m m v :£ lO I a F, m
m '- m N '' m v -0 O 'm«^ a N C m .. m `Z m. m c
N m ' a o 23 o = N R s R. y ^ m =9 n Q -3 c o n 7 a a 2 m N n P. P a m m
n A O 3i n II7 I( o a v �. -2' n 3 .'� 3 3 m « ,m m ... N a yy o m 0 C) , s � A 3 a ii q i,1 N 3 « 3
p 3 9 O ' .[o m. Q l y 1 c o m A Ii G k E «ai S .yo'V o=i 1 m m a O o 1 - 12 v — n c a c D{+!an m o �)
iu g. m s > 3 10 a o a�1 • FA rn 5 =T n o I 3 0 3 o m 0 n 5 '.. 13 5 'a g. m ° 3 a vo !1 l'o X
a ,ma < m ; N � �I 33 = � 3 <
m T c c m o m 3 EL s ..fl v 'z m 7 V) •� g 3_ « « ly `$ a v N 'o Z Z - E.
_ E _ m all I o 3.
$ 2 A f d 5 I'g ' =� 3 A, ''2 a. a N - — a a u m 8 y o x m n. 13 1 as 5.v I
• n Za x a 2 'i O 3 « 2 3�,I1 y g o a a A m — H 'Z `v a T 3 m m o x a o a a N
3' ml. o m m n o s U! 0 N g: m G, 0 'N =. a — '+ m +,o m
n > > e3 GI 1,1 N a to m P. a le O w c r '�^. y m n I� m' o n x O+O a'•e N
• om � g � e Cn « os a Ngm n FF, co a <o a n
• m O m m N N
s 1n S g « 1 m Z g ov N m i 2 N q a n
N `� n . a y m 1111
01 ig c j _ 0 N
o . _ Y
m CD
•Z Q : o c
3 = 2 v Im i0.
n1 N a
= A
fmA '. o
n
1 o a Nm
_.I '
f
1 ' f
1
' f I !
Hi
i • ii NO f O O O1i Io 1 ij II
l ;
I.
4 1 v
ti , 11 1 ( ( 1
•
I
o I { o Ir o o 13I I I
•
I t 1
1 t o • o ! + g
4 I
• i 1
0
N -. a A N — N 0 N N N N N A A CO A N N 1 N -' J
1
f
V
m
0
O
A N N O I O O 0 N r Z
C) lI
r N
1 N
)I1e1 !} T
N A A y N 0 O I O N N ' 1 0 S D
i1 II �
1N
• P N N I - 4 O O I O A
I
1 0 1 o 1 o RII � t
'i I{ I o ! 1 a i. o i
o r7i
F
i ` I ' !
4i ( I ( ,
' o �` I a l o j o o
f i I
t{[ 1 O
•
I 3
1 : I
1 ` I
0
N N O CNo N o O o 0 0 0 0 0 • m•N N N NA . 000 0 O O O C No O N +O a
1
I I 1
•
•
Project No.MAPA-28(110) -
Control No.22537 Exhibit"B"
•
Harney St Corridor Feasibility Study ' • Page 8 of 13
•
- r,
. , , , - •
•
•
p o N + y N N m m N m m + N 0 y EC 2 !'' W N Ol Oo Oo • N - V J .� V (Dp O
O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 u' N N 72 •+• C 'F x 41 C I.) "m m r
W W 1 cn� • • • • N • P.,IJ N N N N -o •_.. T m W jJ+ m IJ+ Z .fJ to a + n W N + AI 'CO V m m N
W N + .1 t' '. m m V m b,A W N •-• a N • E. O ; N N 0 E -n r) ry • n C V b r ° r mn N m '• N p O 2 1_
O g 0 9 a .E ' p O V:7 L L V V V �1 C n 2 m m' Q m q O n t, N g. m N
0 0 9 A A m a a 3 3 = O'� o• g 9 'O �°•m °m - m _ _ _ m .� v " lD
a n ? b r C m < y b 'O'O C 2 p 1 H
DII -1 Nmo � y o� -.om mmmSm 'a' pO n C c mm n'O m N g N ,7Vmo '3 N N D n 9 N a n 3 0l=, ° v v 'mm' u a <' c �► c ,. v3 poo' • ti'^ ' (- cCH > > ^ a i ,a 2 w o3 al3 c'm 1p 3 HH
mN Rl a, _vA°ipod a •n S ittUtH
"-a - �'3• "a2• v o .,3 c A oo m, te' c o_ -' - o o' ; a m % F 3 m'• i� $ A• ; O 8 `^mn 0 - ' `i n o m N 3 0' x
c f f T a O _ 3 % G A e• g' 3 o n .. 3 A 'II. a m o 'j g a ,....0, 2
R, d C o m"' O m o v 3 g 0, m 3 3 m - •[c > >S n o u m G a ,� 3 2
7
CD
N m V Q m 3 3 2 a m 3 m 4 a 3 O' rn O ?v m V _ W 'a p m £ 7
-� S. F.
G $ 5 v m m a. 0 N g 0 0 3 3 y s �? ii " n g, a Q .. 3 `c
2 -z 2 5 a n n m rt R. 3 4 o A a y ^.• (q 4 2 n � g 2 y 2 �' N 0))
a m 9 F. •Z m R o _ : F g n N O m m 6 c ° 'o o, £ O
O N �° la O .. 3 V g 1 A ° b 3 d
G N ^ 9 " N N m 5 ".d A °
v o il m " n Y 3 a 3 ,o0 3 " • T
o w �' m H N
a u O 31' m' .c o N
k ti. m 3 A= ° co 0 Q
d a ' o N `7'
_
' u
p" p n c 'ems $ 5 itN
e 1, c o a.-I 3 - Na.
n gel m m
" = ,
a _ a
0 m g "
2, B 0 3 _
} K o 3
0
a -
a
I •
O O 0 -0•
0
0 0 0
M
•
0 0 0
• o 0 • 0
n
O 0 O D
O
a a a N — a N O O N N N A A co A m
. 9
m
• A
N
2
O N N N N N a N a O a N N O
Co. ;Z
rimr
0
. 5
. N
I
T
N N a l N O N N ' O A S D
0
• 2
N.
N
O N N a 0 a N N O N 5
In
o 0 0 11
m
0 0 0
0 0 0 m
0
0 0 0 a
v
0
A a a 0 0 (7, a a A o -. N N a,� a o O O O p O • O O • N°n o) O O No N G a a g 0„,
•
Project No.MAPA-28(110)
Control No.22537 Exhibit"B" I
Harney St Corridor Feasibility Study • Page 9 of 13
J
4i ( I ( ,
' o �` I a l o j o o
f i I
t{[ 1 O
•
I 3
1 : I
1 ` I
0
N N O CNo N o O o 0 0 0 0 0 • m•N N N NA . 000 0 O O O C No O N +O a
1
I I 1
•
•
Project No.MAPA-28(110) -
Control No.22537 Exhibit"B"
•
Harney St Corridor Feasibility Study ' • Page 8 of 13
•
- r,
. , , , - •
•
9 H n ... u % - - - C N • Z. O N ? N G F a ? N o
D N + N P w FJ + D� Di E A to H + fn V 0 Vi N 9 m - N N
v 5 N �v N ° m 3 v o v o r Pc v _v 2• C 3 m ro-
m.
'-a ' 8 y 3 a a a ,n' E z w b m m = A - A a O c p n o O.
a o :off m 5 n 3 v m o m e m m y@ la u.mn. -0 o o m n
= c) = 3 , "• .s g' 3 o a o 3 n ' 8 n S Ii)i) d E. 0 d s CO ro
0 0
H 7 01'� n3. o m w P. 3• o' V1 obi R1 E, n g '
.o. .Z g o m m N a } a c v 5 s m y P.uO rs ' a F N
m e of 9 9 ' m cc T o A E .y 2 g co N m n v 3 .1 T n o
m ' 4. O 3 c = a y 'S CU
as• g03 ; d s mB n H . O gr 1. g u
7 m ' in .Z c7 10 N n ~ w D•, �) < v 'D io '�
7 n 3 N v 3 3 }, a
3 m v N o �. 3 P. m N m ,o m Z ? O m'S 3 co
.c ro ; -. m' N 0 v c
f dy o co g o = g a g a a y ad m p m
-0 5 %n 'h m'n n '9 d N m 3 2 p� y ..<
y a o Z m ? v a O o» P. N j
x a a a m m 3 'p n2 n a C)
a q occ
3. m m n a m m m n '
ns _ ' A N "" 2 'a n
ry Ea 5. } 3 G A -n 2 O 0 O
a
3 x ,.� 0 n 0 o n0)
a a. q d a M 2 m w
rn O n N v O a Q
a m A `
x y O
C
a cr 2 D 3 O c
n dCD a ' ' a
a y O o-so
• G O O , O I
o
" 0 A C.C. A
a n m O Nmm O
( g
m
nCBn =OmfD Om2
A m O° ...O ' �g if ..m
4-m —°_3mm3
I EA al EAA
wk�•ov+v+v+o�
0 9 r 0 00300�"0 0 0 T
o �m tnmtnaaa� 0
cmimmm��� 3 0
fn =at m P ° D ISa 0_
c z o
o m 0 00o rn • aan o a
7
C_ 12
g
av e
m_m
o • InK p 0 O o 0 0 0 0 0 9
co co c 0 < O O O
.'9 $
r o O 8
d
3
1
o y o 0 0
,.< o
• m .8
6)
O a 0 O •O 0
o
fie g
D
u)
v co m u N 9
o I 3 C - mho 3
n
V c v
m
A N m
o
a,O A N N O
sZ n o sZ
m A 8 N r
r
1 N Ncm
T
q n
O I sD DDN A O sp.
0 J r., 0
Z O N z
in N
• s ' m m 5
O N
iO.,
N - m.W
c m
o• 2.
" m o
O x c< N
A N co O m < "' 13 Q a O O m
N C O b en
m •. �ma 00
O O
,3`, O N N N A N r. Iv , O M W •
(AJf 0 co
N O s
e g
T
O o o m 0 0 m
0
g
m 0
0 N O O N
T E 9
_ O
G O N N N A N A O O A cc O O CO A+ a V
O g
W +DN
- m g s W J J O
Project No.MAPA-28(110) Exhibit"B"
Control No.22537 Page 10 of 13
Harney St Corridor Feasibility Study
r Feasibility Study ' • Page 8 of 13
•
- r,
. , , , - •
f I
' t
•
d l d I n b • m m m N y m u u di a A 4 N d E. g d D
Iy m m m m m m y �] ? N N I y m a a a a a A A A • y W W W W W m y .° V a-,j a F•N•N y O
7C N a (.0 FJ +i'l.• m if 0 A 7.40 D 7C ; N N N N N al + •+ ••-. m F N W W W p N P + N N V a N°a + + N (p
V 3 o N V O I°� D % N A V O O N a a > W is •+ W L7 A ° 5- V O + 2 O '� A c``� y '^b 0 E a 'a•° + cu.
�n 3 n 3 o n m c <2. ;a m ! c o *xi m m a :.,1 o < .-.c < o m =l a- ;e3 „, s a ^n O
3 d m 01 m — v m m _ o'�'n v 5. n •d` m n 4 m c o y •O 5. �I y o c m2 a, c
31 .. . ,. 3 3: a iaa -. 'O -i a " s ^ N m -. a a s ° g 6 A o• M.. a oai•° a4g n
Q m T m n O ° v ;c O ° m m o a ° a m m v 3 ° =3 1 0^m ? 3 2
m o - D A m < Dn m 6 m "
J R = tC Om _ o � c _ Fo ,z: N � = Z - o T v o :y 3 - ..,� 3 � „32
3 m O ?'u Z n � c y _ m o .2° m E 'e n o Q m v° � d m o N n� i HO
�C ° < m C ° c '° m 6 y L RN NV m o m 4 '-� o'm m $m70Ammv - 'Dmr `Dn ^m '< rm --}. 9 - 2 <. m c 9 o Ag ,°a a l. A ^g c n d g- g.-S
+ 3 m O mv. �$N 10 = m 3 • .Z m ° m g G ° a •$$ n `o
N m 2' 0 y ! el:). O' y n Tr o '' o n Gf 3 m n emy �' �' H A t�f c 3 a 0 3 v k " '^ <
o m 5 5' C O m o N m g ^ -I. D y a m - p H ; w ° m S a d O y n 3 3
d D g? p7412,4 A y �. O g m F 1 m ` v N 3_.s E 3'3
d I g A a r- f °w ^ ° g 3 o s ° y a G e m F m 3 N
ml r. voa �l Om } �mn ?i�' *�� 030 � � nmv 3 n { m '+ 3y � -o o-o.. s m= � x
•a .°° .z q c y 3 2 m i m ,° 4' m 3 3 O C m ° c ' A _ ; 4 3 ' A v 3. u 7,-g 2 a
Ia a i 3 m ¢ c.o y '� �. H m y ° _ - ?. u m S` m n O o gg a° NI o g B 2
n < 0 2 � m#t�' m _ m m_ N' n �,� $ a' o x_' m -m<• u 3 _,
n m ' z y Y N o ^ 1O c °mm' i• •� T 3 F, m d 3 m g N a m i m• .� v c CD
cn
J H ' 3 `< C n `c_ H n n' m F .° c v a H a 'S>',�; °
m I O S _. a o a a o a ' s. c�
N m m 0 F $ O
g ^-"-� ! m 2 I1!tF
ymva. A - o I w e a n o 0 0. g « = m �' a N 3y Jilt
Ot. m - g m 71
m j 0, •g '° Yra f v< .9 6
n o 0
d y .� 3= d CC,
2 0 3 3 c
CL
•
I m o } a o a N
I • _ 1
I Vol • i=n
_�
o ..2v
. 1. T ,. 3 d s
y
no
0 I I,
Ili
f CO0 3 t 0 i o t o . i• 0
1 ! 1 , r •
r
.
} o 1 ! o i l O o '
t
If 1 1 I
# 1 . �•
f
kr I , ,
I ! I I o
0 N A 0 I. I O tj A y 00 y N o O
•
i i � f1
0 o m
{ 0•
Oa
jb H
0 mco
IT
m3.} i y
rT
o 7 1 0 ! 0 0 ' f, 0 Dy
! � ttl I i • o
o ' rp
fa 11a a s
1 •
INN i a + + -• t + as co
0
W COW CON N N A p N N m
1 • 11
N N a a CO A I + + 1 CO a a 0 0 M
I < II 4
) i o
I
o I N
0, A + N I
o o m
! I 1 -
I
1 A a 0 m o CO m a 0 I I 0 41
1 11
N + + — + N
m A m N m + N A N V N m O V P y N N A o O A +O + N a A O
N
I J 1
•
Project No.MAPA-28(110) Exhibit"B"
Control No.22537 Page 11 of 13
Harney St Corridor Feasibility Study ' ,
•
•
I .
t
•
g ?' 8 d - N + Dil n - w is + N - •+ D
0 0 0 0 0 a- N N x N o m m tD ' N 0 F o C N V N . Co co N • U1 x r v v -1 -I - J - V - �I p N 0
a a x I. is,N A • N m- W j m '7C N � �i
• N N N J N N N N •N •o 0 tG N+ N • ID 2 m N N a _ co N + C m V ao Co V en N a tv N + N
m ut•P is " a w - 6 O C m A 2 g 19
2 q n N a - 0 a m m m m T c 0 p a p a p L1 a p n 2 D]
A a a a a s a a a 3 -1! C m o m c o Q Rl t: 0 0 3 N C m m m m m m
� o to a t3 t3 e3 a m E p,71 v tp. 5.n � m o 3 � � v a m � _ °i m °' — — $ ��, v m^ $ m ,.. H. N. � � d yy co
3 m a 8i m m m m m m a ' h 3 G 2 N. W si G a m o. .m W o 2 d m 2 p m .- O > > Q m ap m p n
a
f w m m 'm m m ,2 mo m _ p Q p m A a C m m m o i�re m m m o _ O m• m t-" v ci g m m '
m o a 5 g) ;v l' Qa• F = N,) N m.A e O l' -g ina v^ 2, o a 3 « 3 l 3 g 3 m 3 $ <, f O
m A _ — _ O m cI
al •m 3'• T'm F.K S N ^E.. : 3 m o 71 v a 32 s 3 0 3 . rt o ' m 3 0 . 3
o c t = o N m 3 a 0 c m 3 0 > > 3 a c C 2 a Q m 10 c
GN m > y 0 ¢°— .Z 7 �y n p $ 'm• 2 m m o = -m f o z °-� a m 11
~ 3 , ? x 3 cD a u m ', 3 3 m m `"a t" ° 0 'T p = m v K. ma m O CD
3 m Ei _g o a p Z m s y m m g J'd 4 ry n 2 , H 2 a t� `<
a x d' - Q N ! a ,--. CA 81 m g '? .c 2 a c, tms
Z m m m �- p A y -• CA no p co g 3 'ti q N 0 3 $ = = v1
7Z1
h' O en
an P c p o - E. • g ik w E m' .(2�nn _ a O
'c i o o• 5- -i 4' a A o a 3 E o t" 2. T. 2 m
m H 'z n< �3 d a ao3 c m _.co
a s A -n
N 4
. � •� O m N N'
m
CD
m S m V ^m N
. v Ro 633 m=
5.o o AN ' g
T. x N
0 ma sv cnc
a 4,-4 a
- N o 0.c g 3 m 1 g 3
g m a 0 m
a 0 3 v
hS
- —
v
3 5
o •'
0 0 •o a
• O
N
o 0 o 21
O O O a
a
•
o O • O a
o
a s a O a a D
D
p
o 0 0 a
3
•
' Co
G0
N
NO
o 0 0 5m
r
0
5
NN
• o O 0 5D
0
2
N
O O • 0
fF
NNN N a A • O 0 0 N A a a U . N . — 0
m
A N W N A N a CO CO 0 M
N m N a A O O a
-o
O
O O a a f/1
a
a o p O a o O O o N a s v N —• a m a to N O O O d 0 tV N a a a A N N O 0 -. 0 0 a
Project No.MAPA-28(110) Exhibit"B"
Control No.22537 Page 12 of 13
Harney St Corridor Feasibility Study
0 ' f, 0 Dy
! � ttl I i • o
o ' rp
fa 11a a s
1 •
INN i a + + -• t + as co
0
W COW CON N N A p N N m
1 • 11
N N a a CO A I + + 1 CO a a 0 0 M
I < II 4
) i o
I
o I N
0, A + N I
o o m
! I 1 -
I
1 A a 0 m o CO m a 0 I I 0 41
1 11
N + + — + N
m A m N m + N A N V N m O V P y N N A o O A +O + N a A O
N
I J 1
•
Project No.MAPA-28(110) Exhibit"B"
Control No.22537 Page 11 of 13
Harney St Corridor Feasibility Study ' ,
•
•
I .
•
i i
•
O V-IN� -9g V'ON V m O m o W V.
�mmms o�3D9 V mo'< E litx O p 0 0 0 0 0 O N O
O x
•
II V E II II II? II T 9 9 L T Y fJ fJ 41 41 p k N N
o ynn A m ` O — p, 41 P 41 N + a .
NI"n-roggi3.o o-2 p A �,n_ N m c m O a- sS n o gi m N
H 01 g5. 5�g a W 2 me a a s a = m m
m n g�7 �'' 'm.o p a r—' N 4 o O O p [� 5. A v O
Se m 4m a m m, 0 .cn c u m in m 5. 9 :: is
�9yy QN E, ro,. c cr O F o A 3 m " N
_ m m
m �m 9. r rg g m c E 4
2 2 2.
u EI o 4 N v 3 N o min g o N
u Z a 'h m s g m 3 go iv
o N 'mo m m C ro 3 o - 6 `=
3 = tt N o T ' a 3 I
3 m o
m m 2, 1 x 3 9 m N
a N
• a 'Av 3 v A ."z N o 0
-' o a a o
3.
o .tti c 0 3� a$ c 3 a
Jr; 3 s O
0-1 1 • �" N
U a s O 2 N
m m w Q
a
y 1 cn
3 ? v 5 p.
o 0
n 4c
0 O a 3 m'
o G C a t
n
T N N X 0 o "' ul
N C
• m �ned8 x;g ct m n�
a o W - O o m
• • ��aa0��0o3E Ei m3 ~ ie.a
Ail
m
44,000
fn Fw E Pflii z
I-0 0▪Coco . m o 0 c
yin NNcnaaa�
m m m 3 0
3• v
mK
J 88- 8
8 ' I pco
D o . m
C ci o
2 0
OW
N
•
a N 0
No�888 0 0 s e o
N o
0 0 9
M '
O
• 0
O
n
}Nt Q .
. d N O
O{!
0
0 o v
3
O
• O
O ,9
m
A
N
yr O
0 o DZ
v. m
•
g A
C N
o' 4
r T
c O
N
r c o
3 g z
N
X)
J
N o O
3• O p
m o
m t Nen
. • • o N O fD t in g, o N A A A m
. • N m OI Et d u A
it It
N T
W -J M
m
W N V
CA IV
3 o o G
a p
+ N m
g
P�O
•
0
or
- 0 y
. 9
o N
MM LI$ ,mni V s..yQnI p� N A k �j 0 N A A A 0 0 O a
O pN q4A�A J OJ
V O O J O V
Project No.MAPA-28(110) Exhibit"B"
Control No.22537 Page 13 of 13
Harney St Corridor Feasibility Study
o ' rp
fa 11a a s
1 •
INN i a + + -• t + as co
0
W COW CON N N A p N N m
1 • 11
N N a a CO A I + + 1 CO a a 0 0 M
I < II 4
) i o
I
o I N
0, A + N I
o o m
! I 1 -
I
1 A a 0 m o CO m a 0 I I 0 41
1 11
N + + — + N
m A m N m + N A N V N m O V P y N N A o O A +O + N a A O
N
I J 1
•
Project No.MAPA-28(110) Exhibit"B"
Control No.22537 Page 11 of 13
Harney St Corridor Feasibility Study ' ,
•
•
I .
•
•
Staffing Plan •
Consultant:Sprinkle Consulting, Inc.
Project No: MAPA-28(110)
Control No: CN 22537
Project Name: Harney St Corridor Feasibility Study
Employee Classification Name Actual Rate Average Rate
Project Director and Bruce Landis 66.53
QA/QC Manager
Deputy Project Managers
and/or Collaborative Task
Leaders(ASLA)
Sr. Civil Engineer
Sr.Traffic Engineer Theo Petritsch 52.52
Sr. Landscape Architect
Christopher Fellerhoff 28.64
Project Planner 28.97
Peyton McLeod 29.69
Landscape Architect
Traffic Engineer
Professional Engineer
GIS Specialist
Jr. Landscape Architect
Planner Jennifer Bartlett 21.63
CADD Technician Justin Tyler 23.00
NOTES:
Project Planner
Christopher Fellerhoff is estimated to complete approximately 68%of the project duties as described on
the following page.
Peyton Mcleod is estimated to complete approximately 32%of the project duties as described on the
following page.
28.64(.68)+29.69(.32)=$28.97
1 • Exhibit."B"
• Staffing Plan
Page 1 of 4
3.
o .tti c 0 3� a$ c 3 a
Jr; 3 s O
0-1 1 • �" N
U a s O 2 N
m m w Q
a
y 1 cn
3 ? v 5 p.
o 0
n 4c
0 O a 3 m'
o G C a t
n
T N N X 0 o "' ul
N C
• m �ned8 x;g ct m n�
a o W - O o m
• • ��aa0��0o3E Ei m3 ~ ie.a
Ail
m
44,000
fn Fw E Pflii z
I-0 0▪Coco . m o 0 c
yin NNcnaaa�
m m m 3 0
3• v
mK
J 88- 8
8 ' I pco
D o . m
C ci o
2 0
OW
N
•
a N 0
No�888 0 0 s e o
N o
0 0 9
M '
O
• 0
O
n
}Nt Q .
. d N O
O{!
0
0 o v
3
O
• O
O ,9
m
A
N
yr O
0 o DZ
v. m
•
g A
C N
o' 4
r T
c O
N
r c o
3 g z
N
X)
J
N o O
3• O p
m o
m t Nen
. • • o N O fD t in g, o N A A A m
. • N m OI Et d u A
it It
N T
W -J M
m
W N V
CA IV
3 o o G
a p
+ N m
g
P�O
•
0
or
- 0 y
. 9
o N
MM LI$ ,mni V s..yQnI p� N A k �j 0 N A A A 0 0 O a
O pN q4A�A J OJ
V O O J O V
Project No.MAPA-28(110) Exhibit"B"
Control No.22537 Page 13 of 13
Harney St Corridor Feasibility Study
o ' rp
fa 11a a s
1 •
INN i a + + -• t + as co
0
W COW CON N N A p N N m
1 • 11
N N a a CO A I + + 1 CO a a 0 0 M
I < II 4
) i o
I
o I N
0, A + N I
o o m
! I 1 -
I
1 A a 0 m o CO m a 0 I I 0 41
1 11
N + + — + N
m A m N m + N A N V N m O V P y N N A o O A +O + N a A O
N
I J 1
•
Project No.MAPA-28(110) Exhibit"B"
Control No.22537 Page 11 of 13
Harney St Corridor Feasibility Study ' ,
•
•
I .
•
•
•
•
•
•
Staffing Plan
Consultant: Rundell Ernstberger Associates, LLC.
Project No: MAPA-28(110)
Control No: CN 22537
Project Name: Harney St Corridor Feasibility Study
Employee Classification Name Actual Rate Average Rate
Project Director and
QA/QC Manager
. Deputy Project Managers Kevin Osburn 85.81
and/or Collaborative Task Eric Ernstberger 83.97 85.47
Leaders(ASLA)
Sr. Civil Engineer
Sr.Traffic Engineer
Sr. Landscape Architect
•
Project Planner
•Landscape Architect Phillip Arden 29.81 29.81
Traffic Engineer
Professional Engineer
GIS Specialist
Jr. Landscape Architect
Planner
CADD Technician
Deputy Project Manager
Kevin Osburn is estimated to complete approximately 82%of the project duties as described on the
following page.
Eric Ernstbergeris estimated to complete approx. 18%of the project duties as described on the
following page
85.81(.82)+83.97(.18) =$85.47 •
•
2 Exhibit"B"
Staffing Plan
Page 2 of.4
e 1 of 4
3.
o .tti c 0 3� a$ c 3 a
Jr; 3 s O
0-1 1 • �" N
U a s O 2 N
m m w Q
a
y 1 cn
3 ? v 5 p.
o 0
n 4c
0 O a 3 m'
o G C a t
n
T N N X 0 o "' ul
N C
• m �ned8 x;g ct m n�
a o W - O o m
• • ��aa0��0o3E Ei m3 ~ ie.a
Ail
m
44,000
fn Fw E Pflii z
I-0 0▪Coco . m o 0 c
yin NNcnaaa�
m m m 3 0
3• v
mK
J 88- 8
8 ' I pco
D o . m
C ci o
2 0
OW
N
•
a N 0
No�888 0 0 s e o
N o
0 0 9
M '
O
• 0
O
n
}Nt Q .
. d N O
O{!
0
0 o v
3
O
• O
O ,9
m
A
N
yr O
0 o DZ
v. m
•
g A
C N
o' 4
r T
c O
N
r c o
3 g z
N
X)
J
N o O
3• O p
m o
m t Nen
. • • o N O fD t in g, o N A A A m
. • N m OI Et d u A
it It
N T
W -J M
m
W N V
CA IV
3 o o G
a p
+ N m
g
P�O
•
0
or
- 0 y
. 9
o N
MM LI$ ,mni V s..yQnI p� N A k �j 0 N A A A 0 0 O a
O pN q4A�A J OJ
V O O J O V
Project No.MAPA-28(110) Exhibit"B"
Control No.22537 Page 13 of 13
Harney St Corridor Feasibility Study
o ' rp
fa 11a a s
1 •
INN i a + + -• t + as co
0
W COW CON N N A p N N m
1 • 11
N N a a CO A I + + 1 CO a a 0 0 M
I < II 4
) i o
I
o I N
0, A + N I
o o m
! I 1 -
I
1 A a 0 m o CO m a 0 I I 0 41
1 11
N + + — + N
m A m N m + N A N V N m O V P y N N A o O A +O + N a A O
N
I J 1
•
Project No.MAPA-28(110) Exhibit"B"
Control No.22537 Page 11 of 13
Harney St Corridor Feasibility Study ' ,
•
•
I .
/
•
Staffing Plan
Consultant:Vireo
Project No: MAPA-28(110)
Control No: CN 22537
Project Name: Harney St Corridor Feasibility Study
Employee Classification Name Actual Rate Average Rate
Project Director and
QA/QC Manager
Deputy Project Managers Dave Ciaccio 60.58
and/or Collaborative Task
Leaders(ASLA)
Sr.Civil Engineer
Sr.Traffic Engineer
Sr. Landscape Architect Steve Rhodes 36.06
Project Planner
Landscape Architect Tom Bentley 33.65
Traffic Engineer
Professional Engineer
GIS Specialist
Jr. Landscape Architect Kyle Wolf 19.23
Planner
CADD Technician
3 Exhibit"B"
Staffing Plan
Page 3 of 4
Staffing Plan
Consultant: Lamp, Rynearson &Associates
Project No: MAPA-28(110)
Control No: CN 22537
Project Name: Harney St Corridor Feasibility Study
Employee Classification Name Actual Rate Average Rate
Project Director and
QA/QC Manager
Deputy Project Managers
and/or Collaborative Task
Leaders(ASLA)
Sr.Civil Engineer Nancy Pridal 54.47
Sr.Traffic Engineer
Sr. Landscape Architect
Project Planner
Landscape Architect
Traffic Engineer Matt Kruse 37.50
Professional Engineer Mike McIntosh 44.95
GIS Specialist Mark Steele 22.25
Planner
CADD Technician Aaron Johnson 25.15
4 •
Exhibit"B"
Staffing Plan
Page.4 of 4
EXHIBIT "C"
INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS FOR
PROFESSIONAL SERVICE PROVIDERS
LPA PROJECTS
Consultant agrees to:
(1) Make a detailed review of its existing insurance coverage,
(2) Compare that coverage to the expected scope of the work under this contract,
(3) Obtain the insurance coverage that it deems necessary to fully protect
Consultant from loss associated with the work. Also, Consultant shall have at a
minimum the insurance described below:
General Liability —
Limits of at least:
$ 1,000,000 Per Occurrence
$ 2,000,000 General Aggregate
$ 2,000,000 Completed Operations Aggregate (if applicable)
$ 1,000,000 Personal/Advertising Injury
• Consultant shall be responsible for the payment of any deductibles.
• Coverage shall be provided by a standard form Commercial General Liability Policy
covering bodily injury, property damage including loss of use, and personal injury.
• General Aggregate to apply on a Per Project Basis.
• The LPA shall be named as Additional Insured on a primary and non-contributory basis
including completed operations (the completed work/product) for three (3) years after the
work/product is complete.
• Consultant agrees to waive its rights of recovery against the LPA. Waiver of Subrogation
in favor of the LPA shall be added to, or included in, the policy.
• Contractual liability coverage shall be on a broad form basis and shall not be amended
by any limiting endorsements.
• If work is being done near a railroad track, the 50' railroad right of way exclusion must be
deleted.
• In the event that this contract provides for consultant to construct, reconstruct or produce
a completed product, products and completed operations coverage in the amount
provided above shall be maintained for the duration of the work, and shall be further
maintained for a minimum period of five years after final acceptance and payment.
Project No. MAPA-28(110) Exhibit "C"
Control No. 22537 Page 1 of 3
Harney St Corridor Feasibility Study
C ci o
2 0
OW
N
•
a N 0
No�888 0 0 s e o
N o
0 0 9
M '
O
• 0
O
n
}Nt Q .
. d N O
O{!
0
0 o v
3
O
• O
O ,9
m
A
N
yr O
0 o DZ
v. m
•
g A
C N
o' 4
r T
c O
N
r c o
3 g z
N
X)
J
N o O
3• O p
m o
m t Nen
. • • o N O fD t in g, o N A A A m
. • N m OI Et d u A
it It
N T
W -J M
m
W N V
CA IV
3 o o G
a p
+ N m
g
P�O
•
0
or
- 0 y
. 9
o N
MM LI$ ,mni V s..yQnI p� N A k �j 0 N A A A 0 0 O a
O pN q4A�A J OJ
V O O J O V
Project No.MAPA-28(110) Exhibit"B"
Control No.22537 Page 13 of 13
Harney St Corridor Feasibility Study
o ' rp
fa 11a a s
1 •
INN i a + + -• t + as co
0
W COW CON N N A p N N m
1 • 11
N N a a CO A I + + 1 CO a a 0 0 M
I < II 4
) i o
I
o I N
0, A + N I
o o m
! I 1 -
I
1 A a 0 m o CO m a 0 I I 0 41
1 11
N + + — + N
m A m N m + N A N V N m O V P y N N A o O A +O + N a A O
N
I J 1
•
Project No.MAPA-28(110) Exhibit"B"
Control No.22537 Page 11 of 13
Harney St Corridor Feasibility Study ' ,
•
•
I .
• Policy shall not contain a total or absolute pollution exclusion. Coverage shall be
provided for pollution exposures arising from products and completed operations (as per
standard CG0001 Pollution Exclusion or equivalent). (If the standard pollution exclusion
as provided by CG0001 has been amended, please refer to the following section entitled
"Pollution Coverage.")
• Pollution Coverage—
• In the event that the standard pollution exclusion as provided by CG0001 has been
amended, coverage may be substituted with a separate Pollution Liability policy or a
Professional Liability policy that includes pollution coverage in the amount of$1.0 million
per occurrence or claim and $1.0 million aggregate. If coverage is provided by a "claims
made" form, coverage will be maintained for three years after project completion. Any
applicable deductible is the responsibility of the Consultant.
Automobile Liability—
Limits of at least: $ 1,000,000 CSL Per Accident
• Coverage shall apply to all Owned, Hired, and Non-Owned Autos.
Workers' Compensation —
Limits: Statutory coverage for the State where the project is located.
Employer's Liability limits: $100,000 Each Accident
$100,000 Disease— Per Person
$500,000 Disease— Policy Limit
• Consultant agrees to waive its rights of recovery against the LPA. Waiver of,
Subrogation in favor of the LPA shall be added to, or included in, the policy
Professional Liability—
Limits of at least: $ 1,000,000 Per Claim and Annual Aggregate
• Coverage shall be provided for three years after work/project completion.
Electronic Data and Valuable Papers—
Limits of at least: $100,000 Electronic Data Processing Data and Media
$25,000 Valuable Papers
Umbrella/Excess —
Limits of at least: $1,000,000 Per Occurrence and Annual Aggregate
• Policy shall provide liability coverage in excess of the specified Employers Liability,
Commercial General Liability and Auto Liability.
• The LPA, shall be an "Additional Insured".
• Consultant agrees to waive its rights of recovery against the LPA. Waiver of subrogation
Project No. MAPA-28(110) Exhibit "C"
Control No. 22537 Page 2 of 3
Harney St Corridor Feasibility Study
o
0 0 9
M '
O
• 0
O
n
}Nt Q .
. d N O
O{!
0
0 o v
3
O
• O
O ,9
m
A
N
yr O
0 o DZ
v. m
•
g A
C N
o' 4
r T
c O
N
r c o
3 g z
N
X)
J
N o O
3• O p
m o
m t Nen
. • • o N O fD t in g, o N A A A m
. • N m OI Et d u A
it It
N T
W -J M
m
W N V
CA IV
3 o o G
a p
+ N m
g
P�O
•
0
or
- 0 y
. 9
o N
MM LI$ ,mni V s..yQnI p� N A k �j 0 N A A A 0 0 O a
O pN q4A�A J OJ
V O O J O V
Project No.MAPA-28(110) Exhibit"B"
Control No.22537 Page 13 of 13
Harney St Corridor Feasibility Study
o ' rp
fa 11a a s
1 •
INN i a + + -• t + as co
0
W COW CON N N A p N N m
1 • 11
N N a a CO A I + + 1 CO a a 0 0 M
I < II 4
) i o
I
o I N
0, A + N I
o o m
! I 1 -
I
1 A a 0 m o CO m a 0 I I 0 41
1 11
N + + — + N
m A m N m + N A N V N m O V P y N N A o O A +O + N a A O
N
I J 1
•
Project No.MAPA-28(110) Exhibit"B"
Control No.22537 Page 11 of 13
Harney St Corridor Feasibility Study ' ,
•
•
I .
r
•
in favor of the LPA shall be provided.
Additional Requirements—
• Any insurance policy shall be written by a reputable insurance company acceptable to
the LPA or with a current Best's Insurance Guide Rating of A — and Class VII or better,
and authorized to do business in Nebraska.
• Evidence of such insurance coverage in effect shall be provided to the LPA in the form
of an Accord certificate of insurance executed by a licensed representative of the
participating insurer(s).
• For so long as insurance coverage is required under this agreement, the Consultant
shall have a duty to notify the LPA and the State of Nebraska Department of Roads
(State) when the Consultant knows, or has reason to believe, that any insurance
coverage required under this agreement will lapse, or may be canceled or terminated.
The Consultant must forward any pertinent notice of cancelation or termination to the
LPA and to the State by mail (return receipt requested), hand-delivery or facsimile
transmission within 2 business days of receipt by Consultant of any such notice from an
insurance carrier. Copies of notices received by the Consultant shall be sent to the LPA,
in care of the LPA's Responsible Charge and to the State at the following address:
Nebraska Department of Roads
Construction Division — Insurance Section
1500 Highway 2, P. O. Box 94759
Lincoln, NE 68509-4759
Facsimile No. 402-479-4854
• Failure of the owner or any other party to review, approve, and/or reject a certificate of
insurance in whole or in part does not waive the requirements of this agreement.
• The Limits of Coverage's set forth in this document are suggested minimum limits of
coverage. The suggested limits of coverage shall not be construed to be a limitation of
the liability on the part of the consultant or any of its subconsultants/tier subconsultants.
The carrying of insurance described shall in no way be interpreted as relieving the
consultant, subconsultant, or tier subconsultant of any responsibility of liability under the
contract.
• If there is a discrepancy of coverage between this document and any other insurance •
specification for this project, the greater limit or coverage requirement shall prevail.
Project No. MAPA-28(110) Exhibit "C"
Control No. 22537 Page 3 of 3
Harney St Corridor Feasibility Study
O
n
}Nt Q .
. d N O
O{!
0
0 o v
3
O
• O
O ,9
m
A
N
yr O
0 o DZ
v. m
•
g A
C N
o' 4
r T
c O
N
r c o
3 g z
N
X)
J
N o O
3• O p
m o
m t Nen
. • • o N O fD t in g, o N A A A m
. • N m OI Et d u A
it It
N T
W -J M
m
W N V
CA IV
3 o o G
a p
+ N m
g
P�O
•
0
or
- 0 y
. 9
o N
MM LI$ ,mni V s..yQnI p� N A k �j 0 N A A A 0 0 O a
O pN q4A�A J OJ
V O O J O V
Project No.MAPA-28(110) Exhibit"B"
Control No.22537 Page 13 of 13
Harney St Corridor Feasibility Study
o ' rp
fa 11a a s
1 •
INN i a + + -• t + as co
0
W COW CON N N A p N N m
1 • 11
N N a a CO A I + + 1 CO a a 0 0 M
I < II 4
) i o
I
o I N
0, A + N I
o o m
! I 1 -
I
1 A a 0 m o CO m a 0 I I 0 41
1 11
N + + — + N
m A m N m + N A N V N m O V P y N N A o O A +O + N a A O
N
I J 1
•
Project No.MAPA-28(110) Exhibit"B"
Control No.22537 Page 11 of 13
Harney St Corridor Feasibility Study ' ,
•
•
I .
FEES AND PAYMENTS
EXHIBIT "D"
A. Payment Method. Payment under this agreement will be made based on Actual Costs
plus a Fixed Fee for profit.
B. Total Agreement Amount. For performance of the services as described in this
agreement, the Consultant will be paid a fixed-fee-for-profit of$13,253.66 and up to a
maximum amount of$231,524.81 for actual costs as defined in paragraph "H" of this
section. The total agreement amount is $244,778.47. The Consultant's compensation
shall not exceed this maximum amount without prior written approval of the LPA.
C. Ineligible Costs. The LPA is not responsible for costs incurred prior to the Notice-to-
Proceed date or after the completion deadline date set out in the NOTICE TO
PROCEED AND COMPLETION section of this agreement or as provided in a written
time extension notification.
D. Federal Cost Principles. For performance of Services under the terms of this
agreement, the Consultant will be paid subject to the terms of this agreement and all
requirements and limitations of the federal cost principles contained in the Federal
Acquisition Regulation (48 CFR 31).
E. Federal-aid. (2-1-12) LPA will not make payments directly to Consultant for services
performed under this agreement. Instead, the State will serve as a paying agent for
LPA, and will pay Consultant directly for properly submitted and approved invoices using
both LPA and Federal funds based on the applicable project federal cost participation
percentage. The following process shall apply whenever the LPA, the State or the
FHWA determines that certain costs, previously paid to Consultant, should not have
been paid with federal funds by the State to Consultant. Consultant shall immediately
repay the State the federal share of the previously paid amount and may invoice LPA for
the costs repaid to the State. LPA shall promptly pay the full amount of the invoice from
its own funds unless LPA, in good faith, disputes whether the Consultant is entitled to
the payment under the agreement or the amount of the invoice. In the event of a dispute
between LPA and Consultant, the dispute resolution process of Section 18 herein shall
be used by the parties.
F. Subconsultant Over-runs and Under-runs. The Consultant shall require any
subconsultant to notify Consultant if at any time the subconsultant determines that its
costs will exceed its negotiated fee estimate. The Consultant shall not allow any
Project No. MAPA-28(110) EXHIBIT "D"
Control No. 22537 Sheet 1 of 7
Harney St Corridor Feasibility Study
Template Dated 3-30-12
O ,9
m
A
N
yr O
0 o DZ
v. m
•
g A
C N
o' 4
r T
c O
N
r c o
3 g z
N
X)
J
N o O
3• O p
m o
m t Nen
. • • o N O fD t in g, o N A A A m
. • N m OI Et d u A
it It
N T
W -J M
m
W N V
CA IV
3 o o G
a p
+ N m
g
P�O
•
0
or
- 0 y
. 9
o N
MM LI$ ,mni V s..yQnI p� N A k �j 0 N A A A 0 0 O a
O pN q4A�A J OJ
V O O J O V
Project No.MAPA-28(110) Exhibit"B"
Control No.22537 Page 13 of 13
Harney St Corridor Feasibility Study
o ' rp
fa 11a a s
1 •
INN i a + + -• t + as co
0
W COW CON N N A p N N m
1 • 11
N N a a CO A I + + 1 CO a a 0 0 M
I < II 4
) i o
I
o I N
0, A + N I
o o m
! I 1 -
I
1 A a 0 m o CO m a 0 I I 0 41
1 11
N + + — + N
m A m N m + N A N V N m O V P y N N A o O A +O + N a A O
N
I J 1
•
Project No.MAPA-28(110) Exhibit"B"
Control No.22537 Page 11 of 13
Harney St Corridor Feasibility Study ' ,
•
•
I .
•
subconsultant to exceed its negotiated fee estimate without prior written approval of the
LPA. The Consultant understands that the amount of any subconsultant cost under-run
will be subtracted from the total compensation to be paid to Consultant under this
agreement, unless prior written approval is obtained from the LPA and, when applicable,
FHWA.
G. Out of Scope Services and Consultant Work Orders. The LPA may request that
Consultant provide services that, in the opinion of Consultant, are in addition to or
different from those set out in the Scope of Services. When the LPA decides that these
services require an adjustment in costs, the Consultant shall: (a) describe the proposed
services, (b) provide an explanation why Consultant believes that the proposed services
are not within the original scope of services and additional work effort is therefore
required, and (c) estimate the cost to complete the services. Consultant must receive
written approval from the LPA before proceeding with the out-of-scope services. Before
written approval will be given by the LPA, the LPA must determine that the situation
meets the following criteria:
• That the additional work is beyond the scope of services initially negotiated with
Consultant; and
• That the proposed services are within the scope of the Request for Proposal under
which Consultant was selected and contract entered into; and
• That it is in the best interest of the LPA that the services be performed under this
agreement.
Once the need for a modification has been established, a supplemental agreement will
be prepared.
If the additional work requires the Consultant to incur costs prior to execution of a
supplemental agreement, the LPA shall use the process set out below:
• The Consultant Work Order (CWO) — DR Form 250 shall be used to describe and
provide necessary justification for the additional the scope of services, effort, the
deliverables, modification of schedule, and to document the cost of additional
services. The CWO form is available on the Department of Roads website at
www.transportation.nebraska.gov/qov-aff/Ipa-guide-man.html#forms4. The CWO
must be executed to provide authorization for the additional work and to specify
when that work may begin. This agreement will be supplemented after one or more
CWOs have been authorized and approved for funding.
Project No. MAPA-28(110) EXHIBIT "D"
Control No. 22537 Sheet 2 of 7
Harney St Corridor Feasibility Study
Template Dated 3-30-12
dor Feasibility Study
Template Dated 3-30-12
O ,9
m
A
N
yr O
0 o DZ
v. m
•
g A
C N
o' 4
r T
c O
N
r c o
3 g z
N
X)
J
N o O
3• O p
m o
m t Nen
. • • o N O fD t in g, o N A A A m
. • N m OI Et d u A
it It
N T
W -J M
m
W N V
CA IV
3 o o G
a p
+ N m
g
P�O
•
0
or
- 0 y
. 9
o N
MM LI$ ,mni V s..yQnI p� N A k �j 0 N A A A 0 0 O a
O pN q4A�A J OJ
V O O J O V
Project No.MAPA-28(110) Exhibit"B"
Control No.22537 Page 13 of 13
Harney St Corridor Feasibility Study
o ' rp
fa 11a a s
1 •
INN i a + + -• t + as co
0
W COW CON N N A p N N m
1 • 11
N N a a CO A I + + 1 CO a a 0 0 M
I < II 4
) i o
I
o I N
0, A + N I
o o m
! I 1 -
I
1 A a 0 m o CO m a 0 I I 0 41
1 11
N + + — + N
m A m N m + N A N V N m O V P y N N A o O A +O + N a A O
N
I J 1
•
Project No.MAPA-28(110) Exhibit"B"
Control No.22537 Page 11 of 13
Harney St Corridor Feasibility Study ' ,
•
•
I .
H. Payments. Payment for work under this agreement will be made based on actual costs
plus a fixed fee for profit. Actual costs include direct labor costs, direct non-labor costs,
and overhead costs.
(1) Direct Labor Costs are the earnings that individuals receive for the time they are
working directly on the project.
(a) Hourly Rates: For hourly employees, the hourly earnings rate shall be the
employee's straight time hourly rate for the pay period in which the work was
performed. If overtime hours are worked on this project, the premium pay portion
of those hours is not allowable as a direct labor cost.
For salaried employees, the hourly earnings rate shall be their actual hourly rate
as recorded in the Consultant's accounting books of record.
(b) Time records: The hours charged to the project must be supported by adequate
time distribution records. The records must clearly indicate the distribution of
hours to all activities on a daily basis for the entire pay period, and there must be
a system in place to ensure that time charged to each activity is accurate.
(2) Direct Non-Labor Costs: These costs include all necessary, actual, and allowable
costs related to completing the work under the agreement, including but not limited
to: meals, lodging, mileage, subject to the limitations outlined below; communication
costs; reproduction and printing costs; special equipment and materials required for
the project; special insurance premiums if required solely for this agreement; and
such other allowable items.
A non-labor cost charged as a direct cost cannot be included in the Consultant's
overhead rate. If for reasons of practicality, the consultant is treating a direct non-
labor cost category, in its entirety, as an overhead cost, then costs from that category
are not eligible to be billed to this project as a direct expense.
Consultant shall submit to the LPA an invoice or billing itemizing all direct non-labor
costs claimed for work under this agreement, and all supporting receipts or invoices.
The State, on behalf of the LPA, will pay the Consultant for all necessary, allowable,
eligible and properly documented direct non-labor costs related to the work under
this agreement.
The following expenses will be reimbursed at actual costs, not to exceed the rates as
shown below.
Project No. MAPA-28(110) EXHIBIT "D"
Control No. 22537 Sheet 3 of 7
Harney St Corridor Feasibility Study
Template Dated 3-30-12
3-30-12
dor Feasibility Study
Template Dated 3-30-12
O ,9
m
A
N
yr O
0 o DZ
v. m
•
g A
C N
o' 4
r T
c O
N
r c o
3 g z
N
X)
J
N o O
3• O p
m o
m t Nen
. • • o N O fD t in g, o N A A A m
. • N m OI Et d u A
it It
N T
W -J M
m
W N V
CA IV
3 o o G
a p
+ N m
g
P�O
•
0
or
- 0 y
. 9
o N
MM LI$ ,mni V s..yQnI p� N A k �j 0 N A A A 0 0 O a
O pN q4A�A J OJ
V O O J O V
Project No.MAPA-28(110) Exhibit"B"
Control No.22537 Page 13 of 13
Harney St Corridor Feasibility Study
o ' rp
fa 11a a s
1 •
INN i a + + -• t + as co
0
W COW CON N N A p N N m
1 • 11
N N a a CO A I + + 1 CO a a 0 0 M
I < II 4
) i o
I
o I N
0, A + N I
o o m
! I 1 -
I
1 A a 0 m o CO m a 0 I I 0 41
1 11
N + + — + N
m A m N m + N A N V N m O V P y N N A o O A +O + N a A O
N
I J 1
•
Project No.MAPA-28(110) Exhibit"B"
Control No.22537 Page 11 of 13
Harney St Corridor Feasibility Study ' ,
•
•
I .
(a) The reimbursement for mileage associated with the use of company owned
vehicles shall be the prevailing standard rate as established by the Internal
Revenue Service (IRS) through its Revenue Procedures. Reimbursement for
mileage associated with the use of a privately owned vehicle (POV), is limited to
the lesser of:
1) The mileage rate which the consultant reimbursed to the person who
•
submitted the claim for POV use, or
2) The prevailing standard rate as established by the IRS.
(b) Automobile Rentals and Air Fares will be actual reasonable cost and if discounts
are applicable the Consultant shall give the LPA the benefit of all discounts.
(c) The reimbursement for meal and lodging rates shall be limited to the prevailing
standard rate as indicated in the current website address for U.S. General
Services Administration's (GSA) rates which is indicated below:
http://www.gsa.gov/portal/category/100120
1) For the Consultant and its employees to be eligible for the meal allowance,
the following criteria must be met.
Breakfast:
a) Employee is required to depart at or before 6:30 a.m., or
b) Employee is on overnight travel.
Lunch:
a) Employee must be on overnight travel. No reimbursement for same
day travel.
b) Employee is required to leave for overnight travel at or before 11:00
a.m., or
c) Employee returns from overnight travel at or after 2:00 p.m.
Dinner:
a) Employee returns from overnight travel or work location at or after
7:00 p.m., or
b) Employee is on overnight travel.
Meals are not eligible for reimbursement if the employee eats within 20 miles
of the headquarters town of the employee.
The Consultant shall note the actual lodging and meal costs in a daily diary,
expense report, or on the individual's time report along with the time of
departure to the project and time of return to the headquarters town. The
total daily meal costs must not exceed the GSA rates set out above.
Project No. MAPA-28(110) EXHIBIT "D"
Control No. 22537 Sheet 4 of 7
Harney St Corridor Feasibility Study
Template Dated 3-30-12
the work under
this agreement.
The following expenses will be reimbursed at actual costs, not to exceed the rates as
shown below.
Project No. MAPA-28(110) EXHIBIT "D"
Control No. 22537 Sheet 3 of 7
Harney St Corridor Feasibility Study
Template Dated 3-30-12
3-30-12
dor Feasibility Study
Template Dated 3-30-12
O ,9
m
A
N
yr O
0 o DZ
v. m
•
g A
C N
o' 4
r T
c O
N
r c o
3 g z
N
X)
J
N o O
3• O p
m o
m t Nen
. • • o N O fD t in g, o N A A A m
. • N m OI Et d u A
it It
N T
W -J M
m
W N V
CA IV
3 o o G
a p
+ N m
g
P�O
•
0
or
- 0 y
. 9
o N
MM LI$ ,mni V s..yQnI p� N A k �j 0 N A A A 0 0 O a
O pN q4A�A J OJ
V O O J O V
Project No.MAPA-28(110) Exhibit"B"
Control No.22537 Page 13 of 13
Harney St Corridor Feasibility Study
o ' rp
fa 11a a s
1 •
INN i a + + -• t + as co
0
W COW CON N N A p N N m
1 • 11
N N a a CO A I + + 1 CO a a 0 0 M
I < II 4
) i o
I
o I N
0, A + N I
o o m
! I 1 -
I
1 A a 0 m o CO m a 0 I I 0 41
1 11
N + + — + N
m A m N m + N A N V N m O V P y N N A o O A +O + N a A O
N
I J 1
•
Project No.MAPA-28(110) Exhibit"B"
Control No.22537 Page 11 of 13
Harney St Corridor Feasibility Study ' ,
•
•
I .
I i ,
d d
(3) Overhead Costs include indirect labor costs, indirect non-labor costs, and direct labor
additives that are allowable in accordance with 48 CFR 31. Overhead costs are to
be allocated to the project as a percentage of direct labor costs. The Consultant will
be allowed to charge the project using its actual allowable overhead rate. Overhead
rate increases which occur during the project period will not be cause for an increase
in the maximum amount established in this agreement.
Fee for Profit(Actual Cost Plus Fixed Fee). The Fixed Fee for Profit was computed
upon the negotiated direct labor and overhead costs. The Fee for Profit is not allowable
upon direct non-labor costs. For monthly or progress invoices, the Fee for Profit is
calculated by multiplying the sum of the direct labor and overhead costs billed by the
negotiated Fee for Profit Rate of"13.35%". Upon completion of the work under this
agreement, the Consultant shall invoice the LPA any remaining Fixed Fee for Profit. If
all of the work under this agreement is not completed for any reason, fixed fee for profit
will be adjusted based on the LPA's determination of the actual percentage of work
completed.
J. Invoices and Progress Reports. The Consultant shall submit invoices to the LPA no
more frequently than at monthly intervals and in accordance with the "LPA
Reimbursement Procedures" which can be found on the State's website at:
http://www.transportation.nebraska.gov/gov-aff/Ipa-quide-man.html#policies4. The
invoices must present actual direct labor, actual overhead, actual direct non-labor costs,
as well as the Fee for Profit based upon the actual direct labor and overhead costs billed •
for that period. The invoices must identify each employee by name and classification,
the hours worked, and each individual's actual labor cost. Direct non-labor expenses
must be itemized and provide a complete description of each item billed.
Each monthly invoice must include a completed "Cost Breakdown Form" (see State's
webpage at http://www.transportation.nebraska.qov/qov-aff/Ipa-quide-man.html) and
must be substantiated by a progress report which is to include/address, as a minimum:
1. A description of the work completed for that period
2. A description of the work anticipated for the next pay period
3. Information needed from the LPA
4. Percent of work completed to date
Consultant shall submit a progress report monthly even if Consultant does not submit a
monthly invoice.
Project No. MAPA-28(110) EXHIBIT "D"
Control No. 22537 Sheet 5 of 7
Harney St Corridor Feasibility Study
Template Dated 3-30-12
N
yr O
0 o DZ
v. m
•
g A
C N
o' 4
r T
c O
N
r c o
3 g z
N
X)
J
N o O
3• O p
m o
m t Nen
. • • o N O fD t in g, o N A A A m
. • N m OI Et d u A
it It
N T
W -J M
m
W N V
CA IV
3 o o G
a p
+ N m
g
P�O
•
0
or
- 0 y
. 9
o N
MM LI$ ,mni V s..yQnI p� N A k �j 0 N A A A 0 0 O a
O pN q4A�A J OJ
V O O J O V
Project No.MAPA-28(110) Exhibit"B"
Control No.22537 Page 13 of 13
Harney St Corridor Feasibility Study
o ' rp
fa 11a a s
1 •
INN i a + + -• t + as co
0
W COW CON N N A p N N m
1 • 11
N N a a CO A I + + 1 CO a a 0 0 M
I < II 4
) i o
I
o I N
0, A + N I
o o m
! I 1 -
I
1 A a 0 m o CO m a 0 I I 0 41
1 11
N + + — + N
m A m N m + N A N V N m O V P y N N A o O A +O + N a A O
N
I J 1
•
Project No.MAPA-28(110) Exhibit"B"
Control No.22537 Page 11 of 13
Harney St Corridor Feasibility Study ' ,
•
•
I .
I
•
K. Progress Payments. Payments will not be made unless the monthly progress reports
provide adequate substantiation for the work and the LPA and the State determine that
the work has been properly completed. The State, on behalf of the LPA, will make a
reasonable effort to pay the Consultant within 30 days of receipt of the Consultant
invoices.
L. Final Invoice. Upon completion of the work under this agreement, the Consultant shall
submit their final invoice with a letter identifying it as the final invoice. The letter shall
also include the following information/statements:
1. Project name/location, project number, control number, service provided, and
agreement number.
2. All the work under this agreement has been completed and all required
deliverables have been submitted to the LPA,
3. Consultant has no outstanding issues to be resolved regarding the work under this
agreement.
In addition, the Consultant shall review the overhead costs billed to-date to determine if
the overhead rates used on the progress billings match the actual allowable rate
applicable to the time period that the labor was incurred. If cost adjustments are
necessary, they should be reflected on the final invoice. If a particular year's actual
overhead has not yet been computed or approved by the State, the most recent years
accepted rate should be applied.
M. Final Payment. Upon determination by the LPA and the State that the work was
adequately substantiated and completed in accordance with this agreement, payment
will be made in the amount of the approved final invoice. The acceptance by the
Consultant of the final payment will constitute and operate as a release to the LPA and
the State for all claims and liability to the Consultant, its representatives, and assigns, for
any and all things done, furnished, or relating to the services rendered by or in
connection with this agreement or any part thereof.
N. Audit and Final Cost Adjustment. Upon acceptance by the LPA and the State, the
State, or its authorized representative, may complete an audit review of the payments
made under this agreement. The Parties understand that the audit may require an
adjustment of the payments made under this agreement. The Consultant agrees to
reimburse the State for any overpayments identified in the audit review, and State
agrees to pay Consultant for any identified underpayments.
Project No. MAPA-28(110) EXHIBIT "D"
Control No. 22537 Sheet 6 of 7
Harney St Corridor Feasibility Study
Template Dated 3-30-12
Sheet 5 of 7
Harney St Corridor Feasibility Study
Template Dated 3-30-12
N
yr O
0 o DZ
v. m
•
g A
C N
o' 4
r T
c O
N
r c o
3 g z
N
X)
J
N o O
3• O p
m o
m t Nen
. • • o N O fD t in g, o N A A A m
. • N m OI Et d u A
it It
N T
W -J M
m
W N V
CA IV
3 o o G
a p
+ N m
g
P�O
•
0
or
- 0 y
. 9
o N
MM LI$ ,mni V s..yQnI p� N A k �j 0 N A A A 0 0 O a
O pN q4A�A J OJ
V O O J O V
Project No.MAPA-28(110) Exhibit"B"
Control No.22537 Page 13 of 13
Harney St Corridor Feasibility Study
o ' rp
fa 11a a s
1 •
INN i a + + -• t + as co
0
W COW CON N N A p N N m
1 • 11
N N a a CO A I + + 1 CO a a 0 0 M
I < II 4
) i o
I
o I N
0, A + N I
o o m
! I 1 -
I
1 A a 0 m o CO m a 0 I I 0 41
1 11
N + + — + N
m A m N m + N A N V N m O V P y N N A o O A +O + N a A O
N
I J 1
•
Project No.MAPA-28(110) Exhibit"B"
Control No.22537 Page 11 of 13
Harney St Corridor Feasibility Study ' ,
•
•
I .
A J
. i . . s
O. Consultant Cost Record Retention. The Consultant shall maintain, and also require
that its Subconsultants/Subcontractors maintain, all books, documents, papers,
accounting records, and other evidence pertaining to costs incurred and shall make such
material available for examination at its office at all reasonable times during the
agreement period and for three years from the date of final cost settlement by FHWA
and project closeout by the State. Such materials must be available for inspection by
the LPA, State, FHWA, or any authorized representative of the federal government, and
when requested, the Consultant shall furnish copies.
•
•
Project No. MAPA-28(110) EXHIBIT "D"
Control No. 22537 Sheet 7 of 7
Harney St Corridor Feasibility Study
Template Dated 3-30-12
C-25A CITY OF OMAHA
LEGISLATIVE CHAMBER
Omaha,Nebraska
RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF OMAHA:
WHEREAS, the City of Omaha desires to utilize Federal Surface Transportation Funds for a
design study to assess the feasibility of a multi-modal corridor along Harney Street from 10`k Street to
42nd Street, as a part of the 2013-2018 Capitol Improvements Program Transportation Project No.'112;
and,
WHEREAS, Sprinkle Consulting, Inc. has been selected in accord with the Architect's and
Engineer's Review and Selection Committee rules to perform these engineering services, the specifics of
which are detailed in the attached Design Study Services Agreement, which by this reference is made a
part hereof, identified as Federal Aid Project MAPA-28(110), State Control No. 22537; and
WHEREAS, the Nebraska Department of Roads has agreed to steward the programmed funds as
required by the Federal Highway Administration, according to the attached Agreement between the City
of Omaha and Sprinkle Consulting,Inc.; and,
WHEREAS, the City's portion of the total cost is currently programmed to be $48,955.69, which
will be paid from the 2010 Transportation Bond Fund 13183, 2012 Issue Transportation Bonds
Organization 117117.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
OMAHA:
THAT, as recommended by the Mayor, the Design Study Services Agreement between the City
of Omaha and Sprinkle Consulting, Inc. for,design study services to assess the feasibility of proposed
multi-modal improvements to the Harney Street corridor between 10`1' Street and 42nd Street, as a part of
the 2013-2018 Capital Improvements Project No. 112, which carries the designation of Federal Aid
Project MAPA-28(110), State Control No. 22537, with the City's share of the study costs, currently
programmed to be $48,955.69, to be paid from the 2010 Transportation Bond Fund 13183, 2012 Issue
Transportation Bonds Organization 117117, is hereby approved.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED:
THAT, the City Council hereby authorizes the Mayor and City Clerk to sign the attached
Agreement on behalf of the City of Omaha.
1585htp
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
DEPUTY CITY ATTORNEY DATE
•
ByQ... ...:... // .. . ...
Ce ilmember
Adopted r 212
D
ity Clerk M417
,2
Approved
Mayor
ayments.
Project No. MAPA-28(110) EXHIBIT "D"
Control No. 22537 Sheet 6 of 7
Harney St Corridor Feasibility Study
Template Dated 3-30-12
Sheet 5 of 7
Harney St Corridor Feasibility Study
Template Dated 3-30-12
N
yr O
0 o DZ
v. m
•
g A
C N
o' 4
r T
c O
N
r c o
3 g z
N
X)
J
N o O
3• O p
m o
m t Nen
. • • o N O fD t in g, o N A A A m
. • N m OI Et d u A
it It
N T
W -J M
m
W N V
CA IV
3 o o G
a p
+ N m
g
P�O
•
0
or
- 0 y
. 9
o N
MM LI$ ,mni V s..yQnI p� N A k �j 0 N A A A 0 0 O a
O pN q4A�A J OJ
V O O J O V
Project No.MAPA-28(110) Exhibit"B"
Control No.22537 Page 13 of 13
Harney St Corridor Feasibility Study
o ' rp
fa 11a a s
1 •
INN i a + + -• t + as co
0
W COW CON N N A p N N m
1 • 11
N N a a CO A I + + 1 CO a a 0 0 M
I < II 4
) i o
I
o I N
0, A + N I
o o m
! I 1 -
I
1 A a 0 m o CO m a 0 I I 0 41
1 11
N + + — + N
m A m N m + N A N V N m O V P y N N A o O A +O + N a A O
N
I J 1
•
Project No.MAPA-28(110) Exhibit"B"
Control No.22537 Page 11 of 13
Harney St Corridor Feasibility Study ' ,
•
•
I .
HIflIIfl{ fl41!
l N , OOOO (D O
`O c0 .r- O �' pi, 4 fl C Q . E 1
> .+ `O t!i N c9.,* ,mot a E --
:, O • In p; � cP w a p' 0
6-1 0
CD
co 0
O `' n c� a
cGO�. �i CD �r 0 w a "'ri coo ••N Z Z o o •w o 0 •
N N n C!Q a `ts .t N �- CD VQ a�. C7 ;S N CD b N O CD
�.�y` W .. .. A?. n • •
�-. a . to O..N N 8 yA r� N 6..
cr
�� �. ,. w W __, W .� N , C
--• O p `�cD O WOVS ' , CD v, =W \. NO N n N .h N = � p
� + O
N O O .70C4 tn iii UQ n 0 00
Cr
.per, CCD '-< v) CD CDO v, i CCD — p. N 1.1 O C
� CCD CD
40,
.
•
the total cost is currently programmed to be $48,955.69, which
will be paid from the 2010 Transportation Bond Fund 13183, 2012 Issue Transportation Bonds
Organization 117117.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
OMAHA:
THAT, as recommended by the Mayor, the Design Study Services Agreement between the City
of Omaha and Sprinkle Consulting, Inc. for,design study services to assess the feasibility of proposed
multi-modal improvements to the Harney Street corridor between 10`1' Street and 42nd Street, as a part of
the 2013-2018 Capital Improvements Project No. 112, which carries the designation of Federal Aid
Project MAPA-28(110), State Control No. 22537, with the City's share of the study costs, currently
programmed to be $48,955.69, to be paid from the 2010 Transportation Bond Fund 13183, 2012 Issue
Transportation Bonds Organization 117117, is hereby approved.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED:
THAT, the City Council hereby authorizes the Mayor and City Clerk to sign the attached
Agreement on behalf of the City of Omaha.
1585htp
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
DEPUTY CITY ATTORNEY DATE
•
ByQ... ...:... // .. . ...
Ce ilmember
Adopted r 212
D
ity Clerk M417
,2
Approved
Mayor
ayments.
Project No. MAPA-28(110) EXHIBIT "D"
Control No. 22537 Sheet 6 of 7
Harney St Corridor Feasibility Study
Template Dated 3-30-12
Sheet 5 of 7
Harney St Corridor Feasibility Study
Template Dated 3-30-12
N
yr O
0 o DZ
v. m
•
g A
C N
o' 4
r T
c O
N
r c o
3 g z
N
X)
J
N o O
3• O p
m o
m t Nen
. • • o N O fD t in g, o N A A A m
. • N m OI Et d u A
it It
N T
W -J M
m
W N V
CA IV
3 o o G
a p
+ N m
g
P�O
•
0
or
- 0 y
. 9
o N
MM LI$ ,mni V s..yQnI p� N A k �j 0 N A A A 0 0 O a
O pN q4A�A J OJ
V O O J O V
Project No.MAPA-28(110) Exhibit"B"
Control No.22537 Page 13 of 13
Harney St Corridor Feasibility Study
o ' rp
fa 11a a s
1 •
INN i a + + -• t + as co
0
W COW CON N N A p N N m
1 • 11
N N a a CO A I + + 1 CO a a 0 0 M
I < II 4
) i o
I
o I N
0, A + N I
o o m
! I 1 -
I
1 A a 0 m o CO m a 0 I I 0 41
1 11
N + + — + N
m A m N m + N A N V N m O V P y N N A o O A +O + N a A O
N
I J 1
•
Project No.MAPA-28(110) Exhibit"B"
Control No.22537 Page 11 of 13
Harney St Corridor Feasibility Study ' ,
•
•
I .