Loading...
RES 2013-0532 - Agmt with Carollo Engineers Inc for OPW 52193, 49th and Caldwell area sewer separation project rtt � F t � °s� Public Works Department + � p Omaha/Douglas Civic Center et,. « April 23, 2013 3 '' r ?� I �'s 1 1 ! �' ` ` 1819 Farnam Street,Suite 601 ®4r F 11",F Omaha,Nebraska 68183-0601 �o �ry (402)444-5220 04, FEBRUr C' C L._I`+1`, Fax(402)444-5248 City of Omaha k'1 A "' 4` �y -} 1� i Robert G.Stubbe,P.E. Jim Suttle,Mayor Public Works Director Honorable President and Members of the City Council, Transmitted herewith is a Resolution approving Amendment No. 1 to a Professional Services Agreement with Carollo Engineers, Inc. to perform the study phase and conceptual design phase work for the 49th and Caldwell Area Sewer Separation project, known as OPW 52193, was approved by Council Resolution No. 589 on May 1. 2012. The attached Amendment to the Agreement authorizes Carollo Engineers, Inc. to conduct preliminary design, final design, and bid phase services for the 49`" and Caldwell Area Sewer Separation project. The exact scope of services is included in the attached Amendment. Carollo Engineers, Inc. has agreed to perform the services detailed in Amendment I of the attached agreement for a fee not to exceed $1,059,245 to be paid from Sewer Revenue Improvements Fund 21124, Sewer Separation Organization 1 16912: Sewer Rcvenur, Bonds will be issued to finance this project. Carollo Engineers, Inc. has filed the required Contract Compliance Report, Form CC-1, in the 1-luman Rights and Relations Department. The Public Works Department requests your consideration and approval of the attached Resolution and Amendment to the Professional Services Agreement. Respectfully submitted, Reterrehl-to ity Council for Consideration: b rt G ���� 3 .. ---- - RoMayor's -- ---�------- Date Stubbe, P.E. Date �-Iayor s Office ;' Public Works Director Approved as to Funding: Approved. afj" 9-0 Allen Herink Date Human Rights and Relations ate Acting Finance Director r)epanment 036djr AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO THE AGREEMENT FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR OPW 52193—49TH & CALDWELL AREA SEWER SEPARATION (RNC) PROJECT The Professional Services Agreement between the City of Omaha, Nebraska (OWNER) and Carollo Engineers, Inc. (ENGINEER) dated May 1, 2012 for professional services to provide study phase services is hereby amended as follows: ENGINEER is obligated to comply with the Utilization of Small and Emerging Small Businesses as provided in Exhibit A. Section VIII. INDEMNIFICATION of the Professional Services Agreement is hereby replaced with the following: VIII. INDEMNIFICATION The ENGINEER agrees, to the fullest extent permitted by law, to indemnify, defend and hold harmless the CITY, its officers, directors and employees (collectively, CITY) against all damages, liabilities or costs, including reasonable attorneys' fees and defense costs, to the extent caused by the ENGINEER's negligent performance of professional services under this AGREEMENT and that of its subconsultants or anyone for whom the ENGINEER is legally liable. The CITY agrees, to the fullest extent permitted by law, to indemnify and hold harmless the ENGINEER, its officers, directors, employees and subconsultants (collectively, ENGINEER) against all damages, liabilities or costs, including reasonable attorneys' fees and defense costs in connection with the PROJECT, to the extent caused by the CITY's negligent acts or the negligent acts of anyone for whom the CITY is legally liable. Neither the CITY nor the ENGINEER shall be obligated to indemnify the other party in any manner whatsoever for the other party's own negligence. Neither party shall be liable to the other for consequential damages, including, without limitations, loss of use or loss of profits, incurred by one another or their subsidiaries or successors. Paragraph K of Section X. GENERAL CONDITIONS of the Professional Services Agreement is hereby replaced with the following: K. Equal Employment Opportunity Clause. Annexed and made a part hereof by reference are the equal employment provisions of this contract. All reference to "Contractor" shall mean "ENGINEER". Refusal by the ENGINEER to comply with any portion of this program as therein stated and described will subject the offending party to any or all of the following penalties: (1) Withholding of all future payments under the involved contracts to the ENGINEER in violation until it is determined that the ENGINEER is in compliance with the provisions of the contract; 1 (2) Refusal of all future bids for any contracts with the ENGINEER or any of its departments or divisions until such time as the ENGINEER demonstrates that they have established and shall carry out the policies of the program as herein outlined. Contract Compliance Ordinance No. 35344, Section 10-192 Equal Employment Opportunity Clause During the performance of this contract, the Contractor agrees as follows: 1) The Contractor shall not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of race, religion, color, sex, age, sexual orientation, gender identity, national origin, or disability as defined by the Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990 and Omaha Municipal Code 10- 192 and 13-89. The Contractor shall ensure that applicants are employed and that employees are treated during employment without regard to their race, religion, color, sex, age, sexual orientation, gender identity, disability or national origin. The Contractor shall take all actions necessary to comply with the Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990 and Omaha Municipal Code including, but not limited to, reasonable accommodation. As used herein, the word "treated" shall mean and include, without limitation, the following: Recruited, whether advertising or by other means; compensated; selected for training, including apprenticeship; promoted; upgraded; demoted; downgraded; transferred; laid off and terminated. The Contractor agrees to and shall post in conspicuous places, available to employees and applicants for employment, notices to be provided by the contracting officers setting forth the provisions of this nondiscrimination clause. 2) The Contractor shall, in all solicitations or advertisements for employees placed by or on behalf of the Contractor; state that all qualified applicants will receive consideration for employment without regard to race, religion, color, sex, age, sexual orientation, gender identity, disability or national origin. 3) The Contractor shall send to each labor union or representative of workers with which he has a collective bargaining agreement or other contract or understanding a notice advising the labor union or worker's representative of the Contractor's commitments under the equal employment opportunity clause of the City of Omaha, Nebraska, and shall post copies of the notice in conspicuous places available to employees and applicants for employment. 4) The Contractor shall furnish to the contract compliance officer all federal forms containing the information and reports required by the federal government for federal contracts under federal rules and regulations, and including the information required by Omaha Municipal Code sections 10- 192 to 10-194, inclusive, and shall permit reasonable access to his records. Records accessible to the contract compliance officer shall be those which are related to paragraphs (1) through (7) of this subsection and only after reasonable notice is given the Contractor. The purpose of this provision is 2 to provide for investigation to ascertain compliance with the program provided for herein. 5) The Contractor shall take such actions with respect to any subcontractor as the City may direct as a means of enforcing the provisions of paragraphs (1) through (7) herein, including penalties and sanctions for noncompliance; however, in the event the Contractor becomes involved in or is threatened with litigation as the result of such directions by the City, the City will enter into such litigation as is necessary to protect the interests of the City and to effectuate these provisions (of this division); and in the case of contracts receiving federal assistance, the Contractor or the City may request the United States to enter into such litigation to protect the interests of the United States. 6) The Contractor shall file and shall cause his subcontractors, if any to file compliance reports with the Contractor in the same form and to the same extent as required by the federal government for federal contracts under federal rules and regulations. Such compliance reports shall be filed with the contract compliance officer. Compliance reports filed at such times as directed shall contain information as to the employment practices, policies, programs and statistics of the Contractor and its subcontractors. 7) The Contractor shall include the provisions of paragraphs (1) through (7) of this section, "Equal Employment Opportunity Clause," and Section 10- 193 in every subcontract or purchase order so that such provisions will be binding upon each subcontractor or vendor. A detailed description of the scope of work and services to be performed is listed in Exhibit B. In summary, this amendment incorporates additional services for preliminary design, final design, and bid phase services for the OPW 52193 — 49th & Caldwell Area Sewer Separation (RNC) Project based on the Study phase completed for the project. Compensation for the services in the Amendment shall be on an hourly basis as outlined in Section IV of the May 1, 2012 Agreement. The estimated man-hours for this additional work are shown in Exhibit C. The maximum amount for the services covered by this amendment shall not exceed one million fifty nine thousand two hundred forty five Dollars ($1,059,245) without prior written authorization by the City of Omaha. This amendment does not change any of the provisions of the original contract. In accordance with the provisions of the May 1, 2012 Agreement; 3 l This Amendment is executed by ENGINEER thiseP day of-re4 . 2013. (A44 -)/1/ BEy1' . R ,› ---- ATTEST ,-'-„", ,, `.-. l, 'e.c ?".Ps.d , . -.. 0'itie) By r1L(.r 1.1 it_447Ej ' gL4 4 .140-144d- CY.ec+ -Vi\it_ tic 9,rc.sute #-- (Title) This Amendment is executed by OWNER this o day of /SrY/, 2013. A'1TEST CITY OF OMAHA,A Municipal Corporation AP City Clerk /or APPROVED AS TO FORM: , „, „-------ki Deputy City Attorney 4 EXHIBIT "A" UTILIZATION OF SMALL AND EMERGING SMALL BUSINESSES It is the policy of the City of Omaha that Small and Emerging Small Businesses shall have the maximum practicable opportunity to participate in City of Omaha projects. With regard to this AGREEMENT, the following Certified Professional Service Provider(s) have been identified and contracted with to perform the identified project tasks: Scope of work or Projected project tasks to be commencement and performed completion date of Name of small or work Agreed price with emerging small SB/ESB o business Address Percentage(/o) R.W. 6225 N 89th Surveying,Easem April 2013 $257,580.00 24% Engineering and Circle, Omaha NE ent Preparation, October 2014 Surveying, Inc. 68134 Utility Coordination and drafting $257,580.00 24% Totals CERTIFICATION The undersigned certifies that he/she is legally authorized by the ENGINEER to make the statements and representations regarding small and/or emerging small business participation and that said statements and representations are true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge and belief. The undersigned will enter into formal agreement(s) with the identified small and/or emerging small business(es) (which are otherwise deemed by the City of Omaha to be technically responsible to perform the work) listed at the price(s) set forth in this Exhibit conditioned upon execution of a AGREEMENT by the undersigned with the City of Omaha. The ENGINEER agrees that if any of the representation made regarding utilization of small and/or emerging small business by the ENGINEER knowing them to be false,or if there is a failure by the ENGINEER to implement the stated agreements,intentions,objectives,goals,and comments set forth herein without prior approval of the Public Works Director, such action shall constitute a material breach of the AGREEMENT, entitling the City of Omaha to terminate the AGREEMENT for default. The right to so terminate shall be in addition to,and not in lieu of,any other rights or remedies the City of Omaha may have for other defaults under the AGREEMENT, under City of Omaha's Contract Compliance Ordinance or otherwise. Additionally,the ENGINEER will be subject to the terms of any future Professional service awards. Signature Title: Vice President Date of Signing Firm or Corporate Name:Carollo Engineers,Inc. Address: 11422 Miracle Hills Drive, Suite 115, Omaha NE,68154 Telephone Number:402-496-4088 5 EXHIBIT "B" SCOPE OF SERVICES AMENDMENT NO. 1 OPW 52193 49th & Caldwell Area Sewer Separation (RNC) ENGINEER shall provide preliminary engineering design, final engineering design and bidding assistance to the CITY as outlined in the task descriptions described herein. Preliminary design shall be based on the recently completed 10% Study phase documents, as approved by the CITY, along with all field investigations results and utility coordination information. An additional amendment may be prepared if Services During Construction, or construction inspection and administration services are needed, as determined by the CITY. ENGINEER shall perform the preliminary and final engineering design and bidding assistance services in accordance with CITY and CSO Program Plans, Protocols, Procedures, Standards, and Guidance Documents. These documents can be found on the CSO Web Portal in the following location: http://www.omahacsopt.com/projects/Shared%20Documents/Forms/Document%20Group.aspx The following documents are hereby included in this Scope of Services by reference: Document Name Document Date • PLANS Combined Sewer Overflow Control Program Quality Management Plan 05/26/2010 Risk Management Plan 04/12/2010 Environmental Plan Updated June 2012 PROTOCOLS Sewer Separation Protocol Rev. 0.01 Updated 07/30/2010 Construction Management Protocol 06/27/2012 PROCEDURES City of Omaha Manhole and Lamping Inspection Procedure Revision 2 I Updated 03/12/2012 City of Omaha Pipeline Inspection Procedure Using Closed Circuit Updated 03/12/2012 Television Revision 2 • • Public Information Procedure for CSO and RNC Projects Updated 12/12/2011 ROW Management and Property Acquisition Procedure for(Non-Federal) I Updated 09/16/2010 6 Projects.............._._. _. . Geotechnical Investigations Procedure for Sewer Separation Projects Updated 06/30/2010 I City of Omaha Smoke and Dye Testing Procedure(Revision 2) Updated 03/12/2012 Utility Coordination Procedure Updated 07/19/2012 STANDARDS 03/15/2010 Omaha CSO Program CAD Standards with Update 04/26/2010 With 04/26/2010 Update InfoWorks Modeling Standard Updated 06/24/2010 Interim Flow Monitoring Standard,Rev. 0 12/30/2011 Public Works Department Design Division Surveying Proposals Guidelines for Preparation and Presentation 03/04/2011 GUIDANCE DOCUMENTS Sewer Separation Deliverable Expectations Guidance Documents 05/19/2012 Sewer Separation Cost Estimate Template Guidance Updated 06/04/2010 Omaha Green Solutions Site Suitability Assessment and BMP Selection 12/21/2009 Process Guidance Document Private Property Investigation Guidance Updated 07/12/2010 Sanitary Sewer Design Basis and Methodology Guidance Updated 06/27/2010 Storm Sewer Design Basis and Methodology Guidance Updated 06/27/2010 Sustainability Guidance Updated 01/04/2011 Urban Design Review Board Guidance Updated 12/20/2010 CSO Project Communication: PMT and Project Teams Technical Updated 10/2012 Memorandum Notes: 1. Any documents listed above may be updated during the duration of the project. In the event that a change is made to a document that affects the scope of work included herein, a contract change may be required. 2. City of Omaha Standard Specifications and Plates shall be used, where applicable, unless special conditions require modification. Modifications are to be approved by the CITY. 7 TASK 1 -- PROJECT MANAGEMENT Objective: Provide for the overall project management and administration, project coordination, public involvement and neighborhood coordination throughout the duration of the PROJECT. Deliverables: Updated Quality Control Plan; Updated Project Health and Safety Plan; Updated Project Execution Plan; monthly invoices; monthly progress reports; monthly schedule updates; progress meeting and other meeting minutes. Scope: 1.1. Project Management and Administration. ENGINEER to provide project management and administrative activities including: 1.1.1. Project Management and Administration. ENGINEER shall monitor progress and schedule and facilitate coordination of the PROJECT design elements; Prepare monthly invoicing with estimated percentage of work complete by contract task; prepare monthly progress reports; scope, schedule, and budget tracking; provide staffing management and contract administration; maintain communication with PMT; maintain Quality Control; provide monthly PROJECT schedule updates; If not on schedule or budget, explain reasons for deviations and mitigation plan to rectify. File project documents on the Project page of the Program Web Portal and provide a hard copy of all deliverables to the PMO Library. 1.1.2. Updated Quality Control Plan (QCP). ENGINEER will review and update the existing QCP prepared as part of the study phase and update in accordance with the CSO Progrm Quality Management Plan (QMP). QCP should address field data QC as required in Field Services Procedures. Maintain QCP throughout the duration of the project. 1.1.3. Updated Project Health and Safety Plan (HSP). The ENGINEER is responsible for the health and safety of its employees and confirming that ENGINEER's subcontractors have a good understanding of all PROJECT health and safety requirements. The CITY and PMT put a high value on the safety of all personnel working on delivery of the CSO Program. ENGINEER will review and update the project specific HSP prepared as part of the study phase to apply to employees working on this PROJECT. The HSP will address safety in the office, site visits, and field investigations, shall include OWNER and PMT requirements and shall be consistent with the CSO Program Protocols. Engineer shall provide health and safety plan cover pages from any subcontractors not involved in the study phase. 1.1.4. Updated Project Execution Plan (PEP). ENGINEER will update the PEP that was created during study phase with all relevant preliminary and final design information in accordance with the requirements set forth in the project delivery plan, protocols, plans, procedures, standards and guidance documents prepared by the PMT. The PEP will include project procedures, 8 CAD drafting standards, GIS coordination and deliverable format requirements, filing standards, public involvement coordination, project team organization, and a detailed project schedule developed in Microsoft Project with associated deliverable dates. Maintain PEP throughout the duration of the project. 1.1.5. Initial Project Kickoff Meeting. ENGINEER will conduct the initial project kickoff meeting with PMT. The purpose of the meeting will be to review the project approach, PEP, project goals/objectives and preliminary design; establish project communication procedures; and establish the project schedule. ENGINEER will prepare minutes for the meeting and distribute electronically in Microsoft Word format. 1.1.6. Monthly PMT Meeting. ENGINEER will conduct monthly progress meetings with the PMT for the duration of the PROJECT to provide updates on project progress, budget and schedule status, current project issues, and public involvement activities. Anticipated future activities and PMT needs will be discussed. ENGINEER will be responsible for arranging the meeting, preparing an agenda, conducting the meeting, and taking and distributing meeting notes. Fifteen (15) progress meetings are assumed based on the preliminary schedule. 1.2. Agency and Project Coordination. ENGINEER will provide agency and project coordination activities including: 1.2.1. Utility Coordination. ENGINEER will provide for the communication with the utilities in the project area including notification of the project, requests for facility information, requests for clarifications, transmittal of drawings, and meetings to discuss the project per the Utility Coordination Procedure. ENGINEER will send utility requests directly to the utility companies with copies of the requests to the PMT utility coordinator. ENGINEER will be responsible for setting up and updating a utility tracking log throughout the PROJECT, maintaining it throughout the PROJECT, and taking and distributing meeting notes and incorporating utility information into the design of the PROJECT. ENGINEER will be responsible for providing utilities with relevant project information to facilitate with any required design work for replacement or relocation of their existing infrastructure within the PROJECT area. The ENGINEER will identify one person from the Project Team who will act as the singular contact throughout the PROJECT to request information from the Utilities. 1.2.2. Agency Coordination and Permitting. Agency coordination will be conducted in conformance with the Environmental Plan and under the oversight of the PMT's Compliance Coordinator. Communication with the impacted agencies will be in conformance with the Environmental Plan. The impacted agencies may include the Nebraska State Historic Preservation Office, the Nebraska Department of Environmental Quality, EPA Region 7, and the CITY's Quality Control Division. ENGINEER will be responsible for 9 taking and distributing meeting notes and incorporating Agency information into the design of the PROJECT. 1.2.3. CITY Agency Coordination. ENGINEER will provide for meetings through the CITY Project Manager with CITY Agencies including other divisions within the Public Works Department, Planning Department, and Parks, Recreation and Public Property Department. Meetings will be held as necessary to maintain open lines of communication, obtain feedback on design elements that may impact other departments and allow for design reviews/comments (2 meetings budgeted). Coordination with the City Planning Department regarding Urban Design Review Board approvals shall be in accordance with the Urban Design Review Board Guidance. 1.2.4. GIS Coordination. This task includes GIS coordination work for the ENGINEER as well as coordination with the CITY/PMT to manage and update CITY GIS information for the PROJECT. This includes providing necessary electronic files and information developed as part of the PROJECT to the CITY/PMT for updating the CITY's GIS database. If any GIS deliverables are submitted as part of this project, all GIS deliverables (in any task) should be created in ESRI's ArcGIS ArcMap v10.0 software, be in a file geodatabase format (shapefiles or personal geodatabase formats are not acceptable), and the use of the City of Omaha's GIS metadata XML template to populate new data with required metadata. 1.2.5. Program Management and Technical Team Meetings. This task includes program management and technical team meetings anticipated during the course of the project. Meetings will be held between the ENGINEER, CITY, PMT, and SUBCONSULTANTS (2 meetings budgeted). 1.3. Public Involvement and Neighborhood Coordination. ENGINEER shall communicate with the impacted property owners, businesses, schools, and neighborhood associations affected by the PROJECT; organize and conduct meetings to discuss the PROJECT scope and schedule; develop correspondence regarding PROJECT; and prepare exhibits. ENGINEER shall be responsible for the following: 1.3.1. Conduct One (1) 60% Design Public Meeting. The ENGINEER will organize and conduct a public PROJECT 60% to 80% design level meeting in coordination with neighborhood associations and other stakeholders. The ENGINEER will determine the distribution list for the public meetings, prepare and distribute the public meeting notifications according to the Public Information Procedure, arrange for the meeting place, arrangements and logistics for the meetings and prepare the presentation, agenda, sign-in sheets, meeting notes and other items as necessary, and as reviewed by the PMT. The purpose of the "Open House" style meeting will be to review the overall PROJECT design plans, including proposed schedule, potential community enhancements discussions, and opportunities for public input. ENGINEER will prepare presentation materials including Power Point presentations, 10 hardboards, maps, design drawings and handouts to present at the meeting, and take minutes for the meeting and distribute electronically in Microsoft Word format for draft and PDF format for final. 1.3.2. Conduct Stakeholder Communications. Plan and implement one-on-one and small group meetings with impacted stakeholders (such as neighborhood associations, businesses, schools, churches, organizations, elected officials, community leaders in PROJECT area), PMT, and CITY agencies to coordinate proposed improvements, green infrastructure, community enhancements, and construction impacts (2 meetings budgeted). A meeting is expected near completion of 30 percent design to discuss community enhancements with neighborhood associations. A second meeting is budgeted as a follow up on community enhancements or as needed to improve communications with impacted stakeholders. 1.3.3. Develop CSO/RNC Program Public Website Content. 1.3.3.1. Write PROJECT description and provide photos or exhibits to the Program Public Facilitator (PPF) to be posted to the projects section of the CSO Program public website. 1.3.3.2. Provide all public meeting information to the PPF per the Public Information Procedure. 1.3.3.3. Provide a draft of any news opportunities to the PPF for coordination with the Program media communications and provide copies of any printed news items to be posted to the news archives on the public website. 11 TASK 2—(NOT INCLUDED) TASK 3—PRELIMINARY (30%) DESIGN Field Work and Data Acquisition Objective: Perform field investigations to acquire data sufficient to complete 30% design of the Project. Collected data will supplement field investigation results obtained during the field investigation and conceptual design phases of the project. Deliverables: Survey Data(both field books and electronic) Geotechnical Report Manhole condition assessments CCTV Scope: 3.1. Topographic Survey. Perform a site survey in sufficient detail to prepare construction documents. The survey shall follow the proposed pipe routing defined in conceptual design. Survey for the sewers within the neighborhood shall extend from the street centerline to the house. The survey of the route through undeveloped areas shall extend 50 feet on each side of the proposed centerline. Survey shall be performed in accordance with the Public Works Department Design Division Survey Standards. Survey field book and survey digital data shall be given to the CITY upon completion of final design. Features include edge of pavement, edge of gravel, culverts, pipes, boxes, structures, drives, fences, and utilities, trees and landscaping will be located in the improved areas. See Figure 1 for limits of topographic survey area. Prepare informational door hanger letter to to residents before starting any surveying work. A draft copy of the letter will be sent to the PMT for review. Door hangers will be hand delivered to all homes within the limits of the topographic survey area. Copies of the letter will be kept with the surveyors and handed out to residents that approach with questions. 3.2. Utility Input into CADD. Based on information obtained from the utilities at the Utility Coordination Meeting, input utility locations into CADD not picked up by the topographic survey. 3.3. Subsurface Utility Exploration. Perform Subsurface Utility Exploration (SUE) for key utilities based on information obtained from the utility companies. An allowance of 1 individual pothole of SUE work is included for areas that are not performed by the utilities themselves. A cost allowance of $1,910per pothole is included to employ a Contractor to perform potholing including traffic control and surface restoration. Proposed SUE work will be reviewed with CITY and PMT, and proceed only upon authorization by the CITY. The SUE pothole will be backfilled and and a temporary patch will be provided. CITY will provide and install a permanent roadway patch at pothole location. 12 3.4. Geotechnical Investigations. A subsurface exploration shall be performed in accordance with the Geotechnical Investigation Procedure for Sewer Separation Projects. Geotechnical investigations will include 32 test borings located at critical locations and spaced at intervals as shown on the attached map. The boring locations will be adjusted based on equipment access, site conflicts, utility clearance issues and sites of environmental concern noted in the EDR report and identified during the conceptual phase. At boring location sites in areas of environmental concern, a photoinonization detector (PID) shall be used to check for indications of potential petroleum hydrocarbons. The geotechnical investigations will include the use of a PID on nine (9) test borings. If detectable PID readings are identified during the PID screening, sample contamination analysis in accordance with additional services in section 8.5 will be implemented. Water samples will also be obtained if in sufficient quantity to sample in borings where detectable PID readings are identified. Right of entry will be obtained by the CITY and all boring locations must be readily accessible. Perform test borings to obtain geologic information and samples of the soils, and laboratory tests to determine the relevant engineering properties of the various soil strata. Boring depths are intended to extend 5- to 10-feet below excavation level to permit assessment of excavation stability and possible shoring. If trenchless installation techniques are anticipated, this investigation shall evaluate and provide design criteria/parameters for this construction. See Figure 2 for proposed boring locations. 3.5. Manhole Condition Assessment. Perform Level 4 — Complete Condition Assessment manhole inventories, condition assessments and connectivity determination within the project area, as required, per the Manhole and Lamping Inspection Procedure. Approximately 2 total structures will be investigated as shown in Figure 3. 3.6. Street Corings. Perform street coring to determine composition and thickness of existing street surfacing and street base materials. Coring of the street section will include thirty-eight (38) proposed locations as shown in Figure 4. Perform analysis of existing materials to determine bearing capacities and suitability for long term reliability. Investigation shall also address adjacent streets that may be used for access routes to the construction area. This information will help to determine which streets will or will not hold up to construction activities (especially if the pavement is cut into) so the ENGINEER can properly determine pavement removal/replacement areas in coordination with existing street and curb conditions and utility impacts. Include results of investigations and evaluations in the geotechnical report. 3.7. CCTV Investigation. Perform additional CCTV as necessary. The CCTV allowance includes cleaning, televising and review of existing piping in the project area, as required, and is based on an estimated 1644 feet of sewer performed in accordance with the Pipeline Inspection Using CCTV Procedure. See Figure 5 for CCTV locations. 13 3.8. Rehabilitation Recommendations. The CITY is NOT looking for manhole or pipe rehabilitation or replacement recommendations as part of these plans and specifications UNLESS it is needed to immediately make the existing sewer separation function properly as designed. Examples include: Cured-in-Place (CIPP) lining to provide structural integrity to an unstable sewer line that is to be converted to a storm or sanitary sewer, OR replacement of a highly unstable existing sewer or manhole that could not withstand construction of the proposed new facilities due to the close horizontal and vertical proximity. The ENGINEER shall discuss possible recommendations early on with PMT and CITY staff to get confirmation or obtain direction on what rehabilitation to proceed with and incorporate into the PROJECT, if any. 3.9. Geotechnical Report. A geotechnical report shall be prepared and will discuss the general soil and ground water conditions underlying the site; provide an estimate of the dewatering flow rate anticipated at the boring locations for use in preparing the dewatering permit; present the relevant engineering properties of the existing soils and PID results, if applicable; provide excavation and earthwork recommendations including minimum setbacks from adjacent structures; and recommend design criteria and parameters for pipe bedding, pavements, and other earth supported improvements. ENGINEER shall provide the CITY with electronic files of all geotechnical test boring locations (and identification numbers referenced in the geotechnical report) created while preparing the Geotechnical Report. ENGINEER shall coordinate with the PMT to assure that minimum data attributes are provided with the electronic data. Private Property Investigations Objective: This task will consist summarizing investigations at private properties that have already been completed in the PROJECT area. The private property investigations will help identify critical elevations to be served, and will help determine routing and prioritize phasing for the project area. Deliverables: The key deliverables will be map summarizing private property inflow and inflitraion results and private property addresses of each defect identified. Scope: 3.10. Sewer Backup Investigation: Perform an investigation on as many as five (5) properties to resolve sewer backup discrepancies noted in the Study Phase of the project or as needed. Specifically the investigation will focus on determining if a rain related backup actually occurred and will include a letter to the homeowner and/or renter, potential phone correspondence, and face-to-face meeting at the property in question if needed. Results will be summarized in the 30% BODR. 14 Inflow Source Investigations. Investigate properties in the project area that have area or driveway drains and determine if such drains can be directed to proposed storm sewers. 3.11. Investigation Results. Note inflow locations, backup descrepency investiogations, and service lateral locations (if required per additional services) on a base map to be incorporated into design. Summarize private property defects, describe type of defect, and denote addresses of defects and provide summary to the City. Green Infrastructure Evaluations Objective: Perform continued evaluation and preliminary design of green infrastructure based on the results of the pre-screening review of candidate green solution locations and localized BMP's by the CITY and PMT staff during the 10% Conceptual Design phase and as identified during the design phase. Deliverables: Green Infrastructure Technical Memorandum Scope: 3.13. Draft Green Infrastructure TM. Update the Green Infrastructure Technical Memorandum, per the Green Solutions in Sewer Separation Guidance. Updates to the Green Infrastructure Technical Memorandum shall include the proposed green infrastructure elements identified as feasible during pre-screening and through continued evaluation. An allowance has been made for evaluation of up to two (2) additional stormwater BMPs , including screening efforts, conceptual layout, and an OPC. The potential savings to the storm sewer system associated with implementation of the green infrastructure will also be presented. 3.14. Review Draft TM. Review the draft Green Infrastructure TM with the CITY and PMT and prepare meeting minutes. 3.15. Address Review Comments. The review comments from the PMT and City staff will be addressed and the final Green Infrastructure Technical Memorandum will be submitted for final review. 30% Design Deliverable Objective: Develop 30% design deliverables for review and utility coordination. The 30% design deliverable is meant to provide a preliminary determination of alignment and depth of proposed storm and sanitary sewers and/or conversion of the existing combined sewer to either storm or sanitary, in relationship to existing utilities and street features based on the level of information available. Deliverables: Preliminary drawings of the proposed sewer improvements including known utilities. Copies will be provided in printed and electronic format in accordance with the Sewer Separation Protocol. Deliverables shall be based on the 30% Deliverables Guidance document for the Basis of Design Report and 30% Design Drawings. 15 Scope: 3.16. Hydrologic and Hydraulic Modeling and Calculations. Update the hydrologic and hydraulic calculations based on layout of the proposed system. The final storm sewer layout will be set after completion of the topographic survey, field investigations, and review of potential conflicts. The proposed pipe system will be adjusted as necessary to maintain the sewer flow without surcharging the pipes or manholes beyond acceptable design limits. 3.17. Flooding Analysis for Country Club Ave./Saddle Creek Rd. Refine existing model to include 60 to 84-in combined sewer in Coutnry Club Ave/Saddle Creek Rd. Model the 100-yr, 24-hr, storm event to determine extent of flooding in Country Club Avenue and Saddle Creek Road in the project area. PMT will assist project team in development of boundary conditions. If available, 100-yr, 24-hr, hydrographs for upstream infrastructure (i.e. Country Club Phase II) will be provided to the project team_ 3.18. System Refinement. Review the proposed storm and sanitary systems for conflicts with existing utilities, routing limitations, and constructability issues. Adjust the proposed storm and sanitary sewer systems as necessary to eliminate conflicts wherever reasonably possible including selecting and evaluating alternate alignments; revising inlet locations; and adjusting pipe inverts. Throughout 30% Preliminary Design continue to evaluate utility conflicts, cost, and constructability of both full and partial separation in Area C (primarily 50th St.). A final decision will be made by the City on full separation or partial separation(potentially leaving stub-outs on some branches) for all Areas after 60%design plan review. 3.19. Proposed Routing Field Investigation. ENGINEER will coordinate a ENGINEER site visit with the PMT as part of a Monthly Progress meeting to field verify the route of the proposed sewer system at critical locations prior to commencement of the topographic survey to evaluate for constructability, if required. Sewer layout to be adjusted based on the findings. 3.20. Hydraulic Performance. Verify the capacity and performance of the adjusted storm and sanitary sewer systems to ensure the proposed pipes and manholes do not surcharge beyond acceptable design limits. Adjust as needed to meet this criterion. Sanitary sewer system shall be designed in conformance with the Sanitary Sewer Design Basis and Methodology Guidance. Storm sewer design shall be in conformance with the Storm Sewer Design Basis and Methodology Guidance. 3.21. Finalize Routing and Sizes. Update the system layout based on the topographic survey. Evaluate for conflicts and adjust accordingly. Evaluate the hydraulic performance and adjust the pipe sizes and inverts accordingly. 3.22. Plan and Profile Sheets. Import the topographic survey and develop the plan/profile sheets. The scale for the plan and profile sheets shall be 1-inch equals 16 20 feet horizontally and 1-inch equals 5 ft vertically. Some clean-up of survey data is generally necessary so that the plan sheets are not overly cluttered as per the CAD Standards. Import available utility drawings. Show proposed storm sewer improvements. Show proposed green infrastructure location and type (no detailed green infrastructure drawings on plan/profile sheets). 3.23. Utility Relocation Coordination. Coordinate utility relocation requirements with affected utilities. Minimize utility relocation and design utility crossings by field verifying critical elevations, including locations of existing manholes, utilities, and sewer infrastructure along preferred alignments. 3.24. Pavement Removal and Replacement. Perform pavement assessment along the proposed pipe routing and potential construction routes as defined in the conceptual phase. The visual evaluation of pavement and ramp conditions from the conceptual phase along with pavement corings will be used as part of that asssement. Recommendations of pavement removal and replacement will be provided. Identify and incorporate pavement removal and replacement limits along with anticipated intersection radii modifications and sidewalk and handicap ramp construction (conservative estimates at this stage). Determine preliminary pavement removal and replacement areas while taking into consideration existing street and curb conditions, and potential utility impacts to the City right-of-way and pavement due to relocations and replacements. Intersection improvements will include incorporation of minimum 25-foot radii upgrades at intersections identified by the CITY along arterial and collector street intersections along the proposed construction alignments. Updated ADA curb ramps will generally be designed for all four corners at every intersection affected along the project alignment. Intersection and ramp improvements shall be designed in accordance with guidance the CITY will provide during final design. Estimated costs for the potential pavement removal and replacements and intersection radii and curb ramp requirements should be included in the 30%construction cost estimates. 3.25. Inflow/Infiltration Reduction Requirements. All sewer separation projects will include a minimum amount of rehabilitation and new construction measures to minimize and eliminate some direct sources of storm and ground water inflow and infiltration in both sanitary and storm sewer manholes, whether in pavement or in non-paved areas. These measures include: (1) installing external frame seals and solid manhole covers on all new manholes; (2) installing external frame seals on all existing manholes exposed during construction, which may include rebuilding risers; (3) cut out, expose, rebuild risers if necessary, and install external frame seals on all existing manholes which are on sanitary sewers or on pipes that are being changed from combined to sanitary sewers; (4) replace existing perforated manhole covers with solid covers (and new frame if necessary) on all existing sewers which are changed from combined to sanitary sewers, AND on any existing sanitary sewers (especially upstream branches that feed into these renovated sewers). This work will be included in the final design project plans and specifications for the direct project area at a minimum, and to the extent of the system outside of the project area as determined through discussions with the PMT. 17 Estimated costs for the above I/I reduction requirements should be included in the 30% construction cost estimates. 3.26. Permits. In collaboration with the PMT Compliance Team in accordance with the Environmental Plan, develop a preliminary list of the potential permits and clearances needed for this PROJECT. Communications with permitting agencies need to be done in conformance with the Environmental Plan. No permit applications are anticipated for performance of field investigations or surveying for preliminary and final design services. 3.27. Project Phasing and Scheduling. Develop a project phasing and sequencing, if applicable, and discuss in the technical memorandum. It is assumed that the project will not be separated into multiple construction contracts. 3.28. Right-of-Way Requirements. Prepare right-of-way requirements for the construction of the new sewer system per the ROW Management and Property Acquisition Procedure. The right-of-way requirements are to be shown on the plans and discussed in the technical memorandum. Summarize potential properties impacted by the project on the ROW Table with current property information. 3.29. Opinion of Probable Construction Cost. Prepare an opinion of probable costs (OPC) based on the (30%) preliminary drawings and level of design. The OPC is to be developed in accordance with the Sewer Separation Protocol and provided in the technical memorandum. 30% Basis of Design Report Objective: Prepare a 30% Basis of Design Report that summarizes the findings, calculations, assumptions, and phasing plan, based on the preliminary design. Deliverables: The key deliverables will be the Basis of Design Report and 30% design drawings per the Basis of Design Report Guidaance and the 30% Design Drawings Guidance. The 30% Urban Design Review Board submittal is also included. Scope: 3.30. Risk Mitigation Strategy. The ENGINEER shall develop an initial risk assessment and mitigation strategy for the risk factors identified in the Sewer Separation Protocol. The Risk Mitigation Strategy TM shall include an identification of risks that should be carried forward to construction contractors as the controlling entity. 3.31. Preliminary Permit List. Include a preliminary list of the permits needed for this PROJECT. 3.32. Preliminary Project Sustainability Strategies. The ENGINEER shall finalize sustainability strategies and quantify anticipated benefits where applicable. The Program Management Team will also provide program expectations regarding the level of achievement for applicable objectives of the rating system. 18 3.33. Basis of Design Report. The 30% Basis of Design Report shall summarize the development of the preliminary plans including field data, GIS data, hydrologic and hydraulic calculations; system sizing; utility coordination; community enhancements, neighborhood coordination; sustainability, risk mitigation strategy, green infrastructure; agency coordination; environmental issues, permits; property acquisition; OPC; and recommendations for final design including phasing and sequencing. 3.34. Plan Distribution. Coordinate with the PMT for the distribution of the 30% deliverables to the review agencies, permitting agencies, utilities, and CITY departments for review and comment. City Traffic will be provided a plan overview map sheet with impacted streets shown to assess potential areas of conduit/signal wire opportunities. 3.35. Utility Coordination Meeting. ENGINEER will conduct a utility coordination meeting per the Utility Coordination Procedure. ENGINEER will be responsible for taking meeting notes and distributing meeting notes. The meeting will be coordinated with the PMT. 3.36. Finalize TM. Address review comments. PMT will endeavor to complete reviews of all PROJECT deliverables within a three week time period; however, this will be dependent on workload at the time of the submittal. Sufficient schedule float shall be included to allow a 4 week review time when necessary. CITY and PMT review comments will be compiled in one Quality Review Form (QRF) document per deliverable and will be submitted to the ENGINEER. ENGINEER will incorporate comments from the QRF into the design. Address/resolve QRF comments. Submit the final TM and drawings to the PMT in accordance with the Sewer Separation Protocol. 3.37. 30% Walkthrough. Coordinate field review and walkthrough using 30% preliminary design plans. The focus of this walkthrough will be on planning, green infrastructure, tree removals and replacements, traffic and street issues, and overall constructability. The CITY and PMT will identify staff to attend the field review. Document walkthrough comments and outcomes for incorporation into the 60% design. 3.38. Urban Design Review Board (UDRB) Submittal. The ENGINEER shall prepare _ the Urban Design Review Board application and the 30% review submittal package required by the UDRB and the City Planning Department for review by City Planning and the UDRB. In general, the UDRB submittal package will include plan-view drawings that clearly show impacts to Green Streets, Tree removals and replacements, Bicycle routes, Areas of Civic Importance (ACI), etc., as identified by the PMT as well as the proposed mitigation of those impacts, showing sufficient details to convey the proposed work, but in a non-technical way. The submittal may require the services of a landscape architect to meet UDRB expectations. Examples of UDRB submittals will be provided to the ENGINEER for reference. A draft review submittal to the Planning Department will be required (3 copies) and a final Board submittal that incorporates Planning 19 Department comments (17 copies). Urban Design Review Board (UDRB) review comments shall be addressed by the ENGINEER and incorporated into the 60% plans and specifications. Engineer shall attend UDBR board meeting to address comments as necessary 20 TASK 4—FINAL DESIGN Additional Field Work and Data Acquisition Objective: Obtain additional field data necessary to complete final design(if required). See additional services additional field work and data acquisition tasks including geotechnical borings, street corings, CCTV, manhole assessments, SUE, and surveying. 60%Design Objective: Develop 60% deliverables for review and utility coordination. The purpose of the 60% design submittal is to provide the CITY and PMT the opportunity to review the plans, specifications, and appurtenant material so that the ENGINEER can proceed in completing the plans, adding all necessary details, notes, etc. Deliverables: Per the 60% Deliverables Guidance, including 60% plans, specifications and addendum to the Basis of Design Report; The 60% design deliverable is meant to be a substantially complete set of construction plans, specifications and addendum to the BODR, per the 60% Deliverables Guidance including the 60% Design Drawings Guidance, 60% Specifications Guidance and the Addendum to BODR Guidance. Scope: 4.1 Request and Review Utility Drawings. As identified in the data gap report, request and review utility location maps as additional drawings become available including sanitary sewer mains and services; street lights; traffic signals; gas main and services; water main and services; underground and overhead electric; telephone facilities; cable TV; and fiber optic cable. 4.2 UDRB Comments. Incorporate UDRB review comments as appropriate in the 60%plans. 4.3 Finalize Sewer Design Calculations. Complete the hydraulic and final design calculations for the proposed storm and sanitary sewer systems. This will include sewer location, ultimate design tributary area, size and slope. A stormwater drainage inlet analysis will be included in areas of proposed construction per protocol. Storm sewer shall be designed in accordance with the City of Omaha Regional Stormwater Design Manual. Sanitary sewer shall be designed in accordance with the CSO Sanitary Sewer Design Basis and Methodology Guidance. A final decision will be made by the City on full separation or partial separation (potentially leaving stub-outs on some branches) for all Areas after 60% design plan review. 21 4.4 On-site Field Review. Conduct one on-site field review meeting with, at a minimum, the CITY Project Manager, PMT Coordinator, Compliance Coordinator and CITY Construction Manager. This meeting is to be held following completion of the geotechnical field investigations and street corings. The purpose of the meeting is to review existing pavement and curb conditions and proposed intersection radii and curb ramp locations, and (in conjunction with geotechnical investigations, coring, and utility information) identify preliminary extent of pavement, curb, driveway, and sidewalk removals/replacements on the plans. 4.5 Design of Roadway Improvements. Full width removal and reconstruction of pavement between intersection improvements (approximately 2,000 linear feet) will include any driveway and sidewalk improvements. The limits of roadway, driveway, and sidewalk improvements will be determined by location, size, and depth of pipe as well as pavement and curb conditions identified in 30 percent design. 4.6 Design of Intersection Improvements. Intersection improvements will include incorporation of minimum 25-foot radii upgrades at intersections identified by the CITY along arterial and collector street intersections along the proposed construction alignments. Updated ADA curb ramps will be designed for all four corners at every intersection affected along the project alignment. Intersection and ramp improvements shall be in accordance with guidance the CITY will provide during final design. Prepare design details for non-standard curb ramp locations. 4.7 Sewer Rehabilitation Recommendations. Findings and recommendations will be summarized for City/PMT review in the 60% Addendum. Findings and recommendations will be based on sewer televising and field investigation results from previous project work in the project area and previous tasks within this contract. 4.7.1 This task will recommend sanitary sewer and manhole rehabilitation and I/I removal construction required to provide a serviceable sanitary sewer system for the tributary area for City review. Recommendations for follow up on non-critical sanitary sewer defects will also be provided. 4.7.2 For existing combined sewers to become separate storm sewers, this task will recommend: • disconnection of any sanitary service connections remaining connected throughout the tributary area • rehabilitation/repair of any critical structural defects throughout the tributary area • rehabilitation/replacement/protection of existing sewers subject to damage during sewer separation construction 22 4.7.3 Sewer rehabilitation recommendations and associated construction cost, if any, for each sewer reach. A database will be developed in Microsoft Excel/Access that identifies each reach, anticipated future use, and potential and recommended rehabilitation options. An associated colored map identifying the recommended rehabilitation shall be included. 4.7.4 Inflow/Infiltration Reduction Requirements. All sewer separation projects will include a minimum amount of rehabilitation and new construction measures to minimize and eliminate some direct sources of storm and ground water inflow and infiltration in both sanitary and storm sewer manholes, whether in pavement or in non-paved areas. These measures include: (1) installing external frame seals and solid manhole covers on all new manholes; (2) installing external frame seals on all existing manholes exposed during construction, which may include rebuilding risers; (3) cut out, expose, rebuild risers if necessary, and install external frame seals on all existing manholes which are on sanitary sewers or on pipes that are being changed from combined to sanitary sewers; (4) replace existing perforated manhole covers with solid covers (and new frame if necessary) on all existing sewers which are changed from combined to sanitary sewers, AND on any existing sanitary sewers (especially upstream branches that feed into these renovated sewers). This work will be included in the project plans and specifications for the direct project area at a minimum, and to the extent of the system outside of the project area as determined through discussions with the PMT. 4.8. Construction Sequencing/Phasing. ENGINEER shall prepare a recommended project sequencing/phasing to maintain sewage flow at all times, to encourage clean-up, to maintain access to businesses, streets, etc. and to include traffic control, detour plans and pedestrian wayfinding, where appropriate. CITY will provide example sequencing/phasing plan and detailed notes, if requested by the ENGINEER. Phasing and sequencing will also consider appropriate methods for sediment and erosion control in conformance with Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plans and required NPDES permitting. It is assumed that the project will not be separated into multiple construction contracts. 4.9. Temporary and Permanent Easement Descriptions and Access Easements. ENGINEER shall prepare documents for easement acquisition. CITY personnel will perform title searches and negotiate the acquisition of the easements. Identify easements and acquistions necessary for construction and provide information required per the ROW Management and Property Acquisition Procedure. Update potential properties impacted by the project on the ROW Table with current property information. Preparation of 60 easement / acquisition documents is anticipated. 4.10. Permits. The ENGINEER will update the list of environmental permits and clearances for the project along with a proposed schedule for submission of 23 applications for the design and construction of the PROJECT. Incorporate permit design requirements as outlined in the Environmental Plan, into the Basis of Design Report. Communications with permitting agencies need to be done in conformance with the Environmental Plan. No permit applications are anticipated for performance of field investigations or surveying for preliminary and final design services. 4.11. Technical Specifications. The ENGINEER, in accordance with the Environmental Plan, will provide technical specifications that address environmental issues associated with the PROJECT including, but not limited to, management of hazardous or contaminated wastes likely to be found onsite, permitting specification and temporary environmental controls. This may include appropriate modifications of technical specifications developed by the PMT to address environmental issues. The ENGINEER will work with the PMT to continue to identify other regulatory criteria or requirements. 4.12. Risk Management. The ENGINEER shall update the mitigation strategy for the risk factors identified and identify methods to mitigate the risks identified. The Risk Mitigation Strategy TM shall include an identification of risks that should be carried forward to construction contractors as the controlling entity. 4.13. Sustainability. The ENGINEER shall update sustainability strategies previously identified. 4.14. Update OPC. Update the bid item list in accordance with the CITY standard bid items (exact wording and units shall be used as much as possible). Develop new bid items as necessary. The CITY shall also provide a list of bid items that are generally included on all sewer separation projects in case they are needed during construction. Engineers Opinion of Probable Construction Cost (OPC) shall be prepared and submitted per the Cost Estimate Template Guidance. 4.15. Prepare Addendum to the Basis of Design Report. An Addendum to the Basis of Design Report will be prepared in accordance with the Deliverable Guidance Document. This report will identify changes or updates to the 30% BODR and should reflect the overall plan methodology, project assumptions, construction phasing or sequencing, field investigations, summary of permit activities, and summaries of the documents included with the 60% submittal. 4.16. Prepare 60% Plans. 60%plan documents shall include the drawings as identified in the Deliverable Guidance Document and include revised City Standard Plates related to 700 Series Technical Specifications. 4.17. Prepare 60% Specifications. Prepare the Division 00 Specifications, Division 01 Specifications, 700 Series Technical Specifications and Supplemental Technical Specifications per the 60% Specification Guidance. The CITY is using the Engineers Joint Contract Documents Committee (EJCDC) contract documents. Special Provisions and Supplemental Specifications shall be provided for special items and work not covered in the City of Omaha Standard Specifications. The 24 CITY and PMT may also provide some Technical Specifications and Plan Details to be utilized by the ENGINEER, if necessary. 4.18. Prepare Preliminary Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP). Prepare the preliminary SWPPP in accordance with the Environmental Plan. 4.19. Prepare Preliminary Post-Construction Stormwater Management Plan. Prepare the preliminary Post-Construction Stormwater Management Plan in accordance with the Environmental Plan. 4.20. Prepare Preliminary Drainage Report. Prepare Preliminary Drainage Report in accordance with the Environmental Plan. 4.21. Plan in Hand Review Meeting. Organize and attend one onsite review meeting following completion of the 60% plans. City Project Manager shall send and manage the invite list. Attendees will include the ENGINEER, the CITY Project Manager, PMT Coordinator, Compliance Coordinator, Utility company representatives, CITY Construction Division staff (including CITY Utility Coordinator), and other CITY and PMT staff as required to review the plans for completeness, constructability, review existing pavement and curb conditions, proposed intersection radii and curb ramp locations, extent of surface feature removals and replacements, tree removals and replacements, discuss extent of utility relocations/replacements and utility phasing, identification of potential private property conflicts, and identification of other issues that may impact construction. This may include an office meeting to review plan/specification/field review comments, clarify issues and concur on changes. The ENGINEER will take and distribute meeting notes. 4.22. Utility Coordination Meeting. ENGINEER will conduct a utility coordination meeting to review the 60% design drawings. ENGINEER will be responsible for organizing the meeting location, inviting the impacted utilities, taking meeting notes, and distributing meeting notes. Discussions will include utility conflicts, possible alignment revisions of the sewers, and utility phasing. A schedule of relocation work will be requested from the utilities following this meeting. The meeting will be coordinated with the CITY Project Manager, PMT Coordinator, and PMT Utility Coordinator. Invite the CITY Utility Coordinator (in Construction Division). 4.23. Submit 60% Deliverables for Review. Deliver the 60% submittal documents to the CITY and PMT for distribution and review by the CITY, PMT, agencies, and permitting agencies, as required. 60% documents include plans, specifications, Addendum to the BODR, draft permit applications, etc. 4.24. Address Plan and Specification Review Comments. CITY and PMT review comments will be compiled in one Quality Review Form (QRF) document per deliverable and will be submitted to the ENGINEER. ENGINEER will incorporate comments from the QRF into the design. 25 90% Design Objective: Develop 90% deliverables for review and utility coordination. The 90% design submittal is meant to be a complete, bid-ready set of construction documents. The purpose of the 90% design submittal is to provide the CITY and PMT the opportunity to review the plans, specifications, and appurtenant material prior to submitting for regulatory review and bidding the project for construction. Deliverables: Per the 90% Deliverables Guidance, including 90% Design Drawings, Specifications and Final Design Report Guidance documents; 90% deliverables include: final bid item list and quantities, Draft cover letter to NDEQ to cover changes from the LTCP, final drafts of all necessary permit applications and cover letters, Draft Construction Permit Application, Final Design Report, Final Drainage Report, SEB Exhibit A, SB/ESB Construction Utilization TM; Updated List of Permits and Environmental Clearances, ROW Strip Maps, update ROW Table, and updated OPC. Scope: 4.25. Prepare 90% Design Drawings. The 90% Design Drawings are meant to be final, bid-ready plans, and at a minimum shall include the items as identified in the 90% Design Drawings Deliverable Guidance Document. Final quantities on some of the major items (such as pavement, rock, etc.) shall be measured quantities with an additional percentage to cover typical potential overruns due to constructing in an aged, urbanized area, as identified in the Cost Estimate Template Guidance. The CITY will provide a list of typical items and percentage increases to use. 4.26. Finalize Contract Documents. Finalize the contract documents, per the 90% Specifications Guidance Document including cover sheet, Project Contact Information Page, specification section discipline lead sheets, table of contents, Division 00 Specifications, Division 01 Specifications, 700 Series Technical Specifications, Supplemental Technical Specifications, bid item narrative of what the bid item includes, including measurement and payment, and construction constraints. Incorporate utility relocation work schedules as part of the specifications. 4.27. Prepare Final Design Report(FDR). The FDR is a final compilation of the Basis of Design Report (BODR), the addendum submitted at the 60 percent design stage, and any additional modifications and/or calculations that support the final design of the project. The FDR will be prepared in accordance with the 90% Deliverable Final Design Report Guidance. 4.28. Risk Management. The ENGINEER shall update the mitigation strategy for the risk factors identified and identify methods to mitigate the risks identified. The Risk Mitigation Strategy TM shall include an identification of risks that should be carried forward to construction contractors as the controlling entity. 26 4.29. Sustainability. The ENGINEER shall update sustainability strategies previously identified. 4.30. Prepare a Final Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP). Prepare the SWPPP in accordance with City of Omaha regulations, NDEQ Stormwater Construction Permit and the Environmental Plan. 4.31. Prepare Post-Construction Stormwater Management Plan. Prepare the Post- Construction Stormwater Management Plan in accordance with the Environmental Plan. 4.32. Prepare Draiange Report. Prepare Drainage Report and submit with 90% submittal. Prepare Drainage Report in accordance with the Environmental Plan and as identified in Task 5. 4.33. Utility Coordination Meeting. ENGINEER will conduct a utility coordination meeting. ENGINEER will be responsible for organizing the meeting location, inviting the impacted utilities, taking meeting notes, and distributing meeting notes. The meeting will be coordinated with PMT. Utilities to provide a schedule and locations of agreed upon relocation work which shall be included in the 90% specifications. Request utility schedule at least four weeks before plan and specification review distribution to enable incorporation in 90% specs. 4.34. Small and Emerging Small Businesses Utilization Form. Follow the requirements of the Small and Emerging Small Business Program (SB/ESB) as outlined on the City of Omaha Human Rights and Relations Department website and as directed by the CITY, to determine and define portions of the construction project that could be performed by SB/ESB companies. This includes but is not limited to review of the latest CITY certified SB/ESB company listing, identification of sufficient number of companies for each construction task, and completion of EXHIBIT A "UTILIZATION OF SMALL AND EMERGING SMALL BUSINESSES" in the project specifications/contract documents. A Construction Phase SB/ESB Utilization Technical Memorandum shall be prepared that summarizes the evaluation performed by the ENGINEER to identify the portions of the Project that can reasonably be designated for construction by Small Business (SB)/Emerging Small Business (ESB) contractors. The areas identified for SB/ESB subcontractors are specifically designated in the contract documents. 4.35. Prepare Final OPC. Finalize the bid item list in accordance with the CITY standard bid items. Number new bid items in accordance with CITY policy. Engineers Opinion of Probable Construction Cost shall be prepared and submitted per the Cost Estimate Template Guidance. 4.36. Permit Applications. The ENGINEER will update the list of permits (including schedule). A copy of the list of permits (with the status of and responsible party for each permit) and a copy of all prepared permits by the ENGINEER will be included in the 90% submittal along with a copy of all permit applications to be obtained by the contractor, for review by the PMT Compliance Team. Unless 27 otherwise determined by the CITY, any permits, mitigation plans, or similar information developed by the ENGINEER shall be reviewed by the PMT Compliance Team prior to submission of the final information to the CITY for submission to the appropriate agency. Based on comments received from the PMT, the applications are to be revised and prepared by the ENGINEER for execution by the CITY in accordance with the Environmental Plan. All permits will be in the name of the CITY and the CITY will pay directly for any associated permit application fees. 4.37. Submit 90% Documents for Review. Deliver the 90% submittal documents to the CITY and PMT for distribution and review. 90% documents include plans, specifications, Final Design Report, permits, etc. Environmental, permitting, and regulatory issues shall be in accordance with the Environmental Plan and coordinated with the Compliance Team Lead or designated representative. 4.38. Review Comments. CITY and PMT review comments will be compiled in one Quality Review Form (QRF) document per deliverable and will be submitted to the ENGINEER. Approximately three weeks following plan submittal, organize and attend an office review meeting with the CITY Project Manager, PMT Coordinator, Compliance Coordinator, PMT Utility Coordinator, CITY Construction Division staff, and other CITY and PMT staff as required to review and discuss comments. The ENGINEER will take and distribute meeting notes. ENGINEER will incorporate comments into the Bid Documents. 4.39. UDRB Submittal. The ENGINEER shall prepare the Urban Design Review Board application and the 95% review submittal package required by the UDRB and the City Planning Department for review by City Planning and the UDRB. In general, the UDRB submittal package will include plan-view drawings that clearly show impacts to Green Streets, Bicycle routes, Areas of Civic Importance (ACI), etc., as identified by the PMT as well as the proposed mitigation of those impacts, showing sufficient details to convey the proposed work, but in a non- technical way. The submittal may require the services of a landscape architect to meet UDRB expectations. Examples of UDRB submittals will be provided to the ENGINEER for reference. A draft review submittal will be required for Planning Department Review (3 copies) and a final Board submittal incorporating Planning Department comments (17 copies). Urban Design Review Board (UDRB) review comments shall be addressed by the ENGINEER and incorporated into the Final plans and specifications. i. Tree Mitigation Plan. Tree species composition, size and location will be recorded within the potential project impact areas. This information will be used to mitigate tree losses according to Omaha Parks, Recreation and Public Property (OPR&PP) and Urban Design Review Board, as appropriate. The ENGINEER will determine impacts and prepare a mitigation plan, which will include a detailed planting plan. 1. The ENGINEER shall provide the services necessary to determine the number of mitigation trees required due to tree 28 removal within park (inventory, calculation of number of trees required, coordination with OPR&PP on new tree locations). 2. UDRB Replacement Trees along city streets — The ENGINEER shall provide the services necessary to inventory the trees along city streets which will be removed due to construction, determine potential locations of new street trees, develop planting plans as required for replacement trees, provide calculations of number of trees required and planting plans to UDRB for review. Provide any coordination with OPR&PP on street tree locations within city park property. 95% Regulatory Review Submittal Objective: Prepare 95% Regulatory Review Submittal. The 95% regulatory review submittal is meant to be a complete, bid-ready set of construction documents incorporating CITY/PMT comments to be submitted to NDEQ for review and approval. Deliverables: Per the 95% (Regulatory Review)Deliverables Guidance. Scope: 4.40. Prepare 95% Submittal Package. ENGINEER shall prepare a 95% submittal package to the NDEQ for a Construction Permit, incorporating comments received from the City/PMT. Submittal items include: • A cover letter summarizing the project and documenting any significant changes in concept that have been made on the PROJECT in relation to the previously submitted Long Term Control plan (LTCP). (CITY representative will sign) • Completed, signed Application for NDEQ Construction Permit (CITY representative will sign) • Three (3) copies of sealed/signed Design Drawings, with City/PMT comments addressed/incorporated • Three (3) copies of sealed/signed Specifications with City/PMT comments addressed/incorporated • One (1) copy of sealed/signed Final Design Report with City/PMT comments addressed/incorporated. • Final SWPPP (CITY representative will sign) • Final Drainage Report • Post Construction Stormwater Management Plan (CITY representative will sign) 29 Bid Documents Objective: Finalization of the bid documents and preparation of the plans and specifications for bidding. Deliverables: Signed and Sealed plans and specifications, final OPC, Project Advertisement Form, Final Bid Item List and Quantities, all field books, electronic copy of plans and Contract Documents, and electronic copies of all CADD files. Scope: 4.41. Sealed Contract Documents. The plans and specifications shall be signed and sealed by the ENGINEER project manager and the appropriate disciplines. Submit project advertisement form, final quantities, opinion of probable cost (without any Contingency), and one copy of signed plans & specifications (with CITY signed cover sheet) to CITY for advertisement/bidding Quality Control check. Allow for 5 business days for CITY to complete QC check. 4.42. Quality Control Changes. ENGINEER shall make quality control changes based on comments received during CITY's Quality Control check, sign and seal revised plans and specifications. Provide one original and thirty-five (35) copies of final signed and sealed plans (half size) and specifications (contract books) to CITY along with 35 electronic copies of the signed and sealed plans (full size), specifications (contract books), and any other supplemental information that will be part of the contract in pdf format. Final plans and specifications (contract books) shall be delivered to the CITY no later than the day before the project is advertised for bid. 4.43. Document Submittal. Submit copies of all survey field books, CADD drawings in electronic format, final drainage files/models, GIS files, and Contract Documents in Microsoft Word format. 30 TASK 5—PERMITTING SERVICES Objective: Provide additional environmental investigations and permitting, as required. Deliverables: Construction Dewatering Permit Application, Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP), Post-construction Stormwater Management Plan, Drainage Report, City of Omaha Grading Permit Application, NDEQ Construction Permit Appliation, EPA Lead Environmental Review Letter, NDEQ Title 128 Request for Approval Letter.. Scope: 5.1. Unless otherwise determined by the CITY, any permits, mitigation plans, or similar information developed by the Project Team shall be reviewed by the PMT Compliance Team prior to submission of the final information to the CITY for submission to the appropriate agency. Based on comments received from the PMT, the applications are to be revised and prepared by the ENGINEER for execution by the CITY in accordance with the Environmental Plan. All permits will be in the name of the CITY and the CITY will pay directly for any associated permit application fees. 5.2. The ENGINEER will update the list of permits (including schedule). A copy of the list of permits (with the status of and responsible party for each permit) and a copy of all permit applications and cover letters prepared by the ENGINEER will be included in the 60% and 90% submittals along with a copy of all permits and associated applications to be obtained by the contractor, for review by the PMT Compliance Team. It is anticipated that the following permits, cover letters and related reviews, and/or consultations will be completed by the ENGINEER: 5.2.1. Not Used 5.2.2. Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP). Prepare the SWPPP in accordance with the Environmental Plan. 5.2.3. Post-Construction Stormwater Management Plan. ENGINEER will prepare the Post-Construction Stormwater Management Plan in accordance with the Environmental Plan. 5.2.4. Drainage Report. ENGINEER will prepare a Drainage Report in accordance with the Environmental Plan. The Drainage Report shall be compiled into one single PDF document along with the necessary BMP certifications. 5.2.5. Cultural Resources Evaluation and State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) Review Project information as specified in the Environmental Plan will be submitted to City/PMT for review and use in submitting consultation letters to the Nebraska State Historcial Society and State 31 Historic Preservation Office (SHPO). Cultural and Archeological Survey 5.2.6. City of Omaha Post Construction Stormwater Requirements. The ENGINEER will prepare a Post Construction Stormwater Management Plan including a Drainage Report. The ENGINEER shall be responsible for uploading all supporting documentation to the PCSWMP site (PERMIX). 5.2.7. City of Omaha Grading and Erosion Permit. The ENGINEER shall prepare a permit application and also provide the supporting documentation as identified in the permit application in accordance with the Environmental Plan. The ENGINEER shall be responsible for uploading all applications and supporting documentation to the PCWP web site. 5.2.8. NDEQ Construction Stormwater Permit. The ENGINEER shall prepare a permit application and also provide the supporting documentation as identified in the permit application in accordance with the Environmental Plan. 5.2.9. EPA Lead Remediation Review. The ENGINEER shall prepare a letter to EPA, using City/PMT template, requesting a map and list of properties that have been or are planned to be remediated. The ENGINEER shall incorporate plan sheets in the bid set that illustrate the recent lead remediation activity indicated in the EPA's response. The ENGINEER shall incorporate any specific soils handling requirements within the Environmental Controls Specification for construction. 5.2.10. NDEQ Construction Permit. The ENGINEER shall prepare a letter and NDEQ construction permit application for submittal with the Regulatory Review Set of Plans and Specifications. The ENGINEER shall utilize the City/PMT template when drafting the cover letter. 32 TASK 6—BIDDING ASSISTANCE Objective: Provide assistance to the CITY, on an as requested basis, for assistance during the bidding process. Deliverables: Addenda and other items identified by the CITY during the bidding phase. Scope: 6.1. Transition Meeting #1: Scope includes attendance at a Transition meeting with the Program Management Team and CITY Construction Management (CM) staff for the ENGINEER to provide PROJECT design background information and specific design related issues/information to the CM staff. Review pre-bid meeting agenda, permit/approval acquisition status, ROW status and determine if project is ready to bid. Meeting organized by the PMT Coordinator. Meeting documentation prepared by the PMT Coordinator 6.2. Pre-Bid Meeting: Scope includes attendance at Pre-bid meeting organized by the CITY. No more than two personnel from the ENGINEER shall attend the pre-bid meeting. 6.3. Prepare Addenda: Prepare addenda as required to address questions raised at the pre-bid meeting, written questions from bidders, or other Contract Document plan and specification clarifications. One copy of the addenda will be provided to the CITY. 6.4. Bid Evaluation: ENGINEER shall provide assistance in the evaluation of the bids, as requested by the CITY. 33 TASK 7—(NOT INCLUDED) TASK 8 -ADDITIONAL SERVICES Additional services shall be provided only if approved by the CITY through a fully executed Work Change Authorization or Amendment to the AGREEMENT, as appropriate. Scope, schedule and compensation will be negotiated for these additional services as necessary. These additional services may include, but shall not be limited to: 8.1. Topographic Survey. Provide additional topographic survey, if required. Survey. Perform additional site survey in sufficient detail necessary to prepare final construction documents. Survey shall be performed in accordance with the CSO Program Survey Standards. Survey field book and all survey digital data shall be given to the CITY upon completion of final design. Additional topographic survey will include up to five (5) acres of surveying performed at critical locations. 8.2. Subsurface Utility Exploration. Perform Subsurface Utility Exploration (SUE) for key utilities based on information obtained from the utility companies. An allowance of 4 individual potholes of SUE work is included for areas that are not performed by the utilities themselves. A cost allowance of $2415 per pothole is included to employ a Contractor to perform potholing including traffic control and surface restoration. Proposed SUE work will be reviewed with CITY and PMT, and proceed only upon authorization by the CITY. The SUE pothole will be backfilled and and a temporary patch will be provided. CITY will provide and install a permanent concrete per replacement at potahole location. 8.3. Geotechnical Services. Provide additional geotechnical investigations, if required.Geotechnical investigations will include three_L3D test borings located at critical locations. The boring locations will be adjusted based on rig access, site conflicts, and utility clearance issues. Boring locations must be readily accessible on public property. Perform test borings to obtain geologic information and samples of the soils, and laboratory tests to determine the relevant engineering properties of the various soil strata to support design. Boring depths shall extend 5- to 10-feet below anticipated excavation level to permit assessment of excavation stability and possible shoring. If trenchless installation techniques are anticipated, the geotechnical investigation shall evaluate and provide design criteria/parameters for trenchless construction. An amendment to the geotechnical report shall be prepared and will discuss the general soil and ground water conditions underlying the PROJECT site; provide an estimate of the dewatering flow rate anticipated during construction for use in preparing the dewatering permit; present the relevant engineering properties of the existing soils; provide excavation and earthwork recommendations including minimum setbacks from adjacent structures; evaluate feasibility of pipe boring/tunneling, if required; and recommend design criteria and parameters for pipe bedding, pavements, and other earth supported improvements. 34 It is assumed that a photoinonization detector (PID) will not be utilized with these borings. 8.4. Street Corrings. Perform additional three (3) street corings to determine composition and thickness of existing street surfacing and street base materials. Coring of the street section will be determined if needed. Perform analysis of existing materials to determine bearing capacities and suitability for long term reliability. Investigation shall also address adjacent streets that may be used for access routes to the construction area. This information will help to determine which streets will or will not hold up to construction activities (especially if the pavement is cut into) so the ENGINEER can properly determine pavement removal/replacement areas in coordination with existing street and curb conditions and utility impacts. Include results of investigations and evaluations in the in an amendment to the geotechnical report. 8.5. Containmenated Soil Analysis. Submit up to nine (9) soil samples (and up to 3 water samples, if obtained) representing the highest PID reading from each boring with a detectable PID reading for laboratory analysis of petroleum compounds. The soil samples will be submitted for laboratory testing of benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, hexane (BTEX), MTBE, naphthalene, and n-Hexane by Method 8260B and total extractable hydrocarbons (TEH) by Method OA-2. The test results will be incorporated into the geotechnical report. The report will contain an indication of boring/sampling locations, a summary of field and laboratory analytical results and boring logs. 8.6. Manhole Condition Assessment. Perform Level 4 — Complete Condition Assessment manhole inventories, condition assessments and connectivity determination within the project area, as required, per the Manhole and Lamping Inspection Procedure. Approximately three (3)total structures will be investigated. 8.7. CCTV Investigation. Perform additional CCTV as necessary. The CCTV allowance includes cleaning, televising and review of existing piping in the project area, as required, and is based on an estimated _1000 feet of sewer performed in accordance with the Pipeline Inspection Using CCTV Procedure. 8.8. Heavy cleaning and bypass pumping may be needed for the project in order to televise large line segments. Unit rates for heavy cleaning are provided below. Bypass pumping, if required, will be determined to address specific site requirements. A total of five (5)hours is assumed. Heavy Cleaning—Jet Truck $250/Hour • Two—Person Jet/Vacuum Truck Heavy Cleaning—Bucket or Scraper $250/Hour • One-Person Jet/Vacuum Truck and • 2 Person Bucket Machine 8.9. Service Lateral Locations. Schedule and investigate key properties (corner lots, multi-family residential properties, commercial properties) for service lateral 35 location in areas where new sanitary sewers are proposed and multiple service lead discharge locations are possible. As the anticipated separation plan includes potential new sanitary sewers, it is important to identify the location of service laterals for these properties to effectively design the proposed sewers. Investigations generally will consist of dye testing or line locating. This allowance includes investigation of 2 commercial properties, dye testing at 5 residential properties. Effort associated with this task work will be reviewed with the CITY and only performed upon authorization by the CITY. 8.10. Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA) Survey. ENGINEER will perform MBTA survey of the Project area to determine if nesting of any "Species of Significance" such as raptors, bald eagles, etc. are present in the Project area that could impact the timing of the proposed construction activities. The MBTA is applicable year round, but most migratory bird nesting activities occur between April 1 and July 15.The timing of the survey will be coordinated with the Compliance Team. [A subsequent MBTA Survey will be completed prior to the construction activities (clearing and grubbing, tree removal, etc.) to identify active nests. This scope will be included in Services During Construction, if applicable.] i. Reporting 1. Provide memo report of MBTA surveys within one week from completion of MBTA survey. 2. Provide photographic documentation and GPS location of any observed existing nesting of Raptor or Bald Eagle "Species of Significance". 3. Report to contain, surveyor name, date and time of survey, project location, field observations and results, weather conditions, bird species observed (as noted above), location, number and species of active bird nests observed within the construction area, and recommended actions. 8.11. Green Infrastructure Design. Prepare and submit design drawings and specifications as necessary to fulfill submittal requirements for the following design stages: 60%, 90%, 95%, and bid documents. The design shall include one green infrastructure proposed as part of 30% design or a demonstration project selected by the City. The design shall include layout, grading, drain pipe, miscellaneous details, landscaping, etc. for one stormwater feature (drainage area <2 acres). 8.12. Construction Dewatering Permits (to be obtained by the construction contractor) for discharge into the City's sewer system. ENGINEER will include application documentation for the contractor's use in the contract documents.. 8.13. Community Enhancement Design. Prepare and submit design drawings and specifications as necessary to fulfill submittal requirements for the following design stages: 60%, 90%, 95%, and bid documents. The design shall include 36 community enhancement(s) selected by neighborhood associations (or related entities) and approved by the City. Design task shall be based on a not to exceed amount of$6,000. SCHEDULE ENGINEER agrees to complete by September 17, 2014, the necessary final design services listed in this Exhibit, and includes bid ready plans and specifications and permit applications. The schedule of Bid Phase services shall be coordinated with the CITY during the bid phase. Services beyond the final design phase and bid phase, if included by amendment, shall be completed as necessary in context to the actual construction timing. The CITY recognizes that completion of the design work listed in this Exhibit within this deadline is contingent upon timely response from utilities and CITY or their authorized representatives. 37 • .- - + A�g Figure i gure 1. Survey Limits 'i• , "ram` r. Z I ' •.= F ?c Ia ij: : ' •1 £.`Y , ; .. §a 4D' P • 0a a r. ` .10 • -: t* . ' 6': '#r `' • z 'Blond'o S i:, ,"1 # w , 'r °-lam . - t • Z " . .,.. W...,,:+,...-•r Fw- " ,, 'r' . ,. ZI -p _. s a1 ter- -# . t � � i5 � Parker, Stf1, '. i► �f ,, ; # 7l ' ` 'Decatur�"St ai. ,, " 3 i E 0 { • *lifnrrt ri 3 �1 '.., - . S Frankwn, S,),=r�. F nkln St , n 1 If It y _ F ... i: 4es ; , .,_::*;; ,,„;,;;,,,,,,,,:, ,. _ .;;;;_:;,,,,,, , , - ,,,.,,, , _ . ,,,,,- _--;,., re.,,,,.; ,:4:.:„:)..:..r,..,:„.,.,, ,,::: :::„.,:„,:' ,,;4:,/,,,,,m„;.4,! ,4,,,,,,,,,1,,,..' - `. agry#e C\Char.les-St . ` ' reek -rn ' . _ .� �., - -- � ,,.••' �'�' --. ,A - Hamilton S. • - N i.e."Vap. 'ir' -°, . ' . A � z;. , ,N , A Lafayettee *. -. r-I- mow= . p a 'f RE r01N„ WesteFFL,,e, =� Z -, .. �.:- `* -- '. . ; 1 ' f �3• `t `'*ol'as St `. i...... V � �yL +0;,'iii'' , ,,,,,,„ .„:...: ::., ,, el ipli 9 s ix Z r 4,- ` 44 R, 9P r•r, k "�� x y a Nk-icho- f E 4 Z i fi 1. N K t-''',,.7,i1 ,,,,, i,;./ ".. - 1 ' ' ' 4S-'-, ' ,f2sAIn'''41t1--.4404:' .: f r"*„;: 't ;di' ''''' - "s'i*,-` ,,,,,*' . iti ,.-:,..,. 112-aticiwst: :,_.. , .„ ,, , ,,, , , ,,___,,,i ..-.s:...i ii -...;; ., ' ' ... ,,,- . 7.- -t. . .. A-4 ' ; -- -1* -,-.g .!1,--'-'41171- 'Z'te'r,, ' ; A.7; , 1 1;i- ;;,..; 1 '.-r-'1. ,- - .,- 4, >.,.;,,,, ..! 4. l' „,- ,,e,inliiit,....st_ ___-„, 11.4 ,,,,,_ v__ ,„:,,,, ,,,, ",-,; . .,?-,.;.4.' ,.••;T...,. -01..„,7. ,:7) -' , ,),,z, ,4,,,,,,,,, ! !,-,-..„1,... - .., 1 .... ! ,,! ! ..-------- gpv--- ----....„ il a 1 . P' a ° iCun i'nglSt `1-1 1� "� ,1 ,i . L" !"Z ,t s. �-� .#�#�„ � .�mitt,' �t � � �_I �t � � .� sue. �.-� ,, R�A S � ""� � � iS 5t i - ' +r'« I ; a 0.--k ... ,-'r44 a9! ra ,I E ' . �Burt$t . } ! .,,.,IiV'f i-i` - 1 �,�4 -' , . .-- LEGEND "n•HQ>K?JAME: FI✓$fJ1 %YiND NAME: CALDWELL AREA SURVEY Pipe Type SEWER LIMITS �a j.o+ll.^ ®Existing Combineo as Sanitary Not Meeting Min.Velocity®Existing Combined as Storm s SEPARATION ®Ex.Combined as Sanitary —New Sanitary enameers...wr,'w wo,�_,ai:':w,' eExisting Combined as Combined New Storm (RNC)PROJECT Clean Solutions l'm Omaha .._=Survey Area o °oss 0.05 0.1 CSO PN: CSOP. —Sewer Lines i I Miles OPW#: 52193(DATE: 0212013 :r * _ Erskine st Figure 2. Borings ,,. t f !. - fib". -1 �-" irt; ,.-. . ". �y t '� 3,t, + .- V,,- -, 'k _Burdett.St1,,7o•: Z` —K ram.* 3 t 4 - LY,:.#4. ° BlondoSt r.▪= ..w %- 1„- :_, * `'" • .�+' b © • a.9 �• - '-'---- 54, Parker S . '. t 'e s 3 ,t _ .. Z ��5F�. Parker Sty;'; �y =• ` � )"s f :`" `. . +• 41 ® DecaturtSt � .,N t e.�. • ��� 3 1 7 , ` ,. 44- . #k' `7 f D"';' © is A[r -k," `• ,-' i - 4 * , ' c\, x ,: 4 .-' - elf ",ark FrankI St ' `.SFr• 4I n Sty, r" sus a' ' -'' ' E3 . 5 ; \'.® i' rit,14^ �- ,u p ® ,+ '"Seward St 1 •}' ,, •....r.. 1. _,, r'*'a +. = 4, t'�r. t ;a t,.r_, *,'fie ,, ::. ` .� .k. —Charle's`StY Charles St `,t.. . *gar 20 '" c ek .1A '` -1 Iy7, ., ,...,,,,:. ..„:„......,. :„ A ,Harniitom"St . fHarmlton St a :. • 4 „ _ .� :_, .. • <U7 a ® � #i Lafayette,Ave �' i,-` W r fit } -, �a', '' ,.. T 'a ,t ..® �..r ; I,V.i N` ,„ 4' ,, = • m 10irs '4 _ .� ,4 ; L'"afayettg,,Ave :, ,`-rr i„• Western A e "'. ,, C S t ;� I6,.1 `( �. i tda w.. t,„++ •+r.;,A1, ,'1 1" $ '' ' ,M 1 } PIICIalol3 St, r 4,W'',v''',,. 1 11' •t K `t " ,Pt 1 i"�-- - t • ®.� ®OM m'' ,. ', Z #� M rr ,ti= Zill r ® +S ? n • `A'' $i4 St r --CO'=Nicholas d i , = --it. sk s. Sx y . ', " '• ® { y, , -s P 1 t � Cfl ' ' A IZa t , 4,Z.o ' r r °. � 4,x k cn Izrd St "" = ta ��` '' -' i -` ; x Y s , � e CumingIzaldt L ; " , • • • '' t Z Curr�rng,St �. r .. ,3 r >ti '=A Boring Type '1 Database' -- �; 1,11...i4. ,,4 , 4,,,, . .,- J 4. 6: ' :: ' ' .' 'lil f 4 4.; ,....--, -7.:$-• r_<-,, ..3,-.- ------' :.‘47.'..- .tf.-,...--1. 1 .J • NIL r,., •.▪, „ 'Z • a ' "<� i ` + , '� rp =▪ - •FINDS "`I �Geotech Borings • 9 , s`� 41 tfi.r r1 S flp LAST SPILLS . ' , _ � ,, "'IL ,N f• „' * ' N �`w Nt, �PID Geotech Borings -LUST44 �. I i 1 ff 7„ 7 ; YF 0 UST j ,.+' t P .Webster;-St ._ �� " - - -;. its- ,-_• , -i. •' '� .40 1 _ ' .n , 3 x ' _ i , `� -` 'ray f""+, , "�sr�$„�rP" LEGENGPipe Type PROJECT NAME: FIGURE#AND NAME: Existing Combinetl as Sanitary Not Meeting Min.Velocity=F�cisting Combined as Storm 49TH AND FIGURE 2: ®6c.Combined as Sanitary —New Sanitary CALDWELL AREA BORINGS c s 0 1 c G�Pw��^ =Existing Combined as Combined New Stonn H SEWER ® A SEPARATION Clem Solutions for Oni,lia (RNC)PROJECT 0 oos oas ons CSO PN: CSOP. 111.111 mu 3PW#. 52193 DATE: 02/2013 i NW p�rlia`'{'HWU �'.. Lake•St k - r"' ' Figure 3: Manhole Assessments , ��, Erskine St F AErskitae Sty--; sa 1' N : . -Rr e n `- ," _ , s•+rf a # -' .,r !# -,*-.. ..1=i•- , a ^ �' c ' 4 3 '1 • ( ? ,- . • " ".-' •� i i • n Corr°--' ° . rGrntS ~` v - a .'� "_ r ' • ' " t. • . " -.., I . � . ;a n n 1 7• F e ' .- * -, ,, rdett'e S`, i in, o - .,, 1 - .>.-, .' > .., - . t' a t }4, .. 4, . F _BIondosS •^ .a € o_ v � �� yam i !, " ' r :- #s r .„- F r; ,4 Perform Level 4 Assessment t r " S;Parker St 'ti ^�� +� Y, ole "" "_Manh ID 0144140 ><` 9 w L`• qn a $ -•Perform Level4 Assessment � ,' 4 � s . ' :,; r 4 ..:.Q t, YManhole ID:0144020 M pe atur,St ;� N. s. Y y, #,a.. t tp"' .:+' ism �- �w m % v,, ,,t�\ t - .�, o r._ iiiP $t v �,rr , �tr.- � M ; � �\�s ,�' +-�c ,� 4 �� r„ x� �p�§° �I < ' �Franklirl.St �; .Q- . . _ .. Franklin St z _,aQ, ,, • ,,• ' n' I ti ,. s " t ' I 1 Seward St \�� 7�►,; • *e ms �' `� • 7# -- ._ ..4. i 4 le y M .' ma`s` , y5°-`»4:4 s+ ?'#' I s, 3 F i'• l r . I • • _ Nam' r, -t' �'4E ... tea '" ` , _. > - 1 L�ea ,ws ' `. + 3_ I t "r " -\ AIL* I .tom k a Charles St "� I• , ,h". ;. .':' „:,:_i .,.-_,,,,!----al; / cre r 4: "Harnllton :. , .1Hamilto.,#n St"` ,: �- , , ,, , • Z 2, 2 Si,t, ., Lafayette Ave k ,. cn' . . ..!W ar t W R 4 9!• 4g. y@ • t.:- ,ate+ % ::1. . M by __ �j spa 1�.-•i ^' i fl ?RS ."'S ,A„It 'T t's,,.:5s'.l.l4...'2a:f-i._.4,„4,';_,,,.,.,,,,**,,",••.,:',i",,,',tt4Tri.*;'.; �4« WesterniAve ., , `4 _ ..'''','. -" g "' •, ` :� -NlcholaS St. l. .,; ..,'w A1-"•+ ,.xrt `R ."t 74i it t IFS ' .- 7 M: „q J� ,v �t�.. tai t�'1 ' _ z �#'t 4'`Y ,�' _- 1.,.4 4 ^Yv mod a < 1 ,A_4 4 ___ _ z it Nicholas St P` - . ' 1q''� Manhole Guide ,"S c •, ;3 IZard S. r Outside Area rt !':,::—;": ",* try li 0 New Storm St, a 3L 149f ,._.. .:' - �z } •0 New Sanitary ,� 1 i = - , , r' t :,,. i tti' ~ 1 ;< tr ' Curnrrig St ` i • Existing Combined as Storm �' - ,� .a, • ExistingCombined as Sanitary - ;� ' Z t ` i r '. • Existing Combined as Combined 11, tr gg`tst,-1 i +y-,t. i 4, _'; - , .,, - ;'Z °"._ . >,» _ Note.All existin manholes have a ''''6 x ' ; Level 4 assessment unless otherwise. +,� I a I ai > i 1B urt tS_t- LEGEND PROJECT NAME: FIGURE#AND NAME: 49TH AND FIGURE 3: Pipe Type CALDWELLAREA MANHOLE SII ' Carte/1^ Existing Combined as Sanitary Not Meeting Min.Velocity Existing Combined as Storm N SEWER ASSESSMENTS f� �6c Combinetl as Sanitary New Sanitary SEPARATION ® bgmee.,...wo.,-.'�wo:,x„wm wpm,-�Exls[ing Combined as Combined New Storm A (RNC)PROJECT Clean Solutions for Omaha Alternative Areas 0 003 006 01z SO PN: CSOP. Sewer Lines i I MI a PW#: 52193(DATE: 02/2013 :_`.t Erskine•St -. _ --- --��` Figure 4: Street Corings y� J I , 4, r ' 'u ° r -Z t. Z• — '' q. 33 _6rant St. 1(a„ .. t .A„fJ1 .�- p, -�"' I ;� • .fir ".a O. n i d ` -ask 1,' x Z t, '_ A , S yr. S.''''',' 1 .cn • ,,...y; D r F+ - 1- ar-.c, p'' r * � �`. �y.� , ¢0 A. r. t 04 ? t t„ z4 S E r # , „fi < -e xi2 ''''',-4.= a : :: (D¢ _ . 1 - , f . I, v r _ r 7 ; ' ij Pi ,.� ' ! _lti •. • ,.1'' v a " " DecarSt b „,s , : r.°S r:.3 I. `",t*'p.,,, 4 #: - !t* P11 hi � ';".t 4_ { € 16 '' ,, ',Oat rilin.St `� .;Frankli• ', 0 '",z� ,:sawEil x:4'1 _ \ r 1�' . 44, ? * .! .# i30 . ,e x 1# ' .a. .111+ \\ ., '"t- 1""A � '..1., - ?- .+. .-:-°� • �, ' 1 furl --y ®.�:,P,.� .Seward , ..- Y+it, • i. ► - ' _ t ' ® ' '' °- Charles St .,. w ",, ''z` :',a< +1,.Lkaep ...4% �, ta..+'. "y 3I'�'"Y HanllltOn Si ^�© ® --Hamilten`St ,,: , ' „.k T _0, , 'a €� r _�Leafay,ette Ave ` - - I ti r: �rI "� _. « t p r e i- " ""s- A • . I ,- r' *--Ir ' " "a - y,.w !`.- .91',i1 : a t , -'- 24,- ' 4,0' ) . iWesternAve ? L -^4 '� 2Fr•I '. , • 3&:r 'r9t, _ .y• 4tiwo3r • 01 tc . E o,,.ro + :Ai M 5� `:" €; t ' ® FYI ail :.� D. �,. Z a 1 0 3.tr ' ,, antipip' ,L E - 4 .. a ,t Nicholas'St _,# , � `_ 11.0 .s e *_ ,,..� t " f ram ; • yy Noi 414iØ : idj ofII* 4. �' -► Labels •(,.'tet ,, aft .are ' ••� N i _� Geotech boring to ® ' ip , ,, m�4:� ❑ ❑include street coring �Izard.St' 3 1,� -.� , ,_ ,, 'Z r Independent street coring required r . €,r<r it 1 CWn'�IMg - • 6-r ,lY. 'r ,. Y p s-r e eP-+ .x t - + .' "i. i#` ii ,4. - �4 -if",.r.Z `` i I. 'Y e Curnrng S••' • • • t 11 `-- A � � � . ,, . , � !t :,,,, F �, 4 , y "A ay §. ,-ma x— P* T' er,:u) kaslr,.. <l *'_ ' 1----- i ,,4,` # - .3i "W g`F 1 a� • ;."V t, t-- '•k. ,-* ,�. .�,r!?c'g `xae P-..�4'I �5-.BU Set Y'�`'6' .y�''_e..:" 4"'"Fu< -1--*-:,,,,-* s `d 1 9 ., - _ '' LEGEND ROJECT NAME: FIGURE*AND NAME: ' 49TH AND FIGURE 41 Pipe type CALDWELL AREA STREET CORINGS c r.- ' Existing Combined as Sanitary Not Meeting Min-Velocity�Exlsting CombIned as Storm N SEWER 4 =Ex Combined as Sanitary New Sanitary SEPARATION EngMeere,.,wo,x,°.vm,M.,S wu w�ra, �Exsting Combined as Combnetl New Storm ®Geotech Study Area o 0025 005 o.t (RNC)PROJECT Clean Solutions for Omaha CSO PN: CSOP. Sewer Lines I !_ I Mlles OPW#: 52193 IDATE: 02/2013 I ...4a ;xati4 `. .. : . ,.� { Figure 5: CCTV to be Performed r ` yy ', ,e !h 1r' tt :s T 4 V g 7 ,...6„. \1/4 yy I y g ter �!_....+ -- «_r �e ° " )' '�M • 3+• • intisi Z' A :. 4. -..4*..:'' :::-' tea+. ~ a _ ` ?._ z f o; r11. � _ n$ . F. •Ip ID 1 4_1 1..l - 'r P rf nn _ s .ngtil a 4k_L os t �m•14g1i 144 a) S rr ` ,-k.,,---4„, .,,,,,,L,w...‘,. '''.* '.." • ' • 1 r 1 • • • . - VI 14 € 1 PLPng h:7 ) i.: -e i...1' t-- --..., . wi ,,,..:-.! : .,.„,,,,,,.-:.:„.i:_ ii+v'''-.'' 7 'F 4' r --it I V.7 i1 t E) 1440 . <<r q 3 a i lkivotiyK "` ` -.e .f__.. :.«ra Perform CV r „ , S+ �Ir^�' .mi H 014 11 toiMH 0144098 , 1019 ft v 3 1 t,.. ,-i E fj 17w1(� fi wti _i k «•^ % t 3E,r- r '1 p tS)�n ` ."'!rl �'erf.rm CctghA7:,' c . {,mi 1`_ r & I S4•M t ` C YSDia 4- ° 'a ,,,..4 t* .ngth 'it.- 11 y .,r«` .; a f ° ..,., '+:. - - Perform CCTV .,, z --'.- , . .. .. ' '': °"`"` ,. '(Plpe ID 1144105E0144144) 44 :: 41 - - ra .. �' Pip:Dia• `> ,1 . . r mu ..„ L n th 135' 15 it ,'�'� _ jr ik" I 44 74 4 __ ,�.- i 135 : - I t, » ! -4^ !- 0i 0144105_0144104pe Length(ft) , t,,.. it "—Wk.' 0144027_0144056 115 9� . T"" j 0144056 0144096 130 -444'�`-., `: - "' 12"SS along CC 1019 T • `1 0144099_0144096 95 , + p . 4 ',`,` 01441010144113 80 ' 0144113_0144011 70 , �t ' i �^ Total Length:1644 ft :r,. ' I 'a. '' - » I . IF 4 6 k tiro -i f' J i - -C 4 I E ' iI 1t _4 ,a - ate: _-' ,,r,,, •:,i,: -ALIO" „ -.: u;- ,- ' ': ':,,,y,--,-....:.,4„,. -''-,:".1,i' 1- 'i''''''.-''''''r''''''''I'''''Y' • '41''T' ' - ''-'-'4.g"'""" '''..----. t A 7 .„,. . . . ...:, Jr -0: 1- .4,,,,,g. iii PROJECT NAME FIGURE#AND NAME CCTV to be Performed 49TH AND FIGURE 5: /,r.�' CALDWELL AREA CCTV C Sol rw am 49th and Caldwell Study AreaSEWER TO BE PERFORMED E' crs.0 '• SEPARATION Manholes (RNC)PROJECT f ir,"Solo 6 :r f.r.,I OnnI 0 0015 0.03 0.06 —Sewer Lines I MiOO A DATE: 212013 ID i� 1 Numbert 'Task Name 1 Duration ' Start Finish 'Successors(Predecessors 013 !Qtr 2,2013 Qtr 3,2013 I Qtr 4,2013 Qtr 1,2014 -1 Qtr 2,2014 Qtr 3,2014 Qtr 4,2014 ! -L - �-- -._ _ ___--__ Feb Apr �a Jun Jul j Aug_ Oct j Nov I Dec Jan I Feb I Mar I Apr May Jun_y Jul 1 i Aug I Sep_ Oct I Nov_I �� O NTP 1 day Mon 4/22/13 Mon 4/22/13 2,3,8,10,5,4 I • 2 1.1 Project Administration(Assume 18 months) 400 days Tue 4/23/13 Mon 11/3/14 931 3 1 1.2 Agency and Project Coordination 400 days Tue 4/23/13 Mon 11/3/14 1 - _ N 4 in 1.3 Public Involvement and Neighborhood Involvemer 200 days Mon 9/2/13 Fri 6/6/14 1 -- --�--- --- __ 5 in 3.1 Topographic Survey 100 days Tue 4/23/13 Mon 9/9/13 i,27,28,32,29 1 - 1 _ 6 3.2 Utility Input into CADD 5 days Tue 9/10/13 Mon 9/16/13 27.28,32,29 5 -mn 3.3 Subsurface Utility Exploration 5 days Mon 6/3/13 Fri 6/7/13 8 I[� 3.4 Geotechnical Investigation - 0 9 50 days Mon 4/29/13 Fri 7/5/13 13 1 9 j0 3.5 Manhole Condition Assessment 5 days Mon 6/24/13 Fri 6/28/13 12 ---------0 10-la 3.6 Street Corings 30 days Tue 4/23/13 Mon 6/3/13 131 ---Ti n 3.7 CCTV Investigations 40 days Mon 6/3/13 Fri 7/26/13 12 12 ! 3.8 Rehabilitation Recommendations 10 days Mon 7/29/13 Fri 8/9/13 9,11 t 13 ' 3.9 Geotechnical Report 50 days Mon 7/8/13 Fri 9/13/13 378,10 14 ,E 3.1 Sewer Backup Investigation 20 days Mon 6/3/13 Fri 6/28/13 15 - --- 15 3.11 Inflow Source Investigation 5 days Mon 7/1/13 Fri 7/5/13 16 14 • ---TO-: 3.12 Investigation Results 5 days Mon 7/8/13 Fri 7/12/13 20,21 15 17 -I 3.13 Draft Green Infrastucture TM1 20 days Mon 8/26/13 Fri 9/20/13 18 23 18 3.14 Review TM 20 days Mon 9/23/13 Fri 10/18/13 1917 19 ' 3.15 Additional Review Comments 10 days Mon 10/21/13 Fri 11/1/13 18 20 3.16 Hydrologic and Hydraulic Modeling and Calculatio 25 days Mon 7/15/13 Fri 8/16/13 22,23 16 ' 21 3.17 Flooding Analysis 10 days Mon 7/15/13 Fri 7/26/13 16 _ 22 3.18 System Refinement 5 days Mon 8/19/13 Fri 8/23/13 24 20 23 3.19 Proposed Routing and Field Investigation 5 days Mon 8/19/13 Fri 8/23/13 17,3020 311 24 3.2 Hydraulic Performance 10 days Mon 8/26/13 Fri 9/6/13 22 25 la 3.21 Finalize Routing and Size 45 days Mon 6/24/13 Fri 8/23/13 27,28,32,29 26 ; 3.22 Plan and Profile Sheets t SS days Mon 7/1/13 Wed 9/18/131,34,35,36,37 • 27 3.23 Utility Relocation Coordination 15 days Tue 9/17/13 Mon 10/7/13 5,25,6 - - 28 , 3.24 Pavement Removal and Replacement 10 days Tue 9/17/13 Mon 9/30/13 5,25,6 29 3.25 Inflow/Infiltration Reduction Requirements 5 days Tue 9/17/13 Mon 9/23/13 31 5,25,6 • y.� 30 : 3.26 Permits 15 days Mon 8/26/13 Fri 9/13/13 86 23 : 31 3.27 Project Phasing and Scheduling 5 days Tue 9/24/13 Mon 9/30/13 33,34,35,36 29 32 7 3.28 Right of Way Requirements 5 days Tue 9/17/13 Mon 9/23/13 5,25,6 y:11 33 ' 3.29 Opinion of Probable Construction Costs 3 days Tue 10/1/13 Thu 10/3/13 26.31 34 3.3 Risk Management Strategies 3 days Tue 10/1/13 Thu 10/3/13 26,31 _ 35 3.31 Preliminary Permit List 3 days Tue 10/1/13 Thu 10/3/13 26,31 36 3.32 Preliminary Project Sustainability Strategies 3 days Tue 10/1/13 Thu 10/3/13 37 26,31 37 : 3.33 Basis of Design Report 10 days Fri 10/4/13 Thu 10/17/13 38,43 26,13,36 ' 38 : 3.34 Submit 30%Deliervables for Review 20 days Fri 10/18/13 Thu 11/14/13 39 37 39 3.35 Utility Coordination Meeting 1 day Fri 11/15/13 Fri 11/15/13 4038 --- itilm 40 ' 3.36 Finalize TM 10 days Mon 11/18/13 Fri 11/29/13 41,42,44 39 } 41 1 3.37 30%Walk Through 1 day Mon 12/2/13 Mon 12/2/13 4540 42 ! 3.38 Urban Design Review Board(UDRB)Submittal 10 days Mon 12/2/13 Fri 12/13/13 40 43 1 4.1 Request/Review Utility Drawings 15 days Fri 10/18/13 Thu 11/7/13 45 37 44 I 4.2 UDRB Comments 10 days Mon 12/2/13 Fri 12/13/13 40 _ 45 4.3 Finalize Sewer Design Calculations 10 days Tue 12/3/13 Mon 12/16/131,54,55,56,58 41,43 46 1 4.4 On-Site Field Review 1 day Tue 12/17/13 Tue 12/17/13 5645 47 ' 4.5 Design of Roadway Improvements 15 days Tue 2/4/14 Mon 2/24/14 58 1 -48 ! 4.6 Design of Intersection Improvements 15 days Tue 2/4/14 Mon 2/24/14 58 49 1 4.7 Sewer Rehabilitation Recommendations 10 days Tue 12/17/13 Mon 12/30/13 45 50 I 4.8 Construction Sequencing/Phasing 10 days Tue 12/17/13 Mon 12/30/13 56 45 51 1 4.9 Temporary and Permanent Easement Description 10 days Tue 12/17/13 Mon 12/30/13 45 52 1 4.1 Permits 15 days Tue 12/17/13 Mon 1/6/14 60,61,6245 53 I 4.11 Technical Specifications 25 days Tue 12/17/13 Mon 1/20114 45 54 1 4.12 Risk Management 5 days Tue 12/17/13 Mon 12/23/13 45 1 55 I 4.13 Sustainability 5 days Tue 12/17/13 Mon 12/23/13 45 56 : 4.14 Update OPC 5 days Tue 12/31/13 Mon 1/6/14 57,5945,50,46 Project:Rev 1OPW 52193 49th and I Task t - 1 Progress - -- Summary External Tasks f 1 Deadline Ls Date:Mon 3/25/13 Split Milestone ® Project Summary G :J External Milestone 0 Page 1 ID 0 I Numberl 'Task Name Duration 1 Start Finish I Successors Predecessors 1013 1 Qtr 2,2013 'Qtr 3,2013 Qtr 4,2013 Qtr 1 2014 I Qtr 2,2014 Qtr 3,2014 Qtr 4,2014 _ 1_Feb LMar Apr Ma Jun Jul LJNyg 1 Sep Oct 1 Nov 1 Dec Jan J_Feb I Mar f_AprJ May,Jun Jul I Aug LSeg, Oct Nov 57 4.15Prepare Addendum to the Basis of Design Report 10 days Tue 1/7/14 Mon 1/20/14 - 56 58 ' 4-16 Prepare 60%Plans 35 days Tue 12/17/13 Mon 2/3/14 47,48,65 45 • 1 1 59 .I 4.17 Prepare 60%Specifications 15 days Tue 1/7/14 Mon 1/27/14 56 1 -60 1 4.18 Prepare Preliminary Stprmwater Pollution Prevent 10 days Tue 1/7/14 Mon 1/20/14 52 61 1 4.19 Prepare Preliminary Post-Construction Stormwate 10 days Tue 1/7/14 Mon 1/20/14 52 62 -1 4.2 Prepare Preliminary Drainage Report 10 days Tue 1/7/14 Mon 1/20/14 52 63 i 4.21 Plan in Hand Review Meeting 1 day Tue 3/4/14 Tue 3/4/14 65 L. 64 1 4.22 Utility Coordination Meeting 1 day Tue 3/4/14 Tue 3/4/14 65 = 65 1 4.23 Submit 60%Deliverables for Review 20 days Tue 2/4/14 Mon 3/3/14 66,63,64 58 66 1 4.24 Address Plan and Specification Review Comment 5 days Tue 3/4/14 Mon 3/10/14 67,68,69 65 67 I 4.25 Prepare 90%Drawings 35 days Tue 3/11/14 Mon 4/28/14 66 -.- - 68 1 4.26 Finalize Contract Documents 35 days Tue 3/11/14 Mon 4/28/141,73,74,76,75 66 69 1 4.27 Prepare Final Design Report 40 days Tue 3/11/14 Mon 5/5/14 66 11 _____ 70 i 4.28 Risk Management 2 days Tue 4/29/14 Wed 4/30/14 68 7 71 I 4.29 Sustainability 2 days Tue 4/29/14 Wed 4/30/14 78 68 72 1 4.3 Prepare a Final Stormwater SWPPP 5 days Tue 4/29/14 Mon 5/5/14 78 68 • 73 1 4.31 Prepare Post-Construction Stormwater Managem. 5 days Tue 4/29/14 Mon 5/5/14 78 68 74 4.32 Prepare Drainage Report 5 days Tue 4/29/14 Mon 5/5/14 68 41 - 75 1 4.33 Utility Coordination Meeting 1 day Tue 4/29/14 Tue 4/29/14 68 I I ..76 1 4.34 Small and Emerging Small Business Utilization Fc 2 days Tue 4/29/14 Wed 4/30/14 77 68 77 1 4.35 Prepare Final OPC 5 days Thu 5/1/14 Wed 5/7/14 79 76 • • 78 4.36 Permit Applications 15 days Tue 5/6/14 Mon 5/26/14 71,72,73 79 4.37 Submit 90%Documents for Review 20 days Thu 5/8/14 Wed 6/4/14 80,81 77 ___ 80 4.38 Review Comments 25 days Thu 6/5/14 Wed 7/9/14 82 79 81 4.394. UDBRaaSubmittal 15 days Thu 6/5/14 Wed 8/6/14 83 81 • {.J-1 82 4.4 Prepare 95%Submittal Package 20 days Thu 7/10l14 Wed 8/6/14 83 81,80 T--LyQ� 83 4.41 Sealed Contract Documents 10 days Thu 8/7/14 Wed 8/20/14 84 82 84 4.42 Quality Control Changes 15 days Thu 8/21/14 Wed 9/10/14 85 83 __ 85 1 4.43 Document Submittal 5 days Thu 9/11/14 Wed 9/17/14 88 84 • 86 5.1 Acquire Permits in City Name 200 days Mon 9/16/13 Fri 6/20/14 87 30 _ - - 87 ' 5.2 Acquire Pemits 60 days Mon 6/23/14 Fri 9/12/14 89 86 - 88 , 6.1 Transition Meeting No.1 1 day Thu 9/18/14 Thu 9/18/14 89 85 , 89 0 Advertisement 18 days Fri 9/19/14 Tue 10/14/14 90 88,87 90 1 6.2 Pre-Bid Meeting 1 day Wed 10/15/14 Wed 10/15/14 91 89 81 6.3 Prepare Addenda 5 days Thu 10/16/14 Wed 10/22/14 92 90 --g2 1 0 Bidding 5 days Thu 10/23/14 Wed 10/29/14 93 91 93 6.4 Bid Evaluation 2 days Tue 11/4/14 Wed 11/5/14 2,92 Project:Rev 1_OPW 52193 49th and x Task 1 1 Progress Summary External Tasks I- Deadline 1 Date:Mon 3/25/13 Split Milestone 4 Project Summary v J External Milestone O Page 2 • OMAHA CSO PROGRAM 49th and Caldwell RNC Sewer Separation Project PRIME-Carollo Engineers Carollo Engineers SUB#1-Felsburg Holt and Ullevig GIS! Hydraulic/ SUB#2-R.W.Engineering TASK TASK PRIME PRIME Project Project Project Senior Design Hydrology CAD CAD DC Direct SUB#3-Terracon TOTAL TOTAL TASK TASK Manager Engineer Pnnapai Engineer Engineer Modeler Manager Technician Reviewer Clencal Expenses SUB#4-TREKK Design TOTAL. TOTAL 5220 S 160 S235 5155 5120 5170 5135 4125 5220 575 5 HRS $ HRS TASK-1 Project Management 1.1 Project Administration S0 - 1.1.1 Project Management and Administration $50,581 340 $25,040 140 60 60 4 16 100 1.1.2 Updated Quality Control Plan $1,825 13 $1,825 13 1 8 4 25 1.1.3 Updated Project Health and Safety Plan $220 1 $220 1 1 1.1.4 Updated Project Execution Plan $3,015 20 53,015 20 2 12 4 2 25 1.1.5 Initial Project Kickoff Meeting $2,710 16 $2,710 16 4 6 4 250 1.1.6 Monthly PMT Meetings(assume 15 meetings scheduled) $29,200 138 $29,150 138 60 60 18 5000 1.2 Agency and Project Coordination S0 - S0 - 1.2.1 Utility Coordination 54,040 30 $2,360 14 2 12 1.2.2 Agency Coordinating and Permitting 55,230 36 $3,960 26 2 16 8 1.2.3 City Agency Coordination(Assume 2 meetings scheduled) $2,560 14 $2,560 14 4 8 2 250 1.2.4 GIS Coordination S2,920 20 $2,920 20 0 0 8 4 1.2.5 Program Management and technical Team Meetings(Assume 2 additional Meetings) $5,660 38 $3,860 22 4 8 4 4 2 250 1.3 Public Involvement and Neighborhood Involvement $0 - SO - 1.3.1 Conduct One 60%Design Public Meeting $9,140 68 $2,760 16 2 12 2 250 1.3.2 Conduct Stakeholder Communications $5,195 42 $815 6 4 2 25 1.3.3 Develop CSO Program Website Content $1,645 13 $185 1 1 25 Task Hours 789 447 142 217 4 4 20 6 0 0 0 52 Task Fee $123,941 $81,380 531,240 534,720 5940 5620 52,400 51.360 50 SO SO 53,900 56.200 TASK-3A Preliminary 30%Design 3.1 Topographic Survey $850 766 53,640 26 2 8 ,14 16 3.2 Utility Input into CADO 54.600 52 51,600 12 4 8 3.3 Subsurface Utility Exploration $1,910 3 $160 1 1 3.4 Geotechnical Investigation $36,730 46 52,630 14 4 8 2 3.5 Manhole Condition Assessment $1,918 21 $540 3 1 2 3.6 Street Corings $7,855 25 $860 5 1 4 3.7 CCTV Investigations $9,797 42 $640 4 4 3.8 Rehabilitation Recommendations $4,280 30 $4,280 30 2 12 16 3.9 Geotechnical Report $6,360 44 $2,660 16 4 8 4 200 Task Hours 1,029 111 14 51 2 0 40 0 0 0 0 4 Task Fee S158,590 $17,010 53,080 58,160 5470 50 54,800 SO SO SO 50 5300 5200 TASK-3B Private Property Investigations 3.10 Sewer Backup Investigation $4,725 36 $1,035 7 1 4 2 25 3.11 Inflow Source Investigation $2,830 20 $2,830 20 2 8 8 2 3.12 Investigation Results $4,765 34 $4,765 34 2 16 12 4 25 Task Hours 90 61 5 28 0 0 20 0 0 0 0 8 Task Fee $12,320 $8,630 S1.100 S4,480 S0 SO 52,400 SO 5O 50 50 $600 550 TASK-3C Green Infrastructure Evaluation 3.13 Draft Green Infrastucture TM1 $3,180 26 $320 2 2 3.14 Review TM $2,160 14 $1,080 6 2 4 3.15 Additional Review Comments $1,330 10 $640 4 4 Task Hours 50 12 2 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Task Fee $6,670 $2,040 S440 St.600 SO 50 SO SO SO SO SO 50 SO Task-4B 90%Design 4.25 Prepare 90%Drawings 561,470 554 $34,480 224 8 80 100 36 4.26 Finalize Contract Documents $11,750 76 $9,630 58 4 24 2 4 16 8 4.27 Prepare Final Design Report $11,640 82 $9,520 64 4 20 20 4 8 8 4.28 Risk Management $640 4 5640 4 4 4.29 Sustainability $1,760 14 $320 2 2 4.30 Prepare a Final Stormwater SWPPP $1,760 18 $320 2 2 4.31 Prepare Post-Construction Stormwater Management Plan $1,160 10 $320 2 2 4.32 Prepare Drainage Report $3,260 24 $2,720 20 8 12 4.33 Utility Coordination Meeting $1,080 8 $640 4 4 4.34 Small and Emerging Small Business Utilization Forms 5640 4 $640 4 4 4.35 Prepare Final OPC $4,135 37 $1,600 12 4 8 4.36 Permit Applications $2,205 17 $640 4 4 4.37 Submit 90%Documents for Review $4,140 28 $2,740 12 4 8 1500 4.38 Review Comments $5,545 47 $2,360 14 2 12 4.39 UDBR Submittal $9,803 93 $640 4 4 Task Hours 1,016 430 18 178 0 2 144 4 0 0 60 24 Task Fee $120,988 $67,210 $3.960 $28.480 50 $310 $17,280 5680 SO S0 513.290 S1800 S1,500 Task-4C 95%Regulatory Review Submittal 4.40 Prepare 95%Submittal Package $19,135 173 $9,240 52 4 24 16 8 2000 Task Hours 173 52 4 24 0 0 16 0 0 0 0 8 Task Fee $19,135 $9,240 5880 S3,840 S0 SO 51,920 50 SO 5o SO S600 $2.000 Task-40 Bid Documents 4.41 Sealed Contract Documents $8,815 79 $4,080 30 2 16 4 8 4.42 Quality Control Changes S13,425 75 $8,040 18 2 12 4 5200 4.43 Document Submittal $6,460 65 51,020 7 1 2 4 Task Hours 219 55 5 30 0 0 12 0 0 0 0 8 Task Fee $28.700 $13,140 $1,100 54,800 50 SO 51,440 S0 SO S0 SO $600 $5,200 Task-5 Permitting Services 5.1 Acquire Permits in City Name $1,240 9 $160 1 1 5.2 Acquire Pemits S0 - $0 - 5.2.1 Not Used S0 - SO - 5.2.2 SWPPP $1,590 1 $160 1 5.2.3 Post-Construction Stormwater Management Plan $1,890 1 $160 1 5.2.4 Drainage Report $1,290 $160 1 5.2.5 Cultural Resources Evaluation and State HistoriPreserration Office Review $1,240 $160 1 52.6 City of Omaha Post Construction Stormwater Requirements $1,240 $160 1 5.2.7 City of Omaha Grading and Erosion Permit $1,290 $160 1 , 5.2.8 NDEQ Stormwater Permit $1,240 $160 1 1 5.2.9 EPA Lead Remediation Review $2,840 29 $160 1 1 5.2.10 NDEO Construction Permit $1,240 9 $160 1 1 Task Hours 122 10 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Task Fee $15,100 $1,600 SO $1.600 S0 SO 50 SO SO 50 50 SO 50 Task-6 Bidding Assistance 6.1 Transition Meeting No.1 $1,280 8 51,280 8 d 8 6.2 Pre-Bid Meeting $3,170 20 $2,360 14 2 12 6.3 Prepare Addenda $9,950 76 $7,415 51 2 24 1 8 8 8 100 6.4 Bid Evaluation $2,020 14 $2,020 14 2 8 4 Task Hours 118 87 6 52 1 8 8 0 0 0 0 12 Task Fee $16,420 $13,075 $1.320 58.320 $235 51,240 $960 SO SO SO 50 S900 S100 • Task-8 Additional Services • 8.1 Additional Topographic Survey if Required 55,380 44 51,080 6 2 4 8.2 Additional SUE if Required 59,640 28 5640 4 4 8.3 Additional Geotechnical Borings it Required 56,580 22 51,080 6 2 4 8.4 Additional Street Corings if Required $3,880 18 51,080 6 2 4 8.5 Contaminated Soil Analysis if Required 54,320 22 51,720 10 2 e 8.6 Additional Level 4 Manhole Assessments if Required 55,602 58 51,080 0 2 4 8.7 Additional CCTV Investigations it Required 57,080 6 51,080 6 2 4 8.8 Heavy Cleaning and Bypassing 51,250 - s0 - 8.9 Service Laterals 57,869 21 52,600 16 2 12 2 8.10 META Survey 53,310 28 $320 2 2 8.11 Green Infrastructure Design 513,785 126 51,320 0 2 4 2 8.12 Construction Dewatering Permit 52,810 22 51,080 6 2 4 8.13 Community Enhancements Design 511,145 100 51,080 6 2 4 Task Hours 495 82 20 58 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 Task Fee 582,651 514,160 54.400 S9,280 SO SO S480 SO 50 SO SO S0 50 TOTAL Hours 8,312 3,209 324 1,450 7 58 996 68 0 0 112 194 Fee $1,059,245 5501,560 $71_280 S232,000 61.645 S8,590 5119.520 511,560 S0 50 524 640 514.550 517.375 Summary by Firm $ HRS Carolto Engineers 5501,560 3209 47% Felsburg Holt and Ullevig 5217,977 2063 21% R.W.Engineering 5257,580 2818 24% Terracon 550,700 79 5% TREKK Design 531,428 143 3% Total Labor Hours 8,312 Total Fee 51,059,245 OMAHA CSO PROGRAM 49th and Caldwell RNC Sewer Separation Project PRIME.Carollo Engineers FeAOUIg Holt and Ullevig (SUB 62) R.W.Engineering SUB a 1-Felsburg Holt and Ullevig Og Muddy SO MuOUn 09 Muddy SUB a 2-B.W.Engineering SUB a1 SUB a1 Prolect Prolect Senor Senor Env Desgn Pencoal Prolect intern Direct SUB a2 SUB,2 Protect Pmlen v'a Survey RL5 CAD Clerl Seen SUB a1-Temacon TASK TASK Pnnopal Manager Engineer Soenust Engineer Designer Cranial LA LA LA Expenses TASK TASK Menage, Engineer Crew Terlrnenen Expenses SUB ad-'REEK Design TOTAL TOTAL S215 5135 5135 5120 590 525 570 $161 $110 580 TOTAL TOTAL S120 S100 5125 S100 575 550 $ HRS S HRS TASK-1 Project Management 1.1 Project Adnpnlstranon SO SO 1.1.1 Project Management and Administration . S13,049 98 9 50 15 4 10 220 S8.640 72 72 1.1.2 Updated Quality Control Plan SO So 1.1.3 Updated Project Health and Safety Plan S0 SO 1.16 Updated Project Execution Plan SO SO 1.1.5 Initial Prolect Kickoff Meeting $0 S0 1.1.6 Monthly PMT Meetings(assume 15 meetings scheduled) S50 50 SO 1.2 Agency and Project Coordination SO SO 1.2.1 Utility Coordination S0 $1,680 16 4 12 1.2.2 Agency Coordinating and Permitting $1,270 10 8 2 50 SO 1.23 City Agency Coordination(Assume 2 meetings scheduled) SO $0 ' 1.24 GISCoordlnation SO SO 1.2.5 Program Management and technical Team Meetings(Assume 2 additional Meetings) 51,800 16 B B S0 1.3 Public Involvement and Neighborhood Involvement SO S0 1.3.1 Conduct One 60%Onion Public Meeting $6,380 62 4 20 12 15 non SO 1.3.2Conduct Stakeholder Communications 54.380 36 4 16 8 9 200 SO 1.3.3 Develop CSO Program Waage Content $1,460 12 8 4 100 SO Task Hours 224 17 104 15 0 8 20 45 4 10 0 88 76 12 0 0 0 0 Task Fee 025,389 53655 514040 S2.160 SO 5720 Sr.500 $3.150 S644 Sr 100 5O S1420 $10,320 59.120 51200 SO 5O 5O 50 50 TASK-3A Preliminary 30%Design 3.1 Topographic Survey Se 581,500 740 500 40 200 3.2 utility Input Into CADD SO 53,000 40 40 3.3 Subsurface Utility Exploration SE $1,750 2 2 1500 34 Geutechninal Investigation SO $4,000 32 32 3.5 Manhole Condition Assessment SO $0 3.6 Street Corngs 5495 5 1 a $500 4 4 3.7 CCTV Investigations 50 SO U.S Rehabilitation Recommendations S0 SO - 3.9 Gentechnical Repon Se SO - Task Hours 5 0 1 0 0 a G 0 0 0 0 818 0 0 538 40 240 0 Task Fee 1495 50 5135 50 50 5360 50 50 50 SO 50 90 690,760 50 50 507250 54000 518.000 50 51500 TASK-3B Private Property Investigations 3.10 Sewer Backup Investigation $3,690 29 24 5 100 00 - 3.11 Inflow Source lnvestigallon SO - • SO 3.12 Investigation Results SO - 30 - Teak Hours 29 0 0 24 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 0 0 0 Task Fee S3,690 50 50 53240 50 50 50 5350 50 50 50 5100 SO 50 50 SO SO SO 60 50 TASK-30 Green Infrastructure Evaluation 3.13 Draft Green lnirastucture TM1 $2,660 24 16 8 100 50 - 314 Review TM $1,080 8 8 $0 - 3.15 Additional Review Comments $690 6 4 2 $0 - Task Hours 38 0 0 28 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 0 0 0 Task Fee $4,630 SO 50 53700 50 SO 5750 50 50 5O 50 S100 S0 50 50 5O 5O S0 SO SG TASK-3u 30%Design Deliverable _ 3.16 Hydrologic and Hydraulic Modeling and Calculations $0 SO 3.17 Flooding Analysis $0 SO 3.18 System Refinement SO SO 3.19 Proposed Routing and Field Investigation SO SO 3.20 Hydrelic Performance 50 SO 3.21 Finalize Routing and She SO $0 3.22 Plan and Profile Skeels 51,000 20 4 B B sumo B24 2 2 640 3_23 Utility Relocation Coordination SO $2,400 24 8 8 3.24 Pavement Removal and Replacement $9,290 106 2 8 36 -60 230 SO 3.26 flow/nflltration Reduction Requirements SO SO 3.26 Permits ermits 51,080 8 8 SO . 3.27 Project Phasing and Scheduling 51,360 14 2 12 SO - 3.28 Right or Way Requirements 51,690 16 2 8 8 52,000 2{ 8 16 3.29 Opinion of Probable Construction Costs 51,635 17 t 4 4 B S0 _ Task Hours 183 0 3 28 0 68 B4 0 0 0 0 692 2 10 B 8 664 0 Task Fee $16,805 SO 5405 53780 50 S6.120 Sfi 300 50 50 SO 50 5200 S52.840 5240 51.000 51.000 5600 Sag B00 SO 50 TASK-SE 30%Basis St Design Report 3.30 Risk Management Stretegies 50 SO - 3.31 Preliminary Pennh List $1,130 8 8 50 SO 1.32 Preliminary Project SustainadlRy SVategies $1,430 12 9 4 00 50 . 3.33 Basis of Design Report 52,O36 17 1 8 8 100 f0 3.34 Plan Distribution S0 S750 10 10 tri 3-35 Utility Coordination Meeting SO 5440 4 2 2 3.35 Finalize TM $2,090 20 B 4 0 50 SO 3.37 30%Walk Through 02,464 20 6 6 4 50 S0 - 3.18 Urban Design Review Board(UDRBI Submittal $10,744 110 It 16 32 2 4 B • 32 520 50 - Teak Hours 187 0 1 54 0 34 2 B 12 32 14 2 2 0 0 10 0 Task Fee $19,913 50 S135 52290 5O S3060 53300 5140 $1288 51320 52.560 5820 $1,190 5240 5200 SO SO S750 50 50 Task•4A 60%Design 4.1 Request/Review Utility Drawings SO $1,400 16 8 8 4.2 UOR6 Comments S3,452 34 4 16 2 4 50 SO 63 Finalize Sewer Design Calculations SO SO 4.4 On-She Field Review 51,850 16 a 50 SO 4.6 Design of Roadway Improvements(Full Width) 56,170 TO 2 24 40 200 SO 4.6 Design of lntersectbn Improvements S7,430 82 2 32 40 200 SO 4.7 Sewer Rehabilitation Recommendations S0 - SO AS Construnbn SequencingiPhasing $4,610 58 16 40 100 SO 4.9 Temporary and Permanent Easement Descriptions and Access Easements SO $19,600 240 60 1B0 4.10 Permits $1,740 16 4 SO 4.11 Technical Specifications $3,600 32 I 16 SO 4.12 Rlak Management SO • SO 4.13 Sustainabeity $1,060 8 W 4.14 Update OPC $2,535 25 1 8 6 S0 4-15 Prepare Addendum to the Basis of Design Report $1,936 17 1 8 S0 4.16 Prepare 60%Plans 58,575 73 1 24 40 200 $33,800 448 448 4.17 Prepare 60%Speci0cations $2,866 25 1 1 12 50 S0 4.18 Prepare Preliminary Stprntwater Pollution Prevention Plan(SWPPPI $3,790 42 4 30 - 100 S0 4.19 Prepare Preliminary Post-Construction Stonmvaler Management Plan $1,816 17 1 B SO 4.20 Prepare re Preliminary drainage Rep 51,680 16 6 30 4.21 Plan in Hand Review Meeting S1,860 16 8 50 S0 622 Unary Coordination Meeting SO 5440 4 2 2 4.23 Submit60%Deliverables for Review SO $600 5 B 624 Address Plan and Specification Review Comments 51.170 10 6 a SO . Task Hours 567 0 9 136 0 172 234 0 4 0 T16 2 t0 0 60 644 0 Task Fee 564,367 50 51215 518360 50 515,400 $17550 50 5322 5440 SO 51.000 $66,640 5240 51000 50 56003 548.300 50 50 Task-4B 90%Design 4.25 Prepare 90%Drawings $9,590 98 2 24 32 40 200 S17,400 232 232 4.26 Finalize Contact Documents 32.120 16 2 8 8 50 SD 4.27 PrtOare Final Design Report 52,120 16 2 6 8 50 SD 4.25 Risk Management SO SO 4.29 Suaatiyyy 31.H0 12 8 4 silo SD 4.30 Prepare a Final Stormwar SWPPP S1,440 16 te S0 4.31 Prepare Post-Construction Stonnwater Management Plan 5840 8 4 4 S0 4.32 Prepare Drainage Report 5540 4 4 30 4.33 Utility Coordination Meeting SO - 5440 4 2 2 4.34 Small and Emerging Small Business Utilization Forms SO SO 4.35 PrepareFinal OPC 52.535 26 1 6 6 6 SO 4.36 Pent Applications 51,565 13 1 5 4 50 S0 4.37 Submit90%Documents for Review SO 51,400 16 B 8 4.38 Review Comments 53,185 33 1 8 8 16 50 S0 4.39 DORM Submittal 29,183 59 1 8 4 1fi 8 12 40 SBO 50 Task Hours 334 0 10 92 0 72 100 0 8 12 40 252 2 10 0 0 240 0 Teak Fee 834,538 SO 51 350 512 420 50 56480 57.500 50 51.288 51320 53200 5980 S19,240 5240 51.000 50 50 510000 SO 50 Task-4C 95%Regulatory Review Su.inidal 4.40 Prepare 95%Submittal Package 53,895 41 1 8 12 20 100 $6,000 80 BO Task Hours 41 0 8 0 12 20 0 0 0 0 80 0 0 BO 0 Task Fee 53.895 SO 5135 51.080 50 51050 51.500 50 S0 50 50 5100 56,009 SO 50 50 SO 56000 50 50 Task-40 Bid Documents 4.41 Sealed Contract Documents S1,936 17 1 8 8 $2,800 32 16 16 4.42 Duality Control Changes $2,586 25 1 8 B 5 50 $2,600 32 16 15 4.43 DocumentSubmittal $2,640 26 B 8 8 2 100 53.800 32 16 16 Task Hours 68 0 2 24 0 24 16 2 0 0 0 98 0 46 0 0 40 0 Task Fee S7,160 50 5270 53240 50 52.150 51200 S140 SO 50 50 S150 S5,400 00 54.800 SO 50 53600 50 50 Task-5 Permitting Services 5.1 Acquire Permits inCity Name 51,050 8 8 $0 5.2 Acquire PemBs SO - SO 5.2.1 Not Used SO s0 5.2.2 SWPPP f1,130 1 50 f0 6.2.0 Post-Construction 5lormwater Management Plan f1,130 1 B 10 SO 5.2.4 Drainage Report S1,130 50 SO 5.2.6 Cultural Resources Evaluation and State HistorlPreservation 0111ce Review 51,080 SO 5.2.6 City of Omaha Post Construction Stonmwater Requirements 51,080 S0 5.2.7 City of Omaha Grading and Erosion Penny 51,130 50 SO 6.26 NDED Stonmwater Permit 51,080 S0 5.2.9 EPA Lead Remediaton Review $2,680 28 20 100 SO 5.2.10 NDED Construction Permit 51,080 8 SO Task Hours 112 0 0 80 0 0 32 0 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 0 0 0 Task Fee S13.500 50 50 510.800 50 50 52400 50 50 50 50 5300 SO SO S0 S0 50 50 50 50 Task-6 Bidding Assistance B1 Transition Meeting No.1 SO • SO - 6.2 Pre-Bid Meeting S810 8 fi S0 - 6.3 Prepare Addenda 52,535 25 1 8 8 e SD • - 6.4 Bid Evaluation SO - SO - Task Hours 31 0 7 8 0 B 8 0 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 0 0 0 Task Fee 53.345 50 5945 51080 50 5720 5600 50 50 SO 55 50 SO 50 50 50 50 SO 50 50 Task-8 Additional Services 8.1 Additional Topographic Survey It Required SO S4,300 38 28 2 0 8.2 Additional SUE R Required SO 59,000 24 24 6000 8.4 Additional Sree[onng Borings it Required SO SO 8A Con Contl aminated St nal s B Required S0 SO 8 5 AddiogamM Soil Manhole Assessments sesed SO SO 8. Additional CCT d vstgaifeemd Required SO SO 8.78 Heavy Additional CCTV Investigations ations if Required SO SO 8.8 Heavy Cleaning and BYpasaing SO Sp 8 $0.9 Service Laterals SO $o 8.10 NBTA Surrey 5;990 Sfi 2 16 8 I200SO SO 8.11 Green IMraatructure Design L1;465 118 24 8 s0 20 25 150 SO 8.12 Construction Dewatedng Permit 81,230 1R B B 50 S0 8.13 Community Enhancements Design 110,005 94 1 16 20 20 25 150 SO Task Hours 254 C 2 46 16 24 ]6 0 40 0 50 62 G 0 52 2 8 0 Task Fee S22.250 50 5270 56 210 51 920 52 160 55 700 50 S6 440 50 54,000 S550 $13,300 50 50 $6,500 5200 5600 50 56 000 TOTAL Hours 2,063 17 140 544 16 426 644 54 62 38 122 2818 84 92 598 110 1.934 0 Fee S212,922 53.555 518.900 573440 51920 538 340 546 300 53700 59982 541130 59.760 55720 $252,590 510080 59200 574.750 511000 5145050 50 5]500 OMAHA CSO PROGRAM 49th and Caldwell RNC Sewer Separation Project PRIME-Carollo Engineers Terracon TREKK Design SUB a 1-Felsburg Holt and Ullevig CCTV SUB*2-R.w Engineering SUB*3 SUB*3 Principal Project Staff Admin Direct SUB*4 SUB*4 Project Project Field GIS Office Field Field Of to 24- 27 to 4r >48- Heavy Service Traffic Direct SUB*3-Tenacon TASK TASK Engineer Engineer Engineer Expenses TASK TASK Manager Engineer Manager Specialist Tech Tech I Tech II Admn per fool per foot per foot Cleaning Lateral Control Expenses SUB*4-TREKK Design TOTAL TOTAL $150 5115 595 S50 TOTAL TOTAL $175 5129 $90 593 $60 $80 $65 S89 52.85 S3.60 $5.50 $250 $700 5250 $ HRS $ HRS TASK-1 Project Management 1.1 Project Administration SO 1.1.1 Project Management and Administration S0 $3,852 30 10 8 2 10 1.1.2 Updated Ouallty Control Plan SO SO 1.1.3 Updated Project Health and Safety Plan SO $0 1.1.4 Updated Project Execution Plan SO SO 1.1.5 Initial Project Kickoff Meeting $0 SO 1.1.6 Monthly PMT Meetings(assume 15 meetings scheduled) $0 so 1.2 Agency and Project Coordination SO SO 1.21 Utility Coordination S0 SO 1.2.2 Agency Coordinating and Permitting 80 SO 1.2.3 City Agency Coordination Assume 2 meetings scheduled) $0 SO 1.2.4 GIS Coordination S0 $0 1.2.5 Program Management and technical Team Meetings(Assume 2 a0ditional Meetings) S0 SO 1.3 Public Involvement and Neighborhood Involvement S0 SO 1.3.1 Conduct One 60%Design Public Meeting $0 SO 1.3.2 Conduct Stakeholder Communications S0 $0 1.3.3 Develop CSO Program Wabaite Content $0 50 Task Hours 0 0 0 0 30 10 8 2 0 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 Task Fee S0 SO S0 SO S0 SO $3,852 $1]50 $1032 Sf00 50 50 S0 SO $890 SO 50 SO SO SO SO 50 TASK-3A Preliminary 30%Design 3.1 Topographic Survey $0 - SO - 3.2 Utility Input into CADD SO - SO - 3.3 Subsurface Utility Exploration SO - -SO - 3.4 Geotechnical Investigation $30,100 - 30100 S0 - 3.5 Manhole Condition Assessment SO $1,378 18 2 2 6 4 4 3.6 Street Corings $6,000 11 5 6 4855 S0 3.7 CCTV Investigations $0 - 89.157 38 4 8 6 20 1644 4 3.8 Rehabilitation Recommendations $0 • $0 - 3.9 Geotechnical Report $3,700 28 7 7 14 515 50 - Task Hours 39 7 164412 20 0 50 4 10 8 0 26 d 4 0 16 0 0 0 0 4 Task Fee $39,800 51,050 51.380 $1.900 50 S35.470 $I0.535 $700 $1.290 $720 So 51 560 $320 5260 SO $4,085 So 50 SO 50 51.000 SO TASK-3B Private Property Investigations 3.10 Sewer Backup Investigation $4 - SO - 3.11 In0ow Source Investigation SO - $O - 3.12 Investigation Results Se - $0 - Test;Hours - 0 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Task Fee $0 SO So 50 SO 50 $0 S0 S0 SO S0 SO 5O SO 50 SO SO 50 SO S0 So 50 TASK-3C Green Infrastructure Evaluation 3.13 Draft Green Inirastucture TMl $0 - S0 - 3.14 Review TM SO - S0 - 3.15 Additional Review Comments SO - $0 - Task Hours - 0 0 0 0 •- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Task Fee SO SO 50 SO SO SO 50 S0 50 S0 $0 SO SO 50 S0 SO S0 50 S0 50 SO SO TASK-3D 30%Design Deliverable 3.16 Hydrologic and Hydraulic Modeling and Calculations SO - SO - 3.1'! Flooding Analysis SO - SO - 3.18 System Refinement f0 - SO - 3.19 Proposed Routing and Field Investigation SO - SO - 3.20 Hydralk Performance SD - $0 • 3.21 Finalise Routing and Size S0 - SO • 3.22 Pion and Profile Sheets f0 - SO - 3.23 Utility Relocation Coordination SO - SD - 3.24 Pavement Removal and Replacement S0 - SO - 3.2$ lnflowdnfilhatien Reduction Requirements SO - $0 • 3.26 Permits SO • SO - 3.27 Protect Phasing and Scheduling SO - SO - 3.28 Right of Way Requirements SO - SO - 3.29 Opinion of Probable Construction Costs $0 - SO - Task Hours - 0 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Task Fee SO SO 50 $0 SO SO SO SO 50 SO SO S0 SO SO SO 50 SO SO So SO SO SO TASK-3E 30%Basis of Design Report 0.30 Risk Management Strategies SO - SD - 3.31 Preliminary Permit List SO - SO - ].32 Preliminary ProlectSntsinability Strategies 10 - $0 - 3.33 Basis of Design Report SO - SO - 3.34 Plan Distribution SO - SO - 3.35 Utility Coordination Meeting SO - SO - 3.36 Finalize TM f0 - SO - 0.37 30%Walk Through $p - SO - 3.38 Urban Design Review Board IUDRBI Submittal SO - $0 - Task Hours - 0 0 0 0 - 0 O 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Task Fee SO SO so s0 $0 s0 $0 s0 50 $0 $0 s0 $0 50 50 s0 s0 Sc s0 s0 SO so Task.4A 60%Design 4.1 Request/Review Utility Drawings SO SO - 4.2 UDRS Comments S0 SO - 4.3 Finalize Sewer Design Calculations SO SO - 4.4 OnSite Field Review SO SO - 4.5 Design of Roadway Improvements(Full Width) SO SO - 4.6 Onign of Intersection Improvements SO SO 4.7 Sewer Rehabilitation Recommendations SO S0 - 4.8 Construction SeruencinglPhasing SO S0 - 4.9 Temporary and Permanent Easement Descriptions and Access Easements SO SO - 4.10 Permits So $g - 4.11 Technical Specifications SO SO - 4.12 Risk Management SO SO - 4.13 Sustainability S0 SO - 4.14 Update OPC s0 f0 - 4.15 Prepare Addendum to the Basis of Design Report SO SO 4.16 Prepare 60%Plans $0 S0 • 4.17 Prepare 60%Specifications SO SO - 4.18 Prepare Preliminary Stpnnwater Pollution Prevention Plan(SWPPPI SO SO - 4.19 Prepare Preliminary Post-Construction Stormwater Management Plan SO SO - 4.20 Prepare Preliminary Drainage Report SO SO - 4.21 Plan In Hand Review Meeting S0 SO - 4.22 Utility Coordination Meeting SO SO - 4.23 Submit GO%Deliverables for Review $0 SO 4.24 Address Plan and Specification Review Comments SO SO - Task Hours - 0 0 0 0 - 0 O 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Task Fee SO S0 SO SO SO SO SO 50 SO SO 50 SO S0 50 SO SO $0 SO S0 SC S0 S0 Task-4B 90%Design 4.25 Prepare 90%Drawings S0 - SO 4.26 Finalize Contract Documents S0 - SO 4.27 Prepare Final Design Report Se - $0 4.20 Risk Management SO - 50 4.29 Sustainability $0 - S0 4.30 Prepare a Final Stonnwater SWPPP $0 - 50 4.31 Prepare Post-Construction Stonrlwater Management Ptan S0 - SO 4.32 Prepare Drainage Report $0 - SD 4.33 Utility Coordination Meeting $0 - SO 4.34 Small and Emerging Small Business Utilization Forms $0 $0 4.35 Prepare Final OPC $0 - $0 4.36 Permit Applications S0 . SO 4.37 Submit 90%Documents for Review SO - f0 4.39 Review Comments $0 - SO 4.39 UDBR Submittal $0 • $O Task Hours - 0 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Task Fee $0 S0 SO 50 50 SO $0 SO SO 50 50 SO $0 SO 50 SO 50 S0 50 50 50 SD Task-4C 95%Regulatory Review Submittal 4.60 Prepare 95%Submittal Package $0 - $0 . Task Hours - 0 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Task Fee S0 50 SO 50 SO S0 SO SO SO $0 SO SO SO SO SO SO 50 50 SO 50 50 SO Task-40 Bid Documents 4.41 Sealed Contract 0ocuments $0 • !O 6.42 Quality Control Changes $0 - SO - A43 Document Submittal $0 - f0 . Task Hours - 0 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Task Fee $0 SO 50 SO 50 SO SO SO 50 SO 50 50 SO 50 SO SO 50 50 50 SO SO 50 Task-5 Permitting Services 5.1 Acquire Permits in City Name 50 - SO 5.2 Acquire Pemits $0 - SO 5.2.1 Not Used $0 - S0 5.2.2 SWPPP $0 - $0 5.2.3 Post.ConsWCOon Stommater Management Plan SO - SO 5.24 Drainage Report SO • SO 5.2.5 Cultural Resources Evaluation and State HistorlPreservation Office Review $0 • $0 5.2.6 Cityol Omaha Post Construction Stormater Requirements S0 - SO 5.27 City of Omaha Grading and Erosion Permit $0 - 50 5.28 NDEQ Stormwater Permit $0 - SO 5.29 EPA Lead Remediation Review S0 • SO 5.210 NDEQ Construction Permit $0 • S0 Task Han - 0 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D Task Fee $0 S0 SO S0 50 50 $0 SD 50 S0 SO SO SO 50 50. SO 50 50 50 SO 50 S0 Task-6 Bidding Assistance 6.1 Transition Meeting No.1 $0 - SO - 6.2 Pre-Bid Meeting $0 - SO 6.3 Prepare Adtlm0a f0 - $O . 6.4 Bid Evaluation $0 - SO - Task Hours - 0 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Task Fee S0 50 S0 f0 50 SD SO 5o SD SO SO 50 S0 SO 50 SO 50 S0 SO S0 SO SO Task-8 Additional Services 8.1 Additional Topographic Survey if Required $0 - $0 - 8.2 Additional SUE if Required S0 - SO - 8.3 Additional Geotechnical Borings if Required 55,500 16 2 5 8 1 31315 SO - 8.4 Additional Street Conngs it Required 52,500 12 1 4 6 1 1570 SO - 8.5 Contaminated Soil Analysis if Required $2,600 12 4 6 2 1210 SO - 8.6 Additional Level 4 Manhole Assessments if Required SO 54,522 52 4 8 8 20 6 6 8.7 Additional CCTV Investigations if Required 50 $6,000 - 1000 2 8.8 Heavy Cleaning and Bypassing SO 51,250 - 5 8.9 Service Laterals S0 $5,259 6 1 4 7 810 META Survey S0 SO - 8.11 Green Infrastructure Design S0 S0 - 0.12 Construction Dewatering Permit $0 SO - 8.13 Community Enhancements Design SO $0 - Task Hours 40 7 15 14 4 57 4 9 8 0 24 8 6 0 0 0 1000 5 7 2 Task Fee S10.900 51,050 $1,725 51,330 5200 36,595 $17,041 5700 51,161 $720 SO S1,040 $480 $390 50 SO 50 55,500 S1,250 $4,900 5500 50 TOTAL Flours 79 14 27 34 4 143 18 27 18 - 0 50 10 10 10 1644 0 1000 5 7 6 Fee S50,700 52.100 53,105 $3,230 5200 542,065 $31,428 $3,150 $3453 S1620 S0 53,000 S800 5650 5890 54,685 S0 $5,500 51250 54,900 51,500 50 C-25A CITY OF OMAHA LEGISLATIVE CHAMBER Omaha,Nebraska RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF OMAHA: WHEREAS, a Professional Services Agreement with Carollo Engineers, Inc.to perform the study phase and conceptual design phase work for the 49th and Caldwell Area Sewer Separation project, known as OPW 52193, was approved by Council Resolution No. 589 on May 1, 2012; and WHEREAS, additional services are required for preliminary design, final design, and bid phase services; and, WHEREAS, Carollo Engineers, Inc. has agreed to perform the additional services needed as detailed in the attached Amendment No. 1 to the Agreement, which by this reference is made a part hereof, for an additional fee not to exceed $1,059,245 to be paid from Sewer Revenue Improvements Fund 21124, Sewer Separation Organization 116912; Sewer Revenue Bonds will be issued to finance this project. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF OMAHA: THAT, as recommended by the Mayor, Amendment No. 1 to the Professional Services Agreement with Carollo Engineers, Inc. for the provisions of preliminary design, final design, and bid phase services on the 49th and Caldwell Area Sewer Separation project, known as OPW 52193, is hereby approved. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED: THAT, the Finance Department is authorized to pay the additional fee not to exceed $1,059,245 for these engineering services to be paid from Sewer Revenue Improvements Fund 21124, Sewer Separation Organization 116912; Sewer Revenue Bonds will be issued to finance this project. ]035djr APPROVED AS TO FORM: %'6,, 15 3 AGITY ATTORNEY DATE C ilmember Adopted APR 2 3 20i 7-C ".0 ;;% Clerk s/G/3 Approved.... .. .. .. . . . Mayor NO. , ‘.3 Resolution by Res. that, as recommended by the Mayor, Amendment No. 1 to the Professional Services Agreement with Carollo Engineers, Inc. for the provisions of preliminary design, final design, and bid phase services for the 49th and Caldwell Area Sewer Separation project, known as OPW 52193, is hereby approved; and that, the Finance Department is authorized to pay the additional fee not to exceed $1,059,245 for these engineering services to be paid from Sewer Revenue Improvements Fund 21124, Sewer Separation Organization 116912; Sewer Revenue Bonds will be issued to finance this project. 1035Adjr- Presented to City Council APR 2 3 2013 Adopted 7-0 guoter erocvn. City Clerk